INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

PLEA BARGAINING: A TOOL TO NEGOTIATE JUSTICE AND AID THE OVERBURDENED COURTS. BY - RUUHANI THUKRAL

Authors: RUUHANI THUKRAL

Registration ID: 108628 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8628

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ruuhithukral8899@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-33137976/PLEA BARGAINING: A TOOL TO NEGOTIATE JUSTICE AND A

DISCONNECT TO RECONNECT: INDIA’S QUEST FOR BETTER TELECOM LAWS BY - BANSHIKA GUPTA & PRIYANSHI CHAKRABORTY

Authors: BANSHIKA GUPTA & PRIYANSHI CHAKRABORTY

Registration ID: 108626 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8626 & IJLRA8627

Year : Nov -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: arushi.r209@gmail.com & arushi.r209@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-72134447/DISCONNECT TO RECONNECT: INDIA’S QUEST FOR BETTE

REDEFINING EXCLUSIVITY: A CASE ANALYSIS OF EE V VIRGIN MEDIA BY - AKSHANSH PANDEY

Authors: AKSHANSH PANDEY

Registration ID: 108625 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8625

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: akshansh23bbl007@gnlu.ac.in

Page No : 09 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-67317243/REDEFINING EXCLUSIVITY: A CASE ANALYSIS OF EE V VI

OCEANS GOVERNANCE AND THE PROTECTION OF MARINE RESOURCES BY - SHREYA BHARDWAJ

Authors: SHREYA BHARDWAJ

Registration ID: 108624 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8624

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: bhardwajshreya2114@gmail.com

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-32328553/OCEANS GOVERNANCE AND THE PROTECTION OF MARINE RES

WESTERN DOMINANCE AND ECONOMIC MONOPOLY: HOW GLOBAL CONFLICTS AND CONCENTRATION OF ECONOMIC POWER UNDERMINE GLOBAL JUSTICE BY: NISHIMONI SAIKIA

Authors: NISHIMONI SAIKIA

Registration ID: 108623 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8623

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: nishisaikia22@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link ::https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-22619593/WESTERN DOMINANCE AND ECONOMIC MONOPOLY: HOW GLOBA

EXECUTION OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD: POWER OF EXECUTING COURTS IN INDIA BY - ADV. EMILYA ROSE BENNY

Authors: ADV. EMILYA ROSE BENNY

Registration ID: 108622 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8622

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: emilyarosebenny@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-48764914/EXECUTION OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD: POWER OF EXEC

POST-DIVORCE MAINTENANCE FOR MUSLIM WOMEN IN BANGLADESH AND INDIA: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BY - SHRISHTI VERMA

Authors: SHRISHTI VERMA

Registration ID: 108621 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8621

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shrishtiverma83@gmail.com

Page No : 38 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link ::https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-35486273/POST-DIVORCE MAINTENANCE FOR MUSLIM WOMEN IN BANGL

THE ROLE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN UNDERSTANDING AND ASSESSING THE MENTAL HEALTH, COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, AND BEHAVIOR OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS BY - SAMINA IQBAL SURTI

Authors: SAMINA IQBAL SURTI

Registration ID: 108620 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8620

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: saminasurti80@gmail.com

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-47348529/THE ROLE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN UNDERSTANDING A

WHY DO WE OBEY LAW POSITIVISM OR NATURALISM BY - SAMIR HALDER

Authors: SAMIR HALDER

Registration ID: 108619 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8619

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: samiractor07@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/11.2024-49282253/WHY DO WE OBEY LAW POSITIVISM OR NATURALISM

TOWARDS JUSTICE: FOSTERING SOCIAL EQUITY IN INDIAS DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY BY - DR. BHAVANA SHARMA

Authors: DR. BHAVANA SHARMA

Registration ID: 108618 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8618

Year : Sep -2023 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 5

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: dr.bhavanasharma21@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-66274398/TOWARDS JUSTICE: FOSTERING SOCIAL EQUITY IN INDIAS

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Bryan Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary (8t edn, Thomson &West 2004) 1190

[5] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 289, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India).

[6] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 290, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[7] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 291,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[8] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 292,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[9] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 293, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[10] Ibid Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 293, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[11] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 294, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[12] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 295,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[13] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 296,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[14] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 297,2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[15] Ibid, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 297, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[16] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 298, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[17] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 299, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[18] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, § 300, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 1949 (India)

[19] Murlidhar Meghraj Loya v. State of Maharashtra 1976 AIR 1929, 1977 SCR (1)

[21] Kasambhai Ardul Rehmanbhai Shaikh v. State of Gujarat & Anr AIR 854 (1980)

[23] Kripal Singh v. State of Haryana (two thousand) (1) ALD(CRI)613

[25] State of Gujrat v. Harchandji Thakor (2005) CRILJ2957

[1] Cybersecurity Crucial for Modern-day Wars: Scindia, Rediff (July 19, 2024), https://money.rediff.com/news/market/cybersecurity-crucial-for-modern-day-wars-scindia/12907320240718.

[2] Madhusudan Sahoo, Technology Bridges Divides, Cyber Security Vital, Says Scindia, (July 19, 2024), https://www.deccanchronicle.com/amp/nation/current-affairs/technology-bridges-divides-cyber-security-vital-says-scindia-1811192.

[3] Mahesh, Proposal_A4, (Nov. 12, 2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/tax/in-tax-decoding-ndcp-noexp.pdf.

[5] Aashish Aryan, OTT not under ambit of Telecom Bill: Ashwini Vaishnaw, The Economic Times (Dec. 23, 2023), https://m.economictimes.com/industry/telecom/telecom-news/ott-not-under-ambit-of-telecom-bill-ashwini-vaishnaw/amp_articleshow/106224226.cms.

[8] Akanksha Nagar, TRAI releases consultation paper on framework for providing telecom service through authorisation, (July 12, 2024), https://www.storyboard18.com/how-it-works/trai-releases-consultation-paper-on-framework-for-providing-telecom-service-through-authorisation-36856.htm.

[9] Mathanki Narayanan, Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India: An Examination of the Supreme Court’s Application of the Doctrine of Proportionality, (May 12, 2024), https://www.calj.in/post/anuradha-bhasin-v-union-of-india-an-examination-of-the-supreme-court-s-application-of-the-doctrine.

[12] Right to internet fundamental for right to education: Faheema Shirin R.K. v. State of Kerala & Ors., Lawsisto Legal News (Oct. 7, 2020), https://lawsisto.com/legalnewsread/ODU5OA==/Right-to-internet-fundamental-for-right-to-education-Faheema-Shirin-RK-v-State-of-Kerala-Ors.

[14] Indiankanoon.Org, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/223504/.

[1] Convention on the High Seas, opened for signature 29 April 1958, 450 UNTS 82 (entered into force 30 September 1962).

[2] Elinor Ostrom, ‘Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action’(Cambridge University Press 1990).

[3] F Berkes, ‘Adaptive Co-Management: Beyond Fencing and Local Community’ (University of Alberta Press 2009).

[4] United Nations Environment Programme, The Role of Ocean Governance in Sustainable Development (UNEP 2012) https://www.unep.org/resources/report/role-ocean-governance-sustainable-development accessed 15 October 2024.

[5] Food and Agriculture Organization, *The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020* (FAO 2020) http://www.fao.org/3/ca9229en/CA9229EN.pdf accessed 12 October 2024.

[6] United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, opened for signature 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 3 (entered into force 16 November 1994)

[1] John Rawls, The Law of Peoples 23 (1st ed. 1999).

[2] Thomas W. Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights 46 (2d ed. 2002).

[3] Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks 33 (Quintin Hoare & Geoffrey Nowell Smith eds., 1st ed. 1971)

[4] Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address, 19 (Jan. 17, 1961).

[5] Bruce Cumings, The Origins of the Korean War 56-59 (2d ed. 1990).

[6] Noam Chomsky, Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance 128-30 (1st ed. 2003).

[7] Anthony H. Cordesman, The Iraq War: Strategy, Tactics, and Military Lessons 72 (1st ed. 2003).

[8] Max Boot, The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power 203-06 (2d ed. 2003).

[9] Joseph E. Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents 59-60 (1st ed. 2002).

[10] Susan K. Sell, Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights 47-49 (1st ed. 2003).

[11] Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century 321-23 (Arthur Goldhammer trans., 1st ed. 2014).

[13] Dani Rodrik, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy 77-79 (1st ed. 2011).

[14] Susan K. Sell, Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights 47-49 (1st ed. 2003).

[15] Joseph E. Stiglitz, Making Globalization Work 96-98 (1st ed. 2006).

[16] David Van Reybrouck, Congo: The Epic History of a People 402-03 (1st ed. 2014).

[17] Noam Chomsky, Hegemony or Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance 134-36 (1st ed. 2003).

[18] Thomas Pogge, Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric 94-96 (1st ed. 2010).

[19] Susan K. Sell, Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights 50-52 (1st ed. 2003).

[20] David Van Reybrouck, Congo: The Epic History of a People 416-18 (1st ed. 2014).

[21] Thomas Pogge, Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric 103-04 (1st ed. 2010).

[22] Anthony H. Cordesman, The Iraq War: Strategy, Tactics, and Military Lessons 72-73 (1st ed. 2003).

[23] Joseph E. Stiglitz, Making Globalization Work 202-04 (1st ed. 2006).

[24] David Van Reybrouck, Congo: The Epic History of a People 402-03 (1st ed. 2014).

[27] Joseph E. Stiglitz, The Price of Inequality 178-80 (1st ed. 2012).

[28] Dani Rodrik, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy 89-90 (1st ed. 2011).

[29] Thomas Pogge, Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro-Poor Rhetoric 94-96 (1st ed. 2010).

[30] Dani Rodrik, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy 89-90 (1st ed. 2011).

[31] Noam Chomsky, Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance 136-38 (1st ed. 2003).

[32] Dani Rodrik, The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy 79-81 (1st ed. 2011).

[33] Joseph E. Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents 64-66 (1st ed. 2002).

[34] Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century 321-23 (Arthur Goldhammer trans., 1st ed. 2014).

[35] Joseph E. Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents 144-46 (1st ed. 2002).

[36] Noam Chomsky, Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance 136-38 (1st ed. 2003).

[37] Joseph E. Stiglitz, Making Globalization Work 164-66 (1st ed. 2006).

[1] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, 44, No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1996(India)

[2] Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc, (2012) 9 SCC 552

[3] Bank of Baroda v. Kotak Mahindra Bank, AIRONLINE 2020 SUPREMECOURT 1474

[4] Government of India v. Vedanta & Ors, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 744

[6] Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996, 31(7) (a) & (b), No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1996(India)

[7] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, 31(7)(b), No. 26, Acts of Parliament, 1996(India)

[8] Raveechee and Company v. Union of India, (2018) 7 SCC 664

[9] State of Haryana v. S.L Arora, (2010) 3 SCC 690

[10] Indian Railway Construction Company Ltd v. M/s National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd, 2023, liveLaw (SC) 210

[11] M/s International Nut Alliance LLC v. M/s John’s Cashew C, 2024:KER:31904

[12] Jindal exports Ltd v. Furest day Lawson Ltd, MANU/DE/3204/2009

[13] Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc, (2012) 9 SCC 552

[14] TransAsia Private Capital v. Gaurav Dawan, 2023:DHC:2336

[15] Avitel post studioz limited & Ors. v. HSBC pi holdings (mauritius) limited AIRONLINE 2020 SC 691

[16] Shri Lal Mahal Ltd v. Progetto Grano Spa, AIRONLINE 2013 SC 191

[1]Farooq A Hassan, The sources of Islamic laws, 76 In The American Society of International Law (Annual Meeting) 66 (1982).

[3] Moslay Uddin & M.D. Ayatullah, Muslim Law: judicial and legislative changes around the world, SSRN, (Dec.26 2014).

[4] Jasri Jamal, Adminitration of the Islamic Judicial System: An overview, 22 Mimbar Hukum (2012).

[6] W.B. Hallaq, Was the gate of Ijtihad closed, 16 IJMES, 3-41 (1984).

^{^[7]} Rahnema, A.: Pioneers of Islamic Revival (Zed Books Ltd Publishers, (London), UK eds., 1995).

^{^[8]} Arshia Javed & Muhammad Javed, The need of Ijtihad For Sustainable Development in Islam, 8 IIUC Studies 215, 215-224 (2011)

^{^[9]} Asghar Ali Engineer, “Status of Muslim Women”, 29 (6) Economic and Political Weekly 298, 297-300, (1994).

[11] Asaf Ali Asghar Fyzee, Outlines Of Muhammadan Law 211 (Oxforf University Press, 5th ed., 1974)

[12]Chales Hamilton, The Hedaya 140 ( 2nd ed., reprint 1994) (1870).

^{^[13]} Supra note 2. See also Ameer Ali, The Holy Quran, (1934-1938).

[14] R Abdullah, T. Monsoor, F. Johari & W. M. Radzi, Financial support for women under Islamic Family Law in Bangladesh and Malaysia, 21 Asian J. Women’s Stud. 363, 363-383 (2015).

[16] Syed Ameer Ali, Moohummudan Law II, 364 (Kitab Bhavan, 7th ed, 1986)

[17] Manoranjan, Role of Indian Judiciary In Upholding Gender Justice in the Matter of rights of Maintenance of Muslim Women, SSRN, (2011).

[18]Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, No. 8 of 1939, India Code (1993)

[19] Child Marriage Restraint Act, No. 19 of 1929, India Code (1993).

[20] T. Mahmood, The Muslim Law Of India, (Allahbad: The law book Company 1982).

[21] Shariat Application Act, No. 26 of 1937, India Code (1993).

^{^[26]} Md. Sadekur Rahman & Hossain Mohammad Younus Sirazi, Post-Divorce Maintenance (MAA’TA) For Muslim Women in Bangladesh, Pakistan and India, 23, Iosr-Jhss,1, 1-10 (Feb. 2018).

^[27] Zaidan 'Abd al-Baqi, Al-Mar'ah Bayn al-Din wa al-Mujtama' 194-199 (1977)

^{^[29]} Dr Taslima Monsoor, Maintenance of Muslim wives: The Legal Connotations, 9(1), The Dhaka University Studies, 63, 63-86 (1994).

^{^[30]} Azizah Yahia al-Hibri, Muslim Women's Rights in the Global Village: Challenges and Opportunities,15 Journal of Law and Religion. 37-66 (2000 – 2001).

^{^[31]} Dr Taslima Monsoor, From Patriarchy to gender equity: Family Law and its Impact of women in Bangladesh (June 1994) (Ph.d thesis, University of London).

[33] Kusum, Maintenance of a Divorced Muslim Wife: A Critique of the proposed Law, 22 ILJ 408, 408-413 (1980).

^{^[34]}Quran 2:228 (Quranic references translated by Yusuf Ali (1946)).

^[42] Syed Mohammed Ali, Position of Women in Islam, The: A Progressive View, 90-94, ( State university of New York Press. 2004)

^[43]A. A. A Fyzee., Outlines Of Muhammadan Law 177 (Oxford University Press. 5th ed., 2008)

^{^[44]} Kirmani, Nida,,“Beyond the Impasse: Muslim ‘Feminism(s)’ and the Indian Women’s Movement.” Lahore University of Management Science 12, 1–26 (2011).

^{^[45]} T. Mahmood, The Muslim Law Of India, (Allahbad: The law book Company 1982).

[46] Code Crim. Proc., No. 2 of 1974, India Code (1993).

^[48] Lucy Carroll, SHAH BANO, THE MUSLIM WOMEN (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS ON DIVORCE) ACT AND

MUSLIM WOMAN'S RIGHT TO MATAA: BANGLADESH SHOWS WAY OUT OF IMBROGLIO, 39 Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 83-95 (1997).

^{^[49]} Tajinder Kaur v. Balbir Singh , 1978 Cri. L.J.

^[53] Rukhsana Parvins v. Shaikh Mohammad Hussein, 1977 Cri, L.J. 1041 (Bom.)

^{^[54]} Hamid Khan v. Jummi Bi , (1978) I.L.R M.P. 595

^[55] Khurshid Khan v. Husnabanu 1976 Cri LJ 1584 (Bom.)

^[56] Capt.Ramesh Chander Kaushal v. Veena Kaushal and ors. AIR 1978 SC 1807

^[57] Bai Tahira v. Ali Hussain Fissalli Chothia , A.I.R. 1979 S.C. 362;

^[58] Fuzlunbi v. K. Khader Vali , A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1730

^{^[62]} Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum A.l.R. 1985 S.C. 945

^[66] MANORANJAN, “ROLE OF INDIAN JUDICIARY IN UPHOLDING GENDER JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF RIGHT OF MAINTENANCE OF MUSLIM WOMEN”, SSRN. 8-9, 1-15 (2006).

^[67] Yunus v. Bibi Phenkani @ Tasrun Nisa (1987) 2 Crimes 241(Pat)

^[68]Abid Ali v. Mst.Raisa Begum (1988) 1 Rajasthan LR 104

^[70] Usman Khan Bahamani v. Fathimunnisa Begum and ors AIR 1990 AP 225 (FB)

^[71] A. A. Abdulla v. A. B. Mohmuna Saiyadbhai AIR 1988 Guj 141

^{^[73]} Karim Abdul Rehman Sheikh v. Shehnaz Karim Sheikh and Ors II (2000) DMC 634

^[76] Iqbal Bano vs. state of UP AIR 2007 SC 2215, 2218 ¶9

^{^[78]} Huda, Shahnaz, “Personal laws in Bangladesh: The need for substantive reforms” , 15 Dhaka University Studies 103, 103-126 (2004)

^[79] Dalia Pervin, Post-Divorce Maintenance for Muslim Women: Which path to follow in Bangladesh? 8 Society & Change, 227 (2014).

^[80]Md. Sadekur Rahman & Hossain Mohammad Younus Sirazi, Post-Divorce Maintenance (MAA’TA) For Muslim Women in Bangladesh, Pakistan and India, 23, Iosr-Jhss,1, 1-10 (Feb. 2018).

^{^[83]} Hefzur Rahman v. Shamsun Nahar Begum 47 DLR (1995) 74

^{^[85]} Muhammad Ekramul, Utitilies of Marriage Stipulations to remove Gender Inequalities and to Protect

the Rights of Women, 22 Dhaka University L.J. 44 (2011).

[1] Assistant Professor, School of Legal Studies, Himachal Pradesh University Regional Centre, Dharamshala, H.P.

[2] Divya Raisharma, What is social justice, https://blog.ipleaders.in/what-is-social-justice/

[3] S.P. Gupta v President of India and Ors. [1982] AIR 149 (SC) 26

[4] Sadhuram Bansal v. Pulin Behari Sarkar [1984] AIR 1471 (SC)

[6] Crown Aluminum Works v Workmen [1958] AIR 30 (SC); R.S. Swamiji v State of Mysore [1966] AIR 1171 (SC)

[7] J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Co. Limited v Labour Aellate Tribunal of India [1964] AIR 737 (SC) 743

[9] Workmen v. Reptakos Brett [1992] AIR 504 (SC)

[10] Municipal Corporation of Delhi v Female Workers (Muster Roll) [2000] 3 SCC 224, 32, 33

[11] Supranote 9; N.S. Giri v Corporation of City of Mangalore [1999] AIR 1958 (SC)

[12] Consumer Education and Research center and others v Union of India and others [1995] AIR 922 (SC)

[13] G.M., O.N.G.C. Ltd. v Sendhabhai Vastram Patel and Ors. [2005] Su (2) SCR 448

[14] Vishrut Kansal, Supreme Court of India Social Justice Bench: Maiden Dichotomy Between Equity and

Law in Indian Jurisprudential History, Law, Social Justice & Global Development, October 2015, Issue 1, p. 6, https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2015-1/kansal/lgd_2015_1_kansal_pdf.pdf; also see; Supreme Court Bar Association v Union of India [1998] 4 SCC 409

[15] Prakash Cotton Mills (Private) v The State of Bombay [1957] 59 BOMLR 836 (Bombay High Court)

[16] Crown Aluminum Works v Workmen [1958] AIR 30 (SC); Muir Mills Company Limited v Suti Mills Mazdoor Union [1995]

1 SCR 991; Consumer Education and Research center and others v Union of India and others [1995] AIR 922 (SC); Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. and Anr. v Union of India (UOI) and Ors. and Suresh Kumar and Ors. v Union of India (UOI) and Ors. [1996] 10 SCC 104; Air India Statutory Corporation, etc. v United Labour Union and others [1997] AIR 645 (SC); Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja v State of Gujarat [2005] 2 GLR 1142 (Gujarat High Court)

[18] SJB, being a specially constituted bench for securing social justice, will readily grant remedies sought by the petitioner even in borderline cases.

[19] Notification issued by Supreme Court of India 2

17_1418816381.pdf> accessed 01 February 2015.

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

PLEA BARGAINING: A TOOL TO NEGOTIATE JUSTICE AND AID THE OVERBURDENED COURTS. BY - RUUHANI THUKRAL

DISCONNECT TO RECONNECT: INDIA’S QUEST FOR BETTER TELECOM LAWS BY - BANSHIKA GUPTA & PRIYANSHI CHAKRABORTY

REDEFINING EXCLUSIVITY: A CASE ANALYSIS OF EE V VIRGIN MEDIA BY - AKSHANSH PANDEY

OCEANS GOVERNANCE AND THE PROTECTION OF MARINE RESOURCES BY - SHREYA BHARDWAJ

WESTERN DOMINANCE AND ECONOMIC MONOPOLY: HOW GLOBAL CONFLICTS AND CONCENTRATION OF ECONOMIC POWER UNDERMINE GLOBAL JUSTICE BY: NISHIMONI SAIKIA

EXECUTION OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD: POWER OF EXECUTING COURTS IN INDIA BY - ADV. EMILYA ROSE BENNY

POST-DIVORCE MAINTENANCE FOR MUSLIM WOMEN IN BANGLADESH AND INDIA: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BY - SHRISHTI VERMA

THE ROLE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN UNDERSTANDING AND ASSESSING THE MENTAL HEALTH, COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, AND BEHAVIOR OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS BY - SAMINA IQBAL SURTI

WHY DO WE OBEY LAW POSITIVISM OR NATURALISM BY - SAMIR HALDER

TOWARDS JUSTICE: FOSTERING SOCIAL EQUITY IN INDIAS DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY BY - DR. BHAVANA SHARMA

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

[19] Murlidhar Meghraj Loya v. State of Maharashtra 1976 AIR 1929, 1977 SCR (1)

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2