MARITAL RAPE AND ENTANGLEMENT IN LEGAL FRAMEWORK BY - SNEHA JHA
MARITAL
RAPE AND ENTANGLEMENT IN LEGAL FRAMEWORK
AUTHORED
BY - SNEHA JHA
Marital
rape, also known as spousal rape[1],
is the act of engaging in sexual intercourse with one's spouse without their
consent. It is crucial to understand that the absence of consent does not
require physical violence. Marital rape is unequivocally recognised as a form
of domestic violence and sexual abuse. In the historical context, sexual
intercourse within the confines of marriage was often perceived as a
prerogative of spouses. However, it is paramount to acknowledge that engaging
in such activity without the explicit consent of one's spouse is widely accepted
as a form of rape in numerous societies worldwide. This is in line with the
condemnation of such actions by international conventions and the ongoing trend
of criminalisation.
The
absence of legal protection against marital rape is an urgent women’s rights
concern for India, given that estimates from the third (2005-06) and fourth
(2015-16) rounds of the [2]National Family
Health Survey (NFHS) revealed that the
prevalence percentage of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) against women ranges between
3% to 43% in different states of the country. The 5th round of the survey, held
in 2019-20 and conducted in about 637,000 sample households in 707 districts of
28 states and eight union territories, suggests that 1 in 3 women
in India aged 18-49 experience spousal
violence, with at least 5%-6% of the women reporting sexual violence. The NFHS
survey findings found a strong link between sexual and physical violence, so it
recorded marital sexual violence under the umbrella of spousal violence. A breakdown
of the findings shows that 5.6% of married women were physically forced to have
sexual intercourse with their husbands, 2.7% of women were physically forced to
perform sexual activities that they did not wish to perform, and 3.7% of the
women were forced to perform sexual activities against their will through
threats of physical violence.
The current definition of rape under
section 375 of the Indian Penal Code does not encompass marital rape as a
criminal offence. Exception 2 of section 375 specifies that sexual intercourse
by a man with his wife, as long as she is not under fifteen years of age, is
not considered rape. Based on traditional beliefs, it is often assumed that
within marriage, a woman forfeits the right to refuse sexual intimacy with her husband.
This presumption grants husbands unrestricted sexual access to their wives,
infringing upon fundamental human rights and essentially legitimising spousal
rape.
The IPC defines rape under sec. 375
as:
1. Against her will
2. Without her consent
3. With her consent, obtained through
fear of death or hurt
4. With her consent, when the man knows
that he is not her husband and that her consent is given because she believes
that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully
married
5. With her consent, when, at the time
of giving such consent, due to unsoundness of mind, intoxication, or the
administration of any stupefying or unwholesome substance by him personally or
through another person, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences
of that to which she gives consent
6. With or without her consent, when she
is under sixteen years of age
The Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) of 2023, intended as a replacement for
the Indian Penal Code (IPC), does not explicitly classify marital rape as a
criminal offence. Despite incorporating significant reforms and updates, the
BNS maintains an exception wherein sexual intercourse by a man with his wife is
not considered rape, provided she is not under 18 years of age. This provision
results in the continued absence of recognition of marital rape as a criminal
act under the new legislation.
As per Justice [3]J.S.
Verma committee report, The IPC
differentiates between rape within marriage and outside marriage. Under
the IPC sexual intercourse without consent is prohibited. However, an
exception to the offence of rape exists concerning un-consented sexual
intercourse by a husband upon a wife. The Committee recommended that the
exception to marital rape should be removed. Marriage should not be
considered as an irrevocable consent to sexual acts. Therefore, in an
inquiry about whether the complainant consented to the sexual activity, the
relationship between the victim and the accused should not be relevant.
This article
seeks to examine and confirm the assertion that the absence of criminalisation
of marital rape leads to substantial violations of women's rights. The study
will explore the legal, social, and psychological consequences for women in
India where marital rape is not explicitly outlawed, offering evidence to
support the necessity of legal changes to safeguard women's rights.
The
absence of criminalisation of marital rape in India infringes upon fundamental
rights as guaranteed by the Constitution of India, including the rights to
equality, protection from discrimination, right to life and personal liberty.
Right to Equality
ARTICLE 14: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the
law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.
In the rulings of ANWAR ALI SARKAR
VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [4],
the Supreme Court established that any classification under Article 14 of the
Indian Constitution must undergo a test of reasonableness. According to this
test, a classification can only be deemed reasonable if it demonstrates a
rational connection to the objective intended to be achieved by the law.
JOSEPH SHINE VS. UNION OF INDIA[5]: The
Supreme Court struck down Section 497 (Adultery) of the IPC, emphasising that
the Constitution upholds equality and that laws discriminating based on gender
are unconstitutional. This case highlights the need for laws to treat
individuals equally, suggesting that the exclusion of marital rape from
criminal offences is a similar violation of Article 14.
Prohibition of discrimination
ARTICLE 15. (1) The State shall not discriminate
against any citizen based only on religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or
any of them.
ARTICLE 15 (3) Nothing in this article shall
prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.
NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [6]The
Supreme Court decriminalised Section 377, emphasising the need to protect
individuals from discrimination and to uphold the constitutional values of
dignity, autonomy, and equality. This case underscores the importance of
eliminating discriminatory laws based on personal characteristics, such as
marital status.
Right To Life and Personal Liberty
ARTICLE 21. No person shall be deprived of his
life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.
In the case of Bodhisattwa Gautam v.
Subhra Chakraborty[7], the
Supreme Court emphasised that rape constitutes a violation of basic human
rights and infringes upon the victim's fundamental rights, particularly the
right to life as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. It is noteworthy
that the current laws in India do not recognise marital rape, which contradicts
the Court's pronouncement.
In the case of State of Karnataka v. Krishnappa[8], the Supreme Court ruled that sexual violence constitutes an unlawful infringement on the right to privacy and the sanctity of women, in addition to being a dehumanising act.
In K.S. Puttuswamy vs. Union of
India, [9]the
Supreme Court recognised the right to privacy as a fundamental right of all
citizens under ARTICLE 21
VISHAKHA
VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [10]This
case recognised sexual harassment as a violation of fundamental rights under
Articles 14, 19, and 21. Similarly, marital rape undermines a woman's right to
personal liberty and dignity.
The
PIL filed by Anuja Kapur in the case of Anuja Kapur vs. Union of India Through
Secretary, 2019, urged the Court to direct the Government of India to establish
guidelines and laws on marital rape. However, the Supreme Court bench, led by
Justice SA Bobde and Justice BR Gavai, declined the petition, emphasizing that
the task of formulating laws falls within the purview of the legislature, not
the judiciary. The court's role primarily involves interpreting the law rather
than creating it.
In 2022, the Delhi High Court issued
a divided ruling on the matter of criminalising marital rape, ultimately
upholding the existing law. Consequently, the issue is now set to be reviewed
by the Supreme Court. Justice [11]Rajiv
Shakdher found that the marital rape exception violates provisions of the
Indian constitution as it leads to “denial of bodily autonomy and agency of married women, which
must be rectified”. He further observed that the marital rape exemption
“suffers from manifest arbitrariness and discrimination as a crime as heinous
as rape is not recognised as an offence in marriage”.
Justice Hari Shankar emphasised that
a straightforward approach cannot be applied within a marriage. He argued that
consent for sexual intimacy may be given without genuine willingness, and the
state should not intervene in the private realm of a marital relationship.
"Here's
something to think about: What changes can be made to the legal framework to
address these discrepancies?"
The criminalisation of marital rape
calls for reform in the legal system
Need to propose the following legal
reforms:
Amendments to the Indian Penal Code
(IPC):
1. Amend Section 375 to remove the
exception clause that states sexual intercourse by a man with his wife, if she
is not under 15 years of age, is not considered rape.
2. Amend or repeal Section 376B to
address ambiguities related to marital rape and explicitly criminalize
non-consensual sexual acts within marriage.
Introduce Specific Legislation:
Enact a comprehensive law that
defines and criminalizes marital rape, detailing penalties and support
mechanisms for victims.
There should be an adequate support
system for victims
The state should prioritise the
establishment of dedicated centres that offer comprehensive support to victims
of marital rape, including medical, legal, and psychological assistance. These centres
must be easily accessible, especially in rural and remote areas. Additionally,
we need to strengthen the capacity of existing women's helplines to effectively
handle cases of marital rape and provide immediate assistance.
Creating awareness
Launch nationwide campaigns to raise
awareness about marital rape, its consequences, and the rights of victims.
Use various media platforms to
disseminate information and challenge societal norms that condone marital rape.
Availability of legal aid
To raise
awareness about marital rape, its consequences, and the rights of victims,
nationwide campaigns can be launched. Information can be disseminated and
societal norms that condone marital rape can be challenged by utilising various
media platforms.
Conclusion
Marital
rape is a despicable form of sexual violence in which one spouse coerces the
other into sexual activities without their consent. It is a severe infringement
upon personal autonomy and bodily integrity, and it unfortunately occurs within
the confines of marriage.
Marital
rape can result in profound and diverse repercussions for the victim, encompassing
physical, psychological, social, economic, and legal dimensions.
Criminalising marital rape in India is important for various reasons. It is in coherence with the principles of gender equality and fundamental human rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Addressing marital rape through legal reform is essential in the fight against gender-based violence and the advancement of societal progress. This action unequivocally communicates that sexual violence within marriage is unacceptable and confronts prevailing attitudes that tolerate or belittle such abuse. This can drive a shift in cultural norms, fostering a stronger emphasis on consent and gender equality.
[1] https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Marital-Rape-and-Law
(LAST VISITED ON 21/05/2024)
[3] Https://clpr.org.in/tag/justice-verma-committee/
(LAST VISITED ON 21/05/2024)