[1] M. P. Ram Mohan, Promode Murugavelu, Gaurav Ray and Kritika Parakh (2020) : Doctrine of Frustration under Section 56 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872
[2] S.S Rana and Co. Advocates (2017), “India: Frustration of Contracts
[3] Varun Singh, “Frustration of Contracts: The Indian Perspective”
[4] Aditya Mehta, Arjun Sreenivas and Sameer Bindra (2020), “Frustration (of Contracts) in the times of SARS Cov. 2
[5] G.M. Sen (1972): Doctrine of Frustration in the Law of Contracts
[1] Dr. Sudhir Ravindran, Real Property vs. Intellectual Property (Sep.20,2019,3:45 PM), https://www.altacit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/12-REAL-PROPERTY-vs-INTELLECTUAL-PROPERTY.pdf.
[2] 4, P. Narayanan, Intellectual Property Law 4 (3rd ed. 2001).
[4] World Intellectual Property Organization Convention (hereinafter WIPO), ar.2(viii) (1967).
[5] Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter UDHR), ar.27 (1948) .
[6] Encyclopedic, Legal Definition and Related Resources of Jus in re propria, Legal Dictionaries of the Encyclopedia of Law Project (Sep. 15, 2019, 11:22 PM), https://legaldictionary.lawin.org/jus-in-re-propria/.
[8]BalewMersha, Concept, Scope and Nature of IPR, Abyssinia law (Oct. 24, 2019, 9:43 AM), https://www.abyssinialaw.com/online-resources/study-on-line/item/467-concept-scope-and-nature-of-intellectual-property-rights.
[9] V.K. Ahuja, The law relating to IPR in India 139 (2nd ed. 2015).
[10] V.K. Ahuja, The Law of IPR:In Prospect And Retrospect 272 (2001).
[11]American Express Bank Ltd. v.Puri, (2006) IIILLJ 540 Del ¶41.
[17] Permanent Mission of India, Standards and Principles concerning the availability scope and use of trade-related intellectual property rights, ¶46, 10 July, 1989, MTN.GNG/NG11/W/37.
[25]Inphase Power Technologies v. Abb India Ltd, MFA No. 3009 & 3010/2016.
[26]V. Subramanium, Principles of natural justice and principles of equity, (Nov. 1, 2019, 4:45 PM), http://www.allbankingsolutions.com/Articles/Articles-VS-Principles-of-Natural-Justice.htm.
[27]Brady v. Chemical Process Equipments P. Ltd., AIR372 (Del.1987).
[28] Rebecca K Myers, Confidentiality, Non disclosure and Secrecy Agreements, Lexis Practice Advisor Journal, (Nov. 2, 2019, 3:00 PM), https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexis-practice-advisor/the-journal/b/lpa/archive/2015/11/30/confidentiality-nondisclosure-and-secrecy-agreements.aspx.
[29]Danieli Corus BV v. Steel Authority of India., O.M.P. (I) (COMM.)189/2017.
[2]Reeve T Bull, BUILDING A FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNANCE: RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW AND RULEMAKING PETITIONS, 67 Adm. Law Rev. 265–319 (2015), http://jguelibrary.informaticsglobal.com:2074/stable/24475490.
[3]Deepa Kansra, RETROSPECTIVITY OF JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF PENAL STATUTES, 51 Journal of the Indian Law Institute 250–266 (2009).
[5] T. Barai vs Henry Ah Hoe 1983 AIR 150, 1983 SCR (1) 905
[6]Aashish Aryan, Retrospective taxation: the Vodafone case, and the Hague court ruling,The Indian Express (2020), https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/retrospective-taxation-the-vodafone-case-and-the-hague-court-ruling-6613799/ (last visited Dec 14, 2020).
[7] Pralhad Krishna Kurane vs The State Of Bombay, 1952 A.I.R. Bom 1.
[8] Let the good (or safety) of the people be the supreme (or highest) law.
[9]A D Woozley, What Is Wrong With Retrospective Law?, 18 Philos. Q. 40–53 (1968), http://jguelibrary.informaticsglobal.com:2074/stable/2218027.
[10] "Hear the other side". This is a strong principle that no person shall be judged without a fair hearing.
[12]Uma Narayan, Sources of Indian Legal Information, 7 Legal Information Management 133–139 (2007).
[13] Justice Madan B. Lokur (Retd.), “Judiciary And Social Justice, Dignity And Personal Liberty, Human Rights And Frights”: Justice Madan Lokur (2020), https://www.livelaw.in/columns/judiciary-and-social-justice-dignity-and-
[14]Sharp Fall in Citation of Supreme Court Judgments by Foreign Courts After 2014, Study Finds, The Wire, https://thewire.in/law/supreme-court-foreign-citations-study (last visited Dec 14, 2020).
[15] Sanjeev Verma, UAPA Act: Why UAPA cases fall flat in courts - Times of India,The Times of India, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/why-uapa-cases-fall-flat-in-courts/articleshow/77191240.cms (last visited Dec 14, 2020).
[16]“the burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms not he who denies”, is the principle that a person is considered innocent unless proven guilty.
[17]International Military Tribunal for the Far East, R Pal & S Araki, The United States of America and Others Vs. Araki Sadao and Others: Judgement of the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pal, Member from India (1948), https://books.google.co.in/books?id=brJxAQAACAAJ.
Citation
* The present paper was presented at 44th Indian Social Science Congress, March 15-19, 2021 held at Samrat Ashok Technological Institute, Vidisha, M.P.
[1] Salomon v. Salomon & Co., Ltd. [1897] AC 22 (HL)
[2] Nagaraj M S & Shalini G , Innovation in Indian CSR-a Conceptual Model, IJIR Vol-2, Issue-13, 2016 (Special Issue)
[1]AMARTYA SEN, THE ARGUMENTATIVE INDIAN 220 (Penguin Book 2006).
[2] Annie Gowen, India ranked world’s most dangerous place for women, reigniting debate about women’s safety, THE Washington Post, June 27,2018.
[3] Michael S. Moore, Four Reflections on Law and Morality, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1527(2007).
[4]Jeannette L. Nolen, Adultery sexual behaviour, ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA(Feb.,09,2009)http://www.britannica.com/topic/adultery.
[5] Dr. Vijaykumar Shrikrushna Chowbe, Adultery – A Conceptual and Legal Analysis, SSRN (June, 03, 2011) https://articles.ssrn.com/sol3/articles.cfm?abstract_id=1856991.
[6] DR. PARAS DIWAN, MODERN HINDU LAW66-68(Allahabad Law Agency, 24th ed.2019).
[7] Faizan Mustafa, Not a criminal act, The Hindu, Jan. 11, 2018.
[8]McAfee Noelle, Feminist Philosophy THE STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY(June,28,2018) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/feminist-philosophy/.
[9]GEETANJALI GANGOLI, INDIAN FEMINISMS: LAW PATRIARCHIES AND VIOLENCE IN INDIA 61, (Ashgate Publishing Company, 2007).
[10] K.D. GAUR, COMMENT ON THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 388, (Eastern Law Publication,2013).
[11] K.D. GAUR, A TEXT BOOK ON THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 734, (Eastern Law Publication, 2004).
[7] Sec 130 Crpc – Use of Armed Forces to disperse assembly
(1) If any such assembly cannot be otherwise dispersed, and if it is necessary for the public security that it should be dispersed, the Executive Magistrate of the highest rank who is present may cause it to be dispersed by the armed forces.
(2) Such Magistrate may require any officer in command of any group of persons belonging to the armed forces to disperse the assembly with the help of the armed forces under his command, and to arrest and confine such persons forming part of it as the Magistrate may direct, or as it may be necessary to arrest and confine in order to disperse the assembly or to have them punished according to law.
(3) Every such officer of the armed forces shall obey such requisition in such manner as he thinks fit, but in so doing he shall use as little force, and do as little injury to person and property, as may be consistent with dispersing the assembly and arresting and detaining such persons.