All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[2] Shakti Vahini v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.

[3]Naz Foundation v. Govt. (NCT of Delhi), 2009 SCC Online Del 1762,94:

[4] Dipak Misra C.J., Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1,144.

[5] MARTHA NUSSBAUM, POLITICAL EMOTIONS: WHY LOVE MATTERS FOR JUSTICE 382 (2013).

[6] Indu Malhotra J., Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1,20.

[7] See generally DAVID A.J. RICHARDS, WHY LOVE LEADS TO JUSTICE: LOVE ACROSS THE BOUNDARIES (2015).

[8] See generally BELL HOOKS, THE WILL TO CHANGE: MEN, MASCULINITY AND LOVE (2004).

[9] Arunkumar v. The Inspector General of Registration, 2019 SCC OnLine Mad 8779.

[10] PLATO, THE SYMPOSIUM (translated by Alexander Nehamas & Paul Woodruff, 1989).

[13] Shafin Jahan v. Asokan, (2018) 16 SCC 368,19.

[14] International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), Yogyakarta Principles - Principles on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity, Introduction to the Yogakarta Principles (March 2007).

[15] Chandrachud J., Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1, ¶ 67.

[18] Arunkumar v. The Inspector General of Registration, 2019 SCC OnLine Mad 8779, ¶ 16.

[19] Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, (2018) 10 SCC 1.

[21] Shakti Vahini v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 192.

[1] (“Prostitution | Definition, History, and Facts”)

[2] Girja Bai v Sadashiv Dhundiraj AIR 1916 PC 104 (Privy Council).

[3] Kamepalli Avilam v. Mannem Venkataswamy, 1917 (13) MLJ 746

[4] Syed Kasam v. Jorawar Singh [(1922) ILR 50 Cal 84 (PC)]

[5] Adiyalath Katheesumma v. Adiyalath Beechu [ILR 1930 Mad 502] ...

1] Article 12(3) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and USA.

[2] Section 9(1)(vi)(b) Explanation 4, The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[3] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[13] The Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[14] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[16] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[17] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[18] Transmission Corpn. of A.P. Ltd. v. CIT, (1999) 7 SCC 266.

[19] The Income Tax Act, 1961, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 1961 (India).

[21] The Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[22] The Copyright Act, 1957, No. 14, Acts of Parliament, 1957 (India).

[26] PILCOM v. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2020) SCC OnLine SC 426.

[27] Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC.

[1] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[2] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[4] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[5] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[6] Kenton, Will. “Vertical Merger.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 22 July 2022, www.investopedia.com/terms/v/verticalmerger.asp.

[7] Kenton, Will. “Conglomerate Merger.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 19 May 2021, www.investopedia.com/terms/c/conlgomeratemerger.asp.

[8] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[9] Takeovers in India – An overview, by Vijay Sambamurthi & Siddharth Shah

[10] Report of The Committee On Unemployment, May 1973, Govt. Of India Min.Of Labour & Rehabilitation (Deptt. Of Labour & Employment)

[12] SEBI. “Report of the Takeover Regulations Advisory Committee.” SEBI, n.d.

[13] Corporate Governance Structure, Mergers and Takeovers in India in the Post Liberalization Regime-Proposals and Policies, by Nandita Das Gupta

[14] SEBI. “Discussion Paper on ‘Brightline Tests for Acquisition of ‘Control ...” Accessed November 2, 2022. Https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/attachdocs/1457945258522.pdf.

[17] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[18] Corporate Governance Structure, Mergers and Takeovers in India in the Post Liberalization Regime-Proposals and Policies, by Nandita Das Gupta

[19] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[22] Gupta, Yogesh. “SEBI Takeover Code- Detailed Analysis.”

[1] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[2] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[4] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[7] Kihoto Hollohan Vs Zachillhu And Others 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651

[8] Gupta, Ruchi. “Ruchi Gupta Writes: The Crisis In Maharashtra Shows The Anti-Defection Law To Be Ineffective, Even Counterproductive.” The Indian Express, June 27, 2022. Https://Indianexpress.Com/Article/Opinion/Columns/Maharashtra-Political-Crisis-Anti-Defection-Law-Ineffective-7992778/.

[1] Stephen R. Arnott, Family Law: Autonomy, Standing, and Children’s Rights, 33 William Mitchell Law Review 809 (2007). Arnott notes that “the very term ‘children’s rights’ is both broad and loose,” id. at 808

[2] The U.N. Declaration of the Rights of the Child comprises a Preamble and ten principles; G.A. Res. 1386 (XIV) 14 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 19, U.N. Doc. A/4354

[3] Geraldine Van Bueren, The International Law on the Rights of the Child 10-11 (Dordrecht/Boston, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995)

[4] The 1924 Declaration stated children “must be the first to receive relief”; the DRC specifies more pragmatically that they are to be “among the first” to receive protection and relief (principle 8).

[5] The Convention on the Rights of the Child, with a Preamble and 54 articles, was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly on November 20, 1989, and entered into force on September 2, 1990. G.A. Res. 44/25, annex, 44 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 49) at 167, U.N. Doc. A/44/49 (1989); 28 I.L.M. 1448 (1989)

[6] Jean Koh Peters, How Children Are Heard in Child Protective Proceedings, in the United States and Around the World in 2005: Survey Findings, Initial Observations, and Areas for Further Study [Special Issue on Legal Representation of Children], 6 Nevada Law Journal 971 (Spring 2006)

[7] Article 1

[8] Articles 7 and 8

[9] Articles 20 and 22

[10] Articles 8 and 30

[11] Article 13

[12] Article 40

[13] Article 12

[14] Articles 21 and 23

[15] Articles 28(3) and 39

[16] Ursula Kilkelly, The Best of Both Worlds for Children’s Rights? Interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights in the Light of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Human Rights Quarterly 311 (2001)

[17] The Sex Trafficking Protocol comprises a preamble and 17 articles. G.A. Res. A/RES/54/263 of 25 May 2000. It entered into force on January 18, 2002

[18] Article 9(4)

[19] Article 12

[20] The Child Soldiers Protocol, comprising a Preamble and 13 articles, entered into force on February 12, 2002. G.A. Res. A/RES/54/263 of 25 May 2000.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Articles 1 and 2

[23] Article 4

[24] Article 3(1-3)

[25] Article 6(1) and (3)

[26] Organization of African Unity (OAU), Declaration on the Rights and Welfare of the African Child, AHG/St. 4 (XVI) Rev. 1 1979, Declaration and Resolutions Adopted by the Sixteenth Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government (July 17-20, 1979)

[27] Article 2

[28] Articles 3-5

[29] Articles 6-12

[30] Articles 13-14

[31] Article 15

[32] Article 16

[33] Article 21

[34]Article 27

[35] Article 28

[36] Article 29

[37] Article 13(1)

[38] Article 13(2a)

[39] Article 14(4)

[40] Article 10(3)

[41] Article 23(1)

[42] Article 18(4)

[43] Article 23(4)

[44] Article 1

[45] Article 5

[46] Article 6

[47] Article 5, paragraph 1

[48] Article 13

[49] Article 3

[50] Article 16

[51] Article 7

[52] Article 8(1)

[53] Article 9

[54] Article 10 (3) and (5)

[55] Article 15

[56] Article 20(1)

[57] Article 20(2)

[58] Article 1

[59] Article 12

[60] Article 2

[61] Article 12

[62] Article 3

[63] Article 7

[64] Article 11

[65] Article 13, paragraph 2

[66] Article 14

[67] Article 19

[68] Article 18

[69] Article 1

[70] Article 4(d)

[71] Article 30

[72] Article 31

[73] Article 1

[74] Article 3, paragraph 1

[75] Article 1(a)

[76] Article 1(d)

[77] Article 11

[1] Prachi Darji, Sept 12, 2019, Prostitution in India,

[2] Raj Bahadur v. Legal Remembrancer, Laws Cal–1953- 2-18

[3] Kiran Bhatty, November, 2019, A Review of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act 1986

[4] Krishnadas Rajagopal; March 25, 2022; Supreme Court recognises sex work as a ‘profession’; The Hindu

[5] The Supreme Court Order On Sex Work: How It Changes Things, And Laws On Sex Work; The Outlook; June 2, 2022

[6] Prachi Darji, Sept 12, 2019, Prostitution in India,

[7] Yashi Verma; July, 2022; Legalization of Prostitution in India; Legal Service India

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

LOVE IN LEGAL REASONING: THE RIGHT TO LOVE AS AN ASPECT OF INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY By- Ms. Shraddha Sataywan Choudhary

Legalization of Prostitution By- Siya Sharma

CASE COMMENTARY: ADDAGADA RAGHAVAMMA AND ANR. Vs. ADDAGADA CHENCHAMMA AND ANR. (AIR 1964 SC 136; 1964 (2) S.C.R 933) By- Shruti Verma

CASE ANALYSIS: ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANOTHER By- Mrudhu Bashni Rajendran

The Takeover Code-A comparison with the Past By- Saahen Sharma

Case Commentary Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu And Others Supreme Court of India by- Saahen Sharma

UNDER DIFFERENT HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS By- Dr.Adv.V.V.Ratheeshkumar

CRITICAL ANALSYIS OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT LAW OF TORTS By- Soumya Pandey

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND INDIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS By- Manish Tripathi

Legal Aspects of Prostitution in India Authored By- Vaibhavjeet Singh

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[4] Krishnadas Rajagopal; March 25, 2022; Supreme Court recognises sex work as a ‘profession’; The Hindu

Citation 2