ABSTRACT
So, the kinds of question this unit
seeks to explore are: Can we regard 'sexuality' as a fixed concept that can be easily understood both
across different time periods and different cultures? Or, is it a made up of the most diverse contexts of social and cultural life, registering
changes as these change? European theorists of the topic such as Michel
Foucault (1990) have suggested that
sexuality as a clearly demarcated field of study and debate emerges during the early 18th century
through a combination of medical, legal, educational and other discourses. That is to say, certain ideas regarding
sexuality that did not earlier exist emerged
during this period and that the emergence of these ideas was linked to the ways
in which sexual behaviour was sought
to be understood and controlled by a variety of 'experts' such as doctors, judges, and teachers
This, in turn, led to the emergence
of different categories of 'sexual beings' such as the
homosexual, the heterosexual, the sexualised woman, the sexually awakened child, the reproductive family, the
pervert, etc. Soon after. Foucault suggests,
sexuality became focused on the family. That is to say, an entire range of
experts (doctors, psychiatrists,
priests, teachers, etc.) concentrated their attention on the family, advising against the perils of 'bad'
sexuality and ensuring its good health. So, through these processes, the family was both
'sexualised' and acted as an agent of sexualisation. That is, it became the benchmark for topics such as
'good' and 'bad' sexuality, and 'healthy' sexual behaviour. In this way, Foucault suggests, sexuality became a
very important topic of discussion,
rather than being banned from being discussed (or, repressed) as is commonly thought.
"Good" sexuality within the family- reproductive sexuality, able to produce a
suitable labour force then became part of the development of capitalism.
As we will see in the sections that
follow, there are several additional contexts to be considered when we think of sexuality in the non-Western context.
However, the key point to retain is the social and historical nature of sexuality.
sexologists and others who offer a
'scientific point of view. This follows from the perspective that we must re-think the truth-of-our-
sexuality perspective as well as the biologism that has historically afflicted sexuality studies. The former suggests that
a) sexual behaviour ought to be
judged according to certain norms; and, b) there is an underlying 'truth about
our sexual lives that we must
understand (for example: the gay gene explains homosexuality': 'sexual orientation is a fixed trait': 'men have uncontrollable
sexual drives', etc.). Biologism in the study
of sexuality, as already indicated above, is connected to the view that it
(sexuality) can be explained by
recourse to a set of unchanging bodily essences and drives. Hence, just as we tend to think that our genders are
biologically determined, so too we assume that our sexual lives unfold according to an inner
biological template. This, in turn, connects to two other ideas. Firstly, we think in terms of
'expressing our sexuality as if it is an essence that simply appears through its own natural logic.
Another point of view would be to say that we enact our sexual selves, that is, it is learnt behaviour. And,
secondly, we too easily assume that 'underneath
our visible differences such as class and status, we harbour the same sexual 'drive".
Transgender are individuals that
are assigned a certain gender at birth but who identify strongly with a different gender. For example, a child who is
identified as male at birth and raised
as a hoy but asserts their gender as female and self-identifies as a
transgender woman. Similarly, a child
who is identified as female at birth and raised as a girl may assert their gender as male and self-identify as a
transgender man. Transgender persons may self-identify as heterosexual, lesbian gay or queer depending on who they
are attracted to. In India, the local terms
to refer to transgender people
are hijras, kinnars,
aravanis, mangalamukhis etc.
The predominant social norm of
heterosexual marriage and reproduction forces
LGBTQI individuals in
closets. They hesitate to speak
openly about their identities or sexual
desires and lead a life that is not true to how they feel. Many are forced into heterosexual marriages and live unhappy lives as a result
of it.
Difficulties in changing legal
gender markers on identity cards and educational certificates. The process of legally changing gender markers is
not standardised across government
departments and state authorities. It leaves trans persons at the mercy of officers who may or may not be
knowledgeable about trans issues.
Many trans and queer people who
don't have access to formal employment often
engage in sex work and are routinely harassed under the Immoral Traffic
(Prevention) Act, 1956. The acts punishable under this law that
are used against queer/trans persons are brothel keeping, living on earnings of sex work, and
prostitution in areas notified by Police & near public
places.
Centre and State Governments were
directed to operate separate HIV Sero-surveillance centres since Hijras Transgender face several sexual health issues.
Consent known to be given under
fear or misconception-A consent is not such a consent as it intended by any section of this Code, if the consent is
given by a person under fear of injury,
or under a misconception of fact, and if the person doing the act knows, or has
reason to believe, that the consent
was given in consequence of such fear or misconception, or Consent of insane person if the consent is
given by a person who, from unsoundness of mind, or intoxication, is unable to understand the nature and
consequence of that to which he gives his
consent or Consent of child-unless the contrary appears from the context. if
the consent is given by a person who is under twelve years of age.
There is no conclusive evidence that a
higher level of natural testosterone (which is different from synthetic testosterone used in doping in sports) without
receptors can provide any advantage.in sports over those who don't have the same.
In this unit sexual orientation and
the main identities that come under the LGBTOI+ umbrellaure discussed. Also addressed are the norms in society
and the pressures this generates on
all those whose desires and lives fall outside the norm. The major social and legal issues faced by LGBTOI people and
the issue of consent in legal and social terms have also been addressed. This research paper concludes with a
focused discussion on a much neglected
section of the LGBTQI umbrella- people with intersex variations and the issues
of gender testing in sports
from a historical and current perspective.
Semula G1120 RE-CISTIENG NATTER
SINGH UNION OF INDIA.Authors: Tanisha Banthia, Saurabh Ranka
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.