Open Access Research Article

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRESS NOTE 2 OF 2026 AND INDIA'S REVISED LAND BORDER FOREIGN INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK: LIBERALISATION, OR A NEW COMPLIANCE ARCHITECTURE?

Author(s):
NAVYA S. RASTOGI BHUPENDRA YADAV
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Access Open Access
Volume 3
Issue 7
Download PDF Open PDF Citation Search Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT On 15 March 2026, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) issued Press Note No 2 of 2026 (PN2), amending paragraph 3.1.1 of the Consolidated Foreign Direct Investment Policy in relation to investments from countries sharing a land border with India (LBCs). PN2 is the most significant revision of the restrictive framework introduced by Press Note No 3 of 2020 (PN3), which imposed a blanket government approval requirement on all LBC-linked investments. PN2 aligns the definition of beneficial ownership with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 and the Prevention of Money Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules 2005, introduces a 10 per cent threshold below which non-controlling investments from third-country entities with LBC exposure may proceed without government approval, creates a dual-track compliance framework of approval versus mandatory reporting, and commits to 60-day processing for investments in specified manufacturing sectors. These changes were given statutory effect through the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) (Amendment) Rules 2026 of 1 May 2026 and operationalised through a revised Standard Operating Procedure of 4 May 2026. This paper critically examines whether PN2 constitutes genuine structural liberalisation or primarily a reconfiguration of compliance obligations. It analyses, in sequence, the specific ambiguities that plagued PN3; what PN2 genuinely resolves and the reasoning behind the choice of the PMLA framework; and what problems persist, including the undefined concept of ultimate effective control, the threshold paradox embedded in the new reporting obligation, the prospectivity gap, and the structural unenforceability of the 60-day commitment. The paper concludes that PN2 is genuine but partial liberalisation: it replaces one species of uncertainty with another, and the net compliance burden on Indian investee companies has on balance increased rather than decreased.

Published Paper

PDF Preview
Download Open

Author Details

Authors: NAVYA S. RASTOGI & BHUPENDRA YADAVRegistration ID: 1013271 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA13271 & IJLRA13272Year: Oct-2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 7Approved ISSN: 2582-6433 | Country: Delhi, IndiaPage No.: 269-288

Article Information

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRESS NOTE 2 OF 2026 AND INDIA'S REVISED LAND BORDER FOREIGN INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK: LIBERALISATION, OR A NEW COMPLIANCE ARCHITECTURE?

Authors: NAVYA S. RASTOGI, BHUPENDRA YADAV

  • Journal IJLRA
  • ISSN 2582-6433
  • Volume 3
  • Issue 7
Citation Download Paper Full Details Search on Google Search on Google Scholar

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • AbbreviationIJLRA
  • ISSN2582-6433
  • AccessOpen Access
  • LicenseCC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.

Current Issue

Ethics and Policy

For Authors