INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF INTER-CASTE MARRIAGE AND ITS POSITIVE IMPACT ON SOCIETY BY - Mr. Karna Singh, Mr. Sailya Singh & Mr. Srinivas Puala

Authors : Mr. Karna Singh, Mr. Sailya Singh & Mr. Srinivas Puala

Registration ID : 106253 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6263, IJLRA6264 & IJLRA6265

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : tkaran4u358@gmail.com, arjunbabu93@gmail.com & pualamlis2011@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-75444723/THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF INTER-CASTE MARRIAGE AND

"CLASHING SOVEREIGNTIES: UNRAVELING THE DOCTRINE OF REPUGNANCY IN THE INDIAN FEDERAL SYSTEM" BY - VAISHALI YADAV

Authors : VAISHALI YADAV

Registration ID : 106262 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6262

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : vaishaliyadav2086@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-83356571/"CLASHING SOVEREIGNTIES: UNRAVELING THE DOCTRINE O

GENETICS, GENESIS, THE BIBLE & BEHAVIOR: PERSPECTIVES ON CRIMINALITY BY: ISHAAN DEEPAK JOSHI

Authors : ISHAAN DEEPAK JOSHI

Registration ID : 106261 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6261

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : ishaanjoshi2k@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-15682873/GENETICS, GENESIS, THE BIBLE & BEHAVIOR: PERSPECTI

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE OF DEEPFAKES IN INDIA: PUNISHMENTS AND PROTECTIONS BY - SHYAMASIS SARANGI & NIDHI SHARMA

Authors : SHYAMASIS SARANGI & NIDHI SHARMA

Registration ID : 106259 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6259 & IJLRA6260

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : shyamasis.sarangi193@nmims.edu.in & sharma.nidhi187@nmims.edu.in

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-32539467/NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE OF DEEPFAKES IN IND

UNDERSTANDING TRIBALS IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCENARIO: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE BY - YASHRAJ SINGH PARIHAR

Authors : YASHRAJ SINGH PARIHAR

Registration ID : 106258 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6258

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : yashraj.nliu@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-25651294/UNDERSTANDING TRIBALS IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONA

ANALYSIS OF CIRCULAR TRADING IN FRAUDULENT AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES RELATED TO SECURITIES MARKETS IN INDIA AND A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH UNITED STATES BY - NALINI R

Authors : NALINI R

Registration ID : 106257 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6257

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : nalinilaw2017@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-78492933/ANALYSIS OF CIRCULAR TRADING IN FRAUDULENT AND UNF

INDIA ASPIRATION TO BE PERMANENT MEMBER UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL. BY - AKASH KUMAR

Authors : AKASH KUMAR

Registration ID : 106256 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6256

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : imtheakashkrsingh@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-27249415/INDIA ASPIRATION TO BE PERMANENT MEMBER UNITED NAT

UNCHAINING JUSTICE: BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGYS PIONEERING ROLE IN INDIAN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR & TANVI BRIJESH SONAWANE

Authors : MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR & TANVI BRIJESH SONAWANE

Registration ID : 106254 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6254 & IJLRA6255

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : pimparkarmrunmai@gmail.com & tanvi.sonawane@gmail.com

Page No : 39 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-56892358/UNCHAINING JUSTICE: BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGYS PIONEER

LIFE SENTENCES WITHOUT PAROLE AND PROPORTIONALITY: EVALUATING THE ETHICAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS BY - TANYA MITTAL

Authors : TANYA MITTAL

Registration ID : 106253 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6253

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : tanyamittal5857@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-18368129/LIFE SENTENCES WITHOUT PAROLE AND PROPORTIONALITY:

UNRAVELING THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN INDIA BY - RADHA RANJAN

Authors : RADHA RANJAN

Registration ID : 106252 Published Paper ID: IJLRA6252

Year : Nov -2023 | Volume : II | Issue : 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id : radharanjan.upsc@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

Doi Link : https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2023-72891755/UNRAVELING THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN

[2] M. Karunanidhi vs Union of India 1979 SCR(3) 254

[3] Deep Chand Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1959] SC 3

[4] National Engg. Industries Ltd. v. Shri Kishan Bhageria 1988 AIR 329, 1988 SCR (1) 985

[5] Security Association of India v. Union of India AIR 2014 SC 3812

[6] Sorens, J. (2013). Federalism. In International Encyclopedia of Political Science (pp. 755-758). SAGE Publications, Inc.

[7] Watts, R. L. (2014). Comparing Federal Systems (4th ed.). McGill-Queen's University Press

^{^[8]} Elazar, D. J. (1995). Federalism as an Integrative Mechanism for National Integration. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(2), 1-14.

^{^[9]}Kincaid, J. (2006). Federalism. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, 202-221.

^{^[10]} Rodden, J. (2011). The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 219-236.

^{^[11]} Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Dryden Press.

[12] R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India, AIR 1957 SC 628.

[13] Zaveri Bhai Amaidas vs State of Bombay AIR 1953 Bom 371, (1953) 55 BOMLR 387, ILR 1954 Bom 117

^{^[14]} Govt. of A.P. Vs J.B. Educational Society Appeal (Civil) 976-978 Of 1999

[15] State of Rajasthan v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 85

^{^[16]} Union of India v. H.S. Dhillon, (1972) 3 SCC 702.

[17] National Engg. Industries Ltd. v. Shri Kishan Bhageria 1988 AIR 329, 1988 SCR (1) 985

[18] Hanks, C. (2018). Repugnancy doctrine. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press.

[1] Chenxi Wang, ‘Deepfakes, Revenge Porn and the impact on women’ (Forbes, 1 November 2019) accessed 15 September 2020

[2] https://www.businesstoday.in/technology/news/story/rashmika-mandanna-deepfake-controversy-what-is-a-deepfake-video-and-how-can-you-spot-one-404734-2023-11-06?utm_source=btweb_story_share

[1] Joint Stakeholders’ submission on the Situation on rights of indigenous people in India, 3^rd Cycle of the Universal periodic Review (UPR) of India, 27 Session of Human Rights Council 1, 1 (2017).

[3] V. Xaxa, Tribes as Indigenous People of India, 34 Economic and Political Weekly 3589, 3589 (1999).

[6] A. Sengupta, On the Theory and Practice of the Right to Development, 24 Human Rights Quarterly 837, 839 (2002).

[8] https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/development (last visited on April 17, 2019).

[10] Hugo Slim, What Is Development?, 5 Development in Practice 143, 143 (1995).

[12] Gunnar Myrdal, What Is Development?, 8 Journal of Economic Issues 729, 729 (1974).

[14] A/RES/41/128, Declaration on the Right to Development, 4 December 1986 https://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/41/a41r128.html (last seen 26 October, 2021).

[15]J.K. Das, Human Rights and Indigenous People 51 (S.P. Nangia, A.P.H. Publishing Corporation 2001).

[16] S.N. Variava, New Direction in the Human Rights Movement, Human Rights Year Book, Universal Law Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. 13, 13 (2010).

[19] A. Sen, Development as Freedom (New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1999), at. 228.

[20] S. Kothari, Whose Nation? The Displaced as Victims of Development, 31 Economic and Political Weekly 1476, 1476 (1996).

[21] W. Fernandes, Singur and the Displacement Scenario, 42 Economic and Political Weekly 203, 203–04 (2007).

[22] State of Kerala v. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala State Unit, AIR 1998 SC 1703.

[24] Naramda Bachao Andolan-I Case, (2009) 8 SCC 46.

[1] Author is an Assistant Professor at School of Law, Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

[2] Regulation 4(n) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003

[3] Section 5, Federal Trade Commission Act, 1914 of the United States of America

[6] Section 15HA of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992

[7] https://scores.gov.in/

[8] Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act)

[3] Akash Kumar, GOLDEN JUBLEE OF COLLECTIVE APPROACH TOWARDS ENVIRONMENT, Volume V Issue II, Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, pg.1, pg. 1-8, 2022.

[1] IBM, ‘What is Blockchain technology?’, https://www.ibm.com/topics/blockchain

[2] What is ‘Block chain’, The Economic Times (14^th October, 2023), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/block-chain

[3] Julie Pinkerton, ‘The History of Bitcoin, the First Cryptocurrency’, (7 August, 2023), https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/the-history-of-bitcoin#:~:text=Bitcoin%20was%20the%20first%20cryptocurrency,identity%20has%20never%20been%20verified

[4] Vishal Gaur and Abhinav Gaiha, ‘Building a Transparent Supply Chain’, Harvard Business Review (May-June 2020), https://hbr.org/2020/05/building-a-transparent-supply-chain

[5] Rella, L. (2019), ‘Blockchain technologies and remittances: From financial inclusion to correspondent banking front Blockchain’, doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00014

[6]David Mhlanga, ‘Block chain technology for digital financial inclusion in the industry 4.0, towards sustainable development?’, Vol 6- 2023, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2023.1035405/full#B33 )

[7] IBM, ‘What are smart contracts on blockchain?’, https://www.ibm.com/topics/smart-contracts

[8] WIPO, ‘Blockchain technologies and IP ecosystems: A WIPO white paper’, [2022], https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/cws/en/pdf/blockchain-for-ip-ecosystem-whitepaper.pdf

[9] Niki Wiles, ‘The Radical Potential of Blockchain Technology’, 6-6-2015, https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/25/smart-contracts-and-blockchain-arbitration-smart-solutions-paving-the-way-for-a-better-dispute-resolution-mechanism/

[10] Mathew Niekerk, ‘How blockchain can help dismantle corruption in government services’, August 27, 2022, https://www.thepeninsula.org.in/2022/08/27/how-blockchain-can-help-dismantle-corruption-in-government-services/?print=print#:~:text=Projects%20integrating%20blockchain%20into%20procurement,several%20drawbacks%2C%20such%20as%20scalability

[11] Patrick Mutabazi, ‘Blockchain Based Land Registries - How Technology Can be Used For Land Registration’, 7 May, 2021, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/blockchain-based-land-registries-how-technology-can-mutabazi

[12] Qiuyun Shang, Allison Price, ‘A Blockchain-Based Land Titling Project in the Republic of Georgia: Rebuilding Public Trust and Lessons for Future Pilot Projects’, January 2019, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330069648_A_Blockchain-Based_Land_Titling_Project_in_the_Republic_of_Georgia_Rebuilding_Public_Trust_and_Lessons_for_Future_Pilot_Projects

[13] Niti Aayog, ‘Blockchain: The India Strategy, Arnab Kumar’, Tanay Mahindru, Punit Shukla and Aalekh Sharan, January 2020, https://punjab.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Blockchain_The_India_Strategy_Part_I.pdf

[14] MDPI, ‘Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing’, Gousia Habib, Sparsh Sharma, Sara Ibrahim, Imtiaz Ahmad, Shaima Qureshi, Malik Ishfaq, 21 November 2022, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/11/341

[15] Elsevier, ‘Blockchain-based recommender systems: Applications, challenges and future opportunities’, Yassine Himeur, Aya Sayed, Abdullah Alsalemi, Faycal Bensaali, Abbes Amira, Iraklis Varlamis, Magdalini Eirinaki, Christos Sardianos, George Dimitrakopoulos, Volume 43 February 2022, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574013721000769

[16] ‘Features of Blockchain’ 14 March 2023, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/features-of-blockchain/

[17] ‘Blockchain Forks’, 4 April 2023, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/blockchain-forks/

[18] IBM, ‘What is blockchain technology?’, https://www.ibm.com/topics/blockchain#:~:text=Blockchain%20is%20ideal%20for%20delivering,accounts%2C%20production%20and%20much%20more

[19] IBM, ‘What is blockchain technology?’, https://www.ibm.com/topics/blockchain#:~:text=Blockchain%20is%20ideal%20for%20delivering,accounts%2C%20production%20and%20much%20more

[20] MDPI, ‘Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing’, Gousia Habib, Sparsh Sharma, Sara Ibrahim, Imtiaz Ahmad, Shaima Qureshi, Malik Ishfaq, 21 November 2022, https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/11/341

[21] Parma Bains, Arif Ismail, Fabiana Melo, and Nobuyasu Sugimoto, ‘Regulating the Crypto Ecosystem: The Case of Stablecoins and Arrangements’, 26 September 2022, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/063/2022/008/article-A001-en.xml

[23] BIS, ‘Cryptocurrencies and Decentralized Finance’, Igor Makarov and Antoinette Schoar, December 2022, https://www.bis.org/publ/work1061.pdf

[26] Internet & Mobile Assn. of India v. RBI, (2020) 10 SCC 274

[28] Information Technology Act, 2000, § 2(1)(t)

[29] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 7

[30] Anu Shrivastava, ‘BCCI v. Kochi – (Un)tangled Issues?’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 16 October 2018, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/10/16/bcci-v-kochi-untangled-issues/

[31] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 33 & 34

[32] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 33

[33] Dena Givari, ‘How Does Arbitration Intersect with the Blockchain Technology that underlies Cryptocurrencies?’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, May 5 2018, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/05/05/scheduled-blockchain-arbitration-april-17-2018/

[34] Hamed Taherdoost, ‘Smart Contracts in Blockchain Technology: A Critical Review’, MDPI, 13 February 2023, https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/14/2/117

[35] IBM, ‘What are Smart Contracts on Blockchain?’, https://www.ibm.com/topics/smart-contracts#:~:text=Smart%20contracts%20are%20simply%20programs,intermediary's%20involvement%20or%20time%20loss; ‘Smart Contracts and Blockchain Arbitration: Smart Solutions Paving the Way for a Better Dispute Resolution Mechanism’, Hiroo Advani, Asif Lampwala and Ria Garg, 25 April 2022, https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/25/smart-contracts-and-blockchain-arbitration-smart-solutions-paving-the-way-for-a-better-dispute-resolution-mechanism/

[36] RBI 2017 Notification, https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=11243

[37] Dena Givari, ‘How Does Arbitration Intersect with the Blockchain Technology that underlies Cryptocurrencies?’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, May 5 2018, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/05/05/scheduled-blockchain-arbitration-april-17-2018/

[38] Laxmi Jagdish, ’ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND ITS ROLE IN COMPANIES’,25-04-2021, https://dejurenexus.com/alternative-dispute-resolution-and-its-role-in-companies/

[39] ‘What is Alternative Dispute Order?’, Times of India, 27 February 2023, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/lawpedia/what-is-alternative-dispute-order-50952/

[40] William H. Gill, Evidence and Procedure in Arbitration, 1 (1965), Justice R S Bachawat, Bachawat: Arbitration and Conciliation, 6^th edition (2017)

[41] C R Datta, Law of Arbitration & Conciliation, 7^th edition (2017)

[42] Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd. AIR 2001 SC 2293 [LNIND 2001 SC 1180]: (2001) 6 SCC 356 [LNIND 2001 SC 1180].

[43] UOI v Singh Builders Syndicate, (2009) 4 SCC 523 : (2009) 2 SCC (Civ) 246; NBCC Ltd v JG Engineers Pvt Ltd, (2010) 2 SCC 385 : AIR 2010 SC 640; NHAI v BSC-RBM-PATI (JV), 2018(4) RAJ 91 (Del)(DB)

[44] Dr P.C. Markanda: Law Relating to Arbitration and Conciliation, 10th edition [2020]

[45] Chief Engineer v Prakash Constructions, 2019(2) RAJ 694 (Mad).

[46] Thalia Kruger, ‘Can Blockchain Arbitration become a proper ‘International Arbitration’? Jurors vs. arbitrators’, 22 May 2022, https://conflictoflaws.net/2022/can-blockchain-arbitration-become-a-proper-international-arbitration-jurors-vs-arbitrators/

[47] Richard J. Gibbon, https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.squirepattonboggs.com/en/professionals/g/gibbon-richard__;!!LBn7KyCY!VrlTqeF46wdW5lQmjE2jt2_94LRpGhOehk_3NlF5GjnRsjtFPfvb2nIrWrpyPnloxKeD9gqPQiHEn8-Bl2ZEsXsqJ1aSULc$

[48] UK Digital Dispute Resolution Rules (Digital DR Rules), 2021.

[49] ‘Smart Contracts and Blockchain Arbitration: Smart Solutions Paving the Way for a Better Dispute Resolution Mechanism’, Hiroo Advani, Asif Lampwala and Ria Garg, 25 April 2022, https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/25/smart-contracts-and-blockchain-arbitration-smart-solutions-paving-the-way-for-a-better-dispute-resolution-mechanism/

[50] ‘Digital Dispute Resolution Rules – a new way of resolving tech disputes?’, 27 May 2021, https://www.dacbeachcroft.com/es/mx/articles/2021/may/digital-dispute-resolution-rules-a-new-way-of-resolving-tech-disputes/#:~:text=Automatic%20decisions%3A%20The%20Rules%20allow,in%20accordance%20with%20the%20Rules.

[51] ‘Smart Contracts and Blockchain Arbitration: Smart Solutions Paving the Way for a Better Dispute Resolution Mechanism’, Hiroo Advani, Asif Lampwala and Ria Garg, 25 April 2022, https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/25/smart-contracts-and-blockchain-arbitration-smart-solutions-paving-the-way-for-a-better-dispute-resolution-mechanism/

[52] Id; https://www.barandbench.com/news/fourth-edition-international-conference-on-arbitration-era-globalization

[53] Andrea Utasy Clark, ‘Cryptocurrency disputes increasingly referred to arbitration, with unique issues arising’, 27 September 2022, https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/cryptocurrency-disputes-increasingly-referred-to-arbitration-with-unique-issues-arising

[54] ‘Whitepaper Smart Derivatives Contracts: From Concept to Construction’, ISDA, October 2018, https://www.isda.org/a/cHvEE/Smart-Derivatives-Contracts-From-Concept-to-Construction-Oct-2018.pdf

[55] ‘Kleros Whitepaper’, Cl´ement Lesaege, Federico Ast, and William George, September 2019, https://kleros.io/whitepaper.pdf

[56] Maxime Chevalier, ‘From Smart Contract Litigation to Blockchain Arbitration, a New Decentralized Approach Leading Towards the Blockchain Arbitral Order’ [Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 12, issue 4, December 2021] 558 – 584 https://academic.oup.com/jids/articleabstract/12/4/558/6414874?redirectedFrom=PDF

[58] ‘An opt-in digital jurisdiction for DAOs and sovereign individuals’, 18 July 2018, https://github.com/aragon/whitepaper

[59] https://jur.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/jur-white-paper-v.3.0.0.pdf

[60] Darcy W.E. Allen, Aaron M. Lane & Marta Poblet, ‘The Governance of Blockchain Dispute Resolution’, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, vol. 25, issue 1, Fall 2019, 75-102

[61] Sharath Mulia and Romi Kumari, ‘Blockchain Arbitration: The Future of Dispute Resolution’, 23 November 2021, https://www.foxmandal.in/blockchain-arbitration-the-future-of-dispute-resolution/

[62] Maxime Chevalier, ‘From Smart Contract Litigation to Blockchain Arbitration, a New Decentralized Approach Leading Towards the Blockchain Arbitral Order’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Volume 12, Issue 4, December 2021, Pages 558–584, https://academic.oup.com/jids/article-abstract/12/4/558/6414874?redirectedFrom=PDF

[63] Ritika Bansal, ‘Enforceability of Awards from Blockchain Arbitrations in India’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, August 21, 2019, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/08/21/enforceability-of-awards-from-blockchain-arbitrations-in-india/

[64] ‘A Look at the Use of Blockchain Technology in the Arbitration Process’, 19 May 2023, https://www.concordlawschool.edu/blog/news/blockchain-arbitration/

[65] Joe Tirado, ‘Lex Cryptographia: Guidelines for ensuring due process in transnational blockchain-based arbitration’, 4 March 2022, https://www.ibanet.org/lex-cryptographia-due-process-blockchain-based-arbitration

[66] A Look at the Use of Blockchain Technology in the Arbitration Process’, 19 May 2023, https://www.concordlawschool.edu/blog/news/blockchain-arbitration/

[67] ‘Smart Contracts and Blockchain Arbitration: Smart Solutions Paving the Way for a Better Dispute Resolution Mechanism’, Hiroo Advani, Asif Lampwala and Ria Garg, 25 April 2022, https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/25/smart-contracts-and-blockchain-arbitration-smart-solutions-paving-the-way-for-a-better-dispute-resolution-mechanism/

[68] Sharath Mulia and Romi Kumari, ‘Blockchain Arbitration: The Future of Dispute Resolution’, 23 November 2021, https://www.foxmandal.in/blockchain-arbitration-the-future-of-dispute-resolution/

[69] A Look at the Use of Blockchain Technology in the Arbitration Process’, 19 May 2023, https://www.concordlawschool.edu/blog/news/blockchain-arbitration/

[71] A Look at the Use of Blockchain Technology in the Arbitration Process’, 19 May 2023, https://www.concordlawschool.edu/blog/news/blockchain-arbitration/

[72] Thalia Kruger, ‘Can Blockchain Arbitration become a proper ‘International Arbitration’? Jurors vs. arbitrators’, 22 May 2022, https://conflictoflaws.net/2022/can-blockchain-arbitration-become-a-proper-international-arbitration-jurors-vs-arbitrators/

[73] Rana Sajjad Ahmad, ‘Blockchain Arbitration: Promises and Perils’, The American Review of International Arbitration, March 23, 2023, https://aria.law.columbia.edu/blockchain-arbitration-promises-and-perils/

[74] Cemre Kadioglu Kumtepe, ‘A Brief Introduction to Blockchain Dispute Resolution’, John Marshall Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2021, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4083107

[75] World Economic Forum, Bridging the Governance Gap: Dispute resolution for blockchain-based transactions, Whitepaper December 2020, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_WP_Dispute_Resolution_for_Blockchain_2020.pdf

[76] Sharath Mulia and Romi Kumari, ‘Blockchain Arbitration: The Future of Dispute Resolution’, 23 November 2021, https://www.foxmandal.in/blockchain-arbitration-the-future-of-dispute-resolution/

[77] Cemre Kadioglu Kumtepe, ‘A Brief Introduction to Blockchain Dispute Resolution’, John Marshall Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2021, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4083107

[78] Alan Ma, ‘Blockchain-Enabled Smart Legal Contracts’, 26 July 2022, https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/86570

[79] Rabindra Kumar Mitra, ‘Blockchain Technology: Importance of Transnational Laws and Jurisdictional Issues in Blockchain Dispute Resolution’, https://rmlnlulawreview.com/2019/02/26/blockchain-technology-importance-of-transnational-laws-and-jurisdictional-issues-in-blockchain-dispute-resolution/

[80] Jelena Madir, ‘Smart Contracts: (How) Do They Fit Under Existing Legal Frameworks?’, 17 December 2018, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3301463

[81] Stuart D. Levi and Alex B. Lipton, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, ‘An Introduction to Smart Contracts and Their Potential and Inherent Limitations’, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, 26 May 2018, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/05/26/an-introduction-to-smart-contracts-and-their-potential-and-inherent-limitations/

[82] Jason Healey and Anni Piiparinen, ‘Did China Just Hack the International Court Adjudicating Its South China Sea Territorial Claims?’, The Diplomat, October 27, 2015, https://thediplomat.com/2015/10/did-china-just-hack-the-international-court-adjudicating-its-south-china-sea-territorial-claims/

[83] THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES And THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, The South China Sea Arbitration

Award of 12 July 2016, https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Award.pdf

[84] World Economic Forum Survey Report, ‘Deep Shift Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact’, September 2015, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf

[85] https://www.foxmandal.in/expertise/technology-law/

[86] Emmanuelle Ganne, Can Blockchain Revolutionize international trade?, WTO, https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/blockchainrev18_e.pdf

[87] UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment 1996 with additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998, https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-04970_ebook.pdf

[88] United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/06-57452_ebook.pdf

[89] Nevena Jevremovi?, ‘2018 In Review: Blockchain Technology and Arbitration’, January 27, 2019, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/01/27/2018-in-review-blockchain-technology-and-arbitration/

[90] General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, https://gdpr-info.eu/

[91] Claudio Lima, Blockchain-GDPR Privacy by Design, How Decentralized Blockchain Internet will Comply with GDPR Data Privacy, https://blockchain.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/blockchain-gdpr-privacy-by-design.pdf

[92] LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF BLOCKCHAINS AND SMART CONTRACTS, report prepared by

THE EUROPEAN UNION BLOCKCHAIN OBSERVATORY AND FORUM, https://www.eublockchainforum.eu/sites/default/files/reports/report_legal_v1.0.pdf

[93] United Nations, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf

[94] Information Technology Act, 2000, § 5 and 10

[95] The Indian Evidence Act, 1872; The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 7(4)(a) and 8

[96] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 7

[97] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 3; United Nations, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf

[98] Aseem Chaturvedi and Trishala Trivedi, ‘India: The Blockchain Arbitral Order: An Indian Perspective’, 16 June 2023, https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration--dispute-resolution/1330488/the-blockchain-arbitral-order-an-indian-perspective

[99] United Nations, Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf

[100] Kleros official website, https://kleros.io/

[101] Nathaniel Popper, New York Times, Ethereum, a Virtual Currency, Enables Transactions That Rival Bitcoin’s, March 27, 2016

[102] Yannick Gabuthy, Blockchain-Based Dispute Resolution: Insights and Challenges, https://doi.org/10.3390/g14030034

[103] Pranay Modi, Kleros: is crypto-based dispute resolution the future?, https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/blog/kleros-is-crypto-based-dispute-resolution-the-future/

[104] Larry A. DiMatteo, André Janssen, Pietro Ortolani, Francisco de Elizalde, Michel Cannarsa, Mateja Durovic, Cambridge University Press, Lawyering in the Digital Age, 18 November 2021

[105] Mauricio Virues, How to Enforce Blockchain Dispute Resolution in Court? The Kleros Case in Mexico, 10 January, 2022, https://blog.kleros.io/how-to-enforce-blockchain-dispute-resolution-in-court-the-kleros-case-in-mexico/

[107] Cl´ement Lesaege, Federico Ast, and William George, Kleros Whitepaper, September 2019, https://kleros.io/whitepaper.pdf

[108] Kleros FAQ, https://docs.kleros.io/kleros-faq

[109] Alesia Zhuk, Applying blockchain to the modern legal system: Kleros as a decentralised dispute resolution system, International Cybersecurity Law Review, 12 April 2023

[110] William George, Kleros and the Advantages and Limitations of Crypto economics, Nov 2, 2021, https://blog.kleros.io/kleros-and-the-advantages-and-limitations-of-cryptoeconomics/

[111] Luis Bergolla, Karen Seif, Can Eken, Kleros: A Socio-Legal Case Study Of Decentralized Justice & Blockchain Arbitration, https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-08/10-%20BERGOLLA%2055-98.pdf, 2022

[112] William George, Kleros and the Advantages and Limitations of Crypto economics, Nov 2, 2021, https://blog.kleros.io/kleros-and-the-advantages-and-limitations-of-cryptoeconomics/

[113] Cl´ement Lesaege, Federico Ast, and William George, Kleros Whitepaper, September 2019, https://kleros.io/whitepaper.pdf

[114] Yannick Gabuthy, Blockchain-Based Dispute Resolution: Insights and Challenges, MDPI, 28 April 2023, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/14/3/34

[115] Aseem Chaturvedi and Trishala Trivedi, ‘India: The Blockchain Arbitral Order: An Indian Perspective’, 16 June 2023, https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration--dispute-resolution/1330488/the-blockchain-arbitral-order-an-indian-perspective

[116] Luis Bergolla, Karen Seif, Can Eken, Kleros: A Socio-Legal Case Study Of Decentralized Justice & Blockchain Arbitration, https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/sites/default/files/2022-08/10-%20BERGOLLA%2055-98.pdf, 2022

[117] Blockchain Arbitration in India: Adopting the Hybrid Model Envisaged by Mexican ‘Kleros’ Case, Raghav Saha, Harshit Upadhyay, June 14, 2022

[118] Ritika Bansal, ‘Enforceability of Awards from Blockchain Arbitrations in India’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, Auguast 21, 2019, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/08/21/enforceability-of-awards-from-blockchain-arbitrations-in-india/

[119] Aseem Chaturvedi and Trishala Trivedi, ‘India: The Blockchain Arbitral Order: An Indian Perspective’, 16 June 2023, https://www.mondaq.com/india/arbitration--dispute-resolution/1330488/the-blockchain-arbitral-order-an-indian-perspective

[120] Teramura, Nobumichi, Ex Aequo et Bono as a Response to the ‘Over-Judicialisation’

of International Commercial Arbitration, 2018, https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/20865

[121] Maxime Chevalier, Arbitration Tech Toolbox: Is a Mexican Court Decision the First Stone to Bridging the Blockchain Arbitral Order with National Legal Orders, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, March 4, 2022, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/03/04/arbitration-tech-toolbox-is-a-mexican-court-decision-the-first-stone-to-bridging-the-blockchain-arbitral-order-with-national-legal-orders/

[122]Transocean Shipping Agency (P) Ltd. v. Black Sea Shipping, (1998) 2 SCC 281

[123] Ritika Bansal, Enforceability of Awards from Blockchain Arbitrations in India, August 21, 2019, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/08/21/enforceability-of-awards-from-blockchain-arbitrations-in-india/#:~:text=In%20blockchain%20arbitration%2C%20arbitrators%20are,service%20providers%20with%20their%20expertise.

[124] Despoina Kottaridou, The use of arbitration for the resolution of disputes arising from the use of blockchain technology, February, 2023, https://repository.ihu.edu.gr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11544/30149/THE%20USE%20OF%20ARBITRATION%20FOR%20THE%20RESOLUTION%20OF%20DISPUTES%20ARISING%20FROM%20THE%20USE%20OF%20BLOCKCHAIN%20TECHNOLOGY.pdf?sequence=1

[125] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 36 & § 48

[126] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 47

[127] Cemre Kadioglu Kumtepe, A Brief Introduction to Blockchain Dispute Resolution, John Marshall Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2021, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4083107

[128] Ritika Bansal, ‘Enforceability of Awards from Blockchain Arbitrations in India’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, August 21, 2019, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/08/21/enforceability-of-awards-from-blockchain-arbitrations-in-india/

[129] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 36

[131] Sanjeev K Kapoor and Saman Ahsan, Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards: India, Global Arbitration Review, 24th July 2023, https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/challenging-and-enforcing-arbitration-awards/report/india

[132] Parthsarthi Srivastava, Siddharth Jain, Riya Singh, Blockchain Arbitration: Identifying the Odds, ADR Newsletter, Sept 22 Vol. 7, https://www.nluo.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/ADR-NEWSLETTER-VOL-_VII.pdf

[133] Justice Manju Goel, Arbitration Award and Stamp Duty Paid On It, 24 Sept 2023, https://www.livelaw.in/articles/arbitration-award-stamp-duty-indian-stamp-act-238558

[135] Blockchain technologies and IP ecosystems: A WIPO white paper, https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/cws/en/pdf/blockchain-for-ip-ecosystem-whitepaper.pdf

[136] Sanjeev K Kapoor and Saman Ahsan, Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards: India, Global Arbitration Review, 24th July 2023, https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/challenging-and-enforcing-arbitration-awards/report/india

[137] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 36

[138] The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, § 36

[139] UNCITRAL, 1958 New York Convention Guide, https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=cmspage&pageid=10&menu=617&opac_view=-1#:~:text=Article%20I%20(1)%20provides%20that,%2C%20whether%20physical%20or%20legal%E2%80%9D.

[141] CIArb, International Arbitration Practice Guideline, Drafting Arbitral Awards Part I General

[142] Despoina Kottaridou, The use of arbitration for the resolution of disputes arising from the use of blockchain technology, February, 2023, https://repository.ihu.edu.gr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11544/30149/THE%20USE%20OF%20ARBITRATION%20FOR%20THE%20RESOLUTION%20OF%20DISPUTES%20ARISING%20FROM%20THE%20USE%20OF%20BLOCKCHAIN%20TECHNOLOGY.pdf?sequence=1

[143] Thalia Kruger, ‘Can Blockchain Arbitration become a proper ‘International Arbitration’? Jurors vs. arbitrators’, 22 May 2022, https://conflictoflaws.net/2022/can-blockchain-arbitration-become-a-proper-international-arbitration-jurors-vs-arbitrators/

[145] Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc., (2012) 9 SCC 648

[146] Chetna Alagh, Justice And Fairness In Arbitration - An Overlooked Principle?, 11 Sept 2023, https://www.livelaw.in/articles/justice-and-fairness-in-arbitration-an-overlooked-principle-237432#:~:text=According%20to%20Black's%20Law%20Dictionary,applying%20rigorous%20terms%20of%20law.

[148] Ex Aequo et Bono: An Overlooked and Undervalued Opportunity for International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, Nobumichi Teramura, November 18, 2018, https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2018/11/18/ex-aequo-et-bono-an-overlooked-and-undervalued-opportunity-for-international-commercial-arbitration/

[149] Rahul Pagidipati, How blockchain is driving social impact and transforming India, June 4, 2023, https://www.financialexpress.com/business/blockchain-how-blockchain-is-driving-social-impact-and-transforming-india-3113051/

[150] ‘The adoption of blockchain technology in India and its future’, August 5 2022, https://www.businesstoday.in/coindcx-crypto-exchange/articles/story/the-adoption-of-blockchain-technology-in-india-and-its-future-342761-2022-08-05

[151] ‘The adoption of blockchain technology in India and its future’, August 5 2022, https://www.businesstoday.in/coindcx-crypto-exchange/articles/story/the-adoption-of-blockchain-technology-in-india-and-its-future-342761-2022-08-05

[152] ‘The adoption of blockchain technology in India and its future’, August 5 2022, https://www.businesstoday.in/coindcx-crypto-exchange/articles/story/the-adoption-of-blockchain-technology-in-india-and-its-future-342761-2022-08-05

[153] Shakti Bhog Foods Ltd. v. Kola Shipping Ltd., (2009) 2 SCC 134

[154] Trimex International FZE Ltd. v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd., (2010) 3 SCC 1

[155] Niti Aayog, DESIGNING THE FUTURE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION:THE ODR POLICY FOR INDIA, https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Designing-The-Future-of-Dispute-Resolution-The-ODR-Policy-Plan-for-India.pdf

[156] Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 3554

[157] Zhuk, A ‘Applying blockchain to the modern legal system: Kleros as a decentralised dispute resolution system’, International Cybersecurity Law Rev. 4, 351–364 (2023)

[158] China: Supreme People's Court Issues Online Litigation Rules, Addressing Review of Blockchain Evidence, Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2021-07-21/china-supreme-peoples-court-issues-online-litigation-rules-addressing-review-of-blockchain-evidence/

[159] Zhuk, A ‘Applying blockchain to the modern legal system: Kleros as a decentralised dispute resolution system’, International Cybersecurity Law Rev. 4, 351–364 (2023)

[160] Government promises broadband access in all villages by 2022; launches National Broadband Mission, The Economic Times, Dec 17, 2019, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/government-promises-broadband-access-in-all-villages-by-2022-launches-national-broadband-mission/articleshow/72847719.cms

[161] Rural India had 44% more internet users compared to urban markets: Nielsen report, The Economic Times, Mar 16, 2023, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/rural-india-pips-urban-india-in-internet-usage-with-44-more-users-report/articleshow/98704031.cms

[162] Pradhan Mantri Gramin Digital Saksharta Abhiyaan, https://www.pmgdisha.in/about-pmgdisha/

[163] Women constitute one-third of Internet users in India: Study, The Indian Express, 5 Dec 2022, https://indianexpress.com/article/india/women-constitute-one-third-of-internet-users-in-india-study-8305984/

[164] Women constitute one-third of Internet users in India: Study, The Indian Express, 5 Dec 2022, https://indianexpress.com/article/india/women-constitute-one-third-of-internet-users-in-india-study-8305984/

[165] Women constitute one-third of Internet users in India: Study, The Indian Express, 5 Dec 2022, https://indianexpress.com/article/india/women-constitute-one-third-of-internet-users-in-india-study-8305984/

[166] Niti Aayog, DESIGNING THE FUTURE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION:THE ODR POLICY FOR INDIA, https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2023-03/Designing-The-Future-of-Dispute-Resolution-The-ODR-Policy-Plan-for-India.pdf

[1] BRIAN JARVIS, CRUEL AND UNUSUAL: PUNISHMENT AND U.S. CULTURE 14-19 (2004).

[2] THOM BROOKS, PUNISHMENT: A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION 55-62 (2nd ed. 2021).

[3] AHARON BARAK, PROPORTIONALITY: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS 1-16 (2012).

[4] VICTOR HASSAINE, LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE: LIVING AND DYING IN PRISON TODAY 36-62 (Robert Johnson et al., 5th ed. 2010).

[5] MARC MAUER & ASHLEY NELLIS, THE MEANING OF LIFE: THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING LIFE SENTENCES 15-45 (2018).

[6] LARRY J. SIEGEL, CRIMINOLOGY: THE CORE 8-28 (7th ed. 2018).

[7] MARIO MARAZZITI, 13 WAYS OF LOOKING AT THE DEATH PENALTY 58-75 (2015).

[8] ROB CANTON, THE ETHICS OF PUNISHMENT 52-58 (1st ed. 2022).

[9] JOHN F. PFAFF, LOCKED IN: THE TRUE CAUSES OF MASS INCARCERATION AND HOW TO ACHIEVE REAL REFORM 105-111 (2017).

[10] TODD R. CLEAR & NATASHA A. FROST, THE PUNISHMENT IMPERATIVE: THE RISE AND FAILURE OF MASS INCARCERATION IN AMERICA 113-136 (2014).

[11] SHAKA SENGHOR, WRITING MY WRONGS: LIFE, DEATH, AND REDEMPTION IN AN AMERICAN PRISON (2017).

[12] LESLIE JOHANSEN NACK, FOURTEEN: A DAUGHTER’S MEMOIR OF ADVENTURE, SAILING, AND SURVIVAL 210-255 (2015).

[13] DAMIEN ECHOLS, LIFE AFTER DEATH: A REDEMPTION STORY (2013).

[14] MICHELLE ALEXANDER, THE NEW JIM CROW: MASS INCARCERATION IN THE AGE OF COLORBLINDNESS 8-78 (2012).

[15] DIRK VAN ZYL SMIT & CATHERINE APPLETON, LIFE IMPRISONMENT: A GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS ANALYSIS 145-168 (2019).

[16] Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, THE UNITED NATIONS (Sept. 02, 2023, 10:40 AM), https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-against-torture-and-other-cruel-inhuman-or-degrading.

[17] Convention on the Rights of the Child, THE UNITED NATIONS (Sept. 02, 2023, 10:54 AM), https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.

[18] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, THE UNITED NATIONS (Sept. 02, 2023, 10:12 AM), https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.

[20] ANDREW ASHWORTH & RORY KELLY, SENTENCING AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 120-189 (7th ed. 2021).

[21] MARKUS D. DUBBER & TATJANA HÖRNLE, CRIMINAL LAW: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH 142-180 (1st ed. 2014).

[22] DAVID NELKEN, COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE: MAKING SENSE OF DIFFERENCE 11-71 (1st ed., 2010).

[23] FRANCIS PAKES, COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE 9-38 (4th ed. 2019).

[24] MARKUS D. DUBBER & TATJANA HÖRNLE, supra note 24.

[25] PHILIP L. REICHEL, COMPARATIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS: A TOPICAL APPROACH 76-98 (7th ed. 2017).

[27] BRYAN GIBSON & PAUL CAVADINO, THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: AN INTRODUCTION 167-184 (3rd ed. 2008).

[31] Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. 190 (2016).

[32] Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom, [2016] III ECHR 317.

[33] R v. McLoughlin, R v. Newell, [2014] EWCA Crim 188.

[34] Dirk van Zyl Smit et al., Whole Life Sentences and the Tide of European Human Rights Jurisprudence: What Is to Be Done?, 14 HUM. RIGHTS LAW REV. 59, 62-78 (2014).

[38] V.S.R. AVADHANI AND V. SOUBHAGYA VALLI, SENTENCING & VICTIM COMPENSATION: PRINCIPLES & PRACTICES (1st ed. 2014).

[39] P. N. BHAGWATI, DEATH PENALTY: AN AFFRONT TO HUMAN RIGHTS (1st ed. 2011).

[40] A. LAKSHMINATH AND KOMANDURI S. MURTY, SENTENCING JURISPRUDENCE IN INDIA: POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND PRACTICES (2017).

[41] SURENDRA MALIK AND SUDEEP MALIK, SUPREME COURT ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE AND CRIMINAL TRIAL-COVERING CASE LAWS FROM 1950 TO 2018 (2nd ed. 2018).

[42] Maru Ram v. Union of India, (1981) 1 SCC 107.

[44] Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Administration), 1988 AIR 1883.

[45] Charles Sobhraj v. Superintendent, Central Jail, Tihar, AIR 1978 SC 1514.

[46] Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1980 SC 1535.

[47] State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh, 1996 AIR 1393.

[48] Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal, 1994 SCR (1) 37.

[49] Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab, 1983 AIR 957; Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC 898, 1980.

[50] Ram Deo Chauhan v. State of Assam, 2001 (5) SCC 714.

[51] NANCY L. COHEN, BREAKTHROUGH: THE MAKING OF AMERICA’S FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT (2016).

[52] BAZ DREISINGER, INCARCERATION NATIONS: A JOURNEY TO JUSTICE IN PRISONS AROUND THE WORLD (2017).

[53] ANDREW ASHWORTH & RORY KELLY, supra note 23, at 215-222.

[54] DANIEL W. VAN NESS ET AL., RESTORING JUSTICE: AN INTRODUCTION TO RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (6th ed. 2022).

[56] NANCY MULLANE, LIFE AFTER MURDER: FIVE MEN IN SEARCH OF REDEMPTION (2012).

[58] Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom, [2016] III ECHR 317.

[59] MARKUS D. DUBBER & TATJANA HÖRNLE, supra note 24.

[1] Doctoral Research Scholar, Department of law and Governance, Central University of South Bihar, India, NAAC Accredited A++ Grade University, Email ID – murarieflu@gmail.com, Contact No +917004700381

[3] The US National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) reports 2007.

[4] The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

[6] Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF INTER-CASTE MARRIAGE AND ITS POSITIVE IMPACT ON SOCIETY BY - Mr. Karna Singh, Mr. Sailya Singh & Mr. Srinivas Puala

"CLASHING SOVEREIGNTIES: UNRAVELING THE DOCTRINE OF REPUGNANCY IN THE INDIAN FEDERAL SYSTEM" BY - VAISHALI YADAV

GENETICS, GENESIS, THE BIBLE & BEHAVIOR: PERSPECTIVES ON CRIMINALITY BY: ISHAAN DEEPAK JOSHI

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE OF DEEPFAKES IN INDIA: PUNISHMENTS AND PROTECTIONS BY - SHYAMASIS SARANGI & NIDHI SHARMA

UNDERSTANDING TRIBALS IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCENARIO: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE BY - YASHRAJ SINGH PARIHAR

ANALYSIS OF CIRCULAR TRADING IN FRAUDULENT AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES RELATED TO SECURITIES MARKETS IN INDIA AND A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH UNITED STATES BY - NALINI R

INDIA ASPIRATION TO BE PERMANENT MEMBER UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL. BY - AKASH KUMAR

UNCHAINING JUSTICE: BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGYS PIONEERING ROLE IN INDIAN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR & TANVI BRIJESH SONAWANE

LIFE SENTENCES WITHOUT PAROLE AND PROPORTIONALITY: EVALUATING THE ETHICAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS BY - TANYA MITTAL

UNRAVELING THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN INDIA BY - RADHA RANJAN

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF INTER-CASTE MARRIAGE AND ITS POSITIVE IMPACT ON SOCIETY BY - Mr. Karna Singh, Mr. Sailya Singh & Mr. Srinivas Puala

"CLASHING SOVEREIGNTIES: UNRAVELING THE DOCTRINE OF REPUGNANCY IN THE INDIAN FEDERAL SYSTEM" BY - VAISHALI YADAV

GENETICS, GENESIS, THE BIBLE & BEHAVIOR: PERSPECTIVES ON CRIMINALITY BY: ISHAAN DEEPAK JOSHI

NAVIGATING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE OF DEEPFAKES IN INDIA: PUNISHMENTS AND PROTECTIONS BY - SHYAMASIS SARANGI & NIDHI SHARMA

UNDERSTANDING TRIBALS IN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCENARIO: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE BY - YASHRAJ SINGH PARIHAR

ANALYSIS OF CIRCULAR TRADING IN FRAUDULENT AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES RELATED TO SECURITIES MARKETS IN INDIA AND A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH UNITED STATES BY - NALINI R

INDIA ASPIRATION TO BE PERMANENT MEMBER UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL. BY - AKASH KUMAR

UNCHAINING JUSTICE: BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGYS PIONEERING ROLE IN INDIAN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION BY - MRUNMAI PRADEEP PIMPARKAR & TANVI BRIJESH SONAWANE

LIFE SENTENCES WITHOUT PAROLE AND PROPORTIONALITY: EVALUATING THE ETHICAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS BY - TANYA MITTAL

UNRAVELING THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN INDIA BY - RADHA RANJAN

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[5] Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002

Citation 2