Open Access Research Article

DUTY, DELEGATION AND DAMAGE: TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS, VICARIOUS LIABILITY AND OTHER CIVIL WRONGS

Author(s):
SHAKTHI SAMIYA S J
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 7

Abstract

Medicine asks patients for extraordinary trust: to be cut open, sedated, or prescribed powerful drugs by someone they have just met. The law of torts is how society holds that trust to account when it is broken. This article examines the civil liability of medical professionals in India, covering the law of negligence, the standard of care, and the doctrines of res ipsa loquitur and informed consent. It looks closely at vicarious liability, the question of when a hospital or the State must answer for the wrongs of its doctors, nurses and staff, and separates it from the hospital's direct liability for its own failures. It also covers civil wrongs beyond negligence: battery, breach of confidentiality, false imprisonment, misrepresentation and breach of statutory duty. The Indian framework (the common law of torts, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 and constitutional remedies under Articles 21, 32 and 226) is read together with the leading Supreme Court decisions. The article concludes that Indian law has a mature set of doctrines, but its practice suffers from an accountability gap that harms patients and doctors alike. It offers reforms aimed at both.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: SHAKTHI SAMIYA S JRegistration ID: 1013502 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13502Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.