[1] Jennings, W.I., Cabinet Government, 13. [Cited in Dr. Madhabhusi Sridhar, “The Law of Expression, An Analytical Commentary on Law for Media 18” (Asia Law House, Hyderabad, 18, (2007)].
[2] Johan Milton, Aeropagitica and Other Tracts, 27 (1644).
[3] Ernest William Hocking, "Freedom of the Press: A Framework of Principle" (A Report from the Commission on Freedom of the Press, 88-89, 1947). [Cited in Dr. Madhabhusi Sridhar, The Law of Expression, An Analytical Commentary on Law for Media 19 (Asia Law House, Hyderabad (2007)].
[30]M.S.M. Sharma v. Krishna Sinha, AIR 1959 SC 395.
[31]Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi, AIR 1950 SC 129; Express Newspapers Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 578; Sakal Papers v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 305; Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India, AIR 1973 SC 106; Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248.
[32]Sakal Paper (Pvt.) Limited v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 305.
[33]Express Newspapers v. Union of India, 1958 SC 578; Sharma v. Sri Krishna, AIR 1959 SC 395.
[34]Pandit M. S. M. Sharma v. Shri Sri Krishna Sinha and Others, AIR 1950 SCR 594.
[1]World Health Organisation, The re-emergence of infectious diseases, Managing epidemics: key facts about major deadly diseases, (Mar 27, 2022, 05:48 pm),
[12] Reported by Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.
[13] Jennifer Shkabatur, A Global Panopticon- the Changing Role of International Organisations in the Information Age, Michigan Journal of International Law, (Mar 29, 2022, 03:38 pm) https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol33/iss1/508/
[25] World Health Organisation (2020), how the four biggest outbreak since the start of this century shattered some long- standing myths, (April 02, 2022, 01:55 pm)
[30]World Health Organization, Revision of the International Health Regulations, WHA 58.3, Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly (2005).
[31] Article 2, World Health Organization, Revision of the International Health Regulations, World Health Assembly (2005).
[32] World Health Organisation(2020), WHO Director- General’s opening remarks at the International Health Regulations Review Committee, (April 03, 2022, 05:01 pm)
[34] World Health Organisation(2020), WHO Director- General’s statement on IHR Emergency Committee on Novel Corona virus (2019-nCoV), (April 03, 2022, 05:25 pm)
[51] It is a global initiative which aimed at working with vaccine manufacturers to provide countries worldwide equitable access to safe and effective vaccines. It is currently the world’s largest and most diverse COVID-19 vaccine portfolio - including nine candidate vaccines, with a further nine under evaluation and conversations underway with other mayor producers.
[8] Many couples struggle to share their finances after marriage. Is the male meant to be the only owner of the house, or will they split the costs? This issue does not arise in live-in situations. You owe each other nothing, so you split your money evenly and create financial limitations.Information available at https://legalformatsindia.com/is-live-in-relationship-still-against-indian-culture/
[10]Acceptance of the aforementioned category of live-in partnerships as analogous to a domestic connection for the purposes of Section 2(f) of the DV Act does not imply that bigamy is encouraged or that the institution of marriage is under threat. The married woman/wife is not deprived of her marriage rights of support, legitimacy, and custody of children by simply deeming the live-in couple to be in a domestic relationship. It just accepts the current factual condition of our society while proactively promoting the DV Act's key aims of women's safety. https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2021/07/07/live-in-relationships-at-cross-roads-with-morality.html
[17]https://indiankanoon.org/doc/215649/.There is no live-in relationship if he spends a night out with a lady and engages in sexual acts, or if he stays with someone for a few days while on vacation. In addition, if a man has a 'keep/mistress/rakhail whom he financially supports and use her simply for sexual purposes (or as a servant or both), the Supreme Court believes that such a relationship is not marriage.
[31] In Dhannulal v. Ganeshram, to resolve a property dispute, the Court upheld a woman's ability to inherit property when her live-in partner died. Family members said in the court that their grandpa had been cohabiting with a lady for the previous 20 years. They also argued that she was not eligible to receive the land when their grandfather died because she was not married to him.
The Court disagreed, ruling that "where the man and woman lived together as husband and wife, the law will infer that they were living together in a lawful marriage."
[35]An order of the Jharkhand High Court, which stated that Section 125 CrPC does not allow for the grant of maintenance to a woman who is not lawfully married to the person for whom maintenance is sought, was challenged before the Supreme Court. It was admitted that there was a live-in relationship in this case. Referring to the Domestic Violence Act, the court stated that even though the petitioner is not the lawfully wedded wife and hence not entitled to support under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, she would have an effective remedy to seek maintenance under the Act. According to the Act's requirements, economic abuse is also considered domestic violence.
[37] WRIT - C No. - 11108 of 2020, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/73339714/
[38]The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act of 2005 appears to have included live-in relationships as part of the definition of a domestic relationship. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act of 2005 appears to have included live-in relationships as part of the definition of a domestic relationship. Any woman who is or has been in a domestic relationship with the respondent and alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent is a 'Aggrieved Person.' 'Domestic Relationship' refers to a relationship between two people who reside or have lived in a common household at any point in time, and who are connected by consanguinity, marriage, or a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption, or are family members living together as a joint family.
[43] Therefore in Chanmuniya vs Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha 2011 1 SCC 141 the division bench of supreme Court referred certain questions to be decided by the larger bench which are yet to be decided. They were: a) Whether the living together of a man and woman as husband and wife for a considerable period of time would raise the presumption of a valid marriage between them and whether such a presumption would entitle the woman to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C?
b) Whether strict proof of marriage is essential for a claim of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. having regard to the provisions of DVAct, 2005?
c) Whether a marriage performed according to customary rites and ceremonies, without strictly fulfilling the requisites of Section 7(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, or any other personal law would entitle the woman to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.?
[45] As a result, the Supreme Court stressed the importance of expanding Section 2(f) of the PWDVA 2005, which defines "domestic relationships," to include victims of illegal relationships who are poor and illiterate, as well as their children who are born out of such relationships and have no source of income. Furthermore, the Supreme Court urged that Parliament create new legislation based on specific criteria provided by it in order to safeguard victims from any social harm caused by such interactions.
[50].Ibid. The court went on to say that, while socially unacceptable in this country, a live-in or marriage-like relationship is neither a crime nor a sin, and it is an extremely personal decision to marry or not to marry, or to have a heterosexual relationship, and thus the court felt there was a need for legislation because it was the woman who invariably suffered as a result of the breakdown of such a relationship.The Supreme Court bench also providedexamples of several countries that have begun to recognise such relationships. It said that Parliament should take this problem seriously and pass appropriate laws or make appropriate amendments to the Act to safeguard women and children born from such partnerships, even if such a relationship is not in the type of a marriage..
[51]Section 50 of Evidence Act says that opinion on relationship, where applicable.—When the Court must develop a view as to the existence of one person's relationship with another, the opinion stated by behaviour, or any person who, as a member of the family or otherwise, has specific information on the topic, is a relevant fact: However, such an opinion will not suffice to show a marriage in proceedings under the Indian Divorce Act of 1869. The Supreme Court held in D Patchaiammal versus D Velusamy that if a man and a woman have a live-in relationship for a long period of time, they would be seen as a married couple in society, and the child born from this relationship will be considered legitimate.The question is, whether A and B were married. ? The fact that they were usually received and treated by their friends as husband and wife, is relevant.
[54]Tulsa & others vs Durghatiya and others (4) SCC 520)
[55] Children born out of void and voidable marriages have legitimacy under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and Section 26 of the Special Marriage Act, which provide that children born out of void and voidable marriages are legitimate or regarded to be legitimate.
[59] However, if their parents are not legally married, they will be unable to claim coparcenary rights in their father's HUF property. Because the law specifically states "both legitimate and illegitimate child," claiming maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr. P.C. is entirely within the rights of dependent children born out of live-in relationships. When it comes to guardianship, the mother is considered the natural guardian for such children. Even according to Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, such children have the right to their parents' self-acquired properties..https://journals.sagepub. com/doi/ full/101177/2631831820974585
[1] Article 21(3) includes right to privacy as integral part of the constitution; JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY V.S. UOI, AIR 2017 SC 4161
Article 21(6) includes right to privacy as integral part of life as is cherished constitutional value; RAM JETHMALANI V.S. UNION OF INDIA (2011) 8 SCC 1: JT 2011 (7) SC 104: (2011) 6 SCALE 691
[5] Means- "Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when submission to or rejection of this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment."
[12] World Economic Forum, Reports on Global Gender Gap 2017,
[13] Express Web desk, “India ranks 131 in HDI index: Where do we stand on gender inequality, maternal mortality, schooling?” , The Indian express, (22nd March 2017)
[14]ParulChaudhary, “Gender inequalities in Hindus and Muslim Personal laws in India”, International Journal of Home Science 2015; 1(1): 34-37
[19] Exception of Section 375 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860(45 of 1860) —Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is not rape.
[20]Mr. N.A. Palkhivala, “AN OVERVIEW ON DOWRY PROHIBITION”, Legal India law news and law resources portal, 25th January 2011.
o[21] Section 3(iii)(b)- repeated threats to cause physical pain to any person in whom the aggrieved person is
[1]Krishan Vij, Textbook of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology: Principles & Practice, (Elsevier Publishers, New Delhi, 2011)
[2]Rama Mehta, Socio-Legal Status of Women in India, (Mittal Publications, Delhi, 1987)
[3]Kalantry, Sital and Getgen Kestenbaum, Jocelyn, Combating Acid Violence in Bangladesh, India and Cambodia (June 9, 2011). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-24
[4] Jane Welsh, it was like burning in Hell: A comparative exploration of acid attack violence, 2009.
Beck, Colin J.,
and Emily Miner. 2013. "Who Gets Designated a Terrorist and Why?"
Social Forces 91 no. 3 (March): 837–72.
Bhatia, Michael V.
2005. “Fighting Words: Naming Terrorists, Bandits, Rebels and Other Violent
Actors.” Third World Quarterly 26 (1): 5–22.
Boon-Kuo, Louise,
Ben Hayes, Vicki Sentas, and Gavin Sullivan. 2015. Building Peace in Permanent
War: Terrorist Listing and Conflict Transformation. London, Amsterdam:
International State Crime Initiative, Transnational Institute.
Carl, Miller.
2011. "Is It Possible and Preferable to Negotiate with Terrorists?"
Defence Studies 11 (1): 145–85.
Conciliation
Resources and Berghof Peace Support. 2011. “Mediating Peace with Proscribed
Armed Groups. A Policy Workshop Report on the Implications of European Union
(EU) Counter-Terrorism Legislation for Mediation and Support for Peace
Processes.”(January).
EU Council. 2001.
“Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the Application of Specific Measures to
Combat Terrorism (2001/931/CFSP).” Official Journal of European Communities. L
344/93.
Cronin, Audrey
Kurth. 2009. How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of
Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
De Goede, Marieke.
2011. “Blacklisting and the Ban: Contesting Targeted Sanctions in Europe.” Security
Dialogue 42, (6): 499–515.
Dudouet,
Véronique. 2010. “Mediating Peace with Proscribed Armed Groups.” Special Report
239.
Dudouet,
Véronique, Katrin Planta, and Hans-Joachim Giessmann. 2016. The Political
Transformation of Armed and Banned Groups. Lessons Learned and Implications for
International Support. Berlin, New York: Berghof Foundation, United Nations
Development Programme.
Duhart, Philippe
Eugène. 2018. “Talking with Terrorists, Talking with Governments: Insurgent
Perspectives on Legitimisation and Engagement.” Critical Studies on Terrorism.
1–21.
Duyvesteyn,
Isabelle, and Bart Schuurman. 2011. “The Paradoxes of Negotiating with
Terrorist and Insurgent Organisations.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth
History 39 (4): 677–92.
Eriksson, Mikael.
2009. In Search of a Due Process: Listing and Delisting Practices of the
European Union. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
European Union
External Action. 2012. ‘Mediation and Dialogue in Transitional Processes from
Non-State Armed Groups to Political Movements / Political Parties’. EEAS
Mediation Support Project.
Florquin, Nicolas,
and Elisabeth Decrey Warner. 2008. "Engaging Non-State Armed Groups or
Listing Terrorists? Implications for the Arms Control Community."
Disarmament Forum1:17–26.
Gross, Joshua.
2010. “Talking with Terrorists: Terrorist Groups and the Challenge of
Legitimization.” Journal Of Public and International Affairs 21:93–114.
——— 2011.
‘Proscription Problems: The Practical Implications of Terrorist Lists on
Diplomacy and Peacebuilding in Nepal’. Praxis 26:38–59.
Haspeslagh,
Sophie. 2013. "'Listing Terrorists': The Impact of Proscription on
Third-Party Efforts to Engage Armed Groups in Peace Processes-a Practitioner’s
Perspective." Critical Studies on Terrorism 6 (1): 189–208.
Haspeslagh, Sophie
and Teresa Dumasy. 2016. “Proscribing Peace?: The Impact of Terrorist Listing
on Peacebuilding Organisations.” Conciliation Resources Briefing Paper
(January).
Haspeslagh, Sophie and Véronique Dudouet.
2015. “Conflict Resolution Practice in Conflicts Marked by Terrorist Violence:
a Scholar-Practitioner Perspective.” In Researching terrorism, peace and
conflict studies: Interaction, synthesis and opposition, edited by Ioannis
Tellidis and Harmonie Toros, 103-123. London: Routledge.
Hayes, Ben, and
Gavin Sullivan. 2010. “Time to Rethink Terrorist Blacklisting.” Statewatch
Journal 20 (3).
Helgesen, Vidar.
2007. “How Peace Diplomacy Lost Post 9/11: What Implications Are There for
Norway?” Oslo Files on Defence and Security 3:1–24.
Hofmann, Claudia,
and Ulrich Schneckener. 2011. “Engaging Non-State Armed Actors in State-and
Peace-Building: Options and Strategies.” International Review of the Red Cross
93 (883): 603–21.
Home Office. 2013
Proscribed Terrorist Organisations. London: HM Government.
Institute for
Economics and Peace. 2017. “Global Terrorism Index 2017: Measuring and
Understanding the Impact of Terrorism.”
Jones, Seth G. and
Martin C. Libicki. 2008. How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons For Countering Al
Qa’ida. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Podder, Sukanya.
2013 “Non-State Armed Groups and Stability: Reconsidering Legitimacy and
Inclusion”. Contemporary Security Policy 34 (1): 16–39.
Santos, Soliman M.
2010 “Counter-Terrorism and Peace Negotiations with Philippine Rebel Groups.” Critical
Studies on Terrorism 3 (1): 137–154.
Sriram, Chandra.
2008. Peace as Governance: Power-Sharing, Armed Groups, and Contemporary Peace
Negotiations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tellidis, Ioannis,
and Harmonie Toros, eds. 2015. Researching Terrorism, Peace and Conflict
Studies: Interaction, Synthesis and Opposition. London: Routledge.
Toros, Harmonie.
2008. “‘We Don’t Negotiate with Terrorists!’: Legitimacy and Complexity in
Terrorist Conflicts.” Security Dialogue 39 (4): 407–26.
University of Ottawa
Faculty of Law. 2007. Ottawa Principles on Anti-terrorism and Human Rights, 8
February 2007.
Wennmann, Achim.
2009. “Getting Armed Groups to the Table: Peace Processes, the Political
Economy of Conflict and the Mediated State.” Third World Quarterly 30 (6):
1123–38.
Whitfield, Teresa
(2010). Engaging with Armed Groups: Dilemmas & Options for Mediators.
Mediation Practices Series. Geneva: Center for Humanitarian Dialogue.
Wils, Oliver, and
Véronique Dudouet. 2010. “Peace Mediation and Listed Terrorist Organizations:
Challenges for Peacebuilding.”
Zartman, William
I., and Guy Olivier Faure. 2011. Engaging Extremists: Trade-Offs, Timing, and
Diplomacy. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace
Citation 2
65876451 adaskdjlkh lkhlkhasd
IJLRA
N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE
N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)