Open Access Research Article
UNRAVELING THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN INDIA
Published Paper
Article Details
UNRAVELING
THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN INDIA
AUTHORED BY
- RADHA RANJAN[1]
ABSTRACT
India's
independence in 1947, it has cultivated a secular, multifaceted, culturally
rich, and dynamic democracy that has made it the enmity of many unconventional
and extremist ideas and faiths that attempt to establish order using
fourth-generation combat techniques like Jihad and "Proxy War." The
fights that Jehadi groups like the Lashkar-e-Taiba alongside other proxy groups
backed through the Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence Agency are waging
disregarding India are ordinary examples of those types of disputes. Despite
certain preventative measures put in place by the Indian government in the wake
of the assaults in Mumbai on November 26, there is no well-defined
counter-terrorism strategy that has been formulated in the form of a theology
or white paper. India's administration must be very clear about its position on
terrorism if it wants to shed its reputation as a "soft state". This
academic paper offers a thorough examination of terrorism as a criminal offense
in India. It examines the legal foundation for terrorism-related crimes under
Indian law, concentrating on the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
(UAPA), and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The essay also looks at how terrorism
has changed through time, the difficulties in identifying and convicting
terrorists, and the function of international law in the fight against
terrorism. This article tries to give a detailed knowledge of the legal
complexities pertaining to terrorism in India via a synthesis of legislative
provisions and pertinent case laws.
Keywords: Terrorism, Organized crime,
Section 121, 9/11, Terrorists, Section 121A, 26/11, Mumbai Attacks.
INTRODUCTION
"Terrorism must be outlawed by all civilized
nations- not explained or rationalized, but fought and eradicated. Nothing can,
nothing will justify the murder of innocent people and helpless children."
~ Elie Wiesel
Terrorism
continues to be a transnational issue that affects countries like India. The
statutory remedy for terrorism is complex and includes both national law and
cross-border collaboration. This article explores the nuances of terrorism as
an offense in India and clarifies the legal options available to combat this
threat. India hasn't been immune to the effects of terrorism, which is a
serious worldwide problem. The main piece of legislation controlling criminal
crimes in India is the IPC, 1860.[2]
The IPC's incorporation of terrorist-related measures demonstrates the nation's
willingness to successfully countering terrorism. India doesn't have a single,
comprehensive definition of terrorism, in contrast to several countries. The societal
and economic and geopolitical climate of the globe changed drastically and
abruptly after 9/11 (Michael 2007). Since then, the majority of today's
problems have been put on hold, and terrorist activity has emerged as a major
problem. Nearly every nation is now aware of the threat posed by the terrorist
acts that occur throughout the world. As a result, counterterrorism safety
protocols were given precedence over other concerns. The US National
Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) reports[3]
that during January 2004 and July 2007, terrorist incidents in India resulted
in 3,900 fatalities, 9,076 injuries, and 2,144 hostage takings. After Iraq,
this was the country with the second-highest terrorism-related rate of
fatalities during this time.' Of fact, India's 1.1 billion people put the
country at a smaller amount of loss per person than the raw numbers show.
Additionally, a large number of these deaths fall within the fundamental limbo
that is shared by the word’s "terrorism" and "insurgency".
The information is nevertheless terrifying. In an effort to safeguard their
population from terrorist threats, security measures are continually evaluated
with the goal of tightening them up. Such steps could prevent terrorist
attacks, but they might still occur when it's more convenient for them. One
cannot overstate the importance of developing an integrated and successful
tactics that targets terrorists as opposed to their causes.
TERRORISM
IN INDIA
Given the
prospects of the Indian country and the global "war on terrorism,"
violent Islamist terrorism within India is carried out in an exceedingly
crucial environment. For instance, Mumbai, India's economic and manufacturing
center, was heavily targeted throughout the years. Additional goals consist of
the nation's capital, New Delhi, along with the thriving IT hubs of Bangalore
and Hyderabad. Temples of faith and the train, "Samjhauta
Express", that connects India and Pakistan were further damaged,
along with Varanasi, one of India's oldest towns.
This
ostensible deliberate aiming seems for being intended to undermine India's
rebounding economy or to incite communal hostility among Hindus and Muslims,
weakening the sustainability of India's liberal politics and impeding the
India-Pakistan reconciliation. Due to the decrease in backing from the
Pakistani government as a consequence regarding this reconciliation, the
terrorists fighting in Kashmir have suffered. The extremists want to see the
reconciliation wrecked for this crucial reason. The ramifications are thereby
quite high for both nations. In fact, they go past even the issues stated
earlier and even impinge on the term "war on terrorism." If
Pakistan and India were compelled into war, as they almost did after the acts
of violence on the Indian Parliament in December 2001, that might have a
significant impact on the nation's ability to host US operations in Afghanistan
and would make the already difficult task of maintaining tranquility and
security in the way essential tactical region much more difficult.
Terrorist assaults
in India have been mostly funded and backed from Pakistan as well as Bangladesh
beyond the frontier. This assistance encompasses broad strategy by criminal
organizations like LeT and JeM, the procurement of bombs and weapons, and
personnel training, particularly in the concentration areas of Pakistani
Kashmir. However, a deeper look at the terrorist assaults in India also reveals
a sizable "homegrown" element, including just over one percent of the
140 million Muslims in that country. In certain situations, criminals are found
among Indian migrant laborers in the Gulf, wherever the LeT has a strong
influence.
These
domesticated components seem to be driven by two regional frustrations that are
closely connected. First, Muslims often have a low socioeconomic level (SES). A
recent authorized Government of India Publication detailed this in great
detail. According to this study, Muslims had a poorer standard of living than
people in general and those who are Dalits, or so-called "untouchables,"
did. Moreover, Human rights are impacted by terrorism in a variety of ways. As
terrorism spreads as well as institutionalizes, it continues to represent a
serious danger to human rights all across the globe. Since the 1970s, terrorism
has expanded into increasingly structured, fiscally secure, and orchestrated
kinds aimed at dozens of people that are often victims of abductions murders,
and sexual assaults. This is an alarming infringement of human rights.
In
accordance with the aims of the organization or groups, different aims and
goals drive terrorists. Moreover, terrorism takes in several forms. The
following are the main categories of terrorist activities that are often
recognized internationally:
1. Religious terrorism- If we discuss about kind of
terrorism that is religious so it is governed by a supreme belief many of the
people who are engaged in terrorist duties think it is the service towards
religion as well as the commands of the Creator to ensure they propagate
bloodshed and engage in terrorist activities in line with faith they hold. And
one may infer that these people seek to persuade individuals to adopt their
viewpoint on a certain religion.
2. Ideology oriented terrorism- As we saw
regarding the ideology-based terrorism thus it means that philosophy which
encourage mainly violence and string human murdering rape, Genocide, etc. it
can be any form of agenda it can be left and it can be right as well.
3. State-sponsored terrorism- Several
nations have used terrorism as a part of their foreign strategy. State-sponsored
terrorism differs from other types of terrorism in that it is started to
achieve specific, well-defined policy goals rather than garner media attention.
4. Political terrorism- Political terrorism is an
extremely deadly kind of violence because it is carried out by those who are
part of society. Because it is carried out by skilled individuals, it is more
important than criminal terrorism. As a result, it is difficult for law
enforcement to apprehend them quickly. Both on a national and worldwide scale,
terrorism spread.
ANTI- TERRORISM
LAWS IN INDIA
It is
projected that an array of rules ought to be designed within the rule of law
structure in a republic to efficiently avoid and fight all kinds of terrorism
after the terrorist incident that occurred triggering brutality, the
destruction of life, freedom, danger to the safety of individuals and
belongings, generating disarray and nervousness in the society, and most of all
jeopardizing the unity, independence, and sovereignty of India. These laws serve
as a foundational premise for law enforcement organizations engaged in
counterterrorism or counterinsurgency operations.
UNLAWFUL
ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION)
The
Unlawful Activities Prevention Act of 1967 is one of the first anti-terrorism
laws. It was created to prohibit anti-terrorist actions and put restrictions on
groups that support terrorism and engage in anti-national activity. The
Unlawful Activities Prevention Act of 1967 does not provide a specific
description of a terrorist. The fact that the UAPA was specifically designed by
law to impose restrictions on groups and organizations rather than individuals
is a very significant and crucial argument. Those associations and
organizations were as follows: if they provide funds for terrorist activities
or terrorist groups, as well as if they support and participate in any acts
that are detrimental to the security and unity of the nation. If we consider the UAPA's character, we can
see that it is a highly contentious Act since the Parliament often amends it to
improve its operation. After POTA was repealed in 2004 and the legislation for
preventing the occurrence of terrorist activities was passed in 2001 after the
assault on Parliament, the UAPA became a stricter legal requirement.
However,
since its passage, the POTA has been repeatedly abused by the authorities, and
many people's rights have been violated as a result.[5]This
is because the POTA gave the government the power to detain anyone it suspected
of being guilty of a crime without charging them or conducting an investigation
for at least 180 days. After that, the UPA administration abolished this Act
for the reasons that have already been briefly described. However, a lot of
POTA provisions—or, more accurately, their provisions—were added to the UAPA
Act via an amendment. And using this Act undoubtedly increased government
authority. And sometimes, individuals have complained that they are the targets
of this Act sans any justification—or, to put it another way, innocent people
are subject to this Act without justification. Because before the change made
possible by this Act, the authorities could only designate certain entities and
groups as terrorist. However, with the amendment, the UAPA may now proclaim
certain persons to be terrorists. Many other amendments have also been made to
the statute. which we'll go through in depth here one by one.
TERRORIST
AND DISRUPTIVE ACTIVITIES
The
following anti-terrorism statute, known as TADA, was adopted by the Parliament
on September 3, 1987. This action was taken to stop terror operations in the
country. Following the turmoil in Punjab and the expansion of terrorist
operations, the TADA was passed into law in order to impose limitations.
However, the TADA's regulations and application were very rigid and rife with
arbitrary rulings. People's basic rights were being violated without following
the proper legal procedures. TADA was contested in court to be ruled illegal
when it was first passed because of its infamous abuse. In the case of Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab[7],
the supreme court of India maintained its constitutional legitimacy on the
presumption that individuals given such draconian statutory powers would
operate in good faith and for the benefit of the general public. Regarding
DATA, there are several instances of investigating officials abusing this Act. Many
of the harsh and regressive TADA rules were deemed unlawful by the Supreme
Court in 1994's landmark Kartar Singh v.
State of Punjab decision. "Deplorably, committed young people are
engaging in heinous crimes against humanity after being seduced by hardened
criminals and clandestine radicals. Despite the extreme measures taken and the
heightened monitoring, terrorists and militants continue to cause chaos when it
serves their purposes. The court said that: "No one can dispute these
clear facts and plain reality by adopting an ostrich-like mentality fully
disregarding the looming threat. It also examined the effect of TADA on the
protection of human rights and its abuse. In the end, the Terrorist and
Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act of 1987 was deemed unconstitutional by
the court after it was thoroughly examined and found to have been misused,
violating peoples' human rights while also not being in the best interests of
public safety. It was finally repealed by legislation in 1995.
VARIOUS
SECTIONS OF INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Waging, Attempting to Wage, or Aiding in the Waging of
War Against the Government of India: Section 121[8]
Overview: Infractions including waging war against the Government of
India, trying to do so, or aiding in that effort are covered under Section 121.
It focuses on behaviors that endanger the country's security and sovereignty.
Key
Components:
-
Warfare: Acts that include the declaration of war
against the Government of India are prohibited under this provision. Both
internal and external hostility are included in it.
-
War Fight: This section covers efforts to start a war
with the government. This applies to situations when there is a clear intention
and preparedness to start a war even if it may not have started yet.
-
Warfare Against the Government: This provision also
holds anyone responsible for aiding, abetting, or supporting the act of waging
war against the government accountable. This acknowledges the significance of
the people who enable such deeds.
Punishment:
For violations of Section 121, the penalty is either death or life in prison,
with the potential for the loss of assets used to wage war.
Conspiracy to Commit Crimes Punishable by Section 121A[9]:
Overview:
Conspiracies to commit crimes under Section 121 are covered under Section 121A.
It focuses on those who or organizations that intend to conduct actions that
would be considered waging war against the Indian government.
Key
Components: This section focuses on the act of conspiring to commit a crime
that is punished under Section 121. It includes arrangements made to carry out
such activities by two or more people.
Punishment:
The penalty for conspiring to commit an offense under Section 121 (Section
121A) has the same implications as the penalty for the actual violation, which
includes the possibility of the death penalty or a life sentence in prison as
well as the seizure of property.
Collecting weapons, etc., with the intent to wage war
against the government of India is prohibited under Section 122[10]:
Overview:
Acts that include gathering weapons, ammunition, or resources with the purpose
to wage war against the Government of India are the subject of Section 122.
Key
Components:
The act of
gathering weapons, ammunition, or resources required to wage war against the
government is covered under this clause.
Intent to
Start a War: The weapons and resources gathered must be intended to start a war
against the Indian government.
Punishment:
For violations of Section 122, the penalty is either life in prison or a
sentence of up to 10 years in jail, as well as the possibility of a fine.
Concealing with the Motive of enabling Design to
Engage in War, Section 123[11]:
Overview:
The concealment of information with the purpose of assisting a plan to conduct
war against the Government of India is addressed in Section 123.
Key
Components:
Disguising
Information: This section tackles the deliberate concealment of information on
strategies or plans for going to war with the government.
The desire
to enable the overall design or strategy to wage war against the Government of
India is a critical component.
Punishment:
For violations of Section 123, the penalty is either life in prison or a
sentence of up to 10 years in jail, as well as a possible fine.
Sedition, Section 124A[12]:
Overview:
Despite not having a clear connection to terrorism, Section 124A addresses
actions that promote violence or foster animosity or disrespect for the government.
It could be pertinent in several terrorism-related situations.
Key
Components:
This
section focuses on actions that incite hate or disdain for the government or
call for violence against it.
Intent to
Promote Violence: A key element of this crime is the desire to stir up violence
or general chaos.
Punishment:
Sedition-related crimes under Section 124A are punishable by up to life in
prison, a fine, or both.
NATIONAL
SECURITY ACT 1980 (NSA)
The next
legislation is the National Security Act, which was passed by the legislature
on September 2 and 3, 1980, under the UPA administration.
In essence,
the NSA's mission is to safeguard the nation's welfare while simultaneously
advancing national security and maintaining diplomatic ties with foreign
nations.
The NSA is
a preventive detention statute that holds any suspects before charges are filed
and investigations are completed for the sake of national security.
In order to
maintain public order and state security, preventative detention and other
restrictions on personal freedom are permitted under Article 22(3)(b) of the
Indian Constitution.
The NSA is
still making headlines at this time due to the corona virus in India, as many
people have been detained by means of the NSA because they knowingly attempted
to spread the disease. According to news sources, those who are affiliated with
the Tbligi zamat were suspected of having the virus after testing positive for
it in a hospital, and they attempted to attack the medical staff and nurses.
Additionally, several anti-social elements have recently been detained in the
states of MP and UP under the NSA.
IMPORTANT
CASE LAWS
1. The Supreme
Court maintained the constitutional legitimacy of the NSA and the Ordinance
that came before the Act by a 4:1 majority in the case known as the NSA case, A.K. Roy v. Union of India[13].
The Court determined that the clauses of the Act authorizing the detention of
people on certain grounds as operating in a way detrimental to the
"defence of India," "security of the state," and
"relations with foreign power" were not imprecise nor arbitrary. The
Court issued a number of directives while maintaining the NSA and its
implementing Ordinance in order to protect the rights of detenues held in
accordance with the NSA. The court ordered:
1) that the
detainee's family members be informed in writing of his arrest and detention as
soon as it occurs;
2) that the
detainee be held in his usual residence unless exceptional circumstances call
for a different location;
3) that the
detainee be allowed access to his own food and books; and
4) that he be
kept apart from those who have been found guilty.
2. The
petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus in R
(Saifi) v. Governor of Brixton Prison[14]
objected to his or her extradition to India on the grounds that, among other
things, the prosecution had relied on a statement that had been acquired by
torture and had now been recanted. The International Convention against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984's
Article 15 was clearly carried out by common law and domestic law, according to
the queen's Bench Devision court, which accepted the Magistrate Judgement that
fairness did not call for the statement to be excluded.
3. In Babulal Parate v. State of Maharashtra
(1961)[15],
the defendants were accused of trying to wage war against the Government of
India in violation of Section 121. The Supreme Court sustained the conviction
and noted that even an outward sign of war preparation might be covered by this
clause. The wide definition of "waging war" under Section 121 was
brought to light in this instance.
4. In State of Maharashtra v. Dr. Praful B. Desai
(2003)[16],
the defendants were accused of plotting to conduct war against the Government
of India in violation of Section 121A. According to the Bombay High Court,
Section 121A may be used to penalize those who conspire to carry out a crime
under Section 121. This case highlighted the fact that conspiracy itself may be
a crime.
5. Shew Mangal
Singh was prosecuted in State of West
Bengal v. Shew Mangal Singh (1995) [17]under
Section 122 for allegedly gathering weapons with the intent to wage war against
the Government of India. According to the Calcutta High Court, this clause
cannot be invoked simply by having a collection of weapons. The prosecution
must prove that there was a deliberate desire to go to war.
6. The defendants
in Vincent George v. Union of India
(2010) were accused of violating Section 123 by withholding information
with the purpose of facilitating a plan to conduct war against the Government
of India. According to the Kerala High Court, the accused's concealment of
their membership in a terrorist group might be seen as withholding information
to aid in the plan to wage war.
7. Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962)[18] is one of
the significant sedition cases. In this decision, the Supreme Court maintained
Section 124A's validity while also emphasizing that dissent from the
government's policies does not always constitute sedition. The court ruled that
an act must entail inciting violence or public unrest in order to be classified
as sedition.
SUGGESTIONS
The idea
that all nations should cooperate in the fight against terrorism and that all
laws passed by the various nations and the United Nations should be faithfully
carried out seems pretty much utopian as a recommendation, but is highly
likeable. Additionally, it would be to point out that it is crucial for a fair
inquiry that the investigating agencies in every country be free from political
influence and prejudice. Additionally, the party nations must adhere strictly
to the responsibilities of each State that are outlined in international law,
and periodically they work to pass new legislation aimed at preventing
terrorism and other immoral actions on a worldwide scale. Additionally,
protecting the core human rights and fundamental freedoms of its population
should be every State's first concern. The International Court of Justice
should also be included when discussing international laws and actions
pertaining to terrorism since it may play a significant and significant role in
terrorist prevention. It is important to keep in mind that governments
sometimes disregard international law in favor of their own interests. As for
the states' individual accountability, it should be underlined that they must
accept responsibility for any unlawful or terrorist conduct that occurs inside
their borders. Additionally, it is crucial for every state's government to
assess the basic issues facing its residents. Basic necessities like food,
health care, and education must be met by the government in order to prevent citizens
from becoming distracted and choosing paths that are harmful to both the state
and humanity as a whole. And they need to understand their responsibility
towards the nation, follow all the legal norms under the supervision of the
constitution, and keep a fair investigation in any terrorist matter free from
any kind of pressure. All gaps, whether they are under the investigating
authorities or in the implementation of laws, must be filled. Furthermore, the
government must provide every suspect the chance to prove their innocence and
inform them of the reason for their detention. Doing so is crucial for
safeguarding the fundamental human rights of the populace.
CONCLUSION
In India,
terrorism is a complex problem with many different manifestations and underlying
reasons. It involves a diverse range of individuals and reasons and includes
both domestic insurgencies and cross-border conflicts as well as transnational
threats. Effective counterterrorism initiatives depend on an understanding of
the causes of terrorism. Among the key factors that have supported terrorism in
India are socio-economic inequality, religious extremism, interregional
disputes, historical grudges, and political instability. The government and
security forces have put a lot of effort into fighting terrorism, including
passing laws, sharing intelligence, and cooperating internationally. The
shifting nature of terrorism, open borders, and the formation of new extremist
groups, however, continue to pose problems. A comprehensive strategy is
required, combining security precautions with treating the root problems.
Important elements of this strategy include encouraging intercommunal
discussion, social and economic development, and combating extremist ideas. In
addition, international collaboration and intelligence sharing must keep
playing a crucial role in the fight against domestic and international
terrorism. In order to ensure the safety and security of the country and its
residents, it is ultimately necessary to continuously work to uncover the
complexities of terrorism in India. This demands continued commitment on both a
national and international level.
REFERENCES
·
US National Counterterrorism Center, 'Worldwide
Incidents Tracking System', http://wits.nctc.gov/ RunSearchCountry.do?countryld=20&confirmed=true,
accessed 25 August 2023.
·
Hamid Boakai Kamara “The impact of Terrorism on Human
Rights"-GRIN 2017 https://m.grin.com/document/379326 (visited on August
25, 2023)
·
Acharya.91 "anti- terrorism laws in India"
available at www.legalservicesindia.com/article1382iantk terrorism-laws
(in-india. htmI (visited on 2 September 2023)
·
National Security Act 1980; available at:
https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-newsanalysis/national-security-act-1
(visited on 19 April 2020) National Security Act 1980; available at:
https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-newsanalysis/national-security-act-1
(visited on 30 October 2023)
·
Redirecting... Available at:
https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=true&handle=hein.journals%2Fjilfa7&div=12&start_page=169&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=19&men_tab=srchresults
(Accessed: 1 November, 2023).
[1] Doctoral Research Scholar, Department of law and Governance, Central University of South Bihar, India, NAAC Accredited A++ Grade
University, Email ID – murarieflu@gmail.com, Contact No +917004700381
[2] The
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860.
[3] The US National Counterterrorism
Center (NCTC) reports 2007.
[4] The Unlawful Activities
(Prevention) Act, 1967
[5] Prevention of Terrorism
Act, 2002
[6] Terrorist
and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987
[7] (1994) 3 SCC 569
[8] Section 121
[9] Section 121A
[10] Section 122
[11] Section 123
[12] Section 124A
[13] AIR 1982 SC 710
[14] (2003) 1 WLR1134
[15] 1961 AIR 884, 1961 SCR (3) 423
[16] AIR 2003 SC 2053
[17] 1981 AIR 1917, 1982 SCR (1) 360
[18] 1962 AIR 955, 1962 SCR Supl. (2)
769
Article Information
UNRAVELING THE SHADOWS OF TERRORISM AS A CRIME IN INDIA
Authors: RADHA RANJAN
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/11/08
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.