BODY AS A COMMODITY: A COMMENT ON ORGAN TRAFFICKING By- Swetha A & Rithika SS

BODY AS A COMMODITY: A COMMENT ON ORGAN TRAFFICKING
 
Authored By- Swetha A
IV BCOM LLB (Hons)
School Of Excellence in Law
The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai-600113.
 
Co- Authored By- Rithika SS
IV BCOM LLB (Hons)
School Of Excellence in Law
The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai-600113
Mail: ssrithika1311@gmail.com
 
Abstract
  “Organs are too precious to be futile”
We are no more in a century of superstition, where it is considered to be a sin to bury a dead body without the organs in it. Since human trafficking has been zoned out human trafficking for swindling their precious organs is ruling the underground world. To be more accurate, there’s no need for trafficking why because innocent people are well prepared to vend themselves to quench the demands of their creditors. This illegal process of organ trafficking between donors and recipients is eased by the presence of middlemen. The aftermath comes with regression and exhaustion since the major share of consideration given to the donor is parted by the middleman and the victim is left with drained well-being. It becomes much laborious task to leap from dawn to dusk without an organ inside with depleting health and wealth. Last but not least, people got rid off their kidney but not their debt. Positive measures like encouraging the people to donate organs will be more pertinent in this regard than the punitive measures. Perhaps it’s a blessing to be ceaseless through organ donation than to bury a corpse with organs alive in it.
 
Lately, India is becoming one of the perfect site for medical tourism. People in need of any kind of medical treatments stop at our airports to get themselves cured. Though, it represents a positive development in our Medical field, the other side of coin points out the underground markets functioning to satisfy the needs of these foreign patients at the cost of living citizen’s life. The most well-known crime that occurs in these markets is “organ trafficking or Organ trade”. Needy and downtrodden community are ready to spare their life to settle their debts. Eventually, middlemen swindle the lion’s share of money and poor donors are left helpless with meagre share and feeble physique and psych. This is not done just like unplugging an organ from one person and plugging it into another, it involves the participation of a middleman. Thus, people from different countries or from the domestic country, who are waiting for organ transplantation are connected with donors via one or more middleman.
 
 
Organ trafficking
Trading of human organs and tissues, usually for transplantation, which occurs out of track and which gives huge profit to intermediaries is known by the term organ trafficking. This crime is contagious and has attracted the attention of many international institutions. Organ trafficking consists any of the following activities:
a)      Removing organs from living or deceased donors without valid consent or authorization or in exchange for financial gain or comparable advantage to the donor and/or a third person;
b)      Any transportation, manipulation, transplantation or any other use of such organs;
c)      Offering any undue advantage to, or requesting the same by, a healthcare professional, public official, or employee of a private sector entity to facilitate or perform such removal or use;
d)      Soliciting or recruiting donors or recipients, where carried out for financial gain or comparable advantage; or
e)      Attempting to commit, or aiding or abetting the commission of, any of these acts[1]
 Trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons by means of threat or use of any other force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability, or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of the removal of organs[2].
 
Why is there a need for middleman in organ transplantation?
In 2016, JP Nadda, then Union health minister, said in Lok Sabha that “against the demand of 2 lakh kidneys, only 6,000 were available. Similarly, against the demand of 30,000 livers only 1,500 were available and against the demand of 50,000 hearts merely 15 were available across the country”. Every year in India, 100,000 people are in need of corneal transplant, but in reality, we are able to do only about 25,000 corneal transplants. Universally, organ donation is voluntary. Two voluntary systems are as follows:
 • Opt in: Donor gives consent for organ donation
 • Opt out: In this system, anyone who has not refused for organ donation is considered as a Donor.
 
 In India, we have only the Opt-in system, while many western countries practice the Opt-out system 
 According to the Multi Organ Harvesting Aid Network Foundation (MOHAN foundation), a Chennai based NGO working on organ donation, only about 3% of the demand is met. The needs for organ transplantation is not satisfied and as a result patients die due to non-availability of organ at right time. Thus, they rely on middlemen to monetarily connect with a stranger and thereby it enters an illegal market.
 
 On the other hand, people who got struck in the debt-loop, decides to donate their organs for a predetermined amount. They are approached by middlemen and medical brokers with an offer to donate organs for money. Thus, 96% of illegal transplantation is to pay off debts that came from food, household expenses, rent, etc. Ironically, organ donation doesn’t pave them a way out of debts-loop because most of the money involved in the transaction is absorbed by the middlemen and a less than a penny is only available to the donor. Thus, they fall back into the vicious circle of poverty and debt.
 
 
Red market
The place where the participants of illegal transplantation, such as recipient, donor, middlemen, meet is called Red market. Usually, organ trafficking occurs in three ways, they are:
  1. Organs are removed by way of force from the donor’s body
  2.  Organs are removed with the consent of the donor for a consideration
  3. Medical practitioner will remove the organs without the knowledge of the donor.
In many cases, the poor healthy donors from slum areas are more active in Organ trafficking. For instance in kidney transplantation, after interactions between medical brokers and surgical entrepreneurs, a region will be fixed as “kidney zones” which comprises of persons facing extraordinary debts. According to UAE surgeon, kidneys from Bombay are cheaper and less safe than kidneys from Chennai. That’s why India is considered to be hub of organ trafficking for the buyers from Europe, the Middle East, Japan, North America, Southeast Asia and Australia. Scott Carney, journalist and author of “Red Market” have mentioned in his book that “all in, I figure, I’m worth about $ 2, 50,000”. His acquaintance with an illegal market helped him to know his worth. From top, his hair to all ligaments joining his joints has separate price and can be traded in Red market. Each organ is priced differently according to the demand and supply in the market.
 
Side effects
Organ Transplantation by illegal means does harm both the donor and recipient both legally as well as physically. Donor risk their life for the sake of money and turn their life even more to a worsened situation. According to a study, 50% of the kidney donors faced exhaustion and anxiety after donation. They all commonly complained of ‘half man syndrome’ which means they feel emptiness in their abdomen and that increases the fear of losing the other one. They also diagnosed of less sexual potency after kidney donation. The reason for such serious issues is lack of post-surgery treatment. Many are not left with money for aftermath treatment because the consideration they received will be mostly used to pay off debts. Paradoxically, those poor donor have to run again for their livelihood, with one kidney.
 
At times, even the recipient is also not benefitted from such illegal organ transplantation. Already lakhs and lakhs will be spent by the patients for the organ, middlemen and medical expenses. So, they ignore the Immunosuppressant therapy[3] which is necessary to prevent the rejection of transplant by the recipient’s body. They are not able to sustain the long-term Immunosuppressant therapy due to time and cost factors. Thus, it results in another kidney failure in spite of high-cost transplantation. Additionally, some young nephrologist ignore the tissue mismatches and go ahead with transplantation surgeries which even results in kidney failure.
Hike in organ trafficking
Though organ trafficking is prevalent since 1980 we can witness a hike in it in certain periods. One such hike occurred when Tamil Nadu was thrashed by tsunami in 2004. “In Chennai, the victims of human trafficking for organ removal are largely part of the fishing communities who lost their homes in the 2004 tsunami. The traffickers began to target hundreds of people after tsunami with good offers. Brokers even provided a home where such organ donor could reside temporarily following surgery. This also helped brokers to attract more individuals towards the sale” said the study conducted by Coalition for Organ-Failure Solutions, a non-profit international and human rights organization[4]. One more factor which added fuel to fire is job loss due to Covid-19. That group of people who were already uneducated, uninsured, unemployed are now even more desperate to take up offers which they shouldn’t take[5]. Since people has been rendered helpless to pay their debts and maintain their family, they opted to sell their kidney to accomplish their manly duties in vain. In the recent years organ brokers started using social media as a recruiting platform for the red market.
Legal ways to donate organs
How organ donation can be done legally?
Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 is the only legislation in India to guide organ donation and prevent organ trafficking. It’s crucial for us to know about donor and recipient before entering into the procedure. Donor is a person who donates his organs for therapeutic purpose[6]. Recipient is a person in whose body organ from donor is transplanted[7].
 
 
Donors
Organ donation can be done by both living human beings and dead and they are known as living donors and deceased donors respectively. Organs can be donated from the body of a deceased, once authorisation is obtained. Authorisation can be obtained in the following ways:
1.      Authorisation can be obtained from the donor itself before his death or from his near relative[8].
2.      If the donor had in writing in the presence of two or more witnesses, unequivocally authorized at any time before his death, the removal of any human organ or tissue for therapeutic purpose, the person in lawful possession of the dead body of the donor grant to a registered medical practitioner facilities to remove that human organ or tissue unless he has reason to believe that the donor had revoked the authorisation subsequently[9].
3.      Where neither such authority is given by a person before his death nor any objection was expressed for removal of human organs or tissues from his body, the person lawfully in possession of the dead body can authorise the removal of human organs or tissues of the deceased person for therapeutic purposes unless he has any reason to believe that a near relative of the deceased has objection to do the same[10].
Living donor
·         When it comes to deceased donation there is no complicated restriction but in the case of living donation, donor should be a near relative i.e. spouse, son, daughter, father, mother, brother, sister, grandfather, grandmother, grandson or granddaughter to the recipient[11]. Living donation can also come from a person who is not a near relative but who is a good friend who wishes to donate organs out of love and affection which is known as altruistic donation. Such donors who is not a near relative should get the approval of authorisation committee for organ donation. 
·         In B.L. Nagaraj and ors vs. Kantha and ors[12], the high court has held that, there is no provision in the act which prohibits the person who is not a near relative by definition from donating his kidney. The relationship of donor with the recipient, period of acquaintance and the degree of association, reciprocity of feelings, gratitude and other human bonds perhaps some of the factors which would sustain ‘affection and attachment’ between two individuals. The committee has to ensure that human organ has not become an article of commerce. The main thrust of the act is against commercial dealings in human organs.  
·        A near relative should get the permission of doctor in charge of the transplant before removing or transplanting organs or tissues. If in case, donor or recipient is a foreign national, prior approval of authorisation committee is essential before removing or transplanting organs or tissues.
 
Organ donation in the case of brain death
When brain stem is permanently damaged, the patient is declared brain dead as the person cannot regain consciousness or breathe. The definition of brain death states that there is complete cessation of cerebral function wherein the proximate cause is known and is considered irreversible. The American Association of Neurology (AAN) has defined brain death with three cardinal signs: cessation of the functions of the brain including the brainstem, coma or unresponsiveness, and apnea[13]. Brain stem is a part of a central nervous system having centre for consciousness and respiration. Heart will continue to function for 36 to 72 hours on life support[14]. As the blood supply is maintained to the vital organs during this period, the organs can be taken from the dead with the consent of relatives. In case of brain stem death, organs or tissues can be removed from the body of the deceased, only when such death is certified by a board of medical experts consisting of:
i)       The registered medical practitioner in charge of the hospital in which brain stem death has occurred.  
ii)    An independent registered medical practitioner, being a specialist to be nominated by the registered medical practitioner as mentioned above from the panel of names approved by the appropriate authority.
iii) A neurologist or a neurosurgeon to be nominated by the registered medical practitioner as mentioned in clause (i) from the panel of names approved by the appropriate authority
iv)  The registered medical practitioner treating the person whose brain stem death has occurred[15].
Minors in organ donation
i)       To understand the part of minors in organ donation, we should travel back to the legislation which was made in 1994. Originally, the act contained that, “a donor means any person not less than eighteen years of age”[16]. Later the amendment which was made in 2011, diluted the rigidity of the provision and added that, no human organs or tissues shall be removed from the body of the minor before his death for the purpose of transplantation except in the manner as may be prescribed[17].  The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules 2014 mention that living organ or tissue donation by minors shall not be permitted except on exceptional grounds to be recorded in detail with justifications prior approval of the Appropriate Authority and state government concerned.
ii)     The court’s observation came while hearing, through video conferencing the urgent plea of a 17 year old girl, seeking court’s permission to donate a part of her liver to her father, who is suffering from advance stage of liver failure due to disease known as Cirrhosis of liver. To ascertain the potential required for the procedure, Justice Sachdeva ordered the Director of Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, to constitute a committee of two senior doctors preferably, one of whom is an expert in liver transplant and biliary sciences. The plea mentioned that minor’s mother is not a suitable donor and the 17 year old girl is the eldest child and also of the same blood group of her father but then the plea was rejected by the authorization committee approved by the Delhi government.
iii)   Also, human organs or tissues cannot be removed from the body of a mentally challenged person before his death for the purpose of transplantation[18]. Where brain-stem death of any person, less than eighteen years of age, occurs and is certified, any of the parents of the deceased may give authority in such a form and manner prescribed for the removal of human organ or tissue[19].
 
Remedial measures to eradicate organ trafficking
The National Human Rights Commission had constituted a core group of medical experts to go into the issues relating to the public health and human rights and in particular about the illegal organ trade. The commission has called for the following measures on the basis of the recommendation of the group,
?       State Medical Councils should screen the records of hospitals performing organ transplants and estimate the proportion of transplants, which have been made through a compassionate donor mechanism. In case of kidney transplants, wherever the proportion has exceeded 5% of the cases performed in any of the past 5 years, the State Medical Council should initiate a full-fledged enquiry into the background of the donors and the recipients, as well as a careful documentation of the follow-up health status of the donor and the nature of after care provided by the hospital. Wherever police enquiry is needed to know the backgrounds of donor and recipient, the aid of the State Human Rights Commission may be sought for providing appropriate directions to the state agencies.
?       Cadaver transplant programmes should be promoted to reduce the demand for live-donors.
?       Facilities for chronic renal dialysis should be increased and improved in hospitals, to provide alternatives to kidney transplantation
?       Better facilities should be provided for transparent and effective counseling of prospective donors.
?       Wherever possible, a mechanism should be established for independent verification of the veracity of compassionate donation by a group of experts, which is external to the hospital wherein the transplant procedure is proposed to be informed.
Istanbul Declaration On Organ Trafficking
To address the growing unethical problems in the field of organ donation the transplantation society (TTS) and the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) held a summit meeting in Istanbul in 2008. In 2010 TTS and ISN created the Declaration of Istanbul Custodian Group (DICG) to disseminate the Declaration and to respond to new challenges in organ trafficking and transplant tourism. Between February 2018 and May 2018, the DICG carried out a wide-ranging consultation, open to all interested parties, to update the Declaration in response to clinical, legal and social developments in the field. Results were presented, reviewed and adopted accordingly.
 
 
Principles
1. Governments should develop and implement ethically and clinically sound programs for the prevention and treatment of organ failure, consistent with meeting the overall healthcare needs of their populations.
2. The optimal care of organ donors and transplant recipients should be a primary goal of transplant policies and programs.
3. Trafficking in human organs and trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal should be prohibited and criminalized.
4. Organ donation should be a financially neutral act.
5. Each country or jurisdiction should develop and implement legislation and regulations to govern the recovery of organs from deceased and living donors and the practice of transplantation, consistent with international standards.
6. Designated authorities in each jurisdiction should oversee and be accountable for organ donation, allocation and transplantation practices to ensure standardization, traceability, transparency, quality, safety, fairness and public trust.
7. All residents of a country should have equitable access to donation and transplant services and to organs procured from deceased donors.
8. Organs for transplantation should be equitably allocated within countries or jurisdictions, in conformity with objective, non-discriminatory, externally justified and transparent rules, guided by clinical criteria and ethical norms
9. Health professionals and healthcare institutions should assist in preventing and addressing organ trafficking, trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal, and transplant tourism.
10. Governments and health professionals should implement strategies to discourage and prevent the residents of their country from engaging in transplant tourism.
11. Countries should strive to achieve self-sufficiency in organ donation and transplantation.
 
 
 
The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994
The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 not only regulates organ donation and transplantation but also prevents organ trafficking and punishes such persons who indulged in such trafficking.
?         Donor and other persons who are empowered to give authority for the removal of human organ or tissue shall not authorise such removal of organ or tissue for any purpose other than therapeutic purpose[20].
?         The medical practitioner shall not undertake any removal or transplantation of organ or tissue unless explaining in such a manner as may be prescribed all possible effects, complications and hazards connected with the removal and transplantation to the donor and the recipient respectively[21].
?         Any person who renders his services to or at any hospital and who helps in any manner in the removal of any human organ without authority, shall be punishable with imprisonment and fine. Where any registered medical practitioner is convicted as mentioned earlier, his name shall be reported by the appropriate authority to the respective state medical council for taking necessary action including the removal of his name from the register of the council for a period of 3 years for the first offence and permanently for the second offence[22].
?         Whoever-
?    makes or receives any payment for the supply of any human organ;
?    seeks to find person willing to supply for payment any human organ
?    offers to supply any human organ for payment
?    initiates or negotiates any arrangement involving the making of any payment for the supply of human organ or tissue shall be punished with imprisonment and fine[23].
?         Whoever publishes or distributes, inviting persons to donate organs in return for a monetary award shall be punished with imprisonment and fine[24].
?         Whoever abets in the preparation or submission of false documents including giving false affidavits to establish that the donor is making the donation of the human organs, as a near relative or by reason of affection or attachment towards the recipient[25]. 
?         Where any offence punishable under this act is committed by a company, every person who was in charge and responsible to the company, at the time of commission of the offence shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence. Where any such offence which is punishable under this act is committed by the company and it is proved that, it is committed in connivance with director, manager, company secretary, they shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence.[26]
Machineries to weed out organ trafficking
The Central Government shall appoint by notification one or more officers as appropriate authorities for each state and union territories. The State Government shall appoint by notification one or more officers as appropriate authorities[27]. The State Government and Union Territories shall constitute by notification, one or more authorisation committees[28] consisting of such members as may be nominated by the state governments and union territories on such terms and conditions as may be specified in the notification for the purposes of approval or rejection of donors. 
 
Authorisation committee (AC)
The purpose of this body is to regulate the process of authorisation to approve or reject transplants between the recipient and donors other than the first relative. The primary duty of the committee is to ensure that the donor is not being exploited for monetary consideration to donate their organ. The joint application made by the donor and recipient is scrutinized and a personal interview is essential to satisfy the AC the genuine motive of donation and to ensure that the donor understands the potential risks of the surgery. Information about the approval or rejection of a donor is sent to the hospitals through mails.
 
Appropriate authority (AA)
The purpose of this body to regulate the removal, storage, and transplantation of human organs. A hospital is permitted to perform such activities only after being licensed by the authority. The powers of AA include inspecting and granting registration to the hospitals for transplant surgery, enforcing the required standards for hospitals, conducting regular inspections of the hospitals to examine the quality of transplantation and follow-up medical care of donors and recipients, suspending or cancelling the registrations or erring hospitals, and conducting investigations into complaints for breach of any provisions of the act. The AA issues a licence to a hospital for a period of 5 years at a time and can renew the licence after that period. Each organ requires a separate licence.
 
How can you donate your organs?
The procedure to donate organ is not an arduous one. It is a voluntary and simple process. Because of lack of awareness, it seems like toilsome process. Ways to donate organs are as follows,
?       A person can fill up the consent form which is available in National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organisation(NOTTO) to donate his/her organs after death
?       Such consent to donate organs can be given by approaching the hospitals, which being a registered and recognised one for organ transplantation.
?       A donor can also get a donor card from registered organ donation agencies. Though such card is not a legally enforceable one, it instils a person’s consent to donate organs.
Organ donation day –Driving force
It can be rightly said that, organ trafficking can be prevented and eradicated by all of us. It’s better to donate organs to those who are in need rather than to decompose in the soil. Awareness campaigns and programmes must be conducted to weed out all the superstitious believes associated with organ donation. People must be made familiar with organ donation process. “World Organ Donation Day” is observed on August 13 to inspire people to pledge to donate their organs. Live Donor and families of Deceased Donors should be recognized, acknowledged and honored in social and government events for their precious contribution to mankind. May all of us indulge ourselves in this invaluable contribution and become immortal.


[1] Definition derived from the Council of Europe Convention against Trafficking in Human Organs (2015), the Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism, available at: https://www.declarationofistanbul.org/images/Policy_Documents/2018_Ed_Do/2018_Edition_of_the_Declaration_of_Istanbul_Final.pdf (last visited on 5/2/2023)
[2] Definition derived from the Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, supplementing the united nations convention against the transnational organized crime (2000)
[3] Immuno suppressant therapy, available at: https://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/immuno (last visited on: 5/2/2023)
[4] Coalition for Organ Failure Solution is a non-profit international health and human rights organisation with a mission to end the organ trade, especially trafficking in persons for the removal of organs.
[5] Statement by Aimee Comrie, project coordinator, GLO.ACT at United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
[6]Section 2(f) of Transplantation of Human Organs and tissues Act, 1994.
[7] Section 2(m) of Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994.
[8] Section 3 (1A) (i) of Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994.
[9] Section 3 (2) of Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994
[10] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.3
[11] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.2(i), s.9
[12]B.L. Nagaraj and others vs Dr. Kantha and others, AIR 1996 Kant 82, ILR 1995 KAR 2050
[13]Brain death and organ donation, available at: https://www.riajournal.com/doi/JRIA/pdf/10.5005/jp-journals-10049-0073 (last visited on 7/02/2023)
[14]Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994),s.2(d)
 
[15] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.3(6)
[16] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.2(f)
[17] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994),s.9(1B)
[18] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.9(1C)
[19] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s. 3(7)
[20] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.11
[21]Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.12
[22] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.18
[23] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.19, s.19A
[24] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.19(f)
[25] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.19(g)
[26] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.21
[27] Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.2(b)
[28]Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994, (Act No. 42 of 1994), s.2(c)