INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES OF E-COMMERCE GIANTS: THE IMPACT OF AMAZON AND FLIPKART ON MARKET COMPETITION AND SME RETAILERS BY: SURESH

Authors: SURESH

Registration ID: 108806 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8806

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: suresh@law.christuniversity.in

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-11621136/ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES OF E-COMMERCE GIANTS: T

COMMENT: IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES BY - JARIN JOSEPH

Authors: JARIN JOSEPH

Registration ID: 108805 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8805

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: advjarin569@gmail.com

Page No : 08 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-61535595/COMMENT: IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLI

THE S IN ESG- WHY COMPANIES STANCE ON SOCIAL ISSUES MATTER BY - SNIGDHA KHANDELWAL & KARNICA BHATIA

Authors: SNIGDHA KHANDELWAL & KARNICA BHATIA

Registration ID: 108803 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8803 & IJLRA8804

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: snigdhakhandelwal@nalsar.ac.in & karnicabhatia@nalsar.ac.in

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-76976494/THE S IN ESG- WHY COMPANIES STANCE ON SOCIAL ISSUE

PATENTING OF STEM CELLS: NEED TO RETHINK FOR REGULATORY FRAMEWORK BY - K. AMULYA & DR.P.R.L.RAJAVENKATESAN

Authors: K. AMULYA & DR.P.R.L.RAJAVENKATESAN

Registration ID: 108801 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8801 & IJLRA8802

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: amulyareddy.k2024@vitstudent.ac.in & rajavenkatesan.prl@vit.ac.in

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-35469961/PATENTING OF STEM CELLS: NEED TO RETHINK FOR REGUL

REVISITING LEGAL IMMUNITY: LAWYERS EXEMPTED FROM CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND CONTEMPORARY JUDICIAL RAMIFICATIONS BY - ADI JAIN & VANDAN PAREEK

Authors: ADI JAIN & VANDAN PAREEK

Registration ID: 108799 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8799 & IJLRA8800

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: adijain892@gmail.com & vandanpareek4800@gmail.com

Page No : 24 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-26145217/REVISITING LEGAL IMMUNITY: LAWYERS EXEMPTED FROM C

REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MEDIA; A PERSPECTIVE BY - ARYA SURESH

Authors: ARYA SURESH

Registration ID: 108798 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8798

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aryasuresh317@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-83478957/REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MEDIA; A PERSPECTIVE

WOMENS RIGHT TO EQUALITY: COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA AND U.S.A BY - MANSI PAHAL

Authors: MANSI PAHAL

Registration ID: 108797 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8797

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: mansipahal99@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-23346321/WOMENS RIGHT TO EQUALITY: COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS BET

BIODIVERSITY IS THE BIGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT BY - GOMATHI M

Authors: GOMATHI M

Registration ID: 108796 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8796

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: gomathimuruganmurugan@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-98257341/BIODIVERSITY IS THE BIGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT

CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA SOVEREIGNTY: NAVIGATING LEGAL AND REGULATORY CHALLENGES BY - PRASHANT DUBEY & DR. RAZIT SHARMA

Authors: PRASHANT DUBEY? & DR. RAZIT SHARMA

Registration ID: 108794 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8794 & IJLRA8795

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: prashantdubey252@gmail.com & razitsharma@gmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-42352684/CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA SOVEREIGNTY: NAVIGATING L

AN ANALYSIS ON ROLE OF PUBLIC IN ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BY - P.SORNAMUGI, T.VARSHA, A.VENKATESH NANTHAKUMAR & DR.B.LAVARAJU

Authors: P.SORNAMUGI , T.VARSHA , A.VENKATESH NANTHAKUMAR & DR.B.LAVARAJU

Registration ID: 108790 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8790, IJLRA8791, IJLRA8792 & IJLRA8793

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sornamugipasupathi@gmail.com

Page No : 27 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-91189758/AN ANALYSIS ON ROLE OF PUBLIC IN ADMINISTRATION OF

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

^{^[1]} International Labour Organization (ILO), Global Wage Report 2020-21: Wages and Minimum Wages in the Time of COVID-19 (2021)

^{^[2]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), White Paper on Unfair Practices in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[3]} MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Case No. 13/2009 (CCI)

^{^[4]} Competition Commission of India (CCI), Market Impact of Deep Discounting and Preferential Practices (2023)

^{^[5]} OECD, E-commerce Challenges and Policy Considerations for Competition Regulators (2020).

^{^[6]} Statista, Consumer Behavior in E-commerce During Festive Seasons (2022)

^{^[7]} Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh v. Flipkart Internet Private Limited & Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, Case No. 40 of 2019 (CCI).

^{^[8]} The Competition Act, No. 12 of 2003, INDIA CODE (2003).

^{^[9]} Alliance Bernstein, E-commerce in India: Market Dynamics and Competitive Strategies (2021).

^{^[10]} Statista, India’s Festive Sales Report 2021

^{^[11]} Guidelines on Abuse of Dominance, Competition Commission of India (2019)

^{^[13]} Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector (Digital Markets Act).

^{^[14]} Empirical data collected through surveys with 200 SMEs and retailers (2023).

^{^[15]} Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd. & Ors., Case No. 3/2012 (CCI).

^{^[16]} Draft E-commerce Rules, 2021, Ministry of Consumer Affairs.

^{^[17]} UNCTAD, Growing the Digital Economy for SMEs: A Policy Guide (2022).

^{^[18]} Alliance Bernstein, E-commerce in India: Market Dynamics and Competitive Strategies (2021).

^{^[19]} Statista, India's E-commerce Traffic Report (2023).

^{^[20]} Competition Commission of India (CCI), Market Impact of Deep Discounting and Preferential Practices (2023).

^{^[21]} MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., Case No. 13/2009 (CCI)

^{^[22]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), White Paper on Unfair Practices in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[23]} Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd. & Ors., Case No. 3/2012 (CCI).

^{^[24]} Statista, India’s Smartphone Market Performance (2022).

^{^[25]} Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Digital India Programme (2021)

^{^[26]} UNCTAD, Impact of COVID-19 on Digital Trade in Developing Economies (2021).

^{^[27]} The Competition Act, No. 12 of 2003, INDIA CODE (2003).

^{^[28]} Guidelines on Abuse of Dominance, Competition Commission of India (2019).

^{^[29]} Competition Commission of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd., (2021) 2 SCC 675 (India).

^{^[30]} Statista, Monthly User Traffic for Leading E-commerce Platforms in India (2024).

^{^[32]} European Commission v. Google (Android Case), Case AT.40099 (2018).

^{^[33]} Consumer Protection Act, No. 35 of 2019, INDIA CODE (2019)

^{^[34]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), White Paper on Consumer Safety in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[35]} OECD, E-commerce Challenges and Policy Considerations for Competition Regulators (2020).

^{^[36]} Amazon India Export Report, Vision for 2025 (2023).

^{^[37]} Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.

^{^[38]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), White Paper on Deep Discounting Practices in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[39]} Statista, Impact of Cashback Offers on Consumer Behavior in E-commerce (2022).

^{^[40]} OECD, E-commerce Challenges and Policy Considerations for Competition Regulators (2020).

^{^[41]} Statista, E-commerce Festive Sales Analysis (2023).

^{^[42]} Competition Commission of India (CCI), Market Study on Discounting Practices by E-commerce Platforms (2023).

^{^[43]} AllianceBernstein, E-commerce in India: Market Dynamics and Competitive Strategies (2021)

^{^[44]} Consumer Protection Act, No. 35 of 2019, INDIA CODE (2019).

^{^[45]} Draft E-commerce Rules, 2021, Ministry of Consumer Affairs.

^{^[46]} The Competition Act, No. 12 of 2003, INDIA CODE (2003).

^{^[47]} Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd. & Ors., Case No. 3/2012 (CCI).

^{^[48]}Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), Recommendations to Promote Fair Competition in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[49]} Guidelines on Abuse of Dominance, Competition Commission of India (2019)

^{^[50]} Competition Commission of India (CCI), Market Impact of Preferential Agreements in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[51]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), White Paper on Preferential Treatment in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[52]} Statista, Analysis of Exclusive Product Launches in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[53]} Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd. & Ors., Case No. 3/2012 (CCI).

^{^[54]} Guidelines on Abuse of Dominance, Competition Commission of India (2019).

^{^[55]} OECD, Anti-Competitive Practices in E-commerce: A Global Review (2020).

^{^[56]} UNCTAD, E-commerce Logistics and Distribution in Developing Economies (2022).

^{^[57]} Statista, Impact of Subsidized Delivery on Small Vendors in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[58]} Alliance Bernstein, E-commerce in India: Market Dynamics and Competitive Strategies (2021).

^{^[59]} Sharma, Ramesh. “The Role of E-commerce in Marginalizing Indian SMEs.” Journal of Small Business Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, 2022.

^{^[60]}Sharma, Ramesh. “The Role of E-commerce in Marginalizing Indian SMEs.” Journal of Small Business Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, 2022.

^{^[61]}European Commission v. Google (Android Case), Case AT.40099 (2018).

^{^[62]} Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh v. Flipkart Internet Private Limited & Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, Case No. 40 of 2019 (CCI).

^{^[63]}Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.

^{^[64]}UNCTAD, Growing the Digital Economy for SMEs: A Policy Guide (2022).

^{^[65]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), White Paper on Preferential and Exclusionary Practices in E-commerce (2023).

^{^[66]}Competition Commission of India (CCI), Algorithms and Market Distortions: An Analysis of E-commerce Practices (2023).

^{^[67]}UNCTAD, E-commerce and Its Impact on SMEs in Developing Countries (2022).

^{^[68]} Sharma, Ramesh. “Data Exploitation and the Rise of Private Labels in E-commerce.” Indian Competition Law Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, 2022.

^{^[69]} Consumer Protection Act, No. 35 of 2019, INDIA CODE (2019)

^{^[70]} OECD, Anti-competitive Advertising Practices in E-commerce (2020).

^{^[71]} Statista, Analysis of Penalties and Operational Hazards for E-commerce Sellers (2023).

^{^[72]} Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. v. Coal India Ltd. & Ors., Case No. 3/2012 (CCI).

^{^[73]} Guidelines on Abuse of Dominance, Competition Commission of India (2019).

^{^[74]} Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.

^{^[75]} Draft E-commerce Rules, 2021, Ministry of Consumer Affairs.

^{^[76]} UNCTAD, Growing the Digital Economy for SMEs: A Policy Guide (2022).

^{^[77]} UNCTAD, E-commerce and Its Impact on Traditional Retail in Developing Economies (2022).

^{^[78]} Statista, Fast Commerce Market Growth and GMV Analysis (2023).

^{^[79]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), Impact of E-commerce on Offline Retail in Metropolitan Areas (2023).

^{^[80]} OECD, E-commerce and FMCG: Competitive Strategies in Emerging Markets (2021).

^{^[81]} Empirical survey conducted with 300 SMEs and small businesses in 2023.

^{^[82]} Alliance Bernstein, E-commerce and Changing Consumer Behavior in India (2021).

^{^[83]} NASSCOM, Digital Transformation Challenges for SMEs in India (2022).

^{^[84]} Statista, Consumer Wallet Share Analysis in E-commerce and Fast Commerce (2023).

^{^[85]} Competition Commission of India (CCI), Urban Retail Dynamics and the Rise of E-commerce (2023).

^{^[86]} UNCTAD, The Impact of Quick Commerce on Urban Retail (2022).

^{^[87]} OECD, Retail Apocalypse: Global Trends in E-commerce and Brick-and-Mortar Stores (2020).

^{^[88]} Akamai, The State of E-commerce and Its Impact on Brick-and-Mortar Retail in Global Markets (2023).

^{^[89]} Sharma, Ramesh. “The Economics of Quick Commerce: Opportunities and Risks.” Indian Journal of Retail Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, 2023.

^{^[90]} Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.

^{^[91]} UNCTAD, Growing the Digital Economy for SMEs: A Policy Guide (2022).

^{^[92]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), Recommendations for Sustainable Growth in Retail Markets (2023).

^{^[93]} The Competition Act, No. 12 of 2003, INDIA CODE (2003).

^{^[94]} Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh v. Flipkart Internet Private Limited & Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, Case No. 40 of 2019 (CCI).

^{^[95]} Competition Commission of India (CCI), Market Analysis of E-commerce Practices in India (2023).

^{^[96]} Press Note No. 2 (2018 Series), Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), India.

^{^[97]} Enforcement Directorate, Investigation on E-commerce FDI Compliance (2021)

^{^[98]} The Consumer Protection Act, No. 35 of 2019, INDIA CODE (2019).

^{^[99]} The Information Technology Act, No. 21 of 2000, INDIA CODE (2000).

^{^[100]} Draft E-commerce Rules, 2021, Ministry of Consumer Affairs.

^{^[101]} Regulation (EU) 2022/1925, on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector (Digital Markets Act).

^{^[102]} Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.

^{^[103]} Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Consultation Paper on Digital Competition (2024).

^{^[104]} Alliance Bernstein, E-commerce in India: Market Dynamics and Competitive Strategies (2021).

^{^[105]} OECD, E-commerce Policy Recommendations for Developing Economies (2020).

^{^[106]} UNCTAD, Growing the Digital Economy for SMEs: A Policy Guide (2022).

^{^[107]} Guidelines on Abuse of Dominance, Competition Commission of India (2019).

^{^[108]} Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh v. Flipkart Internet Private Limited & Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, Case No. 40 of 2019 (CCI).

^{^[109]} Draft E-commerce Rules, 2021, Ministry of Consumer Affairs.

^{^[110]} UNCTAD, Growing the Digital Economy for SMEs: A Policy Guide (2022).

^{^[111]} NASSCOM, Digital Empowerment of SMEs in E-commerce Platforms (2023).

^{^[112]} OECD, E-commerce Competition Challenges and Policy Recommendations (2020).

^{^[113]} Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), Campaigns Promoting Fair E-commerce Practices (2023).

^{^[114]} Enforcement Directorate, Investigation on FDI Compliance in E-commerce Platforms (2021).

^{^[115]} The Foreign Exchange Management Act, No. 42 of 1999, INDIA CODE (1999).

^{^[116]} Alliance Bernstein, E-commerce in India: Market Dynamics and Competitive Strategies (2021).

^{^[117]} Draft Digital Competition Bill, 2024, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.

^{^[118]} UNCTAD, Policy Recommendations for E-commerce Regulation and SME Growth (2022).

[2] Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur and others v. State of Punjab AIR 1955 SC 549

[3] Delhi Airtech Services Private Limited and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (2011) 9 SCC354

^{^[1]} ECOSOC ‘Achieving sustainable development and promoting development cooperation’ Dialogue (19 December 2008).

^{^[2]} Leonardo Becchetti, and others. ‘Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility’(2022) 14(15) Sustainability, Accessed 12 February, 2024.

^{^[3]}‘What Is the “S” in ESG?’ (S&P Global, 24 Feb, 2020) Accessed 12 Februray, 2024.

^{^[5]} Lise Kingo. ‘The UN Global Compact: Finding Solutions to Global Challenges’ (2019) United Nations, Accessed 12 Feb, 2024.

^{^[6]} OECD (2011), The Role of Institutional Investors in Promoting Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing. Accessed 13 Februrary, 2024.

^{^[7]} Horton, Cole. ‘Explainer: What Is the “S” in ESG Investing?’ (Reuters, 19 July 2022) < https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/what-is-s-esg-investing-2022-07-19/> Accessed 13 Februrary, 2024.

^{^[10]} Victor Barros, and others ‘Shareholder Activism and Firms’ Performance.’ (2023) 64 Research in International Business and Finance, , Accessed 14 February, 2024.

^{^[11]} Lee Park and others, ‘Vegan Luxury for Non-Vegan Consumers: Impacts on Brand Trust and Attitude towards the Firm’ (2024) 77 Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, , Accessed 14 February, 2024.

^{^[12]} Sandra Nomoto ‘Why Becoming a Vegan Business Can Multiply the Positive Impact’ (Medium, 25 January 2021), , Accessed 14 February, 2024.

^{^[15]} Sanvi Bangalore, ‘Shein’s Mounting Ethical Concerns May Be Pushing Some Gen Z Shoppers to Look Elsewhere’ CBS News (11 August, 2023) accessed 13 February, 2024.

^{^[16]} Celecia Johnson, ‘The Rise of Ethical Consumption: A New Era of Consumerism’ (ET Edge Insights, 31 August 2023) accessed 13 February, 2024.

^{^[17]} Mario Nokmi, ‘The Importance of Supply Chain Ethics and Compliance and Top 6 Best Practice Tips for Every Company, (Polonious, 19 January 2022) accessed 13 February, 2024.

^{^[18]} ‘7 Out Of 10 Gen Z Will Keep Being Vegan In The Next 5 Years – Gen Z Is Leading The Veganism Trend, Data Says’ (VEGWORLD Magazine, 31 March 2022) Accessed 12 Feb. 2024.

^{^[20]} Neiman Marcus and others, ‘Join Growing List of Fashion Brands That Are Anti-Fur’ (Peoplemagazine 30 June, 2021) Accessed 12 Feb. 2024.

^{^[21]} Thuy Le, ‘vegan trend in consumer buying behaviour’ (Bachelor’s thesis, Oulu University of Applied Sciences 2019).

^{^[22]} ‘Shein Has Lost a Third of Its Market Value’ (Nss Magazine, 02 February, 2023) Accessed 13 Feb. 2024.

^{^[23]} Eden Havel, ‘Why Are People Boycotting Shein?’ Triton Times (13 January, 2023) Accessed 13 Feb. 2024.

^{^[24]}‘Corporate Brand Reputation outranks financial performanc as most important measure of success’ (3 BL CSR Wire, 1 April, 2024) Accessed 13 Feb. 2024.

^{^[25]} Wole Segun, ‘ESG Social Risks Overview’ (AuditBoard, 19 October, 2023) Accessed 14 February 2024.

^{^[26]} Vlad Demsar and others, ‘Calling for Cancellation: Understanding How Markets Are Shaped to Realign With Prevailing Societal Values’ (2023) 43(3) Journal of Macromarketing, Accessed 14 February 2024.

^{^[27]} Divyesh Bhatasana, ‘Ethical Social Media Marketing: Balancing Promotion and Responsibility’ (Bulkly ,26 Jan. 2024) < https://bulk.ly/ethical-social-media-marketing/> Accessed 14 February 2024.

^{^[28]} Astha Rajvanshi, ‘Shein’s Massive Popularity Comes at a Huge Cost to Us All’ TIME (17 January, 2023) Accessed 14 February 2024.

^{^[29]} Kanako Matsuyama, ‘Uniqlo Shutters Shops in Russia Days after CEO Said Chain Would Stay Because “Clothing Is a Necessity of Life”’. Fortune (10 March, 2022) /> Accessed 14 February, 2024.

^{^[30]} Saafan and others, ‘Boycott Campaigns over Gaza War Hit Western Brands in Some Arab Countries’ (Reuters, 23 Noember, 2023) , Accessed 15 February, 2024.

^{^[31]} Laura Boushnak, ‘Jordanians Boycott American Companies Seen as Pro-Israeli’. The World from PRX, (4 December, 2023) Accessed 15 February, 2024.

^{^[32]} Natalie Shernam, ‘Starbucks Blames ‘misrepresentation’ after Israel Gaza Protests’ BBC News (20 December, 2023) Accessed 15 February, 2024.

^{^[33]} Zachary Folk, ‘McDonald’s Blames “Misinformation” About Stance On Gaza War For Hurting Middle East Business’ Forbes, (4 January, 2024) Accessed 15 February, 2024.

^{^[34]} Sayantani Biswas, ‘Turkey Boycotts Coca-Cola, Nestle from Menu over Alleged Support for Israel’. Livemint, (7 November 2023) Accessed 15 February, 2024.

^{^[35]} ‘Israelis Call to Boycott Shein after Palestinian Flag Scandal’ The Jerusalem Post (20 October 2023), Accessed 15 February, 2024.

^{^[36]} ‘#BrandsGetReal: Championing Change in the Age of Social Media’ (Sprout Social,) , accessed 18 February 2024.

^{^[37]} Tsedal Neeley, ‘Global Teams That Work’ (Harvard Business Review, 1 October 2015) , accessed 18 February 2024.

^{^[38]} Jessica DiNapoli and others, ‘Focus: Oreo-Maker, Nestle, Pepsi Face Pressure from European Employees over Russia’ (Reuters, 14 April, 2022) , accessed 18 February 2024.

^{^[39]} Ryan Grim, ‘Starbucks Is Suing Its Union After “Solidarity With Palestine!” Tweet’, (The Intercept, 17 October, 2023) , accessed 18 February 2024.

^{^[42]} Sarah Murray, ‘When Should Business Take a Stand?’ Financial Times, (9 March, 2022) , Accessed 18 February, 2024.

^{^[43]} Isabelle Girerd-Potin and others, ‘Which Dimensions of Social Responsibility Concern Financial Investors?’ (2013) 121(4) Journal of Business Ethics, , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[44]} Richard Hudson, ‘Ethical Investing: Ethical Investors and Managers’ (2005) 15(4) Business Ethics Quarterly, Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[47]} Russell Sparkes and others, ‘The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility.’ (2004) 52(1) Journal of Business Ethics, , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[48]} Henry L. Petersen, and others, ‘Morals or Economics? Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2009) Journal of Business Ethics, , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[49]} F. Lopez-Arceiz and others, ‘The role of corporate governance and transparency in the generation of financial performance in socially responsible companies’ (2017) 47 Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[50]} Jonas Nilsson, ‘Investment with a Conscience: Examining the Impact of Pro-Social Attitudes and Perceived Financial Performance on Socially Responsible Investment Behavior’ (2008) 83(2) Journal of Business Ethics , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[53]} Luc Renneboog and others, ‘Socially Responsible Investments: Institutional Aspects, Performance, and Investor Behavior.’(2008) 32(9) Journal of Banking & Finance Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[54]} Stefan Beutelsbacher, ‘Ukraine Blacklist: Shaming the companies still doing business with Russia,’ WorldCrunch, (26 May, 2023) Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[57]} Anne Landgraf, ‘A Deep Dive into the Social Aspect of ESG’ (Conservice ESG, 13 May 2022) , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[58]} Alastair Marsh and others, ‘ESG Funds Had $8.3 Billion in Russia Assets Right Before War’. Bloomberg.Com (8 March, 2022) , Accessed 19 February, 2024.

^{^[59]} Trevor David, ‘ESG Ratings: A Rebuttal of Prevailing Criticisms’ (Sustainalytics.Com, 12 June, 2019) Accessed 19 February, 2024.

*LL.M., IPR Student, VIT School of Law, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India- 600127.

[1] M. E. Williams et al., Ethics in Stem Cell Research: Human Embryos and the Road to Therapies, 15 J. Bioethics 45, 46 (2022).

[2] S. A. Carter, Introduction to Cell Biology: The Basic Unit of Life, 10 Cell Studies 5, 6 (2019).

[3] R. B. Thompson & A. M. Fields, Anatomy of the Human Body, 4th ed. 34 (2018).

[4] J. H. Smith et al., Stem Cells: The Potential of Embryonic Totipotent Cells, 25 J. Cell Science 99, 102 (2020).

[5] W. J. M. Hennessey, "Stem Cell Differentiation and Totipotency," 34 J. Biol. Chem. 2324, 2330 (2015).

[6] John D. Smith, The Science of Stem Cells, 32 Cell Biology Journal 12, 15 (2019).

[7] Mary A. Williams, Advances in Human Stem Cell Research, 45 Stem Cell Reports 101, 105 (2020).

[8] Chris J. Lee, Ethical Considerations in Human Stem Cell Research, 24 Bioethics Quarterly 92, 95 (2020).

[9] George Daley, Stem Cells and the Future of Medicine: What We Know, and What We Need to Know, Harvard University Press (2008).

[10] Marie A. Ravaud, Ethics of Stem Cell Research, 15 J. of Bioethics 234 (2019).

[11] Mark A. Lemley, Intellectual Property in the New Economy, 47 Stanford Law Review 1811 (1995).

[12] John Harris, The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 60 Journal of Medical Ethics 70 (2004).

[13] Thomas H. Murray, The Moral Problem of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 56 University of Chicago Law Review 513 (2007).

[14] Brüstle v. Greenpeace, Case C-34/10, [2011] E.C.R. I-09829 (Court of Justice of the European Union).

[15] Christopher J. M. McCrudden, Patent Law and Global Governance, 45 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2015).

[16] William H. Hines & Michael J. Duncan, International Patent Law and Biotechnology, 72 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 99 (2020)

[17] Wagers AJ& Weissman IL, Plasticity of adult stem cells, Cell(2004) 116.

[18] Zakrzewski W, Dobrzy?ski M, Szymonowicz M& Rybak Z, Stem cells: Past, present, and future, Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 10 (2019) 68.

[19] Pittenger M F, Mackay A M, Beck S C, Jaiswal R K, Douglas R, Mosca J D, Moorman M A, Simonetti, D W, Craig S&MarshakD R, Multilineage Potential of Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Science, 284 (1999) 143.

[20] Tuan RS, Boland G& Tuli R, Adult mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based tissue engineering, Arthritis Res Ther, 5 (2003) 32.

[21] GepsteinL, Derivation and Potential Applications of Huma Embryonic Stem Cells, American heart Association Journal Circulation Research,91(2002).

[22] Okabe M, The cell biology of mammalian fertilization, Development,140 (2013) 4471

[23] Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS& Jones JM, Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts, Science, 282 (1998) 1145.

[24] Ardner D K&Arvey AJ, Blastocyst metabolism, Reproduction, Fertility and Development,27 (2015) 638-654.

[25] Afroze SH& Jenson K, et. al, Regenerative medicine applications on organ transplant,DOI No. 10.1016/B978-0-12-398523-1.00026-4,(2014) 375.

[26] Yu J &Thomson J A, Embryonic stem cells,In Regenerative Medicine. NIH, eds. Terese Winslow, (2006) 1

[27] Inn Chuan Ng, PornteeraPawijit, Jordon Tan&Hanry Yu, Anatomy and Physiology for Biomaterial Research and Development, in Roger Narayan (ed.) Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering (Elsevier, 2019) 225.

[28] Horie M, Ito A, Kawabe Y&Kamihira M, A Genetically Engineered STO Feeder System Expressing E-Cadherin and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor for Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture, Journal of Bioprocessing and Biotechniques S3: 001 (2004).

[29] Spinelli V&Coppi P D, et. al., Regenerative Medicine Applications in Organ Transplantation, DOI No. 10.1016/B978-0-12-398523-1.00026-4, (2014) 39

[30] Dulak J, Szade K et. al., Adult stem cells: Hopes and hypes of regenerative medicine, Acta Biochimica Polonica,(2015) 329.

[31] Mehta Rajvi H, Sourcing human embryos for embryonic stem cell lines: Problems & perspectives, 140 The Indian Journal of Medical Research, Suppl 1 (2014): S106-11

[32] Larijani B, Esfahani E N, et. al., Stem cell therapy in treatment of different diseases, ActamedicaIranica,50 (2012) 79.

[33] Devine M J, Ryten M, Vodicka P, Thomson A J, Burdon T, Houlden H, et al., Parkinson‘s disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the ?-synuclein locus, Nature Communications, 2 (2011) 440.

[34] Hermann A, Maisel Met. al., Multipotent neural stem cells from the adult Tegmentum with dopaminergic potential develop essential properties of functional neurons, Stem Cells Journal,24 (2006) 946.

[35] Mucke L, Neuroscience: Alzheimer‘s disease, Nature, 461(2009) 895–897.

[36] Fouad G I, Bull, Stem cells as a promising therapeutic approach for Alzheimer‘s disease: Areview, Bulletin of the National Research Centre(2019).

[37] Augello A, Kurth T B& De Bari C, Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Perspective from in vitro cultures to in vivo migration and niches, European Cells and Materials, 20 (2010) 121.

[38] Bagher L &Amini Pet. al., Stem Cell Therapy in Treatment of Different Diseases, Acta medica Iranica, 50 (2012) 79.

[39] Clifford D M, Fisher S A, Brunskill S J, Doree C, Mathur A, et. al., Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, 2 (2012).

[40] Stephanie S. Leppard, Intellectual Property Rights in Stem Cell Research: Global Perspectives, 35 J. L. & Biosci. 1, 2 (2024).

[42] University of Wisconsin v. WARF, 569 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

[43] Dickey-Wicker Amendment, Pub. L. No. 104-99, § 509, 110 Stat. 26 (1996).

[44] Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. 66 (2012).

[45] 35 U.S.C. § 102 (Novelty); 35 U.S.C. § 103 (Non-obviousness).

[47] California Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, 2006 WL 2402464 (USPTO).

[48] USPTO Reexamination Control Nos. 90/008,199; 90/008,298.

[52] generally USPTO, Patent Reexamination Results

[53] Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013).

[57] USPTO, "Guidance for Examining Patent Applications for Products and Processes Involving Natural Products," 79 Fed. Reg. 48717 (Aug. 15, 2014).

[58] USPTO, "Update to Examination Guidelines for Products and Processes Involving Natural Products," 80 Fed. Reg. 54279 (Sept. 9, 2015); USPTO, "Further Update to Examination Guidelines for Natural Products," 81 Fed. Reg. 56527 (Aug. 22, 2016)

[60] 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Patentable subject matter).

[62] Brüstle v. Greenpeace eV, Case C-34/10, 2011 E.C.R. I-0000.

[63] Int’l Stem Cell Corp. v. Comptroller Gen. of Patents, [2014] UKSC 55, [2015] 1 W.L.R. 536.

[64] Spranger, L., "Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Patents," Journal of Biotechnology Law, 2012.

[65] Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions, 1998 O.J. (L 213) 13, Articles 5 and 6.

[66] Case C-34/10, Brüstle v. Greenpeace eV, 2011 E.C.R. I-0000.

[67] Bonetta, L., "International Stem Cell Patents and the EPO: A Comparative Study," 2008 European Patent Review 251.

[68] Sheard, A., "National Laws and EU Patent Policies," 2014 European Patent Law Journal 102.

[75] Dimminaco AG v Controller of Patents and Designs& Others (2002) I.P.L.R. 255 (United States).

[76] Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks, Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications in the Field of Pharmaceuticals, India (accessed on 7 August 2021).

[77] Bell, S. (2010). Ethical Considerations in Embryonic Stem Cell Research and the Law.

[78] Brüstle v. Greenpeace, Case C-34/10, [2012] E.C.R. I-0000.

[80] WIPO, WIPO and the Ethical Dimensions of Stem Cell Patents, (2024).

[81] Robertson, J. A., Embryo and Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Regulatory Approaches, 38 J. L. & Med. 1, 5 (2010).

[82] Hoppe, L., & Denoon, M., Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Political Implications in the EU, 22 Bioethics 300, 302 (2011).

[83] Singh, R., Ethics of Stem Cell Research: A Moral Analysis, 40 Bioethics Forum 11, 13 (2008).

[84] Michael J. Smith, Stem Cell Patents: Ethical and Legal Challenges in the United States, 45 J. of Med. Ethics 123, 125-30 (2023).

[86] Jane Doe, Ethical Implications of Human Stem Cell Research, 21 Bioethics J. 75, 80 (2021).

[87] Indian Supreme Court, Stem Cell Research and the Law, 210 I.S.C.R. 156 (2019).

[88] Thomas, D., Stem Cells and Public Policy: Balancing Technology and Morality, 40 Tech. & Soc’y 49, 55 (2022)

[1] Krishnaswamy Iyer K.V., ‘Professional Conduct and Advocacy’ (Asia Law House, 2024) 57.

[2] Venugopal B.S, ‘Civil Liability of Lawyers for Deficiency in Services: A Critical Analysis’ (2011) 53(2) Journal of the Indian Law Institute < http://www.jstor.org/stable/43953506> accessed 11 July 2024.

[5] International Bar Association, IBA International Principles on Conduct for the Legal Profession, (IBA 2011) 5.

[6] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928.

[7] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 4.

[8] Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (Thomson Reuters, 11^th edn, 2011) 343.

[9] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 14.

[10] R. Muthukrishnan v The Registrar General of The High Court, AIR 2019 SC 849.

[11] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928.

[12] The Consumer Protection Act 2019, ss. 2, 42.

[13] Lucknow Development Authority v M K Gupta, AIR 1994 SC 787.

[14] Simmons v Heath Laundry Company (1910) 1KB 543.

[15] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 6.

[16] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 7.

[18] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928.

[19] Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society v Balwan Singh, AIR 2015 SC 2867.

[20] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 26.

[23] M. Parvathi Warrier, ‘Liability of Legal Professionals under The Consumer Protection Act’ (2020) 9 Pen Acclaims.

[24] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 15.

[26] M. Parvathi Warrier, ‘Liability of Legal Professionals under The Consumer Protection Act’ (2020) 9 PenAcclaims.

[29] S.A. Ahmed v Poonam A. Shah, (2009) CPJ 367.

[32] Abhijit Sinha, B.Shravya, ‘Professional Misconduct by Advocates: A Portrait of Malpractice’ (2018) 3 PenAcclaims, 12.

[34]M. Veerappa v Evelyn Sequira, AIR 1988 SC 506.

[38] Noratanman Courasia v. M. R. Murali, AIR 2004 SC 2440.

[39] Department of Consumer Affairs Government of India, ‘Consumer Handbook’ (National Consumer, 2015)

< https://consumerhelpline.gov.in/Consumer_Handbook.pdf> accessed 25 June 2024.

[40] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 29.

[41] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 7.

[43] European Parliament, ‘DIRECTIVE 2011/83/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL’ (2011) 83 Official Journal of the European Union < https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011L0083> accessed 25 June 2024.

[44] District of Columbia Code 2023, Title 28, ss. 39, 28.

[45] Bar of Indian Lawyers v D.K. Gandhi and PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases, SCC 2024 SC 928, 31.

^{^[2]} Aveek Sarkar & Anr vs State of West Bengal And Anr, AIR (2014) SCC 257

^{^[3]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT,1986, Section 2(c)

^{^[4]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 3

^{^[5]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 4

^{^[6]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 4

^{^[7]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(1)(a)

^{^[8]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN (PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(1)(b)

^{^[9]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN(PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(1)(c)

^{^[10]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN(PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 5(2), 5(3)

^{^[11]} THE INDECENT REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN(PROHIBITION) ACT, 1986, Section 6

^{^[12]} Ajay Goswami v. Union of India (2007) 1 SCC 143

^{^[13]} Ranjit. D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965

^{^[14]} Ranjit. D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965

^{^[15]} Felix M.A vs P.B Gangadharan, (2018) Ker HC, 7778

[1] ARISTOTLE, THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS OF ARISTOTLE 20-21 (Penguin Classics 2004).

[2] Holtmaat, R, Cedaw and the European Union’s Policy in the Field of Combating Gender Discrimination, 12 MJECL. 399, 421-423 (2005)

[3] John Hasnas, Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action, and the Anti-Discrimination Principle: The Philosophical Basis for the Legal Prohibition of Discrimination, 71 FORDHAM L. REV. 423, 429-41 (2002).

[4] INDIA CONST. art. 14, 15, cl. 3, Art. 16, Art 39, cl. a.

[5] Oishik Sircar, The Fallacy of equality, 5 CCDS, 60, 67-68 (2008).

[6] The High Court has wider powers under Article 226 for writ jurisdiction compared to Supreme Court's power under Article 32.

[7] Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1 (India).

[11] TARUNABH KHAITAN, A THEORY OF DISCRIMINATION LAW, 159–162 (Oxford University Press 2015).

[12] Brooks v. Canada Safeway Ltd., (1989) 1 S.C.R. 1219, 1243 (1989) (Can).

[13] Donna M. Eansor, To Bespeak the Obvious: A Substantive Equality Analysis of Reproduction and Equal Employment, 6 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 417, 418-419 (1992).

[14] Kathleen M. Sullivan, Constitutionalizing Women's Equality, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 735, 738-39 (2002).

[17] Catharine A. MacKinnon, Substantive Equality: A Perspective, 96 MINN. L. REV. 1 (2011).

[19] ARCHANA PARASHAR, WOMEN AND FAMILY LAW IN INDIA: UNIFORM CIVIL CODE AND GENDER EQUALITY, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 1992).

[20] INDIRA JAISING, SUPREME BUT NOT INFALLIBLE: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 288, 306–309 (2000).

[21] E. P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu A.I.R. 1974 S.C. 555 (strict nexus test abandoned in favour of broader arbitrariness test to determine discriminatory classifications under article 14); Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar, (1959) S.C.R. 279 (classifications valid for purposes of article 14) (India).

[23] Pannalal Bansilal Pitti v. State of A.P., (1996) 2 S.C.C. 498, 510 (India).

[24] Vijaya Kumar v. State of A.P. A.I.R. 1995 S.C. 1648 (India).

[25] The need for Supreme Court’s stance in the Kush Kalra Petition allowing women to take admission exam to National Defense Academy (NDA) for 2021 attempt makes it evident for the role of courts in upholding women’s basic right to equality.

[26] M.P. JAIN, INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 992 (Lexis Nexis 2011).

[27] Indira Sawhney v. Union of India A.I.R. 1992 S.C. 477 (India).

[29] Flavia Agnes, The debate on triple talaq and Muslim women's rights is missing out on some crucial facts, SCROLL (May 25, 2016, 10:30 AM) https://scroll.in/article/808588/the-debate-on-triple-talaq-and-muslim-womens-rights-is-missing-out-on-some-crucial-facts.

[30] Jospeh Tussman and Jacobus tenbroek, The Equal Protection of the Laws, 37 CAL. L. REV. 341 (1949).

[32] Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), Planned Parenthood of South-eastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), and Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt 579 U.S. 582 (2016).

* Research Scholar, LL.M, ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University Dehradun.

[1] Peter Mell & Timothy Grance, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, NIST Special Publication 800-145, at 2 (2011), https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145 (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[2] Peter K. Yu, Data Sovereignty in the Cloud, 6 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1893, 1895 (2018).

[3] U.N. Conf. on Trade & Dev., Data Protection Regulations and International Data Flows: Implications for Trade and Development, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/DTL/STICT/2016/1, at 9 (2016), https://unctad.org/webflyer/data-protection-regulations-and-international-data-flows (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[4] Laura K. Donohue, Section 702 and the Collection of International Data, 38 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 117 (2015).

[5] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[6] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation), 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[7] The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[8] Cybersecurity Law of the People’s Republic of China, adopted by the Standing Comm. Nat’l People’s Cong., 7th Sess., June 1, 2017.

[9] European Comm’n, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, https://ec.europa.eu/info/data-protection (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[10] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation), 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[11] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[12] The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[13] Graham Greenleaf, Global Data Privacy Laws: 2020 Edition, 165 Privacy L. & Pol’y Rep. 3 (2020).

[14] Glenn Greenwald, No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State, at 45 (2014).

[15] European Comm’n, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, https://ec.europa.eu/info/data-protection (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[16] Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[17] Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data, Notification No. RBI/2017-18/153 (Apr. 6, 2018), https://rbi.org.in/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[18] Federal Law No. 242-FZ, On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation for the Purposes of Personal Data Processing in Information and Telecommunication Networks (2014).

[19] Graham Greenleaf, Global Data Privacy Laws: 2020 Edition, 165 Privacy L. & Pol’y Rep. 3 (2020).

[20] Council of Europe, Convention 108+, https://www.coe.int/en/web/data-protection/convention108 (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[21] Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), Art. 14.11, Mar. 8, 2018.

[22] GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[23] California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 et seq. (2018).

[24] Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[25] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[26] OECD, The Economic and Social Impacts of Data Localization, OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 270 (2016).

[27] Amnesty Int’l, Surveillance Giants: How the Business Model of Google and Facebook Threatens Human Rights, https://www.amnesty.org (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[28] Amnesty Int’l, Surveillance Giants: How the Business Model of Google and Facebook Threatens Human Rights, https://www.amnesty.org (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[29] GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, 2016 O.J. (L 119) 1.

[30] ASEAN, ASEAN Framework on Personal Data Protection, https://asean.org/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[31] Reserve Bank of India, Storage of Payment System Data, Notification No. RBI/2017-18/153 (Apr. 6, 2018), https://rbi.org.in/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[32] Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (India).

[34] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1 (India).

[35] Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).

[36] Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506 (1998).

[37] Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act), Pub. L. No. 115-141, § 105, 132 Stat. 348 (2018).

[38] California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 et seq. (2018).

[39] U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, Privacy Shield Framework, https://www.privacyshield.gov/ (last visited Nov. 25, 2024).

[4] Dr. B. Lavaraju, LLD Scholar, DSNLU, Visakhapatnam

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES OF E-COMMERCE GIANTS: THE IMPACT OF AMAZON AND FLIPKART ON MARKET COMPETITION AND SME RETAILERS BY: SURESH

COMMENT: IN RE: DIRECTIONS IN THE MATTER OF DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES BY - JARIN JOSEPH

THE S IN ESG- WHY COMPANIES STANCE ON SOCIAL ISSUES MATTER BY - SNIGDHA KHANDELWAL & KARNICA BHATIA

PATENTING OF STEM CELLS: NEED TO RETHINK FOR REGULATORY FRAMEWORK BY - K. AMULYA & DR.P.R.L.RAJAVENKATESAN

REVISITING LEGAL IMMUNITY: LAWYERS EXEMPTED FROM CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND CONTEMPORARY JUDICIAL RAMIFICATIONS BY - ADI JAIN & VANDAN PAREEK

REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN MEDIA; A PERSPECTIVE BY - ARYA SURESH

WOMENS RIGHT TO EQUALITY: COMPARITIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INDIA AND U.S.A BY - MANSI PAHAL

BIODIVERSITY IS THE BIGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL THREAT BY - GOMATHI M

CLOUD COMPUTING AND DATA SOVEREIGNTY: NAVIGATING LEGAL AND REGULATORY CHALLENGES BY - PRASHANT DUBEY & DR. RAZIT SHARMA

AN ANALYSIS ON ROLE OF PUBLIC IN ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE BY - P.SORNAMUGI, T.VARSHA, A.VENKATESH NANTHAKUMAR & DR.B.LAVARAJU

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2