Open Access Research Article

DIGITAL SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN: EMERGING CHALLENGES UNDER THE POCSO FRAMEWORK

Author(s):
KISHORE CHIMMILI
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The migration of child sexual abuse from physical to digital spaces has exposed structural limitations in a statutory framework — the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) — conceived principally to address contact and proximate offences. This paper undertakes a doctrinal and analytical examination of the challenges that digitisation poses to the POCSO framework, situating the Act within the wider matrix of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and the newly notified Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2026. It traces the Supreme Court's landmark September 2024 ruling in S. Harish v. State of Tamil Nadu, which overturned a widely criticised Madras High Court decision and held that mere viewing, downloading and storage of child sexual abuse material constitutes an offence under Section 15 of the POCSO Act and Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 — a ruling that also directed courts to abandon the term 'child pornography' in favour of 'Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material' (CSEAM), better reflecting the abuse inherent in such material. The paper further examines the graded liability structure introduced by the 2019 Amendment to Section 15, the persistent definitional gap concerning artificial-intelligence-generated and deepfake material depicting children, and the intermediary due-diligence and takedown obligations introduced by the 2026 IT Rules for 'synthetically generated information'. Drawing on comparative material from recent United States prosecutions involving AI-generated abuse material, and on Parliamentary data showing a 94.47 per cent increase in registered POCSO cases between 2017 and 2023, the paper identifies encryption-driven detection gaps, cross-border jurisdictional limitations, under-utilisation of the mandatory reporting obligation under Sections 19 and 20, and definitional ambiguity surrounding synthetic content as the principal unresolved challenges. It concludes with recommendations for statutory clarification of AI-generated CSAM, strengthened intermediary accountability, and institutional capacity-building to close the gap between an increasingly protective judicial posture and the practical realities of digital enforcement.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: KISHORE CHIMMILI
Registration ID: 1013061 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13061 & IJLRA13062
Year: Aug-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 5
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 1659-1677

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.