Open Access Research Article

DIGNITY AT THE THRESHOLD OF DEATH: PASSIVE EUTHANASIA, ADVANCE MEDICAL DIRECTIVES AND THE EVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE OF THE RIGHT TO DIE WITH DIGNITY IN INDIA

Author(s):
AKRITI SINGH
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract
Passive euthanasia, the lawful withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, sits between the constitutional guarantee of life and personal liberty under Article 21 and the criminal law’s ban on intentionally hastening death. This article traces the Indian judicial path from Gian Kaur (1996) and Aruna Shanbaug (2011) through Common Cause (2018), its 2023 procedural modification, and Harish Rana v. Union of India (2026). In Harish Rana, the Supreme Court for the first time applied the framework in full and permitted withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration from a patient in a permanent vegetative state. Using doctrinal and comparative methods, the article argues that Indian law has moved from recognising a right to die with dignity in principle to operationalising it in practice, yet the machinery still rests on judge-made guidelines rather than legislation. Three problems remain unresolved: the reach and evidentiary discipline of the “best interests” standard for patients without an advance directive; the tension between dignity-based reasoning and disability rights; and the lack of palliative-care infrastructure and statutory protection for practitioners. The article closes by proposing the core elements of a comprehensive end-of-life care statute.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: AKRITI SINGH
Registration ID: 1013229 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13229
Year: Sep-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 1673-1690

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.