COPYRIGHT AND ITS INFLUENCE OVER THE COURSE OF ECONOMY by - Tanuj Nijhara & Deepanshi
COPYRIGHT AND ITS
INFLUENCE OVER THE COURSE
OF ECONOMY
Authored by - Tanuj
Nijhara
& Deepanshi
Fairfield Institute of Management and
Technology affiliated with Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha
University.
ABSTRACT
This paper explains the term
copyright, nature of copyrights, views of researchers on copyright and
infringement of copyrights. This paper also explains the Historical Background
of Indian Copyright laws in context of Changes in Britain, it highlights the
emergence of copyright in the reign of British and how it impacted the
protection of copyright in India and analyses
the impact of copyright on Indian economy. It discusses the
interrelation of copyright and economy, along with impact on trade and foreign direct investment. It will explain a detail
study of copyright registrations in last 2-3 years and in this chapter we will
analyze current situation In India, as the copyright-intensive industries are
primarily the media-entertainment and publishing industries, both of which
contribute significantly to the country's economic growth or not.
Contents
INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
This is a general
principle of law that one should not be allowed to extract benefits to him of
what has been produced by the skills, labor and capital of someone else. This
principle forms the very foundation of copyright law. Copyright is a unique
kind of intellectual property. The right that an individual acquires in a work,
which is the product of his intellectual labor, is called his copyright. The
object of copyright protection is to encourage the authors. Composers, artists,
designers etc. to produce original works by rewarding them with the authentic
right for a limited span to exploit their creation for monetary gain. Copyright
means the exclusive right to do or authorize others to do certain acts in
relation to (1) literary dramatic, musical and artistic work, (2)
Cinematographic film, (3) second recordings[1]
Copyright may be regarded
as a negative right rather than being a positive right since it restricts
others from exploiting the work without the consent of copyright owner. In
essence, copyright refers to the negative right of prohibiting the duplicity of
physical material in the fields of literature and art.
Copyright protects the
author, writer or creator of the original work from the unauthorized copying,
exploitation or mutilation. It also prohibits any individual from exercising
any related right attached with the copyright protection. Copyright protection
is essential to encourage exploitation of copyright work for the benefit of
public. The exploitation is done by the entrepreneurs like publishers, Film
producers, sound records etc. to whom the owner of the copyright assigns or
licenses the particular rights. These enterprises are basically profit
oriented, and therefore if they are unable to extract benefits out of the
rights guaranteed to them, they shall not be taking up such projects in their
hands.
Therefore, legal
protection to such entrepreneurs for a certain period of time is indispensable.
There is no copyright
protection for ideas. It is immaterial whether the work is wise or foolish or
it has or has not any literacy or artistic merit.
“Originality” of works
here does not refer that the work must be the expression of original or
inventive thought. The originality relates to the expression of the thought but
the expression does not have to be in an original or novel form, rather the
work must not copied form another work, implying it should originate from the
author itself.[2].
Copyright holders
consequently fear that unauthorized copying and redistribution of their works
will cause their economic returns to decline. Copyright is a subset of the
larger category of property rights which includes both tangible and intangible
assets. Intangible property-- also termed as intellectual property-- includes
technological and scientific works, which are protected by patent law as well
as creative works, which are protected by copyright law. Well-defined and
administered property rights are fundamental to the functioning of market
economies. The first owner of traded products and services--and the remedy that
the parties have in a conflict resulting from any exchange--must be established
for arms-length transactions among individuals to be sensible.
Furthermore, a variety of
decisions--on whether to save and invest, or to pursue education, engage in
skill growth, or research and development (R & D)—is based on the
possibility of being able to claim the wealth produced by those activities.
The debate concerning the
economic implications of copyright has gained considerable attention. India,
due to agreements integrated under TRIPS has been unable to use TRIPS
flexibilities and is under increasing pressure to strengthen its national
intellectual property regime. The subject of intellectual property and its
protection has become a central issue in economic development, scientific and
technological protection.
Evidences suggest that
stronger IPRs positively affect the volume of FDI and exports, particularly in
countries like India with strong absorptive capabilities. It can also give
incentives to firms in developed countries to undertake cross border
investments.
Copyright is a stimulant
in the national economy but the standard of IP protection is correlated to
economic development and its historical and cultural circumstances. For
instance, least economically developed have least standard of protection
whereas countries moving the development ladder, adopt higher standards of
protection because they have more resources devoted to the creation of
intellectual property and represent more attractive market for industrial
countries. Thus, growing pressure for stronger protection.[3]
World Bank (2002, 2003,
2005,) as well as world intellectual property organization in many publications
has asserted that protection of copyrights can help in revenue generation,
improve balance of payments (BOP), provide access to international market as
well as increase employment opportunities.
India must make a concerted
effort to reconstruct its copyright narrative in a way that it balances the
requirement for access to creative product against the need to extract
commercial value aiding the GDP of the nation. India’s copyright laws must be
adapted to mirror the economic urgencies of the present.
Copyright exists in
industrial design in peculiar way, for the manufacturing of machine and machine
parts. This protection is peculiar because if any manufacturing process has
been undertaken on the basis of the copyrighted industrial design, even if the
person making the product hasn’t seen the original drawing and has copied only
a machine made in conformity with that drawing[4].
This protection of industrial design is better than that of patent protection
in terms of tenure of protection, where copyright protection extends beyond 60
years. Patent protection expires after 14 years besides this acquiring
copyright needs no formalities like registration, it comes into existence as
the original work is completed whereas acquiring patent is laborious as well as
involves considerable expenditure.
Due to the international
character of copyright, numerous countries have joined hands to form agreements
for the copyright protection owned by its nationals in other countries. The
Berne convention and UCC were the result of such joint effort. India is a
member of both the conventions whereas most of the countries are member to at
least one of three conventions. Thus, India copyright holders can protect their
copyright in almost all the countries all over the world.
1.1.
Definition of Copyright
The world Intellectual
property Organization (WIPO) has defined Copyright
as “a legal term used to describe the rights that creators have over their
literacy and artistic works. Works covered by copyright range from books,
music, paintings, sculptures, and films, to computer programs, databases,
advertisements, maps and technical drawings”.[5]
The Law of copyright
confers upon the owner of the copyrighted work a bundle of exclusive rights
which are not natural or divine rights but are designed to stimulate activity
and progress in intellectual enrichment.
1.2.
Nature of Copyright
Copyright is the
statutory right of a creator to control and authorize the reproduction of his
intellectual creations. When the author limits his creation to his sole
possession, the author’s absolute control is a mere physical fact but when the
work is disclosed to public in large, he makes it possible for them to
reproduce the same.
Copyright is not aimed to
preclude others from utilizing the ideas or information revealed by the
author’s work. It pertains to the literary musical graphics or artistic form in
which the creator expresses his intellectual conception. It entitles him to
prevent others from reproducing his individual expression without his
permission for a stipulated period of time as per the law of the land.
IMPACT OF COPYRIGHT
ON ECONOMY
Interaction between
copyright and economy
“Intellectual property has the potential to boost or stifle economic
growth”
Intellectual Property rights
(IPR) assume an increasing role in terms of trade and investment. IPR is no longer restricted to being an
academic abstraction, in real terms it is a valuable commercial asset and a driving
force in technological progress leading to increasing competitive capability and resultant empowerment in market.
The
impact of intellectual property rights (IPRS) on the processes of economic
development and growth is uncertain
and dependent on multiple factors. In this regard, the effectiveness of IPRS is highly depended on specific
circumstances of each nation. Although economists are devoting considerable attention to this issue, evidence so far
is mixed and conflicting, in part because many of
the concepts involved are not readily measured.
The
globalization or internationalization of trade and economy, and the
multilateral rules that bound nations
to accept or adopt an approach through close interaction between government, industry and the creative segment of the
society. Strong IP protection with adequate and modernized legislation plus its effective
enforcement undoubtedly helps in transfer
of technology and consequently, technological development. It also helps
in attracting Foreign Direct Investment.
The
intellectual property system is one of the major corner stones of modern
economic policy at the domestic level. It is increasing becoming
a tool for sustainable development. Understanding and appreciating the foundation of intellectual
property and the copyright system, is
a condition for analyzing its growing importance and position in national
strategies for enhancing competition.
Copyright
is not an in itself, it is a means to an end, a catalyst for accelerating
social, cultural and tech-economic
growth in developing countries. Its effective protection and use effects economic growth by providing the necessary
incentives for increasing competitive capability. The recognition of the creator,
the protection of his rights and the rights of those who invest in the making
of his creation, contribute positively to the economic development of the country.
The indispensability of examining intellectual property rights through
the economic perspective is an outcome
of the concept of intellectual property as a social phenomenon. Both economics and intellectual property,
in particular, are explicitly linked to innovation, technology, and
growth. The existences of a copyright is also a legal base for
contractual arrangement between the creator and the one developing the idea and
tone the one hand institutions wishing to use those ideas in their
manufacturing process leading to development.
The
economic development of the country determines the growth of intellectual
property and vice versa. The economic
value of intellectual property, the socio-economic benefits of the works of the mind is not yet a fully
tapped potential in India. There needs to be broadcasting of the awareness of the considerable
relevance of effective protection of intellectual property in safeguarding the results of
technological development, as well as in promoting national creative endeavor.
A
much greater and more widespread knowledge and understanding has to be
constructed of its economic benefit for the private industry also for natural
growth and development in the current generation, also as to how the
intellectual property system can be utilized to promote national creativity.
Many authors of mental works and innovators are unfamiliar of the basic
limitations of intellectual property legislation, and now must sell the
products of their ingenuity. The challenges, particularly for SMEs, are to
improve domestic efficiency of creative management of their core industry in an
increasingly competitive global economy with potential for investments and
exports.
In India,
small enterprises account for as much as 35% of the total value of industrial production in diverse
fields. They contribute more than 30% of the country’s total
export trade and provide employment to over 50 million people.
However special focus is necessary to be laid to technology inputs, quality promotion and other practices to make
them emerge as a vibrant constituent
of the national economy. The problems faced by small enterprises particularly
in accessing technology and
developing export competitiveness have been formidable. Lack of familiarity with new technology options,
inability in accessing them and organizing necessary finance for technology up gradation are a few which need to be
addressed through institutional support.
The
general public must also be made aware of the significant economic importance
of successful intellectual property
rights, as well as the resulting socio-economic gains from increased qualitative competitiveness in
trade and copyright, as well as greater technological innovation possibilities as the world transitions from the industrial to the information age. Both policy makers and researchers require a
better understanding of the substantial effect that a country’s system of IPR protection has also on transfer of
technology especially in high tech industries.
The business
environment both domestic
and international is becoming more competitive. The increasing
market orientation of economic policies in most of our countries coupled with
the gradual lowering of tariff barriers
is reducing the gap between domestic and international markets, and domestic players have to be internationally
competitive.
The
process of development is a multifaceted. It seeks to create a broad-based
sustainable improvement in the quality
of life and the standard
of living. The Economic growth
is a crucial, though not
the only, pre-requisites for development. Removal of barriers and opening up of economics in developing countries had
already resulted in an unprecedented flow of
funds and investment. Again, in those developing
countries which have also used their productive sector to diversify and broad base their manufacturing activities with the use of the IP system for qualitative
production for exports, their living standards have shown a steady and distinctive improvement. The challenges lie in invigorating
the domestic efficiency innovation management.
There
is an increasing recognition in the world over that the IP system provides a
balance of interests between the
creators of new technology, who spend large outlays and resources creation and development of technology,
and consumers of technology who employ it as a
valuable tool for enhancing
their technological capacity and market competitiveness.
Protection
of intellectual property rights is also a necessity for development of the
global information infrastructure. In
particular the improvement of enforcement procedures is urgent need for helping and fostering
creativity and creating activity in a networked era. Well- enforced
copyright legislation is essential for providing the necessary market-based incentives and
rewards needed to promote creativity in literary and artistic works.
It
is an important contribution factor
in socio-economic and cultural
development of a country, as it encourages, attracts and
sustains investment in what has
come to be known as the cultural industry. A modern and well
enforced copyright system could be a driving force and one of the strong imperatives in the process of economic
reform, in further liberalizing and restructuring of the economic and trade policies and in the promotion of national economic
growth & development.
In some countries, the so-called copyright industry is the fastest growing
sector of the economy, generating significant jobs and raising
export performance and potential. The contribution of this industry to the gross national product
(GNP) is also bound to increase in the years
to come, in a number
of rapidly growing
developing countries, while
addressing both the new challenges and opportunities posed by the increasing borderless nature of trade and economy.
Studies have indicated the contribution of copyright
or cultural industries to Gross National Product in world’s national
democracy (India) is 5.06% including their dependent industry.
The
economic importance of intellectual property in respect, for instance, of the
copyright industry in countries, which are major creators of copyright materials, has been well established.
All studies carried out so far indicate that it contributes considerably to
national economic wealth.
For developing countries, an important
economic indicator of the contribution of the copyright of cultural industry is that it is also a substantial
employment provider. The income from exports of intellectual property
products has also increased sizably in a number of countries.
The
significant employment potential of the copyright or cultural industry
is an important factor to be considered in developing
countries, since quite a number of our countries in different regions of the world have a very sizeable
cultural industry, in terms of its contributions to the GNP. The economic
value of the intellectual property
rights lies also in increasing competitive capability,
which is important in an electronic age, particularly also as copyright
protection extends to mass media
communication, printed magazines, sound and television broadcasting, films
and, in some countries, also computer
programs and computer systems for data storage.
A
general realization that is lacking is that copyright industries in a number of
developing countries such as India
are also a sizeable proportion of their respective GNPs and are by no means a negligible proportion of the
economy. They are also substantial job providers, hence the necessity to protect them through strict enforcement, the
natural copyright laws, which latter should provide for stringent penal provisions.
Employment
is a particularly significant consideration in India. One survey revealed that
the public perception about
employment generation is worse than what it was during the second term of the United Progressive Alliance
(UPA). Although another survey showed that job
growth had ostensibly been robust during
the first two years of the current
government, reports suggest
that it was mostly in the informal
sector. Compounding the issue of jobs is the looming
threat of automation, which is poised to do away with many of the
employment opportunities available today.
Adoption
and use of efficient IP system that encourages creative activity is a sine-qua
non in our own larger
national interests. Removal
of barriers and opening up of economies in a number
of developing countries
has already resulted
in an unprecedented flow of funds and investments.
For benefiting from the economic value of the protection of intellectual
property rights, it is necessary that
business and industry, as well as scientific institutions should be encouraged
to consciously promote among their
employees, technocrats and scientists the innovative and creative spirit, and
to use the IP system as a tool for development.
The
impact of intellectual property on growth is determined by nation’s level of
development. Other factors,
which encourage economic
growth, are stimulation of creativity and innovation, market
deepening, reliable quality,
domestic and international knowledge diffusion, composition of global research and
development (R & D) Maskus, et al. (2005). The proposed model explains the process of economic
growth. It emphasizes the importance of
IPRs in theory of endogenous development.
It
highlights the growth process centered on IPRs
through international trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), licensing,
R&D channels (innovation). The
combined effects of IPRs through these channels will boost economic growth. The effect of Intellectual
Property Rights (IPRs) on international trade flows when knowledge intensive goods move across national borders.[6] Patent system promotes
technological and business
competition, because patent holders and their competitors compete each other
to improve inventions and to create new ideas.[7]
The
impact of stronger patent rights on
trade is indeterminate, according to Raffiquzzaman (2002), since trade volumes
rise and fall simultaneously due to
market growth and market strength. The net trade result is determined by which effect takes precedence; if the market
power effect outweighs
the market expansion effect, trade flows will decrease.
If the opposite occurs, strengthened IPR protection will
lead to trade expansion.
CONCLUSION
AND SUGGESTIONS
Conclusion
“The world’s
largest democracy remains one of the most difficult economies in context of
protection and enforcement of IP”
The principal objective
of copyright protection is to encourage the authors, composers, artists, and
designers etc. to create original works by rewarding them with the exclusive
right for the specified period to exploit the work for monetary gains. The exploitation
is done by the entrepreneurs like polishers, film producers, sound recordist
etc. to whom the owner of the copyright assigns or licenses the particular
right.
It is evident form the
historical development of copyright coupled with its recent development that
copyright serves a range of industries stability form the production of books
to the modern media of instruction and entertainment computer industry
(software datasets being regarded as copyrightable material). In this globalize
world, what may be better incentive than economic incentive for the “authors”
to create new works. Copyright provides the legal foundation upon which
monopoly profits can be generated provided the market contains sufficient
demand for such product. Copyright works gain the uniqueness / importance
through the dictates of fashion, as molded by advertising, promotion,
criticism, reputation of author’s previous work, the shortage of new material
and may other factors.
The
history of copyright law is a long and a complicated one. Even after more than
100 years, it is still in a developing stage. This is due to the fact that
technology is evolving at a rapid pace. With new technologies, old law seems to
be falling behind, especially in case of non- literal work.
T.B. Macaulay observed copyright as “tax on the readers for the purpose of
giving a bounty to authors”. This very much indicates the economic shoals of
copyright. The very purpose of copyright is to allow recoupment for the
initiative of creating the material and the investment risked in producing and
marketing it. Therefore “tax on readers” should be broadly proportion to the
objective of copyright law.
If there had been no
restraint form the copyright laws, a copyist could produce a directly
competition product at a much lower cost and shall be determent to the author
and prouder both.
A relevant question that
arises in the process of interpretation of the different intellectual property
laws in whether the copyright duration should be for a relatively shorter
period (as the case of patents or industrial design) or there is some rational
justification for the same. Statute of Anne provides an interesting
suggestiveness. As it first gave a 14 years protection from the date of
publication, considering the entrepreneurs need, coming to an analogy of
patents for invention but then the statute accorded a further interest of the
author and gave him further 14 years protection if he was still swerving. But
in subsequent enactments the pattern had been to provide a undivided period of
entitlement of protection, contrary to the statute of Anne, and the publishers
wren left to free to take an exclusive assignment a or license of the whole
form the author.
The justification
commonly offered for this is that it induces entrepreneurs to take greater
risks in promoting works for which there may be sufficient demand. It is also
contended that copyrighted material is supplied to public through the
cooperation of entrepreneur and author and therefore the long duration of protection
makes it north an author while to embark upon a particular project.
Modern day economist as
that the elision of undivided interest of author and entrepreneur have greater
disadvantage for authors. At the copyright system leaves it up to the entrepreneur
the choice of what to select form the pool of works.
These entrepreneurs
calculate how much to risk in a particular venture, well in advance, by
reference to likely returns over more than a few years.
Therefore, they argue
that to shatter the present copyright period is unlikely to produce any
noticeable effect upon the among of copyright material which are produced by
them for consumption.
Thus, the ongoing debate
as to the period of protection granted by copyright suggests that there shall
be no entrepreneurial loss by shorting the period but no to the author and the
readers it shall be a huge loss where the authors could not use their creation
for monetary gains for long time and if they have to be compensated any ways
for that loss the reader shall have to pay a huge among for the same.
Therefore, it is the public interest to continue with the existing system of
protection.
Copyright, basically, is
a legal protection granted to the entrepreneurs of different industries, for
the exploitation of rights assigned to them by the author / creator of such
original work which qualifies for copyright protection. Copyright can be viewed
as a negative right which prohibits anyone from duplicating physical material
existing in the fields of arts and literature.
The socio-economic
development of a nation always depends on the creativity and invention of
people, which is not possible without effective and adequate implementation of
copyright laws. Creativity and innovation are the new path of the world finance
development.
In the rapidly advancing
technology, the main question that arises is whether such advancement is going
to benefit the works, which are under copyright protection or shall have an
adverse effect on the same.
Although the advancement
in technology has served as a morale booster to the authors creators of new
work as they can create new works with the help of such technology is less
time, effort and expenses. These technologies have themselves qualify for
copyright protection as in the case of computer program, computer generated
programs etc.
But what has been the
real threat to the existing copyrighted material is the same technology which
helps in making exact copies of the copyrighted material without any
significant loss in the quality or the content, this technology has also
contributed to the large scale distribution of such material with the upsurge
of computer software technology coupled with the Internet, the different
industries have been affected a lot, especially the music industry, film
industry, publishing industry.
Although the existing
enforcement techniques when such rights are infringed, have served a purpose to
a great extent till date. It is impossible to presume that they shall be as
effective after few years in this ever-changing technological world.
The United States
representative yearly special 301 report of 2021 held that “India has remained
inconsistent in its progress on intellectual property (IP) protection and
enforcement”[8]
It must be noted that
while India’s enforcement in the digital sphere has improved over time, there
is still shortage of tangible benefits for innovators and creators.
The “priority watch list”
which is a category for the worst intellectual property violators included
India as one of the nine US trading partners. India has made a “meaningful”
progress in promoting IP security, and regulations in some areas but it has
failed to address recent and long-standing challenges.
Suggestions
a)
Therefore,
the need of the hour is draft new enforcement techniques through which the
aggrieved party can make good of their losses and which goes parallel to the
technological advancement. The concept of fair use should be defined properly
as to what acts shall constitute fair use and what shall not be considered a
fair use.
b)
While
the preceding sections of this chapter set out the various legal remedies for
infringement, given the magnitude and dimensions that piracy has attained in
recent times, the only efficient remedy would be a consolidated response by
self-regulation.
c)
There
is also a need for organized action from the film industry including through
the setting up of a piracy prevention fund to tackle piracy both in India and
overseas through litigation, through government and inter-government
co-operation in ensuring enforcement of copyright laws. One possibility for the
purposes of supplementing finances for this fund is to have the government
contribute a small portion of the service tax collected from the entertainment
and media industries to the piracy prevention fund. The government itself loses
out on huge amounts of revenue on account of piracy and it would therefore make
practical economic sense to ensure that the government itself contributes to
the piracy prevention fund. This fund should be employed towards initiating law
suits against the offenders both in India and abroad.
d)
With
the globalization of the economy round the corner these legal discrepancies
that exist in different copyright laws should be remarked as to foster the
global economy.
e)
It
is difficult to determine what to similar to the extent of copyright
infringement as it is a very subjective question. Thus, more specific laws must
be enacted to lessen the area of subjectivity and the need of interpretation.
f)
Efforts
should be made to make TRIPS provisions more flexible. This view was supported
by the Indian Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman while addressing the Asian
Development Bank’s annual meet of 2021.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Statue:
1. The
Copyright Act, 1957
2. The
Berne Convention,1887.
3. The
Rome Convention for protection of performers, producers
of phonographs and broadcasting organizations, 1961.
4. The
WIPO Copyright Treaty,
1996.
5. The
Trade Related Aspects
of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement.
6. Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances, 2012.
7. Universal Copyright Convention, 1952.
Books:
1. Cornish, W. R., Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied
Right, Universal Law
Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., 4th Edition,
2004.
2. Gorman, Robert A.; Ginsburg,
Jane C., Copyright: Case & Material, Lexis Law Publishing, 8th Edition,
2008.
3. Narayanan P., Intellectual property
Law, Eastern law House, 7th Edition, 2009.
4. Wadhera, B. L., Law relating to Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Designs and Geographical Indication, Universal Law Publishing Co. Pvt.
Ltd., 4th Ed. 2007.
5. Yatendra Singh, Justice Cyber
Law, 9th Ed. 2008
6. Alka
Chawla, Copy Right & Related
Rights (International & National Prospective), 2007, Ed.
7. Lexisnexus, (Intellectual Property Right),
2008 Ed.
8. Ahuja, Law of Copyright
& Neighboring Right
(International & National
Prospective), 2008, Ed.
Articles:
1. Vijay Pal Dalmia, “Copyright law in
India- Everything you must know”, Mondaq, 14
December 2017.
2. All Answers
ltd, “Conflict between
Author and Owner of Copyright” (Lawteacher.net, May 2021) <https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/commercial-law/conflict- between-author-and-owner-law-essays.php?vref=1> accessed 6 May 2021.
3. Charul Tripathi, “ Historical Development of Law of Copyright”, Mondaq, 25 August
2020.
4. Lucy
Rana and Shubhankar Shashikant, “ Copyright Growth in India and Developed
Economies: A Study”, Mondaq, 7 January 2020.
5. Khurana & Khurana Advocates
and IP Attorneys, The role of Intellectual Property in Economic Development, 10 March
2021.
Websites:
[1] Sec.13, The Copyright Act,1957.
[2] University of London Press v. University Tutorial
Press (1916)2 Ch. 601.
[3] Knowledge Gap Widens Between
Developed and Developing Countries, (5) Intellectual Property
Rights (A Bulletin from Technology, Information Forecasting and Assessment Council
– TIFAC) 1999.
[4] The Industrial Designs
Act.
[6] See, Intellectual Property and Development, World Bank
(2005), page 19
[7] To ascertain the role of patent system
in international trade.
Schiffel and Kitti (1978) and Bosworth (1980) considered US as recipient and host country respectively.
Whereas Maskus and Penubarti (1995) and Rafiquzzaman
(2002) considered manufacturing
industry in developed countries.