Open Access Research Article

The Right To Freedom Of Religion: The Hijab Controversy (By Divyanjali Nigam)

Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Published 2022/04/23
Access Open Access

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Article Details

Article 25 of the Constitution allows one to not only entertain their religious beliefs but also exhibit their beliefs in such a manner as one thinks is proper and to propagate or disseminate his ideas[1]. Restricting this would amount to violating our country’s secular system.
 
Being a secular country that respects all citizens’ rights, freedoms, and beliefs without discrimination, it is my view that students must be allowed to wear hijabs expressing their religious beliefs, subject to reasonable restrictions such as the Hijab being in tangent with the colour of the school uniform. On a personal note, I am not afraid to disagree with the recent judgement of the Karnataka High Court, which ruled Hijab as not an essential practice of Islam[2]. 
 
A blanket ban is not the solution, but healthily embracing our differences is. Being the diverse country that we are, we can only live together and thrive if we are accommodative towards each other’s differences.


[1]Sri Sri Sri Lakshamana Yatendrulu & Others v State of A.P. & Another (1996)8 SCC 705 (para 14).
[2] Resham v. State of Karnataka, 2022 SCC OnLine Kar 315.

Article Information

The Right To Freedom Of Religion: The Hijab Controversy (By Divyanjali Nigam)

Author Name: Divyanjali Nigam
Title: The Right To Freedom Of Religion: The Hijab Controversy
Email Id: divyanjalinigam28@gmail.com
  • Journal IJLRA
  • ISSN 2582-6433
  • Published 2022/04/23

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • Abbreviation IJLRA
  • ISSN 2582-6433
  • Access Open Access
  • License CC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.