Open Access Research Article

WHEN THE MACHINE ACTS, WHO ANSWERS? REIMAGINING LIABILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE AGE OF AUTONOMOUS AI

Author(s):
ISHIKA RANA
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Artificial Intelligence no longer serves only as a simple tool in humans’ hands but has transformed into a technology that defines the future of communication and also performs functions like generating information, storing information, and creating something new. The issue that arises during this transformation and leaves open many concerns is who will pay for any wrongdoings of artificial intelligence in the case something goes wrong. For instance, in case of the generation of misleading information (which causes some financial loss or injury), it is still unclear who might be responsible in such situations- the user, developer, deployer, or even intelligence itself. Moreover, in the case when a self-driving vehicle causes an accident, it would also be hard to find out who should take responsibility for it.
What these dilemmas show to us is that there is a problem concerning the liability law. In spite of the fact that people and juridical entities are responsible for violations of the law, artificial intelligence cannot belong to either group in a legal sense. At the same time, the situation with intellectual property is quite the opposite, if AI creates something on its own, who will be able to own this result?
In this paper, the author argues that artificial intelligence should not currently be regarded as an independent legal entity. Rather, the author claims that responsibility should take the form of a risk control model where the liability is apportioned based on the level of control, predictable output, design responsibility, deployment responsibility, and the profits received from the AI system. The author further states that intellectual property matters should also be settled in accordance with this statement. For instance, if the AI is merely helping humans with their creativity or inventiveness, there is no need for any radical changes to the current law. However, if the AI system produces outputs autonomously, there is a gap in patent and copyright law since existing laws do not apply.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: ISHIKA RANA
Registration ID: 1013087 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13087
Year: Aug-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 5
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 2036-2053

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.