CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SECTION 498A OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE IN LIGHT OF THE RECENT GUIDELINES GIVEN BY THE SUPREME COURT BY - MS. ANUSHKA BHADURI
CRITICAL
EVALUATION OF SECTION 498A OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE IN LIGHT OF THE RECENT GUIDELINES GIVEN BY THE SUPREME COURT
AUTHORED BY - MS. ANUSHKA
BHADURI
Abstract
A family is a basic
institution of society. It is bridged either by blood or a marriage or through
adoption. It has an immense influence from the time of birth to the death of an individual. A marriage is a foundation between a man and a woman
and a principle tool which leads to
the enlargement of a family. Though even in the modern society today, this very holy foundation of marriage aches
from a crucial communal evil that is dowry. The current position of females in a civilization, depicts the very
extent of the ‘stage of evolution’, to
where a civilization has transpired. The cruelty or oppression against
women from the Vedic times to
the modern era has always questioned the position of women in our society. Hence, the enforcement of Section 498A of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860 acted significant in combating cruelty against females and in curbing out the social
evils and bring about a social reform.
The primary need of the law was to hinder dowry related violence. Section 498A
and section 304B which deals with
dowry death compliments each other. Huge proportion of women have exploited
immense powers given in application of Section 498A to abuse spouses and his family and get an unfair advantage. Ultimately, motive of the section, that is to protect females in true cases of
cruelty, is under threat due to the misuse done by women these days. However,
with the recent passage of time there has been major landmark
judgments that has created helpful guidelines passed by the Hon’ble
Courts which has led to the creation
of certain remedies to counter the misuse of Section 498A. Also, there are provisions in certain legislative Acts
which can be used as remedies to fight against the false allegations. When justice is delayed then justice is not served
and when wives falsely accuse their spouse of 498A IPC, there is no way for the husband to get justice quickly. Therefore, the lawmakers must come up with a
mechanism to ensure that the provision is neutral so that justice
is served on the both sides.
Analysis of Section
498A, Indian Penal
Code, 1860
A dowry is any form of
materialistic good or a monetary gain that the man collects from the wife’s family during commencement of the
marriage. It is typically seen that during dowry, the husband exerts mental and sometimes physical pressure on the
wife and her family. The wives are
usually abused, maltreated and sometimes even divorced or murdered for the
simple reason of them not being able to comply or fulfill the demands.
Due to disgrace affiliated with the
reporting of cases and with the mindset of what the rest of the society thinks, the actual number of cases
reported against social evils like dowry paints a very inaccurate canvas. Only when the victim commits suicide, suffers
death or pursues medical care for the
injuries caused by such subjects, the matter of dowry reaches police station
& the judiciary. Misuse
of smaller gravity
often buried unreported. There have been no statute
in the Indian judiciary addressing
such domestic abuse preceding 1983. Hence, for guarding safety & protecting brutality that women encounter inside their home, the section
was introduced in the
code which protects a women against
cruelty throughout a marriage.
With the recent changes of
laws in India, it is now a punishable offence that cannot be resolved outside of courts. In 1983, with
the second amendment of the Criminal Law Act,
Section 498A was added to the IPC, 1860. Aim of the said provision, is to safeguard
the wives against the
tortures of the husband or his family for dowry and to penalize him and/or the family members for doing so. Thus,
this provision presented itself as a major amendment which safeguarded the women rights and also empowering them to
stand against any kind of extortion.
It is seen that in our society about 80% of the cases relating to domestic
violence or cruelty are somewhat
related to dowry. Hence, such provisions and amendments were a necessity for the prevention of women
against abuse and for such acts to majorly stand alone as an anti dowry act in India.[1]
Now let us talk about
Section 498A and its goals. Parliament marked multiple layers that are important to address the atrocious crimes against women
such as:
a.
Explain
the fundamental offence
of cruelty towards woman by husband & the family of the husband.
b.
To execute policy, that need a investigation onto certain death of woman.
c.
For bringing justice
efficiently to the woman against
the offender, it is important to formulate the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Due to such issue, the IPC,
1860, was formed to comprise both the Section 304B (Dowry death) & 498A. The goal of the said
section, is to protect woman against the harassment of their spouse and husband’s family. A fine of Rs. 30,000 and a
maximum sentence of 3 years has been set.2[2]
For the application of this section, certain
requirements should be met. They are:
i.
The woman should be married.
ii.
The woman should be treated to abuse. Demanding dowry is harsh in itself.
iii.
Such
abuse should be subjected
either by the husband or the spouse’s family if not both.
The nature of the offence of Section 498A can be enlisted
as:
i.
Non-bailable: When there is a complain against
this section, the magistrate has the power to not give bail and transport
the accuse to the court & police
without any requirement of hearing.
ii.
Cognizable: These are such offences
where the police do not need a
warrant for arrest.
iii.
Non-compoundable: Cases that are non-compoundable in nature, the complainant cannot
revoke their complaint i.e, settle the case outside
the court.
Both intentional and
unintentional harm are protected under Section 498A. According to it, the following
acts account for cruelty against women:
i.
Intentionally provoking a woman to a commit suicide.
ii.
Actions
of the perpetrator if found intentional can result in facing charges.
iii.
An act of the perpetrator which may risk mental & physical condition.
iv.
Abusing
the woman with the intention
of receiving any tangible goods by compelling either the woman or her
family members.
v.
Abusing the woman on the grounds
of dowry.
Misuse of Section 498A, Indian
Penal Code, 1860
A massive proportion of women have exploited immense powers
given application of Section 498A
to abuse spouses & his family & get an unfairly advantage. Section 498A
is used by women who want to take revenge
on their husbands
to intimidate and pressurize their
relatives.
The Apex Court, acknowledged growing tradition of men
getting accused untruly under this section,
naming it a phenomenon & a communal disease. As it is observed in Sushil Kumar Sharma
vs. Union Of India And Ors (1997) 5 SCC 536, "Legal Terrorism"[3] explains
the misuse of the said section. Also,
innocent family members such as the elders, are often wrongfully prosecuted and suffer immense harassment through
justice system. The ultimate motive
of the section is to protect females in true cases of cruelty, is under threat
due to false allegations these days.
The crime U/S 498A is both cognizable and non-cognizable & in present day females are quite
aware of how powerful the section stands.
With a single complaint, females can send their spouse
and spouse’s family to jail. Defending a
charge against the clause may be difficult, as complainant's word holds more
power & the story in her
complaint is harder to counter. After a report, wives may force their husband
to complete a divorce, increase
alimony or even outright blackmail. This is a regular method of abuse relating to the section, which
actually intends to serve justice in actual case of cruelty. Increasingly, wives make fake accusations
towards their husband in order to humiliate the entire family, or instead eliminate them from her life. This
trend is contrary to the spirit of the said regulation. Abuse is very common in this provision
& most educated
wives are completely aware that the section is non-bailable
& cognizable, as that the police have to act quickly on a report
and arrest their spouse.
Remedies of Section
498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860
Let us look at some remedies or precautions that a husband,
his family and relatives can take in
case of a false case under the section 498A of IPC. Listed below there are,
multiple remedies that might help a person falsely accused of the said section:
?
A suit for defamation can be filed by the husband
under Section 500 of the IPC. The husband has been
given the opportunity to file a defamation case.
?
He should gather evidence of criminal conspiracy against the wife. A woman who misuses the law for their own interest
can be charged under Section 120B of the IPC
which states criminal conspiracy as a crime. A husband can apply to the
court and seek redressal under this
section of the IPC if he has reasonable apprehension to suspect and can prove that his wife is party to a
criminal conspiracy where she had made false
accusations against him and his
family members.
?
Providing fake evidences is an offense done by any
person, which is defined in section 191
of the IPC. Due to the said section, women cannot base their case on fake
evidences to support the case they filed
U/S 498A.
?
If a woman has threatened her husband or members of his family with physical
harm,complaint shall be filed under section 506 of the IPC,in which it states punishments.
?
If a wife leaves the husband & goes to her
parent’s house, the spouse can apply for restoration
of marriage under Section 9 i.e. by restitution of conjugal rights of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This applies only if
the accused is acquitted or discharged in a 498A case.
?
A change to this
rule is warranted due to
recent findings and an increase misuse.
?
Because the legal system is misused in order to harass
the spouses, women's NGOs are responsible
for investigating complaints thoroughly, without favoring either gender. No woman should be encouraged to make
accusations against her father-in-law in petty
matters.These groups also have a duty to inform the public about the
consequences of misuse of the law through
research and studies.
?
Many men who have been the victims of misuse through
their wives or in-laws have come
forward across the country. There is hardly any group that can effectively help troubled
men and their families by hearing their side of the story and helping
the authorities on their
behalf. There is an urgent need to establish family counseling centers in cities
across the country to
help the affected families.
?
Speedy trials
of the cases would result in
speedy redressal.
?
There is a vague meaning of "mental cruelty"
that may get abused through unwanted manners.
Thus, it should be mentioned
clearly to close the gray
areas of the law.
?
A report should be made only after the civil
authorities confirm that a crime has been committed.
?
As a matter of fact, majority of them convicted under the section
find it diifucult to afford bail and hence is main reason why
the law is so often misused to harass the defenseless. To avoid unnecessary detention of elderly parents,
pregnant sisters and school-aged children, this clause should be made mandatory
for bail.
?
A FIR cannot be withdrawn after its filing in case of
the wife says that she has made a mistake
and wants to return to the marriage. To save the institution of marriage, it
should be difficult. In addition, if
the spouses decide to separate amicably, the ongoing criminal proceedings will seriously disrupt their lives.
?
If the court decides that such allegations are
baseless, actions against those who allege violation
of Section 498A IPC. Thanks to this, fewer people would approach the legal system with dirty hands and in secret. All
officials who intend to unfairly accuse women
and their families
must be criminally charged.
Reports of Law Commission of India
The Law Commission of
India in the report 154 (1996)[4],
suggested the incorporation of Section
498A appended to Section 320 (2), so that it can be completed with approval of
the court. Relevant excerpts from the
report suggest that , Various High Courts have recently abolished criminal proceedings for non-cognizable offenses in
connection with an agreement between the parties to attain euphony
and tranquility in the society.
In view of the submissions received from various parties
and the submissions of the Supreme Court and
High Court, in the September 2009, the Law Commission of India was asked
to reconsider amending Article 498A of the Indian Penal Code or offer other measures
to check the abuse of the said provision. In view of the
submissions received from various parties and the submissions of the Supreme Court and High Court, in the September
2009, the Law Commission
of India was asked to reconsider amending Article 498A of the Indian Penal Code or offer
other measures to check
the abuse of the said provision.
The 154th Report of
the Law Commission reiterated the recommendation on section 498A in Report 177 (2001)[5].
The commission noted that in recent years, the legal commission has received
a number of proposals from individuals and organizations with the aim of aggravating the aforementioned offence.
Furthermore, the Justice
Malimath Committee Report on Reforms in the Criminal Justice System firmly aided the
plea to make Section 498A of the IPC, a
compoundable offense.
Recent
Guidelines on Section 498A, Indian Penal Code by the Supreme Court
In matrimonial disputes, between two individuals, the first
and foremost action a wife could legally
take is to file a F.I.R under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code. The
initiative is foreseen under Section
498 A of the Penal Code. Nowadays it is seen that the inside contents of the FIR are so indistinguishable and
similar which clearly shows the very abuse of the Section. Courts also accept that, innocent persons are falsely
accused under 498 A. But also, there
are real cases where wives have been brutalized by their husbands or relatives.
Due of such faulty accusations,
most of the courts have began to provide judgement in favor of the man and his family. Amongst these
judgments, the Supreme Court made an important
decision on the case of Arnesh Kumar V. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273[6]. In this judgement, the court mentioned, if we
desire to arrange a complaint under Section 125, we must first file a complaint under Section 41A. Also, a man and his family
can only be arrested
if the victim's injury is severe and serious. Many things have changed since
the Supreme Court decision. Recently,
the Supreme Court of Uttar Pradesh has also passed an important judgment which goes a step ahead by giving directions to Section
498 A.
Judgement of Mukesh Bansal V. State of U.P. and
Another (2022), Crl.R. 1187, (2022)
Crl.R. 1122
Now, we would discuss thoroughly on the Judgment of U.P.
High Court in the case of Mukesh Bansal V. State
of U.P. and Another (2022), Crl.R. 1187,
(2022) Crl.R. 1122
The women filed a complaint under Section 498 A against
the husband and mother-in-law. After
an investigation, her husband's family was charged. The husband's family
contested the charges in the
Allahabad High Court. The court considers the accusations absurd. Male members of the husband's family were sexually
accused. Nowadays, it is very common for such charges
to be filed under section
498 A. The court takes up the case against
the mother-in-law and the father-in-law and acquits them. But the husband was charged under
498 A, there the court did not interfere in the prosecution phase. And
rejects the petition that was against
the husband. Even though, the husband's appeal
failed, his mother
and father were relieved and made cleared of
liability. Now even the Hon'ble Courts have agreed that 498 A is being misused and abused by giving false accusations to
the husband's family. Section 354 of
the Indian Penal Code is invoked when an F.I.R. from the women's side is filed. The section deals with
ill-treatment or criminal violence against a woman intended to anger her modesty. Mother-in-law as well
as brother-in-law are usually blamed for such
accusations. Sometimes they are accused of rape. There are also real
cases where cases of false claims
far outnumber the real cases.
The court fails to believe,
the majority of men in our society
have such immoral values.
After concluding this case, the Hon'ble Court had
decided to lay down some major guidelines in
order to prevent the abuse of the said Section. Thus, we can understand the
aforementioned instructions:
?
When a F.I.R. is registered under the section 498 A,
there should be no detention for a maximum of 2 months.
This 2 month period is called the cooling period.
After registration, this complaint
is also sent to the Family
Welfare Committee.
?
The Family Welfare Committee analyzes the case and
decides within two months what is correct
and what is wrong.
?
It was a groundbreaking judgement of no arrest for 2
months. If a woman suffers injuries or physical
violence, there can be an arrest.
?
The Family Welfare
Committee consists of four senior members from both the
families.
?
The committee then records the statement and evaluates
the story on either sides within 2 months. Then the report is returned to the police station.
?
If both the parties get a period of 60 days together,
there is still a hope of resolution between them.
?
The above investigation is then performed
by Investigation Officer
(IO). The Investigating Officer shall be specially
trained to conduct investigations in cases for a minimum of 7 days. Sometimes, if the police are not instructed
properly, the police might not
detain the defendant directly.
Judgement of Arnesh
Kumar V State Of Bihar
(2014) 8 SCC 273
?
Supreme Court judgment
in Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273, stated that a
notification under Section 41 CrPC has to be issued.
?
The notification informs the accused of his probable
detention so that the accused can appear and clarify
his side of the matter.
?
If the notified person is not willing to comply with
preliminary investigation, he can be arrested.
?
Any official that does not comply with the sentence,
then the official, shall be punished. In
addition, if the judge does not carry out the sentence, he will also face
punishment and imprisonment.[7]
The Allahabad High Court had issued above guidelines to
safeguard misuse of section 498 A. These
directions have come when the court realized that, numerous wives make
falsified allegations and claims
against their husband and husbands families. These sort of claims have recurring patterns and storyline that
have led the courts to question the credibility of such claims. With these directions, there still leaves a hope in our
modern society to end women and family
abuse.
Conclusion
Marriage is an elective union of life between one man and a
woman to the debarment of all others.
It is a holy bond made by the individuals towards each other. It is considered
to be a union of their respective
families in the society. Though even in the modern society today, we see that this very holy foundation of
marriage aches from a crucial communal evil that is dowry. Marriage is no longer seen as holy union of two
individuals, rather over the time it turned
into more alike a civil commitment in-between two people in the literal sense
of the word, where one obliges the
other to fulfill marital rights. Section 498A, which otherwise gained notoriety as "legal
terrorism", was inserted mainly to fight against dowry and dowry related
death. Through experience of prominent law persons &
well-known lawyers, and various reports, we can formulate a
solution to curb this communal cancer. However, the addition of Section 498A of the IPC,1860, seemed a honest
solution and quite efficient in those
naive stages of its promulgation, a brand new age of barbarity has dawned in
the recent years.
Even though the Judiciary has not curbed the blatant abuse
of Section 498A, this provision itself
demands immediate compensation for the suffering of insincerely accused sufferers
of dowry harassment. Protection shall
be broadened to the husbands of the society. The misuse of the Section shows that this strict provision has affected
innumerable innocent individuals and
their immediate families as this provision gives protection solely to women,
making this provision bigoted, unfair
and illegitimate. During the last twenty years, Section 498A of the IPC, 1860, had being badly abused, pulling
innocent men to police stations, jails and even courts, stripping families of happiness. Wives who actually want
protection from domestic violence, in
actuality do not use it. This provision is a tool, which can be used as a
dangerous weapon by women who abuse
it in the smallest way possible.
We may hence conclude that although Section 498A of Indian
Penal Code 1860, had been made to prevent married women against abuse by their husbands
and his relatives but now it is being widely misused. The wives
overturn the law by taking advantage and behaving cruelly to their husbands and his relatives and prosecuting them
under Section 498A of the IPC ,1860.
Hence, legal steps should be practiced to curb the menace spreading through misuse of this law.