Open Access Research Article

CYBER CRIMES AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY UNDER THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000: EMERGING LEGAL CHALLENGES

Author(s):
UMANG KAMBOJ
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Information Technology Act, 2000 (“IT Act”) was India's first, and remains its principal, special legislation criminalising conduct committed through computers, computer networks and communication devices. Enacted to give legal recognition to electronic commerce and subsequently fortified by the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, the statute today operates as the technical backbone of India's cyber-criminal-liability framework, running in parallel with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (“BNS”) and its accompanying procedural and evidentiary codes. This paper undertakes a doctrinal and analytical examination of criminal liability under the IT Act, tracing the statute's legislative evolution from 2000 through the transformative 2008 amendment to its present-day interaction with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which came into force on 1 July 2024. It critically analyses the principal offence provisions — Sections 43, 65, 66, 66B to 66F, 67, 67A to 67C, 69, 69A and 70 — assessing their doctrinal clarity, mens rea requirements, and continuing fitness for purpose against a backdrop of rapidly evolving digital conduct, including ransomware extortion, identity theft, cyberstalking, obscene and sexually explicit content, cyber terrorism, and unauthorised access offences. The paper examines the constitutional and jurisprudential turning point represented by Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, in which the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A for vagueness and overbreadth, alongside subsequent judicial engagement with Sections 66, 66C, 66D, 66E, 67 and 69A in cases addressing identity theft, privacy violation, intermediary liability and content-blocking orders. Employing doctrinal legal research methodology supported by secondary data drawn from National Crime Records Bureau reports and Ministry of Home Affairs disclosures, the paper identifies persistent legal challenges: definitional ambiguity in emergent offence categories such as deepfake-facilitated fraud and artificial-intelligence-enabled impersonation, jurisdictional uncertainty in cross-border digital conduct, intermediary liability tensions under the amended IT Rules, 2021, and the practical difficulty of reconciling IT Act prosecutions with the newly codified evidentiary regime under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. The paper concludes that while the IT Act remains doctrinally indispensable, its ageing definitional architecture requires targeted legislative refinement, harmonisation with the BNS framework, and institutional capacity-building to remain an effective instrument of criminal liability in India's digital ecosystem.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: UMANG KAMBOJ
Registration ID: 1013070 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13070
Year: Aug-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 5
Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India
Page No.: 1816-1838

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.