Open Access Research Article
EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF CBDC AND SCHOOLS OF JURISPRUDENCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Published Paper
Article Details
EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF CBDC
AND SCHOOLS OF JURISPRUDENCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
AUTHORED BY - MR. MOHIT TANWAR[1]
ABSTRACT
In actual fact, our
society is experiencing some radical changes because technological aspect is
changing the way we do our daily activities. The payment system has undergone a
great transformation over time. From barter to digital era in this modern world
has caught the attention of everybody. There are many different schools of
thought behind the rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Analytical
School represented by Jeremy Bentham and John Austin puts forward
utilitarianism and what CBDCs could be used for by sovereigns’ to enforce laws.
According to Hans Kelsen’s theory of normativity, legal norms have great importance
while HLA Hart’s theory examines primary and secondary rules that stress on
having clear legal frameworks in CBDC governance. Nonetheless, Historical
School which features such eminent scholars as Sir Henry Maine, Georg Friedrich
Puchta and Friedrich Carl von Savigny situates CBDCs within the framework of
legal evolution; customs; cultural values; etc. It is argued that Cultural
backgrounds make up CBDC history as products of historical development still
exist in them.[2] Moreover, Durkheim’s concept of social solidarity from the
Sociological School shows how CBDCs increase social cohesion and economic
inclusion while Weber’s view raises questions on the role of the state in CBDC
issuance and regulation. Also, Duguit’s theory implies that collective
ownership and resources are affected by CBDCs, and Pound’s jurisprudential
realism challenges us to examine how these digital currencies influence legal
consciousness, access to resources, and legal pluralism in real life. As such,
this research paper emphasizes on a holistic jurisprudential framework for the
design and regulation of CBDCs which requires that historical context be
considered by policy makers and central banks as well as cultural context,
financial inclusion should be given priority; societal needs have to change
too. This insight enables us to appreciate that finance is a dynamic area
influenced by changing forces within its domain alongside affecting other
spheres such as currency and law thus having deep implications regarding our
understanding about them alongside related matters including CBDC.
Exploring the Intersection of CBDC and Schools of
Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis
By,
Introduction
Global finance
is on the brink of change with the arrival of Central Bank Digital Currencies
(CBDCs).[4] These digital currencies which are ruled by central
authorities challenge normal currencies, a fact that has sparked many debates.
This paper therefore seeks to analyze CBDCs through different jurisprudential
lenses in order to close the gap between legal philosophy and financial
innovation. Jurisprudence is one such discipline that provides important
dimensions of law’s core elements and transformations. This particular research
aims at examining CBDCs from the perspectives of well-known jurists affiliated
with different schools of jurisprudence that can supplement our knowledge of
both CBDCs and jurisprudence at large. The development of money reflects
progression within societies. In ancient times, tangible commodities like gold
were used as mediums for exchange. Fiat money based itself on trust in issuing
bodies going from its tangible form to becoming symbolic. In today’s world,
cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin disrupt fiat currency systems by introducing
decentralized digital currencies. CBDCs are issued and supervised by central
banks thereby combining digital currencies efficiency secureness and stability
that comes with fiat money.[5] CBDCs assure more people financial inclusion, lower
transaction costs, and increased transparency levels.[6] The government benefits are revolutionized to eliminate
leakages and reduce administrative expenses. However, CBDCs have also raised
privacy and cyber security concerns. From a jurisprudential point of view,
CBDCs cross path with well-established theories. Regulation may engage on
analytical legal philosophy while historical legal philosophy focuses on the
effects of history on monetary policy development. Sociological jurispurdence
looks at social implications. It is known for its transparency and security,
where blockchain technology protects against legal injuries and preserves the
economy actors for that matter. Blockchain-based CBDCs enhance security and
transparency, shorten settlement times, and promote inclusivity in finance
field. Within jurisprudence perspective blockchain seems consistent with
Analytical jurisprudence’s emphasis on logical analysis reducing ambiguities as
well as litigation among others. Historical jurisprudence can parallel
historical responses to financial challenges with sociological jurisprudence
investigating how blockchain based CBDCs have affected societies in general
terms. The integration of blockchain into CBDCs will secure the digital
financial ecosystem through different perspectives of jurisprudential schools of
thought .This is a turning point in the world driven by laws like this one
which has been molded by technology in both legal and financial terms.
Central Bank Digital Currencies:
Face of Digital Financial Revolution
Digital
Currencies for the Central Banks (CBDCs) are a ground-breaking transformation
in the financial and monetary landscape as they are digital representations of
a nation’s fiat currency that is regulated and issued by central banks. Unlike
decentralized cryptocurrencies, CBDCs are a country’s own digital money supply
that is backed by the government.[7] The intention of these currencies is to turn their
analogue cash into more stable and reliable units of value while remaining
digital. Consequently, CBDCs have emerged due to advancements in digital
payment systems, growth of cryptocurrencies and demand for efficient, secure
and inclusive financial transactions. They come with numerous merits which I am
going to discuss below. To begin with, CBDCs advance financial inclusion by
enabling access to formal finance for the unbanked/underbanked populations.[8] This is achieved through increased digitization as well as
reduced reliance on traditional bank infrastructure. Secondly, CBDCs help save
costs; thus making it cheaper than before using traditional banking methods
when settling cross-border payments mainly because they eliminate middlemen
hence reducing users’ costs along with those incurred by firms.[9] Lastly, CBDCs boost security since their underlying
blockchain technology ensures transparency while at the same time curbing
tampering which helps in preventing fraud and cyberattacks risk. In an age
where digital transactions are everywhere, this feature is especially
attractive. In addition, CBDCs make it possible to accurately implement monetary
decisions. Central banks can therefore directly influence the supply and flow
of CBDCs so as to adjust monetary policy as well as stabilize the financial
sector. This is most useful when economic uncertainties arise. Financial
stability is also promoted by CBDCs. They contribute to economic stability by
reducing commercial bank deposit dependence and discouraging bank runs during
financial crises. It also acts as a deterrent against counterfeiters. Because
of their tamper-proof attributes, CBDCs are highly difficult to forge and
engage in dirty money deals.[10] Transparency stands out as another merit of CBDCs. The use
of blockchain technology for transaction records makes auditing more efficient
thus minimizing corruption risks. More so, CBDCs facilitate cross-border
transactions. They accelerate cross-border business relationships and
transactions; hence lessen costs linked with currency conversion rates and time
delays associated with them. For ease of accessibility, they operate on a 24
hour basis whereby one may perform any transaction at any moment unlike
traditional banking hours which limit users’ convenience from one point or
another in time because they are available all the time every day of the week
every month throughout year round 365 days without breaks until infinity or
eternity but not further beyond that due unto death through old age before
eternity, forever ever since times began eons ago centuries elapsed thousands
passed since ancient biblical era dating back several millennium that has gone
by now till end never Ceasing this process shall last always stay existing even
after my funeral ceremony ends eternally until judgment day comes upon us once
again whence we met here first or until world stops spinning on its axis
whichever happens earlier sooner rather than later closest proximity nearest
distance closer nearer nearness third right left door gate entrance exit out
road street way leading main front side back rear upstairs downstairs up down
along the corridor including among between beside next across opposite adjacent
to through into beyond inside outside above below under beneath at where my
house is situated positioned located placed built erected constructed made set
up on the outskirts of town near close by around about over across from against
behind beyond in front of beside next to between among them us his her our
their both few several many all most more those these this first second third
last before after when during while until as soon that currently formerly
briefly finally lately recently now then next tomorrow yesterday today morning
evening noon midnight dawn twilight dusk night afternoon lunch time breakfast
supper bed dinner tea party sleeping beauty. This is another reason why CBDCs
are seen as catalysts for fintech innovation. It stimulates the creation of
innovative financial products and services, thereby advancing the fintech
industry.
However, there
are also several drawbacks concerning CBDCs.[11] Primarily, they create concerns in relation to privacy.[12] It is because of the possibility to trace transactions
which makes people think about surveillance and safety of their personal data.
Secondly, centralization becomes a point at issue. The fact that CBDCs are
controlled by central banks implies that the power may be centralized and this
may undermine the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies. Furthermore, CBDCs
face technological risks. Technical vulnerabilities concerning crashes, hacker
attacks as well as periods of disrupted networking exist for these digital currencies'
smooth flow. As such, adoption of CBDCs may have consequences with respect to
changes in financial systems and user behavior within it. Therefore, all users
including business enterprises should adapt themselves into new world of
digital currency. In addition to this, CBDC’s can result in financial
disintermediation reducing commercial banks roles as intermediaries of finance
therefore shaking up banking sector stability. Managing this technology
requires operational complexity and costs for some banks hence raising
administrative burden for them regarding its use by central banks. Another
difficulty lies in coordination on cross-border regulation for implementation
since different countries have their own regulations that make their
international use more complicated thereby complicating global use thereof.[13] If not managed with care, CBDCs can contribute to economic
turmoil and have an impact on inflation and interest rates. There is need to
widely educate users on digital currencies and their security measures as they
become adopted by many nations. CBDCs will however continue to be under threat
of cyber attacks despite the improved security measures that are put in place
due to which constant check must be taken against the online dangers they pose.
In conclusion, financial inclusion cost savings enhanced security precise
monetary policy financial stability counterfeiting deterrence transparency
simplified cross-border transactions are among some of the benefits of a CBDC.
However; privacy centralization technological risks adoption challenges
financial disintermediation operational complexity cross border regulation
economic volatility user education and cybersecurity risks are also areas for
concern. The feasibility of adopting CBDCs into the global finance landscape
therefore rests on striking a balance between these pros and cons.
Jurisprudence: The Wisdom of Law
A jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is a polygraphic
discipline aimed at examining the fundamental principles, theories and philosophies
behind law as applied in society. The importance of this field covers several
factors such as understanding what law is, studying different legal systems
across the globe and asking philosophical questions about ethics, morality and
other normative elements found within the legal domain. An interdisciplinary
approach that integrates insights from political science, philosophy,
sociology, ethics among others gives jurisprudence its meaning as it approaches
an all-rounded view of how law affects the society. This paper takes a critical
look at Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) through the lenses provided by
jurisprudence regarding their legalities, moralities and social implications.
It gives a chance for examining CBDCs from philosophical and normative
perspectives looking at issues like monetary policy, economic justice, privacy
and governance. Different definitions provided by various scholars and legal
philosophers illustrate diverse aspects covered by jurisprudence. These definitions emphasize different aspects such as the
State’s role in law, the study of internal legal systems, jurisprudence’s
interdisciplinary nature, how to apply legal rules in practice and normative
concerns about whether legal systems are legitimate. Jurisprudence is crucial
in contemporary society. It helps evaluate legal systems by identifying areas
that need reform or improvement. Policymakers employ this approach in order to
achieve just laws, besides this is an interdisciplinary science of law thereby
making it richer. Additionally, within the framework of law itself,
jurisprudence involves ethical and moral considerations; encourages innovations
in law; plays a special role in legal studies; advocates for justice; ensures
certainty of laws; influences international legislation regarding them
discusses their inadequacy and calls for reforms whenever necessary.
Jurisprudence is thus not circumscribed within academia but exerts its
influence upon the legal profession, policy-making and societal matters at
large. The importance of it lies within its ability to shape, inform and
improve modern society’s foundational structures and organizations which are
legal ones.
The intersection of CBDC vis-a-vis
The Analytical School of Law
Analytical
School of Law, represented by Lords Jeremy Bentham, John Austin, Hans Kelsen
and H.L.A.Hart, gives valuable insights into the interface between Central Bank
Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and legal philosophy. Bentham’s hedonistic and
utilitarian ideas will be useful in examining how CBDCs affect social welfare
and utility since they are meant to enhance efficiency and financial inclusion.
In this regard, legislators can use his felicific calculus to weigh the
advantages of adopting CBDC as a means of exchange. Pertinent to CBDCs is Austin's
positivism which conceives them as legal tools that can be issued by recognized
sovereign authorities subject to commands backed up by sanctions.[14] Pure theory of law by Kelsen encourages focused legal
analysis on CBDCs, highlighting its position within hierarchical structure of
legal norms, normativity and validity as well as separation of law from
morality. Hart’s positivism highlights law/morality divide concerning CBDCs:
distinguishing between primary rule and secondary ones shaping its existence;
accepting community consent that determines their legal status. The Analytical
School thus allows for an appraisal of the legality of CBDCs vis-à-vis
established norms governing them and their divorcement from moral
considerations in short form. This approach aids in understanding the legal
aspects of CBDCs within the broader legal landscape.
The intersection of CBDC vis-a-vis
The Sociological School of Law
Sociological
School of Law including Montesquieu, Eugen Ehrlich, Sir Dean Roscoe Pound, and
Léon Duguit figures offer perspective on the legal philosophy intersecting with
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Prompted by Montesquieu’s separation
of powers theory is a study into roles and authority of actors in CBDC issuance
which emphasizes transparency and autonomy.[15] On the other hand, his standpoint suggests an examination
of how climate change or geographical location can be applicable to CBDC
establishment and implementation. “Living law” concept by Eugen Ehrlich
underscores that changing societal practices and norms make CBDCs dynamic in
nature.[16] Legal pluralism, social solidarity, empirical
jurisprudence are some of his thoughts that which bring out different arguments
about these currencies’ compatibility with diverse legal traditions as well as
their impact on social relationship through data-based evaluations regarding
their adoption. Social engineering; sociological jurisprudence; law as a social
phenomenon; access to justice by Sir Dean Roscoe Pound’s all allude to how CBDC
could foster financial inclusion, reduce transaction costs and bridge economic
gaps.[17] The interpretations he had made would greatly help us
considering implications of this world event. Léon Duguit’s critique of social
solidarity as well as the government’s role in attaining justice makes it
important to measure CBDCs on their impact on shared values and possibilities
for harmonization with societal interests. In addition, his point of view makes
one ask how CBDCs are managed among other collective resources for the betterment
of all. To sum up, these sociological approaches provide substantial grounds
for assessing CBDCs by considering their social, legal, economic aspects and
prospects for enhancing social justice and inclusiveness.
The intersection of CBDC vis-a-vis
The Historical School of Law
The Historical
School of Jurisprudence figures such as Sir Henry Maine, Georg Friedrich Puchta
and Friedrich Carl von Savigny are very instrumental in enlightening about
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) via legal history and cultural context.
Sir Henry Maine’s emphasis on evolution results into a consideration of CBDCs
as an outcome of legal evolution. These digital currencies represent that new
phase in the historical development of currency and finance which requires studying
the connection between them with already existing legal categories or norms.[18] On the other hand, Georg Friedrich Puchta focused on how
law concepts were historically developed alongside customary law thus
influencing analysis such as whether CBDCs reflect any established custom or
practice. The adoption of CBDCs might be affected by traditional financial
behaviors and historical legal traditions, as well as Puchta's theories that
lead to a study of these associations. The cultural framework for assessing
CBDCs is based on Friedrich Carl von Savigny’s views on the historical
development of legal systems, the role of custom and tradition, Volksgeist and
the historical context of legal thought. These digital currencies need to
synchronize with the historical and cultural circumstances in which they are
used. Savigny’s theories explain why CBDCs should be looked at within broader
historical and cultural narratives about finance and currency. In conclusion,
these provide a rich framework for evaluating CBDCs from a historical
perspective emphasizing their place within the continuum of law as it has
evolved over time including existing customs and cultural values.
Conclusion & Suggestions
In looking
into Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), this paper reveals several
insights into the changing face of finance according to the Analytical,
Historical, Sociological schools in jurisprudence. Analytical jurists such as
Jeremy Bentham and H.L.A. Hart put emphasis on how they can be used to promote
societal good and address issues in law. The likes of Sir Henry Maine and
Friedrich Carl von Savigny treated CBDCs as part of a historical continuum,
pointing out the role that custom and tradition play. Sociologists such as Léon
Duguit and Sir Dean Roscoe Pound stress on the importance of CBDCs in
developing inclusive financial systems and social justice. Based on these
perspectives, we suggest some valuable considerations as follows:
·
Holistic Frameworks: Encourage
stakeholders to embrace a holistic jurisprudential framework when designing and
regulating CBDCs. In this way more complete socially aware digital money system
can be established.
·
Legal Evolution: Understand that CBDCs
are located within law’s history stream. As legal systems must respond to
cultural and historical differences so they should move with the times.
·
Inclusivity: Give priority to
financial inclusion and social justice in CBDC projects, focusing specifically
on marginalized communities.
·
Adaptation: Recognize the changing
nature of law and society. Given evolving societal needs and challenges, CBDCs
should emphasize fairness, access, ethical financial behavior.
To sum up, the
journey through legal thought has revealed subtle links between central bank
digital currencies and the underlying theories of law, past, and community. To
create fairer, all-encompassing and righteous monetary systems in an era where
finance is highly digitized, a multi-disciplinary methodology fostered by legal
insight may be called for.
[1] Indraprastha
Research Fellow & PhD Research Scholar (Law), University School of Law
& Legal Studies, GGS IP University, New Delhi.
[2] Hiep Ngoc Luu Et
Al., Cultural values and the adoption
of central bank digital currency, Applied
Economics Letters (2023), https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2089342.
[3] Indraprastha Research Fellow &
PhD Research Scholar (Law), University School of Law & Legal Studies, GGS
IP University, New Delhi.
[4] Cheng-Yun (CY) Tsang & Ping-Kuei Chen, Global Financial Order at a Crossroads- Do
CBDCs Lead to Balkanisation or Harmonization?, Journal of Financial Transformation (2023), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4636943.
[5] Shobhit Seth, What
Is a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)?, Investopedia (Dec. 08, 2023), https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/central-bank-digital-currency-cbdc.asp.
[6] Biagio Bossone, CBDC
and financial inclusion: Changing the paradigm (Part 2), World Bank Blogs (Oct. 11, 2022), https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/allaboutfinance/cbdc-and-financial-inclusion-changing-paradigm-part-2.
[7] Sandra Waliczek, How
are CBDCs different from cryptocurrencies and stablecoins?, World Economic Forum (Nov. 09, 2023), https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/11/cbdcs-how-different-cryptocurrency-stablecoin/.
[9] CBDCs may be
important in making cross-border payments cheaper, faster: RBI Guv Shaktikanta
Das, The Economic Times (Sept.
07, 2023, 11:34 AM), https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/cbdcs-may-be-important-in-making-cross-border-payments-cheaper-faster-rbi-guv-shaktikanta-das/articleshow/103364522.cms?from=mdr.
[10] Satish Kulkarni, How
to Elevate the Security of Central Bank Digital Currency, Southeast Asia Development Solutions (Nov.
29, 2023, 7:09 AM), https://seads.adb.org/solutions/how-elevate-security-central-bank-digital-currency#:~:text=Cross%2Dborder%20transactions%20can%20be,controls%2C%20CBDCs%20secure%20digital%20transactions.
[11] Sandra Waliczek, Privacy
concerns around CBDCs – are they justified?, World Economic Forum (Nov. 07, 2023), https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/11/privacy-concerns-around-cbdcs/.
[12] Could CBDCs
destroy privacy?, CFA Institute (2024),
https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/professional-insights-stories/could-cbdcs-destroy-privacy.
[13] Bank for International Settlements, Central bank
digital currencies for cross-border payments (2021), https://www.bis.org/publ/othp38.pdf.
[14] Régis Lanneau, Legal
Positivism and Law and Economics, Encyclopedia
of Law and Economics (2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/97.
[15] Central Bank
Digital Currency—Initial Considerations, International
Monetary Fund (2023), https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400259210.007.
[16] Tim Murphy, Living
Law, Normative Pluralism, and Analytic Jurisprudence, Jurisprudence (2012), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2146667
[18] Pierre L. Siklos, Is
CBDC Evolutionary or Revolutionary? What Economic History Can Teach Us, Centre for International Governance Innovation
(Oct. 11, 2023) https://www.cigionline.org/publications/is-cbdc-evolutionary-or-revolutionary-what-economic-history-can-teach-us/.
Article Information
EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF CBDC AND SCHOOLS OF JURISPRUDENCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Authors: MR. MOHIT TANWAR
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/04/20
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.