INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] The Author is a final year Undergraduate student [Year V, B.A LL.B (Hons)] from Gujarat National Law University, Attalika Avenue, Knowledge Corridor, Koba, Gandhinagar- 382421

[2] Allyson Haynes Stuart, 'Social Media, Manipulation, and Violence' (2019) 15 SC J Int'l L & Bus 100, 106

[3] Alexandra Stevenson, ‘Facebook admits it was used to incite violence in Myanmar’ (New York Times, 6 November 2018), available at < https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/06/technology/myanmar-facebook.html> accessed on 14 September 2021

[4] Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms & Ors, 2002 (3) SCR 294

[5] Shruti Shikha and Nandita Mishra, 'Cyber Trooping Activities on Social Media and Its Impact on Elections in India' (2020) 7 Indian JL & Pub Pol'y 37, 40

[9] Vasudev Devadasan, ‘Fake News and the Constitution’ (Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy, 17 June 2020) accessed on 17 November 2021

[10] Elizabeth F. Judge and Amir Korhani, ‘Disinformation, Digital Information Equality and Electoral Integrity’ 2020 (19) 2 Election Law Journal 240, 241

[11] Tufekci , Zeynep, “Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency,” (2015) 13 Col. Tech L. J 203, 217; Danaher , John, et al. “Algorithmic Governance: Developing a Research Agenda Through the Power of Collective Intelligence,” (2017) Big Data & Society 4(2): 1–21

[12] Flaxman et.al. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption,” (2016) 80 (1) Public Opinion Quarterly 298, 299

[13] Neill Fitzpatrick, ‘Media Manipulation 2.0: The impact of Social Media on News, Competition and Accuracy’ 2018 (4) 1 Athens Journal on Mass Media and Communication 45, 48

[14] Ekaterina Zhuravskaya et.al, “Political effects of Internet and Social Media” 2020 (12) Ann. Rev Econ 19.1, 19.14

[15] Gustavo Ferreira Santos, 'Social Media, Disinformation, and Regulation of the Electoral Process: A Study Based on 2018 Brazilian Election Experience' (2020) 7 Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais 429

[16] Anupam Das and Ralph Schroeder, ‘Online Disinformation in the run-up to the 2019 Indian Election’ 2020 (24) 12 Information, Communication & Society 1762, 1775

[17] Snigdha Poonam and Samarth Bansal, ‘Misinformation is endangering India’s Elections’ (The Atlantic, 01 April 2019) accessed on 17 November 2021

[18] Dan Burns, ‘FBI, Other agencies did not pay heed to mounting warnings of Jan. 6 riot’ (Reuters, 1 Nov 2021) < https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-other-agencies-did-not-heed-mounting-warnings-jan-6-riot-washington-post-2021-10-31/> accessed on 17 November 2021

[19] Shehroze Khan and James Wright, ‘Disinformation, Stochastic Harm, and Costly Filtering: A Principal-Agent Analysis of Regulating Social Media Platforms’ (2021) < https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09847> last accessed 16 November 2021

[20] Maarten Sap et al., The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection, < https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~msap/pdfs/sap2019risk.pdf> last accessed 14 November 2021

[21] N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 269-80 (1964))

[22] Nina I Brown and Jonathan Peters, 'Say This, Not That: Government Regulation and Control of Social Media' (2018) 68 Syracuse L Rev 521, 533

[23] U.S v. Playboy, 529 U.S. 803, 812 (2000); see also Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552, 566 (2011)

[24] Jarred Prier, ‘Commanding the Trend: Social Media as Information Warfare’ (2017) 11(4) Strategic Studies Quarterly 50, 61

[25] Pablo Barbera, ‘Social Media, Echo Chambers and Political Polarization’ in Nathaniel Persily and Joshua A. Tucker eds. ‘Social Media and Democracy: State of the field and Prospects for Reform’ (Cambridge University Press 2020) 35, 36

[26] Daphne Keller, ‘Amplification and its Discontent: Why regulating the reach of Online Content is hard’ (Knight First Amendment Institute, 8 June 2021), available at < https://knightcolumbia.org/content/amplification-and-its-discontents> last accessed

[27] Mark Silverman, 'LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media' (2019) 101 Int'l Rev Red Cross 383, 385

[28]Anam Ajmal, ‘70% of global internet shutdowns in 2020 were in India: Report’ (Times of India, 04 March 2021) accessed on 17 November 2021

[29] Allyson Haynes Stuart, 'Social Media, Manipulation, and Violence' (2019) 15 SC J Int'l L & Bus 100, 120

[30] Elizabeth C. ‘The Great Firewall of China: Xi Jinping’s internet shutdown’ (The Guardian, 29 June 2018) accessed on 17 November 2021

[31] Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, 2015 (5) SCC 1

[32] Adrian Shahbaz and Allie Funk ‘Freedom on the Net 2019: Crisis of Social Media’ (Freedom House, 2019) < https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2019/crisis-social-media> accessed on 17 November 2021

[33] Kai Reimer and Sandra Peter, ‘Algorithmic Audiencing: Why we need to rethink Free Speech on Social Media’ 2021 (36) 4 Journal of Information Technology 409, 417

[35] Nitish Kashyap, ‘No Political Ads without Pre-certification, Code of Conduct being evolved in consultation with IAMAI and Social Networking sites, ECI tells Bombay High Court’ (Livelaw, 11 March 2019) last accessed 17 November 2021

[36] Udupa, Sahana, ‘Digital Disinformation and Electoral Integrity: Benchmarks for Regulation’ 2019 (54) 51 (EPW 28 December 2019) < https://www.epw.in/engage/article/digital-disinformation-and-election-integrity> accessed on 17 November 2021

[37] Code of Ethics and Broadcasting Standards, (NBDA 01.04.2008) accessed on 17 November 2021

[38] Mathew, Meera, ‘Media Self-regulation in India: A Critical Analysis’ 2016 ILJ L. Rev 25, 33

[39] Rajesh Serupally, ‘Are Political Consultancies a threat to Indian Democracy?’ (The Wire, 17 June2019) accessed on 17 November 2021

[40] Milan Vaishnav, ‘Political Finance in India: Déjà vu all over again’ (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 31 January 2019) accessed on 17 November 2021

[41] Shruti Shikha and Nandita Mishra, 'Cyber Trooping Activities on Social Media and Its Impact on Elections in India' (2020) 7 Indian JL & Pub Pol'y 37, 46

[42] Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Disinformation and ‘fake news’ (HC 2017-19 1791) para 12

[43] Carme Colomina et.al, ‘The impact of Disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world’ (European Parliament DROI Sub-committee, 22 April 2021) : QA-02-21-559-EN-N

[44] Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Rechtsdurchsetzung in sozialen Netzwerken (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 3352 ff. (1 October 2017)

[45] Organic Law No. 2018-1201 of 22 December 2018 Regarding the Fight Against Information Manipulation

[46] Zachary Young, ‘French Parliament passes law against ‘fake news’’ (Politico, 04 July 2018) < https://www.politico.eu/article/french-parliament-passes-law-against-fake-news/> accessed on 17 November 2021

[47] Emiliana De Blasio and Donatella Selva, ‘Who Is Responsible for Disinformation? European Approaches to Social Platforms’ Accountability in the Post-Truth Era’ 2021 65 (6) American Behavioral Scientist 825, 837

[48] Alex Rochenfort, ‘Regulating Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Policy Analysis’ 2020 (25) Comm. L & Pol. 225, 254

[49] Israr Khan, ‘How can States effectively regulate Social Media Platforms?’ (Oxford Business Law Blog, 13 January 2021) < https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2021/01/how-can-states-effectively-regulate-social-media-platforms> accessed on 17 November 2021

[4] 'Nupur Sharma Withdraws Her Controversial Statement After Suspension From BJP' (Firstpost, 2022)

[5] The Pioneer, 'Nupur Sharma Controversy: What Basic Facts Are' (The Pioneer, 2022)

[6] Paper and others, 'Amid Global Outrage, BJP Acts Against Leaders For Hate Remarks' (Thehindu.com, 2022)

[1] Dr. POONAM P. SAXENA, PROPERTY LAW 623 (LexisNexis, 3d ed. 2017).

[3] Balwant Singh v. Chatin Singh, AIR 1985 P&H 74 (India).

[4] Ashkar Singh v. Rawal Singh, AIR 1992 P&H 148 (India).

[5] Ram Bharosee v. Rameeshwar Prasad Singh, AIR 1938 Oudh 26 (India).

[7] Garagaboyina Radhakrishna v. District Registrar, Vishakhapatnam, AIR 2012 AP 190 (India).

[8] Ram Sarup v. Bela, (1884) ILR 6 All 313. (India)

[9] Somashekarrao v. KS Mishra, AIR 1944 Ngp 185 (India).

[10] Ankamma v. Narsaya, AIR 1947 Mad 127 (India); Collector of Ratnagiri v. Vyankatrau, (1872) 8 Bom HC 1 (India).

[11] Tila Bewa v. Mana Bewa AIR 1962 Ori 130 (India).

[12] M Lakshminarayana v. DB Pradeep Kumar, (2010) 1 UP LJ 192 (DB) (India).

[13] Mohd Raza v. Abbas Bandi Bibi, AIR 1932 PC 158 (India); Canbank Financial Services Ltd v. Custodian, (2004) 8 SCC 355 (India).

[14] Bhavani Amma Kanakadevi v. CSI Dekshina Kerela Maha Idavaka, AIR 2008 Ker. 38 (India).

[15] Anantha v. Nagamuthu, (1882) ILR 4 Mad 200 (India); Hussain Khan v. Nateri, (1872) 6 Mad HC 356 (India).

[16] Saraju Bala v Jyotirmoyee, (1931) 35 Cal WN 903 (India).

[19] Teja Singh v Moti Singh, AIR 1925 Oudh 125 (India).

[20] S R Radhakrishnan v. Neelamagam, (2003) 10 SCC 705 (India).

[23] Saraju Bala v. Jyotirmoyee, AIR 1931 PC 179 (India).

[25] Bai Vijli v. Nansa Nagar, (1886) ILR 10 Bom 152 (India).

[26] Beard, Reversionary & General Securities Ltd v. Hall, [1908] 1 ChD 383.

[27] Narmadaben M. Thakker v. Pranjivandas M. Thakker, (1997) 2 SCC 255 (India).

[28] Sridhar v. N. Revanna, (2020) SCC OnLine SC 171 (India).

[1] Rony Schneel, Clinical research in India, Available from, http://www.criteriuminc.com/clinical_research_india.

[2] Clinical trials in india available at http://www.igatecorp. com/icri/html/aboutus/tia.htm (last visited 22nd October10th 2008).

[3] Gevers S , “Medical Research Involving Human Subjects: Towards an International Legal Framework’’ European Journal of Health Law pp 8:293-298 (2001).

[4] Vijay Moza, Opportunities and challenges for clinical research in India, Pharma Express, Available from http://archivepharma.expressbpd.com/20051215/ipcspecial05.shtml

[5] D. Sreedhar, Clinical Trials in India: Current Scenario and Future Outlook, The Pharma Review (May 2009), Kongposh Publication

[7] Clinical Research, Sector profile by FICCI, Available from http://ficci.in/sector/77/Project_docs/ficci-sector- Clinical_Research.pdf

[8] Berkman ND, Wynia MK, Churchill LR. Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans. J Med Ethics

[10] R. Dworkin, Life’s Dominion (London, Harper-Collins,1993) at 166

[14] The convention of Human Rights and Biomedicine under article 17 (1997 )

[1]141 S. Ct. 1183 (2021), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf (last visited May 21, 7:08PM).

[2]https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-google-llc-v-oracle-am-inc(last visited May 21, 6:08PM).

[3]https://www.intepat.com/blog/copyright/copyright-infringement-case-google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc/;Tadhg A.J. Dooley &David Roth, Supreme Court Update: Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (No.18-956), Volume XII Issue 172, The National Law Review, June 21, 2022, https://www.natlawreview.com/article/supreme-court-update-google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc-no18-956(last visited May 21, 6:08PM).

[4]Jeffrey W. Gluck, Oracle v. Google, the never ending case finally ends, Panitch Intellectual Property Law Schwarze, April 21 at 3:09PM, https://www.panitchlaw.com/oracle-v-google-the-never-ending-case-finally-ends/;Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 135 Harv. L. Rev. 431, Nov. 10, 2021, https://harvardlawreview.org/2021/11/google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc/ (Last visited April 23 at 4:00PM).

[5]https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/18-956 (last visited June 21, 6:08PM).

[6]James A.D. White, Misuse or fair use: that is the software copyright question, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1997), Berkeley Technology LawJournal, 251-310, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24122386?seq=22 (last visited June 12, 7:08PM).

[8]https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/cases/ (last visited June 12, 7:08PM).

SOCIAL MEDIA REGULATION: REVIEW OF THE FIELD AND ANALYSIS OF EMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGE (By-Venkata Supreeth.K)

Understanding The Legal And Political Aspect Of Nupur Sharma Controversy (By-Shashank Singh, Ratnesh Sahu & Akanksha Singh)

CAPITAL PUNISHMNENT (By- Muskan Goyal & Anjali Dhupar)

Conditional Gifts: Extent & Limitation Of Its Conditions Under TOPA, 1882 (By : Sejal Choudhary)

Efficacy of Clinical Trials in India (By- Naman Jain)

Google LLC v. Oracle America - A Case Comment (By- Nancy Srivastava)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

SOCIAL MEDIA REGULATION: REVIEW OF THE FIELD AND ANALYSIS OF EMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGE (By-Venkata Supreeth.K)

Understanding The Legal And Political Aspect Of Nupur Sharma Controversy (By-Shashank Singh, Ratnesh Sahu & Akanksha Singh)

CAPITAL PUNISHMNENT (By- Muskan Goyal & Anjali Dhupar)

Conditional Gifts: Extent & Limitation Of Its Conditions Under TOPA, 1882 (By : Sejal Choudhary)

Efficacy of Clinical Trials in India (By- Naman Jain)

Google LLC v. Oracle America - A Case Comment (By- Nancy Srivastava)

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation