INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Bandhua Mukti Morcha v Union of India and Ors 1984 AIR 802

[1] A Asgeirsdottir, M.C. Steinwand, Dispute settlement mechanisms and maritime boundary settlement, Rev. Ind. Organ 10 (2015) 119-143

[1] Aceris Law, law of the sea dispute settlement mechanism, International Arbitration Attorney Network, (2015)

[1]ITLOS, 2012, Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal

[1] Haroon Habib, Bangladesh wins maritime dispute with India, The Hindu, July 9, 2014

[1] ICJ, 2021, Maritime Delimitation in the Indian ocean, Somalia v. Kenya

[1] ICJ, Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean sea and the Pacific ocean, 2018

[1] Sheldon Harris., Japanese biological warfare research on humans: a case study of microbiology and ethics, 666(1), Ann N Y Acad Sci ,21, 24-25 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb38021.x

[1] Seeley, T. D., Nowicke, J. W., Meselson, M., Guillemin, J., & Akratanakul, P, Yellow rain, 253(3), Scientific American,128-137 (1985) https://www.jstor.org/stable/24967794

[1] Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases and of Biological Methods of Warfare, 1925

[1] UN Digital Library, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/593995?ln=en (last visited March 28, 2022)

[1] UN Office for Disarmament Affairs, https://www.un.org/disarmament/news/bwc_2011/ (last visited March 28, 2022)

[1] UNODA Meetings Place, https://meetings.unoda.org/meeting/bwc-revcon-2016/ (last visited March 28, 2022)

[1] V. P. Menon, The Story of the Integration: of the Indian Princely States, (Calcutta 1956).

[1] Nafisur Rahaman Sufi, Kashmir's Bid for Freedom, (Muzaffarabad 1956, Publication of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government, 1956).

[1] Meher Chand Mahajan., Accession of Kashmir to India: The Inside Story, (Sholapur 1950).

[1] M. Zafrulla Khan, The Kashmir Dispute, (Karachi 1950).

[1] LOSING SIGHT IN KASHMIR – THE IMPACT OF PELLET-FIRING SHOTGUNS, Amnesty International, INDIA.

[1] John Cherian, International reaction to abrogation of Article 370: Muted response, FRONTLINE, Sep 27, 2019.

[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Nature of the Judicial Process 19 (Yale University, 1961).

[1] Cf. Pound, “Courts and Legislation” 226, 9 Modern Legal Philosophy Series.

[1] Right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A is a new addition under the right to life in the year 2002. The society felt the need to educate its children in order to make them more aware of the social change taking place around him or her. The way it was carried out was by law so as to make education a compulsory necessity for all children up to 14 years of age.

[1] A V Dicey, Lectures on the relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century 362 (1905).

[1] Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v. West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 All ER 98; Rainy Sky SA v. Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 W.L.R. 2900; Arnold v. Britton [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] A.C. 1619; Wood v. Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] A.C. 1173.

[1] Marks & Spencer Plc v. BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, [2016] A.C. 742.

[1] Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, [2017] A.C. 467.

[1] Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.

[1] Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v. Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] A.C. 465

[1] Hedley Byrne (Supra); Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605; Customs and Excise Commissioners v. Barclays Bank [2007] 1 AC 181.

[1] Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd v. Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd [1967] 1 A.C. 617.

[1] The Sale of Goods Act 1893 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland which regulated contracts in which goods are sold and bought. The whole of this Act, except for Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1980, subject to a number of savings. Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1982. The 1893 Act is still operative in Ireland, although it has been amended on a number of occasions since it came into force.

[1] Nichol v. Godts (1854) 10 Ex. 191, Jones v. Just (1867-68) L.R. 3 Q.B. 197, Mody v. Gregson (1868-69) L.R. 4 Ex. 49 and Drummond & Sons v. Van Ingen & Co (1887) 12 App. Cas 284.

[1] Anns v. Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728, 751 per Lord Wilberforce.

[1] Murphy v. Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398.

[1] Caparo Industries Plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605, Michael v. Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] UKSC 2, [2015] A.C. 1732; Robinson v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4; [2018] A.C. 736

[1] See, Lewis N Klar, Judicial Activism in Private law (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Review 251-240.

[1] Cox v. Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, [2016] A.C. 660.

[1] Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, [2015] A.C. 1430.

[1] Douglas and others v. Hello! Ltd and others (No 3) [2008] 1 A.C. 1; Campbell v. Mirror Group Newspapers [2004] 2 AC 457.

[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law 2 (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).

[1] Stare decisis is a Latin term meaning ‘to stand by decided cases.’

[1] Union of India v. Raghubir Singh (1989) 2 SCC 754; Purbanchal Cables v. Assam Electricity Board (2012) 7 SCC 462.

Covid – 19 Vis-A-Vis Labour Laws In India: Pro-Make In India Or Anti- Human Rights? (By Deboleena Dutta)

PRIVACY OF RAPE VICTIMS: INADEQUATE PROTECTION FROM THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Authored By SHERIN FARHANA EV & M Shamima Parveen (Assistant Professor)

Metaverse Gaming And Its Legal Aspects (By Krishna K.G)

Maritime Boundary disputes and its impact among the neighboring states (By Srividya.S)

Rights and Liabilities of Mortgager and Mortgagee (By Falgu Mukati)

Biological Weapons: The past, the present and the future (By Samayeta Bal)

Tussle Between Copyright And Education In India (By Trishla Parihar)

"The Amnesias of International Law in Kashmir Conflict: Perspectives & Narratives" (By Jeezan Riyaz)

Reforms In The Indian Banking System (By Sruthi. S & Theertha.K)

“Relevancy of Judge made Laws in Legal Research” (By Miss. Gopa Chandra Mandal)

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation