Open Access Research Article

CYBERCRIME AWARENESS AMONG STUDENTS IN RAMANATHAPURAM: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF KNOWLEDGE, DIGITAL SAFETY AND REPORTING AWARENESS

Author(s):
THOWFIK AHAMED
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 7

Abstract

The internet economy and digital service industry have opened up social and learning opportunities as well as digital vulnerabilities to cyber-enabled crime. Students are active users of digital services and host and participate in social media and digital commerce, but frequent use of technology does not necessarily mean that they can recognize cybercrime and know how to respond. This study reports on self-assessed levels of cybercrime awareness; knowledge about, and recognition of, information pertaining to official reporting channels among a sample of students and young people using structured google forms with ten key questions uploaded as a dataset containing 52 responses, covering gender, age/education group, location, awareness of the term cybercrime, recognition of examples, awareness of risk from OTPs/PINs/passwords, awareness of risky links, awareness of the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and helpline 1930, knowledge of where, when and how to report cybercrime, and self-rated level of awareness in the last three. The study is based on a quantitative, cross-sectional and descriptive research design. Responses are described as frequencies and percentages, whereas interesting associations between grouped awareness ratings and respondent gender, location and age/education category are explored through chi-square test of independence. 42 (80.8%) respondents knew about cybercrime; 45 (86.5%) knew about the risks associated with sharing authentication details; 43 (82.7%) knew about the risks associated with clicking links from unknown sources; 14 (26.9%) knew about both the portal and helpline 1930; 26 (50.0%) knew about neither; only 17 (32.7%) knew about the portal, helpline 1930 and where, when and how to report cybercrime; and a majority (50%) self-rated as having moderate awareness, while 17 (32.7%) self-rated as having low or very low awareness. Self-assessed awareness ratings were not associated with respondent location, gender or age/education group in the chi-square test of independence; however, the lack of understanding of where, when and how to report, combined with the high number of moderate self-rated respondents, requires interpretation. Moreover, small expected cell sizes and the cross-sectional nature of the data collected requires caution. The data suggest that some people are aware of cybercrime and have some knowledge on how to prevent it without knowing how to report it; a larger, more well-defined sample with objective measures of knowledge is recommended.  

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: THOWFIK AHAMEDRegistration ID: 1013508 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13508Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.