INSIGHT TO THE PROCEDURE OF THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BY: PALLAVI NAYYAR

AUTHORED BY: PALLAVI NAYYAR
Email: pallavinayar1304@gmail.com
Phone Number: 9911288361
Qualification: LLM (BL)
Year: 2022- 2023
College: AMITY INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED LEGAL STUDIES, NOIDA
Address: 430-Dhruva Apartment, 4-I.P.Extension, Delhi - 110092
 
ABSTRACT
Under the provisions of Section 15K of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 a statutory body was established by Securities Appellate Tribunal. This statutory body was establishedto hear and also to dispose of appeals against the orders which was passed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India or by an adjudicating officer under the Act and to exercise jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred on the Tribunal by or under are Act or any other law for the time being in force.
 
The scope of this research article is to study and understand the procedure of the Securities Appellate Tribunal and identify the problems in some cases. This research article will cover limitation for filing the appeal, presentation and scrutiny of the appeal, a notice of appeal to the respondent, date of hearing, the publication of orders and communication of orders.
 
INTRODUCTIONOF SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
a)    Establishment
Securities Appellate Tribunal is the appellate authority for capital market decisions taken by the SEBI.Under section 15K in the SEBI Act, 1992, the first Securities Appellate Tribunal was established by the notification issued by the Central Government. If more Securities Appellate Tribunal’s are needed then the Union Government has the right to issue the notification in this regard.
According to section 15K[1] of this Act :
·         Through notification of Central Government, one or more Appellate Tribunals can be established which will be known as the Securities Appellate Tribunal. It will exercise the jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred under this Act or any other law for the time being in force.
·         In the notification, the Central Government will refer to the matter and places in regards to which Securities Appellate Tribunal may exercise jurisdiction.
 
b)    Composition
According to section 15L[2] of this Act, there will be
·         One presiding officer
·         Two other members – one should be a judicial member and the other a technical member.
 
c)     Powers of Securities Appellate Tribunal
Securities Appellate Tribunal have the same powers that civil code is vested with under Code of Civil Procedures, 1908.
·         To enforce and summon the attendance of any person
·         To examine him on oath
·         To give order related to discovery and production of documents
·         To obtainevidence on affidavits
·         To issue commissions for examining the documents or witnesses
·         To review Tribunal’sdecisions passed
·         To dismiss an application for default
·         To decide an application as ex-parte
·         Set any order aside or dismiss any application for default or any order passed by it ex-parte
·         Any other matter which may be prescribed
d)    Procedure For filing appeals
1.      A Memorandum of appeal shall be presented in the form annexed to the rules by the Appellant either in person to the registrar of the Appellate Tribunal within whose jurisdiction the person’s case falls or can be sent by the registered post addressed to registrar.
2.      Where the appellant is the company, a memorandum may be preferred, -
§  By either one or more than one legal practitionerswho are authorized by such company or
§  By any of the officers of such company to act as a Presenting Officers and every person so authorized may present the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal.
3.      Where the appellate is other than a company he may appeal in person or by his agent or by a duly organized legal practitioner.
4.      An appeal under sub-rule(1) sent by post will be deemed to have been presented on the same day to the Registrar on which it is received in the office of the Registrar.
5.      The Appeal under sub-rule(1) must be presented in four sets in a Paper Book.The Paper Book should be along with an envelope bearing the full address of the respondent which is of the size of an empty file and where the number of respondents is more than one, the sufficient number of extra paper books together with empty file size envelope baring full address of each respondent shall be furnished by the appellant. Presentation and scrutiny of the memorandum of appeal.[3]
6.      (1)The Registrar shall endorse on every appeal the date on which it is presented under that rule and shall sign the endorsement.
(2)If the appeal is found to be in order on scrutiny, then it will be duly registered and will be given a serial number.
(3)If the appeal is found to be defective on scrutiny and the defect notice is formal in nature then the Registrar in his presence willpermit the appellant to rectify the defect and if the defect is informal in nature then the Registrar may allow the appellant to rectify the defect at the specified time as he may deem fit.
(4)If the concerned appellant fails to rectify the defect within the time allowed in sub-rule(3), the Registrar may by order or for reasons to be recorded in writing, decline to register such memorandum of appeal.
(5) An appeal under sub-rule(4), against the order of the Registrar shall be made to the Presiding Officer concerned in his chamber within 15 days of making such order, whose decision shall be thereon final.
7.      The memorandum of appeal shall be filed with the Registrar of the Appellate Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter by the appellant.
 
SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULE, 2000
a)    Limitation for filing the appeal
·         Within the period of 45 days appeal should be filed before the tribunal.
·         The 45 days start from the day when the appellant will receive a copy of the order against which the appeal is filed.
·         If the appeal is not filed within 45 days, then Appellate Tribunal may if it thinks that there exists a justified reason for not filing the appeal within 45 days, allow that appeal.
 
b)    Form and procedure of appeal
·      A memorandum of appeal which shall be presented in the Form can be presented by any aggrieved person in the registry of the appellate tribunal.
·      The memorandum of appeal must be presented in the Appellate Tribunal within whose jurisdiction the concerned case falls or shall be sent by registered post addressed to the Registrar.
·      In case a memorandum of appeal is sent through the post by the appeal, then it shall be deemed to have been presented in the registry on the day it was received in the registry.
 
c)     Sittings of Appellate Tribunal
·         The sitting of the Appellate Tribunal will be at the place where its office is situated or some other place where the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal falls.
·         When the Presiding Officer is temporarily absent, the Government of India can authorize either of the 2 other members to preside over the sitting of the Tribunal either at its office where it is situated or at some other place where the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal falls.
d)    Appeal to be writing
·         Every appeal, application, reply, representation or any document file before the Appellate Tribunal should be typewritten, cyclostyled or printed neatly and legibly.
·         It should be typewritten on good quality paper of foolscap size in double space and separate sheets should be stitched together. Every page should be consecutively numbered and filled in a manner provided in sub-rule(2).
·         The Appeal under sub-rule (1) shall be presented in 5 sets in a papers book along with an empty file size envelope. This envelope should bear the full address of the particular respondent, in case the respondent is more than one. It should be provided along with asufficient number of extra books together with an empty full-size envelope.
 
e)     Presentation and scrutiny of memorandum appeal
·            The Registrar will endorse the date on every appeal and will sign the endorsement. The date mentioned will be one on which appeal was presented under rule 4 or deem to have been presented under that rule.
·            On scrutiny, ifthe appeal is found to be in order, it will be duly registered and a serial number will be given.
·            The defect can be rectified by the appellant in the presence of the Registrar if permitted in the caseconcerning defect is formal and in nature but if the defect is not formal in nature, the Registrar may give the appellant some time to rectify the defect as he may deem fit.
·            If the appeal has been sent by post and found to be defective, the Registrar may communicate the defects to the appellant and give the appellant some time to rectify the defect as he may deem suitable.
·            If the appellant fails to rectify the defect within the time allotted by the Registrar in sub-rule (3), the Registrar will pass an order which will provide for reasons to be recorded in writing and may decline to register such memorandum of appeal and communicate the order to the appellant within 7 days from declining.
·            An appeal under sub-rule (4), can be made within 15 days of receiving the declining of the appeal by the Registrar. The appeal will be made to the Presiding Officer or in his temporary absence, to the member authorized under sub-rule (2) of rule 5 whose decision will be considered as final.
f)      Contents of the memorandum of the appeal
·         Every memorandum of appeal filed under rule 4 will be put down concisely under different heads.
·         The grounds of appeal will be passed without any argument or narrative.
·         The concerned ground shall be numbered consecutively and shall be the manner provided in sub-rule (1) of rule 7.
·         It will not be required to present a separate memorandum of appeal to get an interim order or direction if the above-mentioned ground is prayed for in the memorandum of appeal
 
g)    Plural remedies
Relief or reliefs not sought against memorandum of appeal against more than one order unless the reliefs are prayed for are in consequence.
 
h)    Notice of appeal to the respondent
A copy of the memorandum of appeal and the paper book should be given by the Registrar to the respondent after they are registered in the registry. The copy can be served by hand delivery or by registered post or speed post.
 
i)       Date of hearing to be notified
·         A notification will be sent by the Appellate Tribunal to the parties regarding the date ofhearing of the appeal.
·         It will be done in a particular manner which will be provided by the Presiding Officer.
·         By passing a general or special order directed by the Presiding Officer.
 
j)      Hearing of Appeal
·         The appellant will be heard in support of the appeal file, on the day fixed or any other day to which the hearing may be adjourned.
·         After this, the Securities Appellate Tribunal will, then, if it thinks necessary, hear the Board or the representative authorized by the Board against the appeal.
·          During the hearing of the Board or its authorized representative presenting the arguments against the appeal, the appellant will be entitled to reply.
·         The written argument should be supplemented by a time-bound oral argument, during the proceedings of the hearing of the appeal.
·         In case the appellant is not present in person or through an authorized representative when the appeal is set for hearing, the Securities Appellate Tribunal may dispose of the appeal on the merits.
 
k)       Order to be signed and dated[4]
·         Each and every order will be signed with the date by the Presiding Officer and 2 other members of the Appellate Tribunal.
·         The authority and power to pass the interim orders or injunctions arepossessed by the Presiding Officer.
·         In the interest of justice, it is necessary for the interim orders or injunctions to be subject to reasons, to be recorded in writing.
 
l)       Publication of orders
·         The orders of the Appellate Tribunal will be released for publication if Appellate Tribunal thinks that it is fit for publication in any authoritative report or the press.
·         It will be released for publication on certain terms and conditions laid down by the Presiding Officer.
 
m) Communication of orders
To the following members a certified copy of each and every order passed by the Appellate Tribunal shall be communicated:
Ø  Board
Ø  Adjudicating Officer
Ø  Parties
 
 
 
CASES CONCERNING OF THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
a)    Satyam Scandal of 2009[5]
In September 2019, in the Satyam Scandal of 2009, the Securities Appellate Tribunal turn down the ban that SEBI put on PwC for the global audit firm’s role in the decade-old Satyam Scandal.
Facts:
Ø  On January 7, 2009, the then Chairmen of Satyam Computer Service, resigned confessing that he had manipulated the various accounts in different forms.
Ø  The global corporate company was also part of the scandal. When the news of the Satyam Scandal spread, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and the auditor of Satyam Computer Service, also served as an independent auditor. The Indian arm of PwC in the US was also sanctioned with a fine of $6 million by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for not obeying the Code of Conduct.
SEBI put a ban on PwC as it provided a helping hand in this scandal. But the Securities Appellate Tribunal ordered SEBI to remove it because it had no authority or jurisdiction to ban PwC from practising and the authority regarding it rests with the ICAI.
 
Critical Analysis: B. Ramalinga Raju hid the true financial position to ensure that his business runs smoothly and take over are at bay. He wanted to get more funds and built an estate. For this purpose, he siphoned those funds in other areas like land holdings which were estimated to about 7 crores and held in Matyas firm. He also did the same with companies in Benami or in his own name. The gap between the fictitious assets of Satyam and the real assets of Matyas was bridged by him. Some senior management allowed certain employees to fake bills of the company which gave a wrong scenario. The invoices warranted in companies system and was found around 5 crores worth of them were fake. The false invoices were forged as cash receipts and hence they were false bank statements. Excel Portal was used for hiding fake invoices, Satyam Project Repository was used to create project ids, Project Bill Management System for generating Bills, operational real-time for creating and managing fake receipts, invoice management system for creating fake invoices all of these apps were used for fraud.
b)    SEBI V. Sahara India Real Estate[6]
This case is regarded as the landmark case with reference to the power and jurisdiction of SEBI in the case of corporate fundraising. SEBI claimed that in the form of Optionally Fully Convertible Debentures, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited claim to have collected deposit from the public. 23 million people from villages and towns invested about 24,000 crores rupees. In July 2015, in this case, SEBI cancelled Sahara MF’s registration with the reasoning that it was not ‘fit and proper to carry out the business. Further,on the order of SEBI, the operations were transferred to another fund house. It also directed to cancel the registration of Sahara MF’s when the 6 month period had expired.
 
Sometime before SEBI cancelled the license of portfolio management of Sahara. In pursuance of an order issued by SEBI, Sahara MF approach the Securities Appellate Tribunal. The appellants were, the Sahara Asset Management Co, Sahara Mutual Fund and Sahara India Financial Corporation.
 
Securities Appellant Tribunal granted 6 weeks to the appellants to approach the Supreme Court.
 
After this, the Sahara MF filed an appeal in the Supreme Court which was dismissed in October 2017 by the apex court. Sahara MF was directed by SEBI to strictly obey the specified timelines in the order passed in July 2015. But the Securities Appellant Tribunal allowed Sahara to withdraw its appeal and to file a fresh appeal as it has the liberty to do so.
 
The decision of the case: The Hon’ble Supreme Court ordered Sahara to refund the entire deposits collected by it through Red Hearing Prospectus at an interest rate of 15% till the date of refund. It also authorized SEBI to take legal recourse in case the appellant i.e. Sahara fails to comply with the said order.
 
Critical Analysis: As per my observation the Supreme Court is justified from all perspectives as it emphasized the fact that how Sahara tried to defeat the provisions of various acts like SEBI Act, 1992, Companies Act, 2013 and jeopardized the lives of investors of lower strata of society who barely earned amount to keep their body and soul together. It gambled with lives of illiterate people who practically have no or little idea of the financial position of a company and so are ambiguous about harnessing the opportunity to make benefit out of schemes like OFCD which needs knowledge about the performance of the company and also about the basic knowledge regarding proper time to turn debentures into shares which will be profitable to them. These investors are not aware of the risk which comes along with these schemes and due to ignorance invest money. The decision of the Supreme Court in every respect will major precedent which will act as a deterrent for them not to involve themselves in such schemes.
 
CONCLUSION
SEBI is the prime regulator of the Securities Market and if it fails to satisfy the company or organization through its regulation, then the person can file an appeal in the Securities Appellant Tribunal. Securities Appellant Tribunal works to mitigate the problems arising out of the orders of SEBI since 1995. In many cases, Securities Appellant Tribunal has proved to check for the accountability and answerability of SEBI.
 
In stock markets, the exchange of shares is taking place. In total in India there are 23 stock exchanges which are being regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). In India, SEBI is the principal regulator of the stock exchange.
 
Any suit or proceedings can not be entertained in Civil Court which has jurisdiction to, in respect of any manner which an Adjudicating Officer appointed under this act is empowered or under this Act to determine and no injection shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any function taken or to be taken in accordance with any power conferred by or under this act.
 
For insurance and all instruments traded on the stock or commodity exchanges, the Government is considering a common appellateauthority. It comes after the formation of the Financial Stability Development Council, which is a statutory body coordinating the functioning of financial market regulators.
 
 
 


[1]Section 15K of SEBI Act, 1992 is dealing with establishment of Securities Appellate Tribunal [https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1583906/]
[2]Section 15L of SEBI Act, 1992 is dealing with composition of Securities Appellate Tribunal [https://indiankanoon.org/doc/765466/]
[3]CHARTERED SECRETARY, VOL XLIII (NOVEMBER 2013) www.icsi.edu/WebModules/LinksOfWeeks/CS_NOV2013.pdf
[4]Substituted by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (Procedure)(Amended) Rules, 2003 w.e.f. 31-10-2003.
[5]CS Alok Singh , Investor Project : A Critical analysis with Satyam Fraud (November 26, 2009) https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/investor-protection-a-critical-analysis-with-satyam-fraud-3763.asp
[6]SEBI V. SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION LTD.  AND ORS. (2013) 1 SCC 1

Authors: PALLAVI NAYYAR
Registration ID: 101905 Published Paper ID: IJLRA1905
Year April -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 7
Approved ISSN : 
2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India 
Email Id: pallavinayar1304@gmail.com
Page No :15 | No of times Downloads: 0065
Doi Link: