INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Dr. POONAM P. SAXENA, PROPERTY LAW 623 (LexisNexis, 3d ed. 2017).

[3] Balwant Singh v. Chatin Singh, AIR 1985 P&H 74 (India).

[4] Ashkar Singh v. Rawal Singh, AIR 1992 P&H 148 (India).

[5] Ram Bharosee v. Rameeshwar Prasad Singh, AIR 1938 Oudh 26 (India).

[7] Garagaboyina Radhakrishna v. District Registrar, Vishakhapatnam, AIR 2012 AP 190 (India).

[8] Ram Sarup v. Bela, (1884) ILR 6 All 313. (India)

[9] Somashekarrao v. KS Mishra, AIR 1944 Ngp 185 (India).

[10] Ankamma v. Narsaya, AIR 1947 Mad 127 (India); Collector of Ratnagiri v. Vyankatrau, (1872) 8 Bom HC 1 (India).

[11] Tila Bewa v. Mana Bewa AIR 1962 Ori 130 (India).

[12] M Lakshminarayana v. DB Pradeep Kumar, (2010) 1 UP LJ 192 (DB) (India).

[13] Mohd Raza v. Abbas Bandi Bibi, AIR 1932 PC 158 (India); Canbank Financial Services Ltd v. Custodian, (2004) 8 SCC 355 (India).

[14] Bhavani Amma Kanakadevi v. CSI Dekshina Kerela Maha Idavaka, AIR 2008 Ker. 38 (India).

[15] Anantha v. Nagamuthu, (1882) ILR 4 Mad 200 (India); Hussain Khan v. Nateri, (1872) 6 Mad HC 356 (India).

[16] Saraju Bala v Jyotirmoyee, (1931) 35 Cal WN 903 (India).

[19] Teja Singh v Moti Singh, AIR 1925 Oudh 125 (India).

[20] S R Radhakrishnan v. Neelamagam, (2003) 10 SCC 705 (India).

[23] Saraju Bala v. Jyotirmoyee, AIR 1931 PC 179 (India).

[25] Bai Vijli v. Nansa Nagar, (1886) ILR 10 Bom 152 (India).

[26] Beard, Reversionary & General Securities Ltd v. Hall, [1908] 1 ChD 383.

[27] Narmadaben M. Thakker v. Pranjivandas M. Thakker, (1997) 2 SCC 255 (India).

[28] Sridhar v. N. Revanna, (2020) SCC OnLine SC 171 (India).

[1] Rony Schneel, Clinical research in India, Available from, http://www.criteriuminc.com/clinical_research_india.

[2] Clinical trials in india available at http://www.igatecorp. com/icri/html/aboutus/tia.htm (last visited 22nd October10th 2008).

[3] Gevers S , “Medical Research Involving Human Subjects: Towards an International Legal Framework’’ European Journal of Health Law pp 8:293-298 (2001).

[4] Vijay Moza, Opportunities and challenges for clinical research in India, Pharma Express, Available from http://archivepharma.expressbpd.com/20051215/ipcspecial05.shtml

[5] D. Sreedhar, Clinical Trials in India: Current Scenario and Future Outlook, The Pharma Review (May 2009), Kongposh Publication

[7] Clinical Research, Sector profile by FICCI, Available from http://ficci.in/sector/77/Project_docs/ficci-sector- Clinical_Research.pdf

[8] Berkman ND, Wynia MK, Churchill LR. Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans. J Med Ethics

[10] R. Dworkin, Life’s Dominion (London, Harper-Collins,1993) at 166

[14] The convention of Human Rights and Biomedicine under article 17 (1997 )

[1]141 S. Ct. 1183 (2021), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf (last visited May 21, 7:08PM).

[2]https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-google-llc-v-oracle-am-inc(last visited May 21, 6:08PM).

[3]https://www.intepat.com/blog/copyright/copyright-infringement-case-google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc/;Tadhg A.J. Dooley &David Roth, Supreme Court Update: Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (No.18-956), Volume XII Issue 172, The National Law Review, June 21, 2022, https://www.natlawreview.com/article/supreme-court-update-google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc-no18-956(last visited May 21, 6:08PM).

[4]Jeffrey W. Gluck, Oracle v. Google, the never ending case finally ends, Panitch Intellectual Property Law Schwarze, April 21 at 3:09PM, https://www.panitchlaw.com/oracle-v-google-the-never-ending-case-finally-ends/;Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 135 Harv. L. Rev. 431, Nov. 10, 2021, https://harvardlawreview.org/2021/11/google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc/ (Last visited April 23 at 4:00PM).

[5]https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/18-956 (last visited June 21, 6:08PM).

[6]James A.D. White, Misuse or fair use: that is the software copyright question, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1997), Berkeley Technology LawJournal, 251-310, https://www.jstor.org/stable/24122386?seq=22 (last visited June 12, 7:08PM).

[8]https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/cases/ (last visited June 12, 7:08PM).

Conditional Gifts: Extent & Limitation Of Its Conditions Under TOPA, 1882 (By : Sejal Choudhary)

Efficacy of Clinical Trials in India (By- Naman Jain)

Google LLC v. Oracle America - A Case Comment (By- Nancy Srivastava)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Conditional Gifts: Extent & Limitation Of Its Conditions Under TOPA, 1882 (By : Sejal Choudhary)

Efficacy of Clinical Trials in India (By- Naman Jain)

Google LLC v. Oracle America - A Case Comment (By- Nancy Srivastava)

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation