Open Access Research Article
CALL FOR REFORM: RENT CAPPING OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES IN DELHI
Published Paper
Article Details
AUTHORED BY - ISHITA BHARDWAJ,
Law Department, Christ
(Deemed to be) University, Delhi NCR, India.
Abstract
This paper explores the
effects of current rent regulations in Delhi, mainly how the Delhi Rent Control
Act has hindered landlords from setting rents at market rates if they were
previously below Rs. 3500. The author shall focus on the background and
necessary provisions of the Model Tenancy Act of 2021. The paper seeks to
outline the effects of Rent Capping. The researcher aims to strike a balance
between landlords' rights and tenant protection within the jurisdiction of
Delhi. Despite this progressive legislation, the Model Tenancy Act hasn't been implemented
in practice at this time in Delhi, questioning its enactment and ramifications.
The author shall examine the effect of implementation of the Model Tenancy Act
in Delhi. This paper shall focus on demarking the consequences of repealing the
rent-capping practices. Finally, the analysis further delves into the projected
surge in tenancy cases that may result from the implementation of the new act.
Key Words: Rent-capping,
Model Tenancy Act, Landlords, Tenants, Rights, Implementation
Introduction
The Delhi Rent Act, has long
been a contentious piece of legislation, shaping the dynamics of rental
property in the National Capital Territory of Delhi. For decades, it has played
a pivotal role in regulating rent levels, particularly for properties with
rents below Rs. 3500. However, this legislation has faced significant
criticism, mainly from landlords who argue that it hampers their ability to set
rents at market rates and manage their properties efficiently.
In response to these
concerns and the changing landscape of urban housing in India, the Model
Tenancy Act was introduced as a central law, aiming to replace all state-level
rent control acts. This new legislation was meant to eliminate the rent cap and
act as guidelines on which new state laws were to be enacted. As per the
Subject lists given under Schedule VII ,Rent is a matter of State list. This
means that the center has no power, whatsoever, to pass legislations affecting
or regulating Rent. If such a legislation is passed, then it is upon the
discretion of the Legislative Assembly of the states to adopt such laws. The
law is a model and it is up to the state to adopt. But, each state has its own rent act to
regulate the rental market. This shift towards deregulation is expected to have
far-reaching consequences for both property owners and tenants in Delhi.
The Delhi Rent Act was
originally introduced to provide protection to tenants by regulating rent
levels and preventing arbitrary evictions. Under this legislation, properties
with monthly rents below Rs. 3500 were subject to stringent rent control measures,
which effectively froze rent levels at rates established decades ago. While
this was intended to safeguard tenants from exorbitant rent hikes, it created a
dichotomy in the rental market. Landlords found themselves unable to charge
market-based rents, leading to concerns about the maintenance and upkeep of
properties, especially in prime locations within the city.
Over the years, these
concerns grew, and calls for reform became increasingly prevalent. Landlords
argued that the rent control laws hindered their ability to cover maintenance
costs, adequately invest in their properties, or realize fair returns on their
investments. This led to a heated debate between tenant rights advocates and
property owners, creating a longstanding impasse in Delhi's rental sector.
Recognizing the need for a
more balanced and modernized approach to rent regulation, the Indian government
introduced the Model Tenancy Act of 2021. This landmark legislation sought to
replace existing state-level rent control acts, including the Delhi Rent Act,
with a central framework that would provide more autonomy to property owners.
One of the most significant changes brought about by this act was the
elimination of rent capping for properties previously subject to the Rs. 3500
thresholds.
This shift towards
deregulation marked a departure from the long-established rent control regime
in Delhi. Property owners celebrated the newfound freedom to set rents at
market rates, aligning their earnings with property values and prevailing
market conditions. However, this newfound freedom raised concerns among tenant
advocacy groups, who worried about potential rent hikes and displacement. But,
the Model Tenancy Act of 2021 is dovetailed to the vision of ‘Housing for All’
by 2022, and aims to “balance the interests and rights of both the landlord and
tenant; to create an accountable and transparent ecosystem for renting the
premises in a disciplined and efficient manner”.
Delhi
Rent Control Act and Model Tenancy Act- An Overview
In this section, I shall
discuss the initial need and background in which Rent Capping was introduced
and purpose of the legislature behind such practices. Further I shall discuss
the relevant provisions relating to Rent Capping Practices as given under the
Delhi Rent Control Act of 1958. Lastly, I shall discuss the projected
consequences which may result from repealing of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Purpose and Need for Rent Capping in Delhi
The purpose of the
legislature while drafting the Delhi Rent Control Act was to protect tenants
from exorbitant rent hikes and ensure their right to continued occupation of
their premises. The Delhi Rent Control Act was enacted in 1958 to address the
prevailing concerns of tenants who were facing arbitrary evictions and rent
increases that were beyond their means. It mainly protected tenants from
exorbitant rent hikes and ensure their right to continued occupation of their
premises. The Delhi Rent Control Act imposed rent control measures,
particularly for properties with rents below Rs. 3500, which effectively froze
rent levels at rates established decades ago. The Act sought to regulate rent
levels and provide tenants with a framework for resolving disputes with their
landlords.
The Delhi Rent Control Act imposed restrictions on landlords' ability to
evict tenants without valid reasons or appropriate notice periods. It also
required landlords to provide specific reasons for eviction, such as
non-payment of rent, willful damage to the property, or violating the terms of
the tenancy agreement. The Delhi Rent Control Act introduced rent control
measures, particularly for properties with rents below Rs. 3500, which
effectively froze rent levels at rates established decades ago. This was
intended to safeguard tenants from excessive rent hikes due to market
fluctuations or landlords' desire to capitalize on property value appreciation.
The Delhi Rent Control Act
extended a measure of security to tenants by making it difficult for landlords
to terminate tenancies without due cause. This provided tenants with the
assurance of continued occupation of their premises, enabling them to plan for
long-term stays and build a sense of stability. While primarily focused on
protecting tenants, the Delhi Rent Control Act also recognized the need to
balance the interests of landlords. It allowed landlords to increase rents in
certain circumstances, such as when the property value had significantly
increased or when the tenant failed to maintain the property adequately.
The Delhi Rent Control Act
aimed to strike a delicate balance between protecting tenants' rights and
safeguarding landlords' interests. It was a significant piece of legislation
that played a crucial role in shaping the rental market in Delhi for decades.
However, its rent capping measures and strict eviction regulations have also
been criticized for stifling investment in rental housing and hindering market
efficiency.
The introduction of the
Model Tenancy Act in 2021 has introduced a new era of rent regulation in India.
The Model Tenancy Act seeks to modernize and streamline the
rental landscape, addressing the concerns of both landlords and tenants while
promoting a more balanced and transparent rental market. The Model
Tenancy Act aims to strike a
more equitable balance between the rights of landlords and tenants, providing a
framework for resolving disputes and ensuring a fair and efficient rental
ecosystem.
Rent Capping and Rent Capping practices in
Delhi
Rent capping practices in
Delhi are regulations that limit the amount of rent that can be charged for
certain types of rental properties. These practices have been in place for
several decades and have been a source of contention between landlords and tenants.
Under the Delhi Rent Control
Act, the rent for properties with rents below Rs. 3500 can only be increased by
10% every three years. If the landlord has incurred any expenditure for any
improvement, addition, or structural alteration in the premises and the cost of
the improvement, addition, or alteration has not been considered in determining
the rent of the premises, they may lawfully increase the standard rent per
year. Landlords have argued that rent capping has prevented them from keeping
up with rising property costs and has made it difficult to maintain their
properties. Tenants have argued that rent capping has made it more difficult to
find affordable housing, especially in prime locations.
Impact of
Rent Capping
In this section I aim to
discuss the adverse impact of rent capping on landlords and tenants in detail.
The implementation of rent capping has had a significant impact on both tenants
and landlords in Delhi. Therefore, I feel it is imminent to discuss the impact
of such rent capping. Further, I shall discuss ways in which the rights of
landlords and tenants can be balanced. Lastly, I shall discuss the consequences
of repealing of such rent capping practices with the implementation of the
Model Tenancy Act, provided that the state chooses to adopt and incorporate its
guidelines into the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Impact of Rent Capping on the Landlords and
Tenants
Rent capping has had several
positive impacts on the tenants in Delhi. It has protected tenants from
exorbitant rent hikes. Rent capping has prevented landlords from raising rents
too quickly, which has helped to keep housing affordable for tenants. The Delhi
Rent Control Act through its rent capping provisions ensured security of tenure
of tenants as it made it more difficult for landlords to evict tenants without
justified causes. This has provided tenants with a greater sense of security
and stability. The author further submits that Rent capping has encouraged
landlords to better maintain their properties, as they are unable to simply
raise rents to cover the costs of repairs and maintenance.
Rent capping has also had
various negative impacts on landlords in Delhi. It has made it difficult to
recover costs as the rate or return from such properties is very low. The cost
of maintaining the property far exceeds the rent which is received. Rent capping
has made it difficult for landlords to recover the costs of repairs,
maintenance, and property taxes. This has led to some landlords neglecting
their properties. Moreover, rent capping has discouraged investment in
properties, as landlords have been reluctant to invest in properties when they
cannot recoup their costs through rent increases. Landlords have faced reduced
flexibility in managing their own properties as it has made it difficult for
landlords to increase rents to match market rates or to evict tenants who are
not paying rent.
The overall impact of rent
capping on tenants and landlords in Delhi is mixed. It has had some positive
impacts on tenants, such as protecting them from rent hikes and providing them
with greater security of tenure. However, it has also had some negative impacts
on landlords, such as making it difficult for them to recover costs and
discouraging investment in rental housing.
Securing the Rights of Tenants &
Landlords
The future of rent capping
in Delhi is uncertain. The Model Tenancy Act of 2021 proposes to replace the
Delhi Rent Control Act and eliminate rent capping practices. However, the Model Tenancy Act has not yet been implemented in Delhi.
It is necessary to strike a
balance between the interests of landlords and tenants when making decisions
about rent capping. Rent capping should be implemented in a way that protects
tenants from rent hikes while also providing landlords with a fair return on
their investment.
The current provision for
rent enhancement by 10% every 3 years is insufficient when looked at the rate
by which the economy grows every year. Therefore, the author suggests
implementation of rent stabilization mechanisms to allow for gradual rent
increases over time, while still protecting tenants from sudden and excessive
rent hikes. Tenant advocacy groups could be strengthened to provide tenants
with support and representation in disputes with landlords. The quantum of
enhancement of rent should be changed from 10% by conducting market studies and
surveys. This will enable in tipping the scales towards giving equal rights
rather than in a particular party’s favor.
Therefore, implementing a
balanced approach to rent regulation can be said to be the need of the hour.
Moreover, by promoting alternative housing solutions and having a balanced rent
regulation, it is possible to create a more equitable and sustainable rental
market in Delhi that benefits both landlords and tenants.
Repealing of Delhi Rent Control Act
The Delhi Rent Control Act of 1958 has been repealed and replaced by the
Model Tenancy Act of 2021. The Model Tenancy Act has been enacted in some states, but not yet in Delhi. The repeal of the
Delhi Rent Control Act is a significant development in the rental market in
Delhi, and it is likely to have a major impact on both landlords and tenants.
The Delhi Rent Control Act was enacted in 1958, and its provisions are
no longer relevant in today's rental market (Godbole,
1999) . For instance, the Delhi Rent Control
Act does not allow landlords to increase rents in line with market rates. The
Delhi Rent Control Act has strict eviction rules which have made it difficult
for tenants to move to new properties, as they have to provide a long notice
period and can be evicted for a variety of reasons, even if they have not
broken their tenancy agreement. This has made it difficult for tenants to find
better-quality housing or to move closer to their workplaces or schools.
The rent capping and eviction rules of the Delhi Rent Control Act have
helped to protect tenants from displacement, as landlords have been less likely
to evict tenants when they know that they cannot easily re-rent the property.
This has helped to ensure that tenants have long-term security of tenure.
Further, the act has ensured that housing is more affordable for tenants, as
landlords have been prevented from increasing rents too quickly. This has been
particularly beneficial for low-income tenants. The old act also established a
Rent Controller system to resolve disputes between landlords and tenants. This
has provided a mechanism for tenants to challenge evictions and rent increases
that they believe are unfair.
The Model
Tenancy Act is intended
to modernize and streamline the rental laws in India. It aims to provide a more
balanced and transparent rental market, addressing the concerns of both
landlords and tenants.
Consequences of repealing Rent Capping
practices on Tenants and Landlords of Delhi
Repealing rent capping practices in Delhi could have a significant
impact on both tenants and landlords. While deregulation may lead to increased
supply of rental housing and more efficient allocation of resources, it is
feared that it may lead to rent hikes and displacement of tenants.
The most immediate and likely consequence of repealing rent capping
would be an increase in rents. As landlords regain their freedom to set rents
at market rates, they may choose to raise rents significantly, especially in
areas with high demand. This could make it difficult for low-income tenants to
afford the same properties for their livelihood. Rent increases would therefore
lead to displacement of tenants, particularly those in neighborhoods with high
market rates. As landlords raise rents, tenants may be forced to move to more
affordable areas, potentially disrupting their communities and access to
essential services.
The repeal of rent capping could also reduce the security of tenure for
tenants. Without rent caps in place, landlords may be more inclined to evict
tenants who are unable to afford rent increases or who are not up-to-date on
their rent payments. This could create a sense of instability and anxiety among
tenants.
Further, deregulation could encourage landlords to invest more in rental
properties, as they would have more flexibility to set rents and recoup their
investments. This could lead to an increase in the supply of rental properties,
which could help to alleviate the current shortage of affordable properties on
rent. With the ability to set rents at market rates, landlords could
potentially earn higher profits on their rental properties. This could
incentivize more individuals and companies to invest in rental housing, further
expanding the supply of housing options.
Landlords would also have greater flexibility in managing their
properties, including the ability to set rent terms and conditions, conduct
background checks on tenants, and evict tenants who breach the terms of their
tenancy agreements.
The overall impact of repealing rent capping practices in Delhi would
depend on how the deregulation is implemented and how the market responds.
While there could be some benefits for landlords, such as increased investment
and flexibility, tenants could face significant challenges, including rent
hikes, displacement, and reduced security of tenure.
Implementation of the Model Tenancy Act
In this section, I shall discuss upon the effect of
implementation of the model tenancy act in delhi and how the act changes the
rights of the landlords and tenants. We shall further discuss the status of
rental property cases and the effect on the courts burden of cases if the model
act is adopted in the National Capital Region of Delhi. Further the act has
only been given a prospective effect and no retrospective effect. Therefore,
the act doesn’t apply to the properties having rent of below 3500 Rs which was
set decades ago and continues to be a meagre amount.
The Model Tenancy Act of 2021 is a comprehensive legislation
that aims to reform and modernize India's rental laws. The Model Tenancy Act
was enacted by the central government and is intended to replace the existing
state-level rent control acts, including the Delhi Rent Control Act of 1958.
Effect on the Rights of old and new Tenants
and Landlords
The implementation of the Model Tenancy Act of 2021 in Delhi
will have a significant impact on the rights of both landlords and tenants.
Landlords will have greater flexibility in setting rents, as
the Model Tenancy Act eliminates rent capping practices. This could allow
landlords to charge higher rents for properties in high-demand areas,
potentially leading to increased profits. Landlords will have greater control
over their properties, as the Model Tenancy Act allows them to conduct
background checks on tenants and establish clear terms and conditions for
tenancy agreements.
The Model Tenancy Act could improve rent collection by
providing a more streamlined dispute resolution process and clearer eviction
rules. This could reduce the number of unpaid rent cases and make it easier for
landlords to evict tenants who are not paying rent.
Looking from the perspective of the tenants, we may see that
the Tenants may face rent hikes, particularly in areas with high demand, as
landlords are no longer bound by rent capping restrictions. The repeal of rent
capping could make it easier for landlords to evict tenants, potentially
reducing their security of tenure. Tenants may need to rely more heavily on
legal recourse to resolve disputes with landlords, which could be
time-consuming and costly.
Effect on courts and rent control procedure
in Delhi
The implementation of the Model Tenancy Act of 2021 in Delhi
is likely to have a significant impact on the courts and rent control
procedures in the city.
The Model Tenancy Act is expected to reduce the number of
pending rent control cases in Delhi. This is because the Model Tenancy Act
establishes a more streamlined dispute resolution process, including the
creation of Rent Authorities and Rent Courts to handle landlord-tenant
disputes. These new bodies are expected to be more efficient than the existing
rent control courts, which are currently overburdened with cases.
The Model Tenancy Act is also expected to simplify rent
control procedures in Delhi. The Act provides clear guidelines for rent
increases, evictions, and other landlord-tenant matters. This should help to
reduce the number of disputes that arise and make it easier for landlords and
tenants to resolve their issues without resorting to litigation.
The role of courts in rent control matters is likely to
diminish under the Model Tenancy Act. This is because the Act establishes a
comprehensive framework for resolving landlord-tenant disputes outside of the
traditional court system. However, courts will still play a role in enforcing
the Model Tenancy Act and adjudicating appeals from Rent Authorities and Rent
Courts.
Despite the potential benefits of the Model Tenancy Act,
there are some potential challenges that could arise from its implementation in
Delhi. One challenge is the need to ensure that the new Rent Authorities and
Rent Courts are adequately staffed and trained. Another challenge is the need
to educate landlords and tenants about the new procedures and their rights
under the Act.
Overall, the implementation of the Model Tenancy Act is
expected to have a positive impact on the courts and rent control procedures in
Delhi. The Model Tenancy Act is designed to streamline dispute resolution,
simplify procedures, and reduce the burden on the courts. However, careful
implementation and education will be necessary to ensure that the Act is
effective in achieving its goals.
It is important to note that the Model Tenancy Act has only
been given prospective effect, meaning that it does not apply to existing
tenancy agreements. This means that properties with rents below Rs. 3500 will
continue to be governed by the Delhi Rent Control Act until the existing
tenancies expire.
Consequences of retrospective and prospective
implementation
Retrospective and prospective implementation are two
different ways of applying a new law or policy. Retrospective implementation
applies the new law or policy to events that occurred before the law or policy
was enacted, while prospective implementation applies the new law or policy
only to events that occur after the law or policy was enacted.
Retrospective implementation can have several consequences,
both positive and negative. Retrospective implementation can be used to address
past injustices or harms that were caused by outdated or unfair laws. For
Instance, a new law that prohibits discrimination against a particular group of
people could be applied retroactively to provide compensation to victims of
past discrimination. Retrospective implementation can help to promote
uniformity in the law by ensuring that all cases are treated the same, regardless
of when they occurred. This can be particularly important in cases where the
law has changed significantly over time.
However, retrospective implementation can also have several
negative consequences. Retrospective implementation can be perceived as unfair,
as it can impose new obligations or liabilities on people who acted in
accordance with the law at the time of their actions. This can lead to a sense
of injustice and resentment. Retrospective implementation can be difficult and
impractical to implement, particularly if it involves applying a new law or
policy to a large number of past events. This can be time-consuming and costly,
and it may be difficult to gather the necessary evidence to adjudicate cases.
Prospective implementation also has several consequences,
both positive and negative. Prospective implementation is generally considered
to be more fair than retrospective implementation, as it does not impose new
obligations or liabilities on people for actions that they took in the past.
Prospective implementation is generally easier to implement than retrospective
implementation, as it does not require applying a new law or policy to past
events. This can be less time-consuming and costly, and it may be easier to
gather the necessary evidence to adjudicate cases.
However, prospective implementation can also have several
drawbacks. Prospective implementation may not have an immediate effect on
addressing past injustices or harms. This can be frustrating for victims of
past wrongs, and it may not provide the same level of deterrence as
retrospective implementation.
The decision of whether to implement a new law or policy
retrospectively or prospectively is a complex one that should be made on a
case-by-case basis. There are both potential benefits and drawbacks to each
approach, and the best approach will depend on the specific circumstances of
the law or policy in question. In general, prospective implementation is likely
to be more acceptable than retrospective implementation, as it is generally
considered to be fairer and more certain. However, there may be cases where
retrospective implementation is necessary to address past injustices or to
provide a strong deterrent effect.
The Model Tenancy Act of 2021 is a comprehensive legislation
that aims to reform and modernize India's rental laws. The Model Tenancy Act is
intended to replace the existing state-level rent control acts, including the
Delhi Rent Control Act of 1958. Retrospective implementation of the Model
Tenancy Act would mean that the act would apply to all existing tenancy
agreements, including those that were entered into before the act was passed.
This would have a number of consequences, both for landlords and tenants.
Landlords would be able to increase rents on existing
properties, even if the rents are currently below the market rate. This could
lead to significant rent hikes for some tenants. Additionally, landlords would
be able to evict tenants more easily than under the current laws. Tenants could
face significant rent increases if the Model Tenancy Act is implemented
retrospectively. Additionally, they could be more easily evicted from their
homes. Although it would be unfair to tenants who entered into tenancy agreements
under the existing laws. Additionally, it is argued that retrospective
implementation would create uncertainty and instability in the rental market.
The current rent control laws are making it difficult for
landlords to invest in rental properties, which is leading to a decrease in the
supply of rental housing. Prospective implementation of the Model Tenancy Act
would mean that the act would only apply to new tenancy agreements. Existing
tenancy agreements would continue to be governed by the current laws until they
expire. This would have a number of consequences, both for landlords and
tenants.
Landlords would not be able to increase rents on existing
properties until the current tenancies expire. Additionally, they would not be
able to evict tenants more easily than under the current laws. But Tenants
would not face rent increases until the current tenancies expire. Additionally,
they would be protected from eviction under the current laws. Additionally, the
prospective implementation would avoid creating uncertainty and instability in
the rental market.
Proponents of prospective implementation argue that it would
not do enough to address the current shortage of affordable housing. They argue
that the provisions of the Model Tenancy Act would
only apply to new tenancy agreements, which would do little to increase the
supply of rental housing.
Conclusion
The decision of whether to implement the Model Tenancy Act
retrospectively or prospectively is a complex one with no easy answers. There
are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the
decision of whether or not to implement the Model Tenancy Act retrospectively
should be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances
of each tenancy agreement.
In addition to the above arguments, it is important to
consider the potential impact of retrospective implementation on the courts.
Retrospective implementation could lead to a surge in litigation as tenants
challenge rent increases and evictions under the new laws. This could further
overwhelm the courts and delay the resolution of existing cases.
Overall, the decision of whether or not to implement the
Model Tenancy Act retrospectively is a difficult one with no easy answers.
There are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue. Ultimately,
the decision should be made carefully and after careful consideration of all of
the potential consequences.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author declared no
potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship,
and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author received no
financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
References
Alok,
A. & Vora, P., 2011. Rent Control in India — Obstacles for Urban Reform. National
University of Juridical Sciences Law Review, 4(1), pp. 83-100.
Basu, Kaushik, Emerson & Munro, P.,
1998. The Economics and Law of Rent Control. World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper Series, Issue Paper No. 1968.
Basu, Kaushik,
Emerson & Munro, P., 2001. Tenancy
Rental Control and Monopolistic. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Department of Economics, Issue Working Paper No. .
Epstein, R., 1988. , Rent Control and the
theory of Efficient Regulation. Brooklyn Law Review, Issue 54, p. 741.
Godbole, M., 1999. Outdated Rent Laws and
Investment in Housing. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(7), pp.
387-390.
Gupta, S. R. & Vishwakarma, S., 2022.
Unconstitutionality of Legislations for Being Obsolete, Outdated and
Outlived. SCC Online Blog Exp, Issue 46.
Gyourko, J. & Linneman, P., 1989.
Equity and Efficiency Aspects of Rent Control: An Empirical Study of New York
City. Journal of Urban Economics, 26(54).
Keating, D., 1988. Commentary on Rent
Control and the theory of Efficient Regulation. Brooklyn Law Review, Issue
54, p. 1223.
Khan, S., 2010. The Arrears as Barometer. Practical
Lawyer, Issue 8, pp. 8-14.
Olsen, E. O., 1991. Is Rent Control Good
Social Policy?. Chicago- Kent Law Review, Issue 67, p. 931.
Singh, D. M., 2009. A New Vision for the
Future of Urban India, Economic Developments in India. Jawaharlal Nehru
National Urban Renewal Mission, 144(18).
Wadhva, K., 1991. Delhi Rent Control Act:
Facts and Fallacies. Economic and Political Weekly, 26(21), pp.
1351-1356.
Wadhva, K., 2002. Maharashtra Rent Control
Act 1999 — Unfinished Agenda. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(25),
p. 2471.
Article Information
CALL FOR REFORM: RENT CAPPING OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES IN DELHI
Authors: ISHITA BHARDWAJ
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/04/22
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.