[4]Adve, Nagraj, and Harish Dhawan. “Suppression of Dissent.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 43, no. 2, 2008, pp. 4–4. JSTOR,www.jstor.org/stable/40276886.
[5]SINGH, ANUSHKA. “Criminalising Dissent: Consequences of UAPA.” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 47, no. 38, 2012, pp.14–18.JSTOR,www.jstor.org/stable/41720156.
[6]South Asia Human RIghts Documentation Centre, and Ravi Nair. “The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act 2008:RepeatingPastMistakes.”EconomicandPoliticalWeekly,vol.44,no.4,2009,pp.10–14.JSTOR,www.jstor.org/stable/40278825.
[8] B D, 'Judicial Analysis Of The Constitutional And Procedural Safeguards Against Arbitrary Arrest And Detention' (2013) 2 ChristUniversityLawJournal
[7]Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177
[8](The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd, [2013] UKSC 18)
[9]Irini A. Stamatoudi, ‘Text and Data Mining’, in Irini A. Stamatoudi (ed.), New Developments in EU and International Copyright Law (Wolters Kluwer, 2016) 262
[11]Lucie M.C.R. Guibault, Copyright Limitations and Contracts: An Analysis of the Contractual Overridability of Limitations on Copyright (Kluwer Law International, 2002) 224-225
[13]Copyright Act of 9 September 1965 (Federal Law Gazette I, p. 1273), as last amended by Article 1 of the Act of 1 September 2017 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 3346), art. 60d
Citation
Citation
[1] Research Scholar (B.E., M.A., M.L.), Sunrise University, Alwar (Rajasthan)
[2] Supervisor(LL.B, LL.M., Ph.D in Law), Sunrise University, Alwar (Rajasthan)
[3]S.S.Peloubet, A Collection of Legal Maxims in Law and Equity, George S. Diossy, New York, 1880, Page 124, Line No.1005.
[4]S.S.Peloubet, A Collection of Legal Maxims in Law and Equity, George S. Diossy, New York, 1880, Page 124, Line No.1005.
[5]‘Res inter alios acta alterinocere non debet’, ‘things done between strangers ought not to injure those who are not parties to it’ ,S.S.Peloubet, A Collection of Legal Maxims in Law and Equity, George S. Diossy, New York, 1880, Page 265, Line No.2203
[6]Inserted by the Constitution (forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, S.46(w.e.f. 03-01-1977)
[4]Ayushi Dubey and Yash Jain, Interim Relief against Third Parties under the Arbitration Act: A Never-Ending Saga, IndiaCorpLaw (2021), https://indiacorplaw.in/2021/10/interim-relief-against-third-parties-under-the-arbitration-act-a-never-ending-saga.html (last visited Apr 22, 2022).
[6]Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India, AIR 1999 SC 565. See alsoAshok Traders v. Gurumukh Das Saluja, AIR 2004 SC 1433.
[7]Vidya Securities Ltd. v. Comfort Living Hotels P. Ltd., AIR 2003 Delhi 214. See also Agajit Jaiswal v. Karmajit Singh Jaiswal, (2007) 4 Arb LR 300.
[8]Nishith Desai Associates, Interim Reliefs in Arbitral Proceedings Powerplay between Courts and Tribunals, January 2020, 14.
[9]Dr. PC Markanda, Law relating to Arbitration and Conciliation, 319(LexisNexis eBook, 9th ed.).
[10]Adhunik Steels Ltd. v. Orissa Manganese and Minerals Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2007 SC 256.
[11]Arvind Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Kalinga Mining Corpn, AIR 2007 SC 2144. See also Shree Ram Mills Ltd. v. Kalpataru Construction Overseas Pvt. Ltd., (2006) 1 Arb LR 229.
[22]Benara Bearings & Pistons Ltd. v. Mahle Engine Components India Pvt. Ltd., 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7226.
[23]Sharad Bansal, The Standard of Review of Interim Orders of an Arbitral Tribunal Seated in India: A Significant Step Towards Certainty, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (2018), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/11/21/the-standard-of-review-of-interim-orders-of-an-arbitral-tribunal-seated-in-india-a-significant-step-towards-certainty/ (last visited Apr 21, 2022).