Open Access Research Article

BAIL JURISPRUDENCE AND THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA, THE UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND AND WALES

Author(s):
J.M. ANISHA
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 8

Abstract

Bail plays an important role within the criminal justice system as it allows personal liberty to be upheld whilst proceeding with the criminal process. Whilst the presumption of innocence can be given to those who are accused of offences, they may be held in custody which can cause problems. This can have an impact on their employment, family life, financial situation and defence. This paper looks at bail law within three countries. India, the United States and England and Wales. It looks at the law surrounding bail, and how courts aim to strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety. India will be looked at by focussing on the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and important cases. The U.S. will look at how the Bail Reform Act of 1984 provides a framework. Finally, England and Wales will be looked at with reference to the Bail Act 1976 and European Convention on Human Rights. This paper will also look at how bail ties in with the presumption of innocence, equality and personal liberty. It is argued that bail decisions should be made on a case by case basis, rather than an extra punishment. Although each country has different laws they all have to strike a balance between the rights of the accused and legitimate public interest.

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Author Details

Authors: J.M. ANISHARegistration ID: 1013615 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13615Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, India

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.