Open Access Research Article
UNDERSTANDING ONE NATION ONE ELECTION IN INDIA BY: ANEEKA ROBY
Published Paper
Article Details
UNDERSTANDING ONE NATION ONE ELECTION IN INDIA
AUTHORED BY: ANEEKA ROBY
3RD-YEAR BA LLB
SCHOOL OF LAW CHRIST (DEEMED TO BE
UNIVERSITY)
RESEARCH PROBLEM
This paper discusses the legal
validity, procedure, and standards of One Nation One Election and why it will
not work in the Indian context. It will also establish the requirement of
simultaneous elections and how they are more feasible and logical in India.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
- What is the historical and
political perspectives of One Nation One Election in India
- What are some criticisms of One
Nation One Election
- What are the logistical
challenges faced in its implementation in India
- How does One Nation One Election
compare with similar policies in other counteries
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
To get in-depth knowledge on this
topic, the primary source for gathering information would be going through
judgements given by Journals, Articles, reports and data by various
organizations, books and websites on the topic as secondary sources. It would
be going through previous research papers, which are done in a similar line as
the topic.
LIMITATIONS
Due to the lack of time and limited
resources, unfortunately, some factors of this research paper may be limited
and restricted and may not be as extensive as it could be.
LITERATURE REVIEW
A democratic nation must conduct free
and fair elections, and the Election Commission was established under the
Constitution as an autonomous and independent authority. This makes sure that
nobody or anything may sway elections. Despite improvements and accolades as
the world's gold standard, the Election Commission of India nevertheless
encounters difficulties throughout every general election. Given that elections
are held for the Lok Sabha and State Legislatures every six months, it has been
argued that a significant change would be to hold these elections concurrently.
This notion predates the Constitution's ratification by twenty years and has
been around since then. The Prime Minister has questioned NDA officials to work
towards supporting simultaneous elections.
As far as feasible, holding
simultaneous elections would save money and shorten the time needed to adopt
the Model Code of Conduct. This would be advantageous since it would prevent
disruptions to government and development efforts, particularly if elections
are done in stages. Simultaneous elections are intended to decrease policy
ambiguity and increase the government's attention on key policy problems. A
constitutional change might be proposed to need the confidence motion in order
to create the government and prevent the no-confidence motion from
destabilising the administration.
Holding elections for Panchayats,
Municipal Bodies, and State Assemblies simultaneously is one way to accomplish
simultaneous elections. The members of the House may decide to do this, or if
the government loses a no-confidence vote.
One approach to implementing
simultaneous elections could be to hold elections for Panchayats, Municipal
Bodies, and State Assemblies at the same time. This can be agreed upon by the
members of the House or if the government loses a no-confidence vote. One approach to implementing simultaneous
elections could be to hold elections for Panchayats, Municipal Bodies, and
State Assemblies at the same time. This can be agreed upon by the members of
the House or if the government loses a no-confidence vote. The concept of 'One
Nation-One Election' refers to the idea of having both the Lok Sabha and State
Legislative Assembly elections held simultaneously on the same day. This is not
a new idea, but it has recently gained momentum with the support of the current
Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi. The objective of this concept is to
synchronize the election process, reduce costs for the government and political
parties, and minimize the disruption of government and public works during
election periods. The Karnataka Legislative Assembly and Council recently held
a debate on this concept, where it was discussed that although elections are
necessary in a democracy, they are time-consuming and costly. The CM of
Karnataka, B. S. Yediyurappa, stressed the need for amendments in the
Constitution and Representation of the People Act, 1951, to implement this
concept. The Speaker of the Assembly, Vishweshwar Hegde Kageri, cited former
Election Commission S Y Qureshi, who said that from the Election Commission's
point of view, it would be easy to implement. He also pointed out that in many
western countries, elections are held at the same time. India is a
parliamentary democracy with a federal structure, where the President is the
head of the country and the Prime Minister, who is the head of the majority
party in Parliament, governs the country with his council of ministers. The
members of Parliament are elected by the voters in their respective
constituencies for a term of five years.
4. THE CONCEPT OF ONE NATION ONE
ELECTION: AN ANALYSIS FROM INDIAN PERSPECTIVE, DR. MEENAKSHI BANSAL[4]
The concept of "One
Nation One Election" calls for conducting a one election that includes
both the Lok Sabha and state assemblies as opposed to separate and ongoing
polls. owing to the negative effects of frequent elections, including their
high costs, disruption of regular public life, and influence on governance
owing to the model code of behaviour during elections, this proposal has gained
traction in India. Recent support for this idea from the Indian President and
Prime Minister has reignited interest in and debate over the subject. The
two-thirds majority needed to modify the constitution to enact simultaneous
voting is not held by the ruling party, nevertheless. In India, the concept of
holding state elections concurrently with federal elections is not new because
it was used up until 1967, but because
the fourth Lok Sabha was prematurely dissolved, elections were divided.
The notion of conducting the Lok
Sabha and state assembly' elections at the same time has gained traction in
India. This idea, called "One Nation One Election," seeks to do away
with the negative aspects of holding elections often, including their high costs,
tiredness from campaigning, and effects on governance during the model code of
behaviour. The President and Prime Minister of India have endorsed this
concept, reviving interest and discussion. By referring to it as "One
Nation One Election," the ruling party has given the idea a more
nationalistic feel. The question of whether state and union elections must take
place concurrently is not addressed in the Indian constitution. In India,
elections were conducted concurrently till 1967, therefore the concept is not
new. However, there are factors including the advantage of the ruling party
over regional parties and the impact of ethnic issues on regional and local
affairs. Political parties and voters must recognise their roles in selecting
the best candidates to serve as the people's representatives if democracy is to
prosper.
ABSTRACT
The view of "One Nation-One
Election" is appealing due to the current complex political culture where
voters across different regions, classes, and linguistic barriers vote for
unified leadership. However, this concept also has complexities in its
implementation, as every state in India has unique issues and problems, and
there may be constitutional and legal challenges in its implementation. India's
diversity with different cultures, traditions, languages, and regional
resources must be considered when implementing the "One Nation-One
Election" concept in a way that does not harm the federal structure and
democracy.
While the voting process may appear
simple to the average voter, its administration and logistics are not what add
complexity; rather, it is the massive electoral politics and vote bank politics
that underlay it. The question of having simultaneous elections was more
recently brought up by the Indian Prime Minister and the Honorable President of
India. In other words, they were in favour of the idea of "one nation, one
election," but it was never implemented. In India, the concept of
conducting state elections concurrently with the federal election was used up
until 1967, when polls were split following the early dissolution of the fourth
Lok Sabha. This paper examines the benefits and drawbacks of the idea of
"one nation, one election." Finally, it is said that everything done
in the political sphere nowadays is done with the intention of winning a vote
or demeaning the opposition party. Is democratic India prepared to abandon the
current electoral system in favour of One India, One Election?
Keywords: One nation one election, Simultaneous election, Democracy, Election
Comission, Lok Sabha, Voter, Election
INTRODUCTION
The One Nation, One Election
initiative wants to hold elections in India simultaneously at all levels of
government. This would include simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha, state
legislative assemblies, and local entities like panchayats and municipalities.
The notion was initially proposed by former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee
in 1999 and has been discussed for many years. The Law Commission of India and
the Election Commission of India advocate for the proposal's adoption, which
has rekindled interest in it in recent years. The government has also endorsed
the idea, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi urging "One Country, One
Election" in his Independence Day speech in 2019.
The discussion of One Nation One
Election has been ongoing in the country for a while. It is a proposal for
simultaneous elections of the national, state and local levels of government in
India. The goals of One Nation One Election are to lessen election frequency,
cut costs, and preserve the nation's political stability. The Law Commission of
India and the Electoral Commission of India (ECI) both suggested the idea at
various points. Nonetheless, there have been practical, legal, and political
issues in implementing One Nation One Election. The Law Commission of India and
the ECI both suggested the idea at various points. Nonetheless, they have been
subject to various legal, political and logistical issues in implementing One
Nation One Election.
The goal of the One Nation One
Election plan, according to the ECI, was to decrease the number of elections
and enhance governance quality. It was initially advocated in 1983. The ECI has
suggested that having many elections at once can stabilise the administration
and allow political parties and candidates to concentrate on governing rather
than electioneering (Election Commission of India, 2018). The Law Commission of
India recommended adopting One Nation One Election in its 170th report in 1999.
According to this opinion, One Nation One Election would ease the financial
strain on the federal government, political parties, and candidates. Moreover,
it would ensure that the administration is stable and that political parties
and candidates can concentrate on governance rather than campaigning (Law
Commission of India, 1999).
Constitutional amendments are
necessary to align the periods of the Lok Sabha and state legislative
assemblies, and simultaneous elections would need extensive organisation and
resources. [6]However,
certain political parties and civil society organisations have attacked the
plan, claiming that One Nation One Election might erode federalism, lessen
political competition, and cause disadvantages to smaller parties and
independent candidates.
India's political, legal, and
institutional frameworks are all impacted by the complicated and contentious
problem of One Nation One Election. Ongoing discussion surrounds the viability
and ramifications of One Nation One Election, and in order to guarantee that it
strengthens India's democratic process and promotes good governance, the
concept has to be carefully considered and examined.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF ONE NATION
ONE ELECTION
During the early years of the
Republic, One Nation One Election was initially suggested in India.
Simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies were first
proposed by the Indian Election Commission in 1983. Former prime minister Atal
Bihari Vajpayee introduced the idea of one nation one election in a speech to
the Lok Sabha in 1999.[7] In 1999,
the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee proposed the idea of one nation
one election in a speech to the Lok Sabha. [8]
However, the idea did not gain much
traction at the time, and elections continued to be held at different times at
the national and state levels. The issue was again brought up in 2016 when the
Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice submitted a
report to the Parliament recommending simultaneous elections.[9]
In 2017, the Law Commission of India
submitted a report to the government recommending the implementation of one
nation one election. The report argued that frequent elections resulted in the
diversion of resources from development work, political polarisation, and the
Model Code of Conduct abuse. The Law Commission suggested a phased approach to
implementing one nation one election, starting with synchronising state and Lok
Sabha elections.[10] In 2018,
the Election Commission of India submitted a report to the Law Ministry,
arguing that simultaneous elections would ensure better governance, reduce the
burden on the election machinery, and cut costs. The report also suggested that
a constitutional amendment would be necessary to implement one nation one
election. [11]
In his Independence Day speech in
2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated his support for one nation one
election, arguing that the current staggered elections drained resources and
disrupted development work. In June 2020, the Election Commission of India
suggested that the government consider holding simultaneous elections in 2024
when elections are due for 14 states.[12]
Despite the renewed attention given
to the idea of one nation one election, there has been considerable opposition
to the proposal from various quarters. Some have argued that the idea is not
feasible, given the diversity of electoral systems and processes across the
country, and would require significant constitutional amendments. Others have
raised concerns about the impact of simultaneous elections on federalism,
democracy, and the accountability of elected representatives.[13]
The idea of One Nation One Election
in India can be traced back to the Republic's early years. The idea was first
proposed by the Election Commission of India in 1983, which suggested the idea
of holding simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha and state assemblies. In 1999,
then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee proposed the idea of one nation one
election in a speech to the Lok Sabha. However, the idea did not gain much
traction at the time, and elections continued to be held at different times at
the national and state levels. The issue was again brought up in 2016 when the
Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice submitted a
report to the Parliament recommending simultaneous elections. [14]
In 2017, the Law Commission of India
submitted a report to the government recommending the implementation of one
nation one election. The report argued that frequent elections resulted in the
diversion of resources from development work, political polarisation, and the
Model Code of Conduct abuse. The Law Commission suggested a phased approach to
implementing one nation one election, starting with synchronising state and Lok
Sabha elections. In 2018, the Election Commission of India submitted a report
to the Law Ministry, arguing that simultaneous elections would ensure better
governance, reduce the burden on the election machinery, and cut costs. The
report also suggested that a constitutional amendment would be necessary to
implement one nation one election. In his Independence Day speech in 2019,
Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated his support for one nation one
election, arguing that the current staggered elections drained resources and
disrupted development work. In June 2020, the Election Commission of India
suggested that the government consider holding simultaneous elections in 2024
when elections are due for 14 states. Despite the renewed attention given to
the idea of one nation one election, there has been considerable opposition to
the proposal from various quarters. Some have argued that the idea is not
feasible, given the diversity of electoral systems and processes across the
country, and would require significant constitutional amendments. Others have
raised concerns about the impact of simultaneous elections on federalism,
democracy, and the accountability of elected representatives.[15]
POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE OF ONE NATION
ONE ELECTION
In India, the concept of One Nation
One Election has been examined from several political views. The idea's
proponents claim that it would result in better governance, lessen the strain
on the electoral system, and result in cost savings. Additionally, they contend
that the nation's regular elections cause the government to run improperly and
divert funds from development efforts.
The governing Bharatiya Janata Party
(BJP), led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has been a prominent supporter of
one nation one election. The BJP contends that one nation one election would
result in a decrease in election-related costs, allowing the government to
concentrate on development initiatives. The party also asserts that repeated
elections cause an unstable environment and a downturn in the economy.
The Indian National Congress, the
largest opposition group, has criticised the one nation one election plan.
Given the variety of election methods and procedures used throughout the
nation, it is argued that the proposal is not workable. Concerns regarding how
simultaneous elections might affect democracy, federalism, and the
responsibility of elected officials have also been voiced by the Congress. The
party has argued that rather than synchronising elections, the emphasis should
be on making sure they are free and fair. [16]
On the subject of one nation one
election, regional parties have also been split. The plan has received support
from some parties but opposition from others. The Telangana Rashtra Samithi and
the YSR Congress Party, among other groups, have backed one nation one
election, claiming that it will improve governance and lighten the load on the
electoral system. The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the Trinamool Congress have
criticised the plan, claiming it would weaken the nation's federal system.
Thus, there are many political
stances on the concept of one nation one election in India, with the ruling BJP
supporting it and the opposition Congress party as well as several local
parties opposing it. The debate about the feasibility and acceptability of one
nation one election persists in India's political discourse.
CRITISIM OF ONE NATION ONE ELECTION
Constitutional challeneges:
One of the critical arguments against
the One Nation One Election plan is the possibility of constitutional
challenges. Elections at all levels of government, including state and
municipal elections, must be coordinated under the concept. Since the Constitution
allows the states to hold their own elections, this would necessitate
considerable constitutional revisions. Critics claim that imposing a
centralised electoral procedure would violate the Indian Constitution's federal
framework. The Indian Constitution establishes a federal form of governance,
with the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the State Election Commissions
(SECs) in charge of election administration. Elections for the Lok Sabha, Rajya
Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, and municipal organisations like
Panchayats and Municipalities are mandated by the Constitution. Each state has
a separate SEC, which is in charge of organising local body elections.
To enable the synchronisation of
elections at all levels of government, the introduction of one nation one
election would need a constitutional modification. However, for this to happen,
it would need the backing of two-thirds of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, as
well as at least 50% of the state legislatures. According to detractors, this is
unlikely to occur since many state governments may object to the idea because
they regard it as a threat to their autonomy.[17]
Lack of political consensus:
The lack of political agreement on
the subject is another another critique of the One Nation One Election idea. To
be put into effect, the idea needs a constitutional modification and the
support of all major parties. However, a number of political parties have
voiced opposition to the idea, expressing worries about federalism, democracy,
and the proposal's viability.
Simultaneous elections may help the
party in power, which has greater resources and a bigger audience, according to
the opposition parties, who claim that the suggestion is an effort by the
ruling party to gain an edge in elections.
The lack of political agreement is
another critique of the One Nation, One Election idea. To be put into effect,
the idea needs a constitutional modification and the support of all major
parties. However, several political parties have voiced opposition to the idea,
expressing worries about federalism, democracy, and the proposal's viability.
Simultaneous elections may help the party in power, which has more excellent
resources and a bigger audience, according to the opposition parties, who claim
that the suggestion is an effort by the ruling party to gain an edge in
elections. The idea may result in a centralised form of government, which might
be contrary to the principles of federalism, prompting certain parties to
express worries about the possible abuse of power by the federal government.
In addition, certain parties have
voiced worries about how simultaneous elections could affect the democratic
process. Critics claim that simultaneous elections could result in a lack of
accountability because the incumbent party could not be subject to ongoing
electoral scrutiny. A decrease in the standard of government and democracy may
result from this.
Furthermore, the proposal's
implementation needs to be improved by the lack of political agreement on it.
All political parties must support the idea, and resistance from any party
might cause it to fail.It may be difficult to get a political agreement on the
plan given the variety of political groups and beliefs in India.
One of the key critiques of the one
nation one election concept, to sum up, has been the lack of political
agreement. It is challenging to reach political consensus since opposition
parties have voiced worries about federalism, democracy, and the viability of
the programme. The execution of the concept and its possible advantages might
be hampered by the lack of unanimity.
Infringement of voter rights:
One of the main issues with the One
Nation One Election plan is that it may violate citizens' basic right to elect
representatives in regular elections. Elections would be held less often, and
voters would have less opportunity to engage in the democratic process if
national and state elections were held concurrently.
Critics contend that simultaneous
national and state elections might prevent voters from evaluating the
performance of their local legislators and casting informed ballots. Voters may
be compelled to choose between their favoured state candidate and desired
national candidate, even if they are unsatisfied with either, as a result of
this.
In a democratic society, having the
ability to vote is a basic right, thus any idea that would jeopardise this
right has to be carefully evaluated. Even though the one nation one election
plan might improve governance and reduce election-related expenses, it must be
implemented in a way that safeguards voters' right to make informed decisions
in free and fair elections. Therefore, every choice regarding one nation one election
must be carefully thought out, taking into account any potential violations of
voter rights.
Logistical challenges:
The demand for synchronised voting
locations nationwide would be one of the main problems. To handle the
elections, many election workers and security people would need to be sent,
which might be a logistical nightmare. Additionally, the Election Commission of
India will be put under a great deal of stress with the deployment of such a
large number of workers. The availability of electronic voting machines and the
logistics of delivering them to polling places would be another obstacle.[18] Only two
businesses in India manufacture the electronic voting machines, so any hiccup
in the supply chain might cause severe issues on election day. Additionally, a
significantly greater number of electronic voting machines would be needed for
simultaneous elections, which could be challenging to acquire and keep.[19]
Additionally, it is necessary to
consider the difficulty of conducting simultaneous elections in states with
diverse political environments and challenges. Elections held concurrently may
not address regional issues since they differ from national ones, which may
cause discontent and instability.
Additionally, India is so large and
has such a diverse geography that it would be difficult to have elections
simultaneously. There are 29 states and 7 union territories in the nation, each
having its own demographics, culture, and voting traditions. Elections in all
of these locations at once would need a tremendous amount of planning and
resources.
Before it can be put into action, the
one nation one election concept must overcome serious logistical issues.
Holding simultaneous elections is a challenging undertaking due to the need for
synchronised polling places, the accessibility of electronic voting machines,
and the various political environments across different states. These
difficulties must be considered in any choice to adopt one nation one election,
and it must be made sure that sufficient resources and coordination are
available to handle them.[20]
Lack of evidence-based research:
The influence of one nation one
election on the Indian political system, according to critics, has not been
adequately investigated with empirical support. Although various nations have
implemented comparable systems, the Indian context is distinct, and it is
uncertain how one nation one election will affect the Indian political system.
More study, according to critics, is required to comprehend the advantages and
disadvantages of one nation one election.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ONE NATION ONE ELECTION WITH OTHER COUNTRIES
The idea of One Nation One Election
is not exclusive to India and has been adopted by a number of other nations.
The implementation and results of ONOE, however, fluctuate greatly between
nations. We shall contrast the ONOE plan in India with other nations'
experiences in this part.
The United States is frequently used
as an illustration of a nation that conducts concurrent elections at several
levels of government. Every two years, there are elections in the US, and both
the national and state and municipal elections take place at the same time. [21]There is
no legal necessity for simultaneous elections, and it is crucial to keep in
mind that state and municipal elections in the US usually take place on
different days. Consequently, the US system cannot be regarded as an actual
ONOE model.[22]
Another nation that has adopted ONOE
is Mexico. Mexico has had concurrent elections for the president, senators, and
members of the lower house of Congress since the 1990s. On the other hand,
Mexico's attempt to implement ONOE has yet to be effective. According to
critics, simultaneous elections are expensive to organise, and there needs to
be more coordination between the many tiers of government. Additionally,
certain regions have needed help to organise concurrent elections due to the
security situation in Mexico.
Another nation that has adopted ONOE
is Indonesia. Indonesia has held simultaneous elections for the president, the
national parliament, and regional legislatures since the 2004 general election.
Indonesia's experience with ONOE, however, has been uneven. There have been
worries about the integrity of the voting process, despite the fact that
simultaneous elections have increased voter turnout and decreased the expense
of having separate elections. The synchronisation of voter lists and the
accessibility of resources for the elections have both experienced problems.[23]
In contrast, because of worries about
the quality of the elections, the Philippines rejected the ONOE concept. To
guarantee a fair and transparent voting process, national and municipal
elections are held separately in the Philippines. According to the Philippine
administration, simultaneous elections would taint the democratic process'
credibility and confuse voters.
CONCLUSION
India has debated the concept of
"One Nation, One Election" for several years. In order to cut costs
and minimise interruption from frequent elections, the idea calls for holding
national and state elections simultaneously. Although the concept is sound, it
also poses a number of issues, including how it will affect democratic
processes and how to synchronise with various political and social realities.
One of the main advantages of the
concept is that it would make elections less expensive. Indian elections are
currently expensive affairs that place a heavy financial load on the treasury
.Simultaneous elections would help the government save money and ensure that it
could concentrate on governing rather than electoral campaigns. The approach
would also lessen the disturbance brought on by frequent elections, which may
negatively affect the government and the economy.
The approach does, however, bring up
some issues. Its effect on democratic procedures is one of the main worries. A
key component of India's democracy is its frequent elections, which allow the
populace to hold elected officials responsible. This democratic process might
be restricted by simultaneous elections as voters only have one chance to
choose their representatives at the state and federal levels. Due to the
considerable increase in time between elections, this can also result in a rise
in voter indifference.[24]
Another issue is the viability of
holding elections simultaneously throughout a varied nation like India. India
is a federal nation with many states, each with political and social systems.
Election synchronisation across all these states would be necessary, which
might be difficult. Additionally, it would not be realistic to time state-level
elections with federal elections because local events and variables frequently
affect state-level elections.[25]
In conclusion, there are advantages
and disadvantages to the "One Nation, One Election" idea. While
frequent elections might be less expensive and disruptive, they could also have
a negative effect on democratic processes and provide practical difficulties.
[1] B. Muthu Kumar, One Election, Two Votes: The
Feasibility of Reviving the Past Trend, 5 GNLU L. REV. 139 (2018).
[3] Parindu Bhagat and Dr. Mrs. Purvi Pokharyal, Conceptual
Reforms One Nation – One Election, Volume 19, Issue 4 of Ilkogretim Online -
Elementary Education Online, 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.764802
[4] Dr.Meenakshi Bansal, The Concept of One Nation One
Election: An Analysis from Indian Perspective, THINK INDIA (Quarterly Journal)
ISSN:0971-1260 Vol-22-Issue-4-October-December-2019
[5] Shivani, One Nation One Election: A New Electoral
Reform in India, 24 Supremo Amicus [201] (2021).
[6] B. Muthu Kumar, One Election, Two Votes: The
Feasibility of Reviving the Past Trend, 5 GNLU L. REV. 139 (2018).
[7] Simultaneous
elections for Parliament and State Legislatures", Election Commission of
India, March 1983
[8] One Nation, One Election: Is It Possible?" PRS
Legislative Research, 30 May 2019
[9] Report of the Department-related Parliamentary
Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice on
Feasibility of Holding Simultaneous Elections to House of People (Lok Sabha)
and State Legislative Assemblies", Rajya Sabha Secretariat, August 2016
[10] Simultaneous Elections - Constitutional and Legal
Framework", Law Commission of India, March 2018
[11] Report on One Nation One Election", Election
Commission of India, August 2018
[12] Simultaneous polls feasible, PM Modi's vision can be
implemented: ECI to Law Ministry", India Today, 7 June 2020
[13] One Nation,
One Election: Is It Feasible and Desirable?", The Wire, 6 June 2019
[14] Report on One Nation One Election", Election
Commission of India, August 2018
[15] Shivani, One Nation One Election: A New Electoral
Reform in India, 24 Supremo Amicus [201] (2021)
[16] Parindu Bhagat and Dr. Mrs. Purvi Pokharyal,
Conceptual Reforms One Nation – One Election, Volume 19, Issue 4 of Ilkogretim
Online - Elementary Education Online, 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.764802
[17] Parindu Bhagat and Dr. Mrs. Purvi Pokharyal,
Conceptual Reforms One Nation – One Election, Volume 19, Issue 4 of Ilkogretim
Online - Elementary Education Online, 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.764802
[18] B. Muthu Kumar, One Election, Two Votes: The
Feasibility of Reviving the Past Trend, 5 GNLU L. REV. 139 (2018).
[19] Simultaneous elections for Parliament and State
Legislatures", Election Commission of India, March 1983
[20] Dr.Meenakshi
Bansal, The Concept of One Nation One Election: An Analysis from Indian
Perspective, THINK INDIA (Quarterly Journal) ISSN:0971-1260
Vol-22-Issue-4-October-December-2019
[21] Parindu Bhagat and Dr. Mrs. Purvi Pokharyal,
Conceptual Reforms One Nation – One Election, Volume 19, Issue 4 of Ilkogretim
Online - Elementary Education Online, 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.764802
[22] Simultaneous elections for Parliament and State
Legislatures", Election Commission of India, March 1983
[23] B. Muthu Kumar, One Election, Two Votes: The
Feasibility of Reviving the Past Trend, 5 GNLU L. REV. 139 (2018).
[24] Simultaneous elections for Parliament and State
Legislatures", Election Commission of India, March 1983
[25] B. Muthu Kumar, One Election, Two Votes: The
Feasibility of Reviving the Past Trend, 5 GNLU L. REV. 139 (2018).
Article Information
UNDERSTANDING ONE NATION ONE ELECTION IN INDIA BY: ANEEKA ROBY
Authors: ANEEKA RO
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2023/04/25
- Volume 2
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.