Open Access Research Article

PENSION AS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED PROPERTY: RECONCEPTUALISING THE RIGHT TO PENSION UNDER ARTICLE 300-A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

Author(s):
AMBIKA A
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 6
DOI https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/09.2026-33278764/PENSION AS CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED PROPERTY: RE

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The constitutional status of pension in India has undergone a significant transformation from a governmental benefit to an enforceable legal entitlement possessing the character of property. The Supreme Court’s decision in Deokinandan Prasad v. State of Bihar marked the foundational stage of this transformation by recognising the right to receive pension as a property right. In D.S. Nakara v. Union of India, the Court further conceptualised pension as deferred compensation for past service and as a measure of social security. Following the Forty-Fourth Constitutional Amendment, the right to property ceased to be a fundamental right, but Article 300-A preserved constitutional protection against deprivation of property except by authority of law. The Supreme Court subsequently reaffirmed in State of West Bengal v. Haresh C. Banerjee and State of Jharkhand v. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava that pension continues to constitute property protected by Article 300-A.
This article examines pension through the framework of Property Law and Constitutional Law. It argues that although pension originates in statutory or service rules, once the prescribed conditions are fulfilled, the entitlement acquires a distinct proprietary character. The State retains the power to regulate pension through valid legislation and statutory rules; however, administrative instructions or executive convenience cannot independently authorise deprivation of an accrued pensionary entitlement. The article analyses the distinction between regulation and deprivation, the meaning of “authority of law” under Article 300-A, the significance of vested and accrued rights, and the relationship between Articles 14, 21 and 300-A. It also considers recent judicial developments and argues that pension jurisprudence demonstrates the continuing constitutional protection afforded to intangible economic interests.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: AMBIKA A
Registration ID: 1013118 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13118
Year: Sep-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 327-341

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.