PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY V. CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY BY - TEJAS JOSHI

Authors: TEJAS JOSHI

Registration ID: 101975 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1975

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tejas14402@gmail.com

Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN IN CUSTOMER GRIEVANCE REDRESS - INDIAN SCENARIO BY - DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE

Authors: DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE
Registration ID: 101974 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1974
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India
Email Id: drdprane@gmail.com
Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link:

MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS TO WIVES, CHILDREN, AND PARENTS IN INDIA: A STUDY THROUGH LANDMARK CASES BY - MEEMANSHA DAYAL

Authors: MEEMANSHA DAYAL

Registration ID: 101973 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1973

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: meemanshadayal@gmail.com

Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

“HINDU ORIGIN AND PERSPECTIVE: INDIAN CONTEXT” BY - DR. PUSHPA MEHDOO

Authors: DR. PUSHPA MEHDOO

Registration ID: 101972 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1972

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: adv.rajendra1990@gmail.com

Page No :19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

PLEA BARGAINING: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS FUNCTION, IMPACT, AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. BY: - SAKSHI MISHRA

Authors: SAKSHI MISHRA

Registration ID: 101971 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1971

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sakshimishra527@gmail.com

Page No :23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

LEGAL ASPECTS OF ANIMAL TESTING UNDER CLINICAL TRIALS BY - AISHWARYA PRABHU

Authors: AISHWARYA PRABHU

Registration ID: 101970 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1970

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aishwaryaprabhu14@gmail.com

Page No :14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

DWARKINS THEORY OF MORAL INTEGRITY OF LAW BY - PARASA TANMAYEE

Authors: PARASA TANMAYEE

Registration ID: 101969 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1969

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tanmayee.parasa@dsnlu.ac.in

Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

RULE OF LAW: A DETAILED ANALYSIS BY - HIMANSHU

Authors: HIMANSHU

Registration ID: 101968 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1968

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: HIMANSHU.SHARMA9519@GMAIL.COM

Page No :16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE BY - DR. NAMRATA GUPTA

Authors: DR. NAMRATA GUPTA

Registration ID: 101967 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1967

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: namrata.allu@gmail.com

Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

RESEARCH ON INDIAN PRISON PROBLEM: A LEGAL ANALYSIS BY – TEKCHAND

Authors: TEKCHAND

Registration ID: 101966 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1966

Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: tekchand912@gmail.com

Page No :17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link:

[4] A V Dicey, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (first published 1885), 10th ed., 1959, London: Macmillan, pp 39–40

[6] Sovereignty, Supremacy and the Origins of the English Civil War, D Alan Orr, Introduction.

[8] The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution, Jutta Limbach, Pg. 1

[9] United States Constitution, created Sept. 17, 1787

[12] The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty by T.R.S. Allen, Oxford University Press.

[13] Act of Settlement of 1700, citation- 12 and 13 Will 3 c. 2

[14] Origins in various Indian, Greek, and Roman documents. Also propounded in Magna Carta

[15] 77 Eng. Rep. 638, Thomas Bonham v College of Physicians

[16] Pollard, David (2007) ISBN:978-0-19-928637-9.

[17] California Law Review, Courts and the Executive in Wartime: A Comparative Study of the American and British Approaches to the Internment of Citizens during World War II and Their Lessons for Today, Amanda L. Tyler, dated June 2019

[19] Judicial Review & Parliamentary Supremacy by David Collins, Duke University.

[20] 1998 c. 42, Passed as envisaged by EU Convention on Human Rights.

[22] The Super The Supervisory Power of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court by Amy Coney Barrett, Notre Dame Law School.

[24] As incoming President Jefferson was his political rival.

[26] A Preference for Deference? The Supreme Court and Judicial Review by Robert M. Howard and Jeffrey A. Segal, Political Research Quarterly Vol. 57

[30] PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY VS. JUDICIAL SUPREMACY IN INDIA by D. C. Chauhan, The Indian Journal of Political Science, Vol.74

[35] Minerva Mills v UOI, AIR 1980 SC 1789, Supreme Court of India.

[37] Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, 1967 AIR 1643, Supreme Court of India.

[38] Anti- Corruption Litigation In Supreme Court of India by Arghya Sengupta,2006

[40] K.S. Puttaswamy v UOI, (2017) 10 SCC 1, Supreme Court of India

[1] Introduction to Clinical Trials – What are they? What Happens? Who is Involved? https://genesisresearchservices.com/introduction-to-clinical-trials-what-are-they-what-happens-who-is-involved/, last seen on 02/12/2022.

[2] About Animal testing, Humane Society International, https://www.hsi.org/news-media/about/.

[3] Pikee Saxena and Rohit Saxena, Clinical trials: Changing Regulations in India, National Library of Medicine, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215498/, last seen on 02/12/2022.

[4] S. Bhambri & Associates, https://www.sbhambriadvocates.com/post/a-critical-study-on-clinical-trials-and-rights-of-animals, last seen 02/12/2022.

[5] Safety Testing, Science, Medicine, and Animals, National Academic Press, Washington, DC, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10733/chapter/10.

[6]By Beonchip, Animal-free testig, History of animal experimentation and animal rights, Jun 8, 2021, https://beonchip.com/animal-rights-history, last seen on 03/12/2022.

[7] Experimentation of cosmetics and household products, Animals Ethics, https://www.animal-ethics.org/experimentation-cosmetics-household-products/, last seen on 03/12/2022.

[8] Draft Prevention of Cruelty to Animal (Amendment) Bill-2022, 24 Nov 2022, https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/draft-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animal-amendment-bill 2022#:~:text=Recently%2C%20the%20Government%20has%20introduced,Fisheries%2C%20Animal%20Husbandry%20and%20Dairying. last seen on 03/12/2022.

[9] Draft for amendment to Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act ready, public comments sought: 3-year jail for gruesome cruelty, 5 for killing, Updated on November 24, 2022, The Free Press Journal, https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/draft-for-amendment-to-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animal-act-ready-public-comments-sought-3-year-jail-for-gruesome-cruelty-5-for-killing , last seen on 03/12/2022.

[10]Animals are not ours, Peta, https://www.peta.org/about-peta/learn-about-peta/, last seen on 03/12/2022.

[11] Cosmetics Testing Ban on Animals Now Permanent, May 24,2014, Peta, https://www.petaindia.com/blog/cosmetics-testing-banned-on-animals/.

[12] Regarding CPCSEA Guidelines, Chapter on Animal Welfare, https://www.pci.nic.in/pdf/15.pdf.

[13]Ambika Hiranandani, Animal rights: Legislation is not enough, September 3, 2019, idr, https://idronline.org/animal-rights-legislation-is-not-enough/.

[14] History of Animal Testing in new PETA Exhibit, ‘Without Consent’, PETA, https://withoutconsent.peta.org/, last seen on 03/12/2022.

[16] Kakoli8 Nath, Landmark Cases and Laws, Finology Blog, https://blog.finology.in/Legal-news/animal-rights-india, last seen on 03/12/2022.

[18] Jis John Sebastian, Protection of Animals: Important Laws in India, last updated on September 24, 2022, ClearIAS, https://www.clearias.com/protection-of-animals/.

[1] Jonathan Crowe, Dworkin on the value of integrity, 96 31 (2004).

[3] Albert Calsamiglia, Dworkin and the Focus on Integrity, 80 Arch. Philos. Law Soc. Philos. 52 (1994).

[5] John Elkington, Integrity and universality?:A comment on Ronald Dworkin’s Freedom Laws, 65 Fordham Law Rev. (1997).

[6] Andrei Marmor, Integrity in Law’s empire, 422 (2019).

[7] Raymond Wacks, Dworkin and moral integrity of law , in Understanding jurisprudence An introduction to legal theory 118 (3 ed. 2012).

[10] John D. Inazu, The limits of integrity, 75 law Contemp. 181 (2012).

[1] David Takacs, ‘THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE, ENVIRONMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THE FUTURE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY’ [2008].

[4] Illinois Central Railroad vs. Illinois [1892], 146 US 387.

[5] Joseph L. Sax, ‘The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention’ [1970].

[6] M.S. Vani, Community Engagement in Water Governance in Water And The Laws In India,

167, 188 (2009).

[8] T.N. Narasimhan, Water Law for India: Science and Philosophy Perspectives in Water And

The Laws In India 535, 555 (1st ed., 2009).

[9] Kamala Sankaran, Water in India: Constitutional Perspectives in Water And The Laws In

India, 17, 24.

[11] David Takacs, The Public Trust Doctrine, Environmental Human Rights and the Future of Private Property,717 New York University Environmental Law Journal(2008)

[12] Joseph L. Sax, The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention,68 Michigan Law Rev. 477 (1970).

[14] Rural Litig. & Entitlement Kendra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, A.I.R. 1985 S.C. 652, 656.

[15] Attakoya Thangal vs Union of India, A.I.R. 1990 K.L.T. 580.

[16] M.C Mehta vs Kamalnath [1997], 1 S.C.C. 388.

[17] 18 M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1 SCC 388.

19 Id.

20 Id.

21 Id

[18] M.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu [1999], S.C.C. 464.

[19] Shailesh R. Shah v. State of Gujarat, 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 164 : (2002) 43 (3) GLR 2295.

[20] 22 M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. v. Radhey Shyam Sahu, (1999) 6 SCC 464.

23 Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd. v. Minguel Martins, (2009) 3 SCC 571.

24 Id.,32.

25 Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. v. Reliance Industries Ltd., (2010) 7 SCC 1. 26 The Constitution of India, Art. 297 (‘Things of value within territorial waters or continental shelf and resources of the exclusive economic zone to vest in the Union’. In the given case Art. 297 (1) was interpreted which states that. “(1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.” Here ‘vest in the Union’ was interpreted to mean that the Central Government held the natural resources as a trustee on behalf of the people at large and the right and responsibilities of such trusteeship could not be abdicated in favour of private corporate interests)

[21] 27 Shailesh R. Shah v. State of Gujarat, 2002 SCC OnLine Guj 164 : (2002) 43 (3) GLR 2295.

28 B.M.Gandhi, Equity, Trusts And Specific Relief13, 208-209 (2001).

29 Ramaswamy R. Iyer, Why a National Water Framework Law, The Hindu (Chennai) January 7, 2013.

30 Id. 31 Planning Commission, The Draft National Water Framework Act, available at http://www. planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/wr/wg_wtr_frame.pdf (Last visited on August 15, 2015). 32 Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, Report of the Committee for the Drafting of National Water Framework Law, 2013, available at http://www.indiaenvironmentportal. org.in/files/file/national%20water%20framework%20law.pdf (Last visited on August 15, 2015). 33 The Constitution of India, Schedule VII, List II, Entry 17. 34 The Constitution of India, Schedule VII, List I, Entry 5. 35 The Constitution of India, Art. 252(1) (‘Power of Parliament to legislate for two or more States by consent and adoption of such legislation by any other State’ states that ‘(1) I it appears to the Legislatures of two or more States to be desirable that any of the matters with respect to which Parliament has no power to make laws or the States except as provided in Articles 249 and 250 should be regulated in such States by Parliament by law, and if resolutions to that effect are passed by all the House of the Legislatures of those States, it shall be lawful for Parliament to pass an Act for regulating that matter accordingly, and any Act so passed shall apply to such States and to any other State by which it is adopted afterwards by resolution passed in that behalf by the House or, where there are two Houses by each of the Houses o the Legislature of that State). 36 The Alagh Bill, 2016, §1(2); The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 2.

[22] David Takacs, The Public Trust Doctrine, Environmental Human Rights and the Future of

Private Property,717 New York University Environmental Law Journal(2008)

39 The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 2 (“Common property resource” means a resource owned in common by a village or group or community, as distinguished from private ownership or ownership by the state). 40 The Alagh Bill, 2016, §2(xxiv); The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 2

The Iyer Bill, 2013, Part 5

[1] Sharma, P. D. (1998). Criminal Justice Administration. In P. D. Sharma, Criminal Justice Administration (p.145). Rajasthan: Rawat Publications

[2] Gosh, P. (n.d.). Share Your Essays. Retrieved April 29, 2021, from www.shareyouressays.com: https://www.shareyouressays.com/essays/essay-on-modern-prison-system-in-india-599-words/121436

[3] Paranjape, N. V. (2017). Criminology,Penology,Victimology. Allahabad: Central Law Publications.

[4] DR. KURT NEUDEK, THE UNITED NATIONS IN IMPRISONMENT TODAY AND TOMORROW- INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON PRISONERS? RIGHTS AND PRISON CONDITIONS EDS., DIRK VAN ZYL SMIT AND FRIEDER DUNKEL; Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Deventer, Netherlands, (1st ed. 1991)

[5] Charles Shobraj vs. Superintendent, Tihar Jail, A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 1514.

[6] Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, A.I.R 1980 S.C. 1579.

[15] Sheela Barse vs State of Maharashtra, AIR 1983 SC 378.

[16] Sheela Barse vs State of Maharashtra, AIR 1983 SC 378.

[17] Dr.Mukesh Garg & Narshelata Singla, Rights of Women In Prisoners: An Evaluation, 1 IJARMSS 134, 142(2012).

[18] Bhusan, V. (1970). Prison Administration in India. Delhi : S Chand.

[19] The Mulla Committee submitted its report in1983

[20] In 1987, the Government of India appointed the Justice Krishna Iyer.

[21] M.H. Wadanrao Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1979) 1 S.C.R. 192.

[22] R. Rajagopal alias R.R. Gopal and Another v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others, (1994) 6 S.C.C. 632.

[23] DHARMBIR VS. STATE OF U.P., (1979) 3 S.C.C. 645. .

[24] JOGINDAR KUMAR VS. STATE OF U.P., A.I.R. 1994 S.C. 1349.

[25] MAHAMMAD GIASUDDIN V. STATE OF A.P., (1978) 1 S.C.R. 153.

[26] PEOPLE'S UNION FOR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS V. UNION OF INDIA, (1982) 3 S.C.C. 235.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY V. CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY BY - TEJAS JOSHI

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN IN CUSTOMER GRIEVANCE REDRESS - INDIAN SCENARIO BY - DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE

Authors: DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE
Registration ID: 101974 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1974
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India
Email Id: drdprane@gmail.com
Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link:

MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS TO WIVES, CHILDREN, AND PARENTS IN INDIA: A STUDY THROUGH LANDMARK CASES BY - MEEMANSHA DAYAL

“HINDU ORIGIN AND PERSPECTIVE: INDIAN CONTEXT” BY - DR. PUSHPA MEHDOO

PLEA BARGAINING: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS FUNCTION, IMPACT, AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. BY: - SAKSHI MISHRA

LEGAL ASPECTS OF ANIMAL TESTING UNDER CLINICAL TRIALS BY - AISHWARYA PRABHU

DWARKINS THEORY OF MORAL INTEGRITY OF LAW BY - PARASA TANMAYEE

RULE OF LAW: A DETAILED ANALYSIS BY - HIMANSHU

PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE BY - DR. NAMRATA GUPTA

RESEARCH ON INDIAN PRISON PROBLEM: A LEGAL ANALYSIS BY – TEKCHAND

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY V. CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY BY - TEJAS JOSHI

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN IN CUSTOMER GRIEVANCE REDRESS - INDIAN SCENARIO BY - DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE

Authors: DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANERegistration ID: 101974 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1974Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India Email Id: drdprane@gmail.comPage No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065Doi Link:

MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS TO WIVES, CHILDREN, AND PARENTS IN INDIA: A STUDY THROUGH LANDMARK CASES BY - MEEMANSHA DAYAL

“HINDU ORIGIN AND PERSPECTIVE: INDIAN CONTEXT” BY - DR. PUSHPA MEHDOO

PLEA BARGAINING: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS FUNCTION, IMPACT, AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS. BY: - SAKSHI MISHRA

LEGAL ASPECTS OF ANIMAL TESTING UNDER CLINICAL TRIALS BY - AISHWARYA PRABHU

DWARKINS THEORY OF MORAL INTEGRITY OF LAW BY - PARASA TANMAYEE

RULE OF LAW: A DETAILED ANALYSIS BY - HIMANSHU

PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE BY - DR. NAMRATA GUPTA

RESEARCH ON INDIAN PRISON PROBLEM: A LEGAL ANALYSIS BY – TEKCHAND

Citation

[17] California Law Review, Courts and the Executive in Wartime: A Comparative Study of the American and British Approaches to the Internment of Citizens during World War II and Their Lessons for Today, Amanda L. Tyler, dated June 2019

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2

Authors: DATTATRAYA PANDURANG RANE
Registration ID: 101974 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1974
Year : April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India
Email Id: drdprane@gmail.com
Page No :13 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: