A FACTUAL CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH ON THE SOCIAL EXCLUSION OF HOMOSEXUALITY DECRIMINALIZATION: A SPECIFIC EMPHASIS ON THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, INDIA. BY - MAHALAKSHMI M. K.
A
FACTUAL CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH ON THE SOCIAL EXCLUSION OF HOMOSEXUALITY DECRIMINALIZATION: A SPECIFIC
EMPHASIS ON THE STATE OF TAMIL
NADU, INDIA.
AUTHORED BY - MAHALAKSHMI M.
K.
Post Graduate Student,
LLM Department of Criminal Law,
Saveetha School of Law,
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
(SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
ABSTRACT
This factual contemporary research explores the social exclusion
impacts of the decriminalization of homosexuality and the study delves into the challenges faced by homosexuals even after the Supreme Court's decriminalization, examining how
both social and cultural factors influence
the aftermath of this legal change and its potential impact on future
generations. The paper aims to
analyze the validity of homosexuality despite its decriminalization. The
research methodology section outlines
a mixed-method approach, combining both descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods.
The study conducted in Chennai, Kancheepuram and Thiruvallur districts in the state of Tamil Nadu, India. The primary research data
collected through face-to-face and online interviews, involving diverse participation consists of two basic types 1. Natural
participants and 2. Artificial participants, Natural participants includes
people from the respective locality and the members from the
artificial participants are drawn from Local Representatives, Social Activists, LGBT Community, Feminists
Groups, Journalists, Researchers and Legal Practitioners from various communities in
total 238 individuals participated in this research comprising 215 quantitative data, Qualitative interview of 18
key participants and 5 stakeholders with
expertise in these matters from diverse backgrounds. The analysis and findings
section present demographic profiles
of respondents and highlights the problems faced by homosexuals. The Chi-square and ANOVA tests reveal
associations between variables, providing insights into age, educational qualification, marital status, and locality. The study suggests
several recommendations,
including education and awareness campaigns, inclusive counseling services, legal advocacy, diverse representation in
media, and strengthened mental health support. The conclusion emphasizes the need for ongoing efforts
to combat discrimination and bias, particularly among older generations, and underscores the importance of addressing cultural
and social factors.
Key Words: Decriminalization, Discrimination, Hate Expression, LGBT, Social Exclusion.
Introduction
The progression of this subject
across various regions
globally has given rise to a culture characterized by secrecy and
discrimination. Laws against same-sex relationships endured for centuries, fortifying stigma and
discriminatory practices. The initial phase saw the emergence of the decriminalization movement
in the mid-20th century, key events include
the decriminalization of homosexuality in England and Wales in
1967 and the pivotal Stonewall Riots in 1969 marking a turning point in LGBT rights advocacy. As the visibility of
decriminalization increased, so did acceptance
of LGBT individuals and their rights. Legal recognition paved the way for
the acknowledgment and protection of same-sex relationships, encompassing the right
to marry, adopt and inherit
contributing to the reduction of discrimination. The cultural and social impacts
coupled with
decriminalization prompted greater representation of LGBT individuals in media,
literature and the arts. This
challenged societal norms, stereotypes, labelling, shaming, fostering empathy and understanding. Although strides have
been made LGBT rights remain an evolving issue in many parts of the world. The ongoing struggle seeks to combat
discrimination and promote equality. The prevailing trend in decriminalization often correlates with increased societal
acceptance of LGBT individuals. The fundamental shifts in culture
resulting from decriminalization manifest in altered
norms and values with greater LGBT visibility in media, art and entertainment. Recent governmental
initiatives aim to raise public awareness about LGBT issues contributing to cultural attitude
shifts. These campaigns focus on reducing
stigma, fostering acceptance and providing support
to LGBT organizations. Government support including funding, resources, policy
making and framing
legislations plays a crucial role in these organizations which in
turn provide vital support and education. Efforts may involve updating
educational curriculum to include
LGBT issues promoting inclusivity, combat bullying and discrimination in
educational institutions.
In this research paper, researcher extensively discuss the social exclusion
impacts of the decriminalization of homosexuality emphasizing the reasons and causes leading
to homosexuality in India within its cultural and social
context. The Government and Judiciary have played pivotal roles in addressing social issues that
persist in India contributing to cultural erosion. While the Indian
Judiciary upholds the ends of justice and social problems
which persist posing a significant challenge to the Nation's integrated identity. The study
delves into the challenges faced by
homosexuals even post-decriminalization by the Supreme
Court. It examines
how both social
and cultural factors
influence the decriminalization of homosexuals and explores their
potential impact on future generations. The paper aims to analyze
the validity of homosexuality despite its decriminalization, considering social exclusion impacts in India.
Anamika B. Panickar (2023) delves
into the perceptions of the older generation regarding the LGBT community focusing particularly on
individuals aged 60 and above. The research revealed that a significant portion of the elderly population held biased views towards the LGBT community. These attitudes were often influenced by factors such as heightened religiosity, limited awareness and the pervasive influence of heteronormative
cultural norms. The implications of these
findings extend beyond the realm of academia offering valuable insights for
psychologists, researchers, medical
professionals and social
activists. By comprehending the origins of prejudice against the LGBT community this research
contributes to the development of strategies aimed at understanding and resolving these issues in society. The study
conducted by Rishka Ahmad (2019) focuses on exploring
the role of sexual identity
in shaping student
perceptions of the LGBT community and also revealed a
significant contribution of sexual identity to students' perceptions of the LGBT community. The implications
of this research extend to the field of counseling, providing a foundation for counselors to assist students in
avoiding sexual identity mismatches and
addressing potential factors that may lead to positive perceptions of the LGBT
community. The findings contribute
valuable insights for educators and mental health professionals working to create inclusive
and supportive environments within educational institutions. Dr. Shilpa
Abani's (2019) research focuses on investigating the perceptions of the LGBT community among
Asian Indians residing
in the USA regarding their entertainment choices.
The analysis and findings revealed significant differences in the
perception of entertainment choices among LGBT Asian Indians, particularly in relation to their gender and the level
of education acquired in the USA. This
research contributes to the understanding of how factors such as gender and
educational background influence the
evolving perceptions of the LGBT community regarding entertainment preferences over the course of their
residency in the United States. Derek
Lim's (2021) research delves into the attitudes, acceptance and knowledge
levels of family physicians towards
homosexual individuals. Interestingly, despite the majority
of family physicians expressing negative attitudes
toward homosexuality and the results
indicated that most of them still demonstrated a capacity for acceptance. This paradox between
negative attitudes and a willingness to accept suggests a nuanced
and potentially complex interplay of factors that influence the perspectives of family physicians on
issues related to homosexuality. Lim's findings contribute to the broader literature on healthcare
professionals' attitudes toward sexual minorities and highlight the importance of understanding the
intricacies involved in fostering more inclusive healthcare environments. Gulevich (2023) explores
the presence of gender and sexuality disparities in attitudes towards gay individuals. The findings underscore that
stronger gender identification, across
genders and sexual orientations, correlates with more negative attitudes
towards both gay men and lesbians.
This research contributes valuable insights into the complex dynamics of attitudes towards individuals of diverse
sexual orientations and shedding light on the potential influence of gender identification on such attitudes. Geetanjali Misra (2009) scrutinizes the significance of judgment which not only
decriminalized same-sex relationships but also focused on granting legal and social rights to sexual minorities. This
study contributes to the literature by documenting
the legal strides made in dismantling discriminatory laws and advocating for
the rights of the LGBT community in India.
The research highlights the intersection of legal and social dimensions in the pursuit
of equality and social justice
for sexual minorities in the country.
Mansi Dagra (2021) address the challenges, proposing
recommendations, valuable perspectives and complexities
surrounding the implementation of laws aimed at safeguarding the rights of the LGBT community.
Objective of the
study
·
To examine the challenges encountered by homosexuals post the Supreme
Court’s decriminalization
and the impact of social exclusion.
·
To determine the primary factors affecting future
generations due to the decriminalization of homosexuality and analyzing possible
solutions to foster
acceptance of homosexuality.
Research
Methodology Study Design:
A mixed method of descriptive quantitative and qualitative was utilized to explore the factors and impacts
linked to decriminalization of Homosexuality among general public in the State
of Tamil Nadu, India. This study adhered
to established guidelines for qualitative and quantitative research
specifically following the consolidated criteria for reporting
quantitative research to ensure the accurate reporting of quantitative findings.
Study setting and period:
This research took place in Chennai, Kancheepuram and Thiruvallur
districts situated in the southern part of Tamil Nadu, India. The study spanned from September
2023 to January 2024.
Population Requirements:
The present investigation aims to ascertain the validity of the
decriminalization of homosexuality by examining
the social exclusion
in the state of Tamil Nadu. The current legalization of homosexuality in
Indian society has given rise to challenges within the social and cultural
fabric of the nation. The primary
research data collected through face-to-face and online interviews, involving diverse participation consists
of two basic types 1. Natural participants and 2. Artificial participants, Natural participants
includes people from the respective locality and the members from the artificial participants are drawn
from Local Representatives, Social Activists, LGBT Community, Feminists Groups, Journalists, Researchers and Legal
Practitioners from various communities in total 238 individuals participated in this research
comprising 215 quantitative data, Qualitative interview of 18 key participants and 5 stakeholders with expertise in these matters
from diverse backgrounds.
Data Collection:
To understand the challenges faced by the homosexuals including all sorts
of social exclusion impact, a
research tool prepared for interviews. The semi-structured interview questions
and key Participant interview
questions were developed in the local language after reviewing literature sources. Before collecting data, the
questionnaire underwent a pre-test with five participants leading to some modifications. The
interviews covered demographic information, the extent of social exclusion impact in reference to
decriminalization of homosexuals. The data collected through face-to-face interviews, telephonic and online in-depth
interviews and the interview schedule formulated in English and then translated into local language.
An in-depth interview
was conducted by the
researchers through note taking. Interviews were scheduled at participant’s convenience often during daytime.
Initially, the researchers reached out to a diverse
group of Local Representatives, Social
Activists, LGBT Community, Feminists Groups, Journalists, Researchers and Legal
Practitioners from three
districts of Tamil Nadu, Southern India. Researchers conducted
telephonic interviews, online and one to one with the participants. The hidden facts about decriminalization of homosexuals came to light through
these interviews. The 215 quantitative data is collected using questionnaire and 18 key participants interviewed across three
districts of Tamil Nadu from the month of September 2023 to January
2024 in their respective localities with each one-to-one interview lasting between
one and a half to three hours. Initially the plan was
to interview only general public but due to the gravity
of the issues related to decriminalization of homosexuals. An additional 5 key participants interviews were later
included to facilitate more in-depth research.
In total 238 individuals participated in this research comprising
215 quantitative data, qualitative interview of 18 key participants and 5 stakeholders with expertise in these matters
from diverse backgrounds.
Trustworthiness:
To ensure the credibility of the study a regress mixed methodology was
employed experts from Saveetha School
of Law reviewed and evaluated
the in-depth questionnaire and interview schedule
ensuring its quality. Prior to data collection, a pre-test was conducted
with five general public leading to
necessary modification in consultation with experts and co-researchers. Diverse
study participants selected based on
socio economic characteristics were interviewed to capture a wide range of perspectives on decriminalization
of homosexuals with respect to cultural and social impact in the Indian society.
To maintain transferability of the overall research process, study
setting and study participant characteristics
were well stated in the methodology part. During data collection a set of
questions and probing
interview techniques were used between
each question which involved posing further questions to delve deeper into the
decriminalization of homosexuals, the problems faced by them and the impact
of social exclusion in the society.
Researchers kept filled
questionnaire and detailed
field notes to document interviews creating a rich and comprehensive description.
To ensure conformability multiple strategies were used, Researchers employed self-reflection and bracketing. The second, third and fourth
researcher also brought
a background in Criminal Justice,
Law, Criminology and Victimology to the table.
The researchers boosted
considerable experience in the
domain of mixed methodological
research.
The study’s context differed from the researcher’s familiar environment
and in some interviews participants were unfamiliar with the researcher and to reduce potential bias measures were taken. The researcher consciously set aside assumptions, perceptions, values and prior knowledge
during data collection
and analysis. Proficiency in the local language was a valuable
asset in reducing interpretative bias.
Interpretation of findings was approached cautiously aiming to balance it with direct quotations from study
participants. Researchers employed peer debriefing, focusing on analyzing qualitative and quantitative
data. They also engaged extensively in the study locale, validating insights from quantitative data and qualitative
in-depth interviews of key participants. During
extended presence they observed and confirmed the issues such as problems faced
by the homosexuals and the solutions
that could be considered and provided by the social and cultural impact
for their considerable standard of living in the society.
Analysis and Findings
Table 1 - Profile
of Respondents
|
Variable
|
Category
|
Percentage
|
|
Age
|
below 20
|
14.5%
|
|
21 - 30
|
41.6%
|
|
|
31 - 40
|
22.4%
|
|
|
41 above
|
21.5%
|
|
|
Gender
|
Male
|
35%
|
|
Female
|
43.9%
|
|
|
Educational qualification
|
Higher Education
|
21.%%
|
|
UG
|
29.4%
|
|
|
PG
|
35.5%
|
|
|
No formal education
|
13.6%
|
|
|
Marital status
|
Married
|
46.3%
|
|
Unmarried
|
53.7%
|
The above table indicates the demographic profile
of the respondents. It is clear from the table that most (41.6%)
are in the age group of 21- 30 years and
43.9% of respondents are female.
Table 2 - Problems faced
by the homosexuals even after decriminalizing:
The bar graph illustrates the challenges encountered by homosexuals’
post-decriminalization. Notably,
28.50% of the respondents acknowledged employment discrimination as the primary issue faced by homosexuals. Following
closely is the lack of rights in adoption, identified by 23.83% of the participants, as the subsequent
significant problem.
Table 3 - Cultural and social impacts
affects the homosexuality after
decriminalization:
|
Cultural
and social impacts affects the homosexuality
|
Strongly disagree
|
Disagree
|
Neutral
|
Agree
|
Strongly agree
|
|
Changes in marriage norms
|
5.14%
|
15.88%
|
13.08%
|
5.6%
|
60.8%
|
|
Lack of generation values
|
4.20%
|
10.7%
|
10.7%
|
64.9%
|
9.34%
|
|
Lack of natural birth
|
4.20%
|
10.7%
|
10.7%
|
64.9%
|
4.20%
|
|
Changes in religious customs
|
6.89%
|
23.15%%
|
36.94%
|
31.52%
|
1.47%
|
|
Gender ratio will differ in society
|
29.9%
|
8.8%
|
4.2%
|
26.6%
|
30.37%
|
The table illustrates the cultural and social impacts influencing
homosexuals, revealing that the highest
percentage of respondents strongly agree (60.8%) with the statement about
changes in marriage norms.
Additionally, the highest percentage of respondents (64.9%) agree that the lack of generational values could be perceived
as a significant social and cultural impact faced by homosexuals, even
after decriminalization.
Table 4 - Factors affecting the future generation:
|
Factors affecting the future generation
|
Strongly disagree
|
Disagree
|
Neutral
|
Agree
|
Strongly agree
|
|
Artificial birth techniques
|
14.4%
|
10.7%
|
7.47%
|
15.4%
|
51.8%
|
|
Health issues of the child
|
5.6%
|
18.2%
|
7.47%
|
35.5%
|
33.1%
|
|
Lack of future generation
|
8.4%
|
13.0%
|
41.5%
|
20.09%
|
16.8%
|
|
Lack of parenting care
|
19.15%
|
19.9%
|
13.08%
|
26.16%
|
19.15%
|
The table above illustrates the factors influencing future generations. Notably,
the highest percentage of respondents (51.8%) strongly
agree that artificial birth
techniques play a significant role,
while the highest
percentage of respondents (26.16%) agree that the lack of parenting care is a notable factor.
Table 5 - Solutions for the problems caused by the social and cultural impact
of homosexuals.
The table presented
above highlights potential
solutions to the challenges encountered by homosexuals. The majority of respondents (35.05%)
expressed acceptance of mental health support, while the second-highest response
(18.69%) favored legal recognition. Consequently, it can be concluded that these two aspects are regarded as key solutions.
Table 6 - Gender-Problems faced by the homosexuals even after
decriminalizing
|
Independent variable
|
Dependent variable
|
Chi-square value
|
P value
|
Result
|
|
Age
|
Problems faced by the homosexuals
|
85.586
|
.000
|
H0 rejected
|
The Chi-square test is done to find the association of problems faced by homosexuals between age groups even after decriminalization. The p values indicate the rejection of the null hypothesis
for all the challenges experienced by homosexuals. Likewise, the crosstab
reveals that respondents aged 21-30
years emphasized discrimination in employment as the primary issue faced by homosexuals, while respondents
aged 31-40 years pointed out discrimination in housing and public accommodation.
Table 7 - Educational qualification - Cultural and
social impact affects the decriminalization
on homosexuality
|
Independent variable
|
Dependent variable
|
F value
|
P value
|
Result
|
|
Educational qualification
|
Changes in marriage norms
|
20.481
|
.000
|
H0 rejected
|
|
Lack of generation values
|
2.074
|
.105
|
H0 is accepted
|
|
|
Lack of natural birth
|
2.391
|
.070
|
H0 is accepted
|
|
|
|
Changes in religious customs
|
12.459
|
.000
|
H0 is rejected
|
|
Gender ratio will
differ in society
|
30.145
|
.000
|
H0 is rejected
|
The ANOVA test is done to find the
significant difference in social and cultural impacts of homosexuals of respondents between educational qualification groups even after decriminalization.
The p values indicate the rejection of the null hypothesis for all factors
except lack of natural birth
and lack of generational values. Examining the mean values,
it is evident that individuals with an undergraduate (UG)
qualification expressed that changes in marriage norms have a significant impact. Likewise, respondents with
postgraduate (PG) qualifications indicated that
changes in religious customs exert a major impact. Additionally, those with no
formal education stated that gender ratios in society would
differ.
Table 8 - Marital status
- Major factor affects the future
generation
|
Independent variable
|
Dependent variable
|
F value
|
P value
|
Result
|
|
Marital status
|
Artificial birth techniques
|
73.044
|
.000
|
H0 rejected
|
|
Health issues of the child
|
5.230
|
.023
|
H0 is accepted
|
|
|
Lack of future generation
|
9.942
|
.002
|
H0 is accepted
|
|
|
Lack of parenting care
|
.067
|
.795
|
H0 is accepted
|
The ANOVA test is done to find the significant difference in major factors affecting the future generation of the society even after
decriminalization of homosexuals. The p values reveal that the null hypothesis is accepted, except in the case of artificial birth techniques. Analyzing
the mean values, it becomes apparent that married respondents have indicated artificial
birth techniques as the primary
factor influencing future
generations.
Table 9 - Locality - Solutions to the problems
faced by the homosexuals even after decriminalizing
|
Independent variable
|
Dependent variable
|
Chi-square value
|
P value
|
Result
|
|
Locality
|
Solutions to the homosexuals even after decriminalizing
|
28.067
|
.000
|
H0 is rejected
|
The
Chi-square test is done to find the association
of solutions to the problems faced by homosexuals between
localities of the respondents even after decriminalization. The p values
indicate the rejection of the null hypothesis for all proposed solutions
to the challenges faced by homosexuals. Likewise, the crosstab demonstrates that respondents from urban areas favored legal recognition
and mental support as the primary solutions to the problems faced by
homosexuals, while respondents from rural areas leaned more towards mental support as
the solution.
Qualitative Insights
A
35-year-old man voiced his belief that “homosexuality
is fundamentally wrong in nature, expressing
this sentiment in Tamil with the phrase "antha varthai intha ulagil oru
thappu." Despite being
probed with additional questions on the topic, he chose not to elaborate or
provide further answers.
The man's response
indicated a reluctance to engage in a more in-depth discussion about his views on homosexuality. Without further elaboration, he promptly redirected the conversation
and moved on to another subject. This brief exchange highlighted the
individual's firm stance
on the matter and his decision to avoid further discourse.
A 30-year-old woman
conveyed an opinion characterized by a certain level of arrogance. She expressed the view that “homosexuals should not be a part of society
and advocated for their complete eradication. Using the Tamil phrase "antha maari iruka ellarum
intha samuthayathula irunthu
neekka padavendum," she emphasized her belief that individuals with a similar orientation ought not to
coexist within the community. This statement reflected a strong and uncompromising stance against the
presence of homosexuals in society. The woman's use of the term "neekka padavendum" indicated a desire for
their elimination or removal. Overall, her expression
underscored a rigid and exclusionary perspective on the inclusion of
homosexuals in the broader societal context.
In expressing her perspective, a 25-year-old woman openly declared that “the current situation is a direct result of divine will”.
According to her viewpoint, the circumstances at hand are intricately tied to the decisions made by
a higher power, attributing the situation to a divine plan. The use of the term "manifestation of divine will" suggests that she believes
the events are part of a larger, purposeful design orchestrated
by a higher force. By stating that it is "something determined by God," she emphasizes
the notion that the outcome
is a deliberate choice made by a higher spiritual
authority. This perspective reflects a belief in the influence of the divine
in shaping events, highlighting a faith-based interpretation of the situation. Overall, her statement
underscores a conviction in the role of God in guiding or directing the course of events.
In sharing his perspective, a 28-year-old man articulated the belief that “members
of a particular group
should be provided with sufficient support and recognition in society.” By
stating that they "must be properly supported," he advocates for
the necessity of ensuring adequate assistance
for individuals within this group. The use of the term "given recognition
in the society properly"
underscores his desire for these individuals to be acknowledged and accepted in
a manner that aligns with societal
norms. This expression of support reflects a broader call for inclusivity and understanding within
the community. The man's statement
suggests a commitment to fostering an environment where individuals from this group
are not only supported but also acknowledged and valued within the social fabric. Overall,
his viewpoint emphasizes the importance of creating an inclusive and supportive society for everyone.
From a street shop, a 48-year-old woman put forth the perspective that “the phenomenon is a social virus.”
By labeling it as such, she implies
a belief that this aspect poses a negative influence on society. Moreover, she asserts that preventative measures
should be taken to keep it from infiltrating
Indian culture. The term "social virus" suggests her perception of it
as a harmful force impacting the social fabric. Her statement
implies a desire for safeguarding the traditional values and norms inherent in Indian culture
by curbing the influence of this phenomenon. This viewpoint reflects concerns about potential
societal repercussions and a proactive stance toward preserving cultural
integrity. Her assertion underscores a belief
in the need for protective measures to uphold
established cultural norms in
the face of perceived challenges.
A 50-year-old, the man inquired
about the ability of homosexuals to have children
and establish a family. His question reflects a
curiosity or concern about the traditional concept of family- building, which typically involves
heterosexual couples. The query suggests a perception that family structures are closely tied to
biological parenthood, and he seeks to understand how these fits within the context of same-sex
relationships. This inquiry may indicate a genuine lack of awareness or understanding regarding
alternative family-building methods commonly adopted by LGBT individuals, such as adoption or surrogacy. His question
highlights a common societal assumption about family formation and
prompts a consideration of diverse family
models.
A 29-year-old man expressed the viewpoint that “homosexuals should be treated
impartially in society. A neutral and inclusive
approach, suggesting that this acceptance could contribute to the promotion of adoption.” His
statement implies a recognition of the potential positive impact on adoption rates, as LGBT
individuals could also be considered as prospective parents. Additionally, his perspective touches upon
the broader societal benefit of population reduction, possibly alluding to the idea that diverse
family structures can play a role in addressing demographic challenges. His statement
reflects a call for equal treatment and highlights the potential societal
advantages of embracing diversity in family-building.
The 52-year-old woman expressed a perspective suggesting that “one's actions depend on the individual, emphasizing a subjective
approach.” She conveyed the idea that the acceptability of behavior hinges on its impact on another
person's life. Her statement implies a casual attitude toward matters, suggesting a relaxed or nonchalant demeanor in
addressing such considerations. Overall, her viewpoint implies
a belief in personal autonomy
while acknowledging the importance of considering how one's actions
may influence others.
The phrase "acts very casually" underscores her apparent non-judgmental stance on individual
behavior.
The
legal practitioner emphasized his thought of conveying the perspective of
supporting the homosexuals and also
shared his thought of law which now protects each and every individuals right by “the existing law and justice provides the sufficient security and
protection to each and every
individuals in the community, especially the homosexuals community”.
The
male of age 29 years of old in the LGBT community proudly exhibits his approach
towards “the contemporary issue of homosexuals. He conveyed that more the
obstacles against us from the social
and cultural causes, we will overcome each and every situation with all the rights which we have in the world”. This
statement attests to their resilience in surmounting social ostracism, demonstrating the patience to await societal
comprehension of their difficulties, problems,
and challenges. It underscores their unwavering commitment to the concept of
hope, embodying a steadfast
belief in the possibility of positive change.
Suggestion and conclusion
1. Education and Awareness Campaigns: Conduct
education and awareness campaigns to address
misconceptions and biases regarding homosexuality, particularly among older generations.
2. Inclusive Counseling Services: Implement
inclusive counseling services for individuals,
considering the findings that stronger gender identification correlates
with more negative attitudes towards the LGBT community.
3. Legal Advocacy: Continue legal advocacy for the rights of the LGBT community, emphasizing the need for comprehensive
legal protections and social acceptance.
4. Diverse Representation: Promote
diverse representation of LGBT individuals in media, literature, and the arts to challenge stereotypes, labeling,
shaming, foster empathy and understanding.
5. Support for Mental Health: Strengthen
mental health support services for the LGBT community,
given that mental health support emerged as a major solution in the research findings.
In conclusion, the research provides
valuable insights into the perceptions and challenges faced by the LGBT community. Despite advancements in legal recognition, discrimination and bias persist, necessitating ongoing efforts for societal change.
The findings underscore the importance of multifaceted strategies, including legal advocacy, education, and mental health support. Addressing negative attitudes and
fostering acceptance, especially among older generations, is crucial for building a more inclusive
society. By recognizing the impact of cultural and social factors, and tailoring interventions
accordingly, we can work towards a future where the LGBT community experiences
equal rights and acceptance across all facets of life.
Limitation of the
study
The data collection spanned a duration of three months, and the
conclusions drawn pertain specifically
to respondents in Chennai, Kancheepuram and Thiruvallur districts in the state
of Tamil Nadu, India. These findings
are not transferable to any other location and therefore should not be
generalized.
Funding
The researchers received no financial support for the research titled “A Factual Contemporary Research on the Social Exclusion of
Homosexuality Decriminalization: A Specific Emphasis on the State of Tamil Nadu, India”.
Reference
1.
Bockting, W. O., Miner, M. H., Romine, R. E. S.,
Hamilton, A., & Coleman, E. (2013). Stigma, mental health, and resilience in an online
sample of the US transgender population. American Journal
of Public Health,
103(5), 943–951. https://doi- org.proxy.binghamton.edu/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301241
2.
Panickar, A. B. & Chatterjee, S. (2023).
Perception of the LGBT Community among Old Age. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(1), 1182-1191. DIP:18.01.120.20231101, DOI:10.25215/1101.120
3. Dagras, Mansi,
Victimization of LGBT Community in India (June 13, 2021).
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3866184 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3866184
4. Delfita,
Wiwi & S., Neviyarni & Ahmad, Riska. (2019). The Contribution of Sexual Identity Towards the Students’ Perception
of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies. 2.
120. 10.32698/0642.
5.
Derek Lim, Seng Bin Ang, Primary care physicians'
knowledge, attitude and perception towards
homosexuality in Singapore, Global Health Journal, Volume 5, Issue 4, 2021, Pages 209-214,
(ISSN 2414-6447)
6.
Dr. Shilpa Abani & Dr. Darshana Dave (2019). The
perception of LGBT Asian Indian community
towards entertainment in the USA. Amity Journal of Management. Vol.VII, No.2, July - December 2019 (ISSN 2347 - 1832)
7. Gaertner, S. L.
& Dovidio, J. F.
(1986). The aversive form of
racism. In J. F. Dovidio and
8.
S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). Orlando, FL: Academic
Press.
9.
Herek, G. M., Gillis, J. R., & Cogan, J. C.
(1999). Psychological sequelae of hate crime
victimization among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 945-951.
10. Gulevich,
O., Krivoshchekov, V. & Sorokina, A.
Gender identification and attitudes toward gay people: Gender and sexuality
differences and similarities. Curr
Psychol 42, 7197–7210 (2023).
11. Lambda
Legal. (2016) Workplace Rights & Wrongs. In Transgender Rights Toolkit: A Legal Guide for Trans People and Their
Advocates. Lambda Legal. Downloaded on May 3, 2019 from: http://www.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/transgender_booklet_-
13. Legate, N.,
Weinstein, N., Ryan, W. S., DeHaan, C. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2018, July 30). Parental Autonomy Support Predicts Lower Internalized Homophobia and Better Psychological Health Indirectly Through Lower Shame in Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Adults. Stigma and Health.
Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/sah0000150
14. Misra, G.
(2009). Decriminalizing homosexuality in India. Reproductive Health Matters, 17(34),
20–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40647442
15. Meyer, I.
H., & Dean, L. (1998). Internalized homophobia, intimacy, and sexual
behavior among gay and bisexual
men. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians,
gay men, and bisexuals. (pp. 160–186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi- org.proxy.binghamton.edu/10.4135/9781452243818.n8
16. Mosher, D.
L. & O’Grady, K. E. (1979). Homosexual threat, negative attitudes toward masturbation, sex guilt, and males’ sexual and affective
reactions to explicit
sexual films. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 47(5), 860-873.
17. Norton, A. T., &
Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a
national probability sample of US adults.
Sex Roles: A Journal
of Research, 68(11–12), 738–753. https://doi-org.proxy.binghamton.edu/10.1007/s11199- 011-0110-6
18. Panickar,
A. B. & Chatterjee, S. (2023). Perception of the LGBT Community among Old Age. International Journal
of Indian Psychology, 11(1), 1182-1191. DIP:18.01.120.20231101, DOI:10.25215/1101.120