THE INTERSECTIONALITY OF CLIMATE JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: ADDRESSING THE DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT ON MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES BY - SIVARANJANI C
THE INTERSECTIONALITY OF CLIMATE
JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS: ADDRESSING THE DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT ON MARGINALIZED
COMMUNITIES
AUTHORED BY
- SIVARANJANI C
ABSTRACT
The research explores the
intersectionality of climate justice and human rights, focusing on the
disproportionate impacts that marginalized communities face due to climate
change. Vulnerable groups, including women, racial minorities, low-income
groups, and Indigenous peoples, face a disproportionate amount of the burden as
climate-related disasters become more frequent and intense. International
agreements like the Paris Agreement recognize the connection between human
rights and climate change, but they frequently do not specifically address the
idea of climate justice for underrepresented groups. These frameworks typically
concentrate on overarching environmental objectives, lacking particular
procedures to protect the needs and rights of marginalized communities. Research
is primarily conducted using exploratory and doctrinal methods. The data
collected has been compiled and tabled for analysis. The data was presented
using a percentage analysis. This
research highlights the importance of integrating a human rights-based approach
into climate action and calls for more robust, inclusive policies that directly
address the disparities affecting marginalized populations while promoting
sustainable development.
Keywords: Climate Justice,
Marginalized communities, Human rights, Policies, Climate Change
INTRODUCTION
The global climate calamity poses a
serious threat to human rights and is an environmental concern. Although
everyone is impacted by climate change, marginalized communities are
disproportionately affected, and existing disparities are made worse. These
groups are more susceptible to resource scarcity, extreme weather, and
environmental degradation because they frequently lack access to social safety
nets, political representation, and resources. This paper explores the
relationship between human rights and climate justice, highlighting how human
rights ideas must be included in climate action. The concept of climate justice
necessitates an emphasis on equity since it recognizes that social, economic,
and political factors influence how the effects of climate change are
experienced, rather than being evenly felt. This research seeks strategies that
guarantee climate responses by comprehending these intersections.
LITERATURE
REVIEW
1. Climate Justice and Marginalized
Communities
The idea of "climate
justice" stresses treating everyone equally, particularly those who are
disproportionately impacted by climate change. Due to their physical positions
and socioeconomic weaknesses, scholars such as Mary Robinson contend that
marginalized communities—such as Indigenous groups, low-income populations, and
racial minorities—are most affected by climate change.[1] Bullard
and Wright state that these populations frequently reside in locations that are
most vulnerable to environmental deterioration, such as coastal or flood-prone
areas, and that they have little access to the resources needed for adaptation
and recovery.[2]
The literature makes it clear that
environmental justice is inherently linked to social justice.
2. Human Rights Frameworks
In particular, human rights
frameworks are essential for addressing how climate change affects
underprivileged groups. The rights to life, health, food, water, and housing
are guaranteed by documents like the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR)” and the “International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural
Rights (ICESCR)”, all of which are directly endangered by climate change.[3]
“The Office of the High Commissioner
for Human Rights (OHCHR)” has underscored the significance of including human
rights in climate action to guarantee that marginalized communities are not
excluded.[4] Human
rights-based approaches to climate policy are crucial, as recent research,
including Knox's work, highlights. This can offer a framework for holding
governments and businesses responsible for climate-related damages that
disproportionately affect marginalized populations.[5]
3. Gender and Climate Vulnerability
Understanding gender dynamics is
essential to comprehending how various groups are impacted by climate change.
Because of their roles in resource management and household care, women,
especially those living in rural regions, are disproportionately affected by
the effects of climate change. The research demonstrates how women frequently
depend more on natural resources for their livelihoods while also encountering
major obstacles when trying to obtain resources like money, land, and water.[6] This
exacerbates their vulnerability in the face of climate-induced disasters.
Gender-based disparities in decision-making further deepen the issue, as women
are often excluded from political and economic processes that determine climate
action priorities.
4. Environmental Protection and Climate
Justice
Indigenous peoples are among the most
affected by climate change due to their close relationship with the natural
environment. Their land rights and cultural practices are deeply intertwined
with local ecosystems, making them particularly vulnerable to environmental
changes. The research work emphasizes that Indigenous peoples often lack
sufficient political representation and legal protections, which limits their
ability to advocate for their land rights and adapt to climate impacts[7].Despite
these challenges, Indigenous communities have been leading advocates for
climate justice, as their traditional knowledge offers critical insights into
sustainable environmental management.
In the Indian context, scholars have
explored the intersection between climate justice and environmental issues,
focusing on how marginalized groups in India, such as rural women and
Indigenous peoples, are disproportionately affected by climate change.[8] The article makes
the case for combining domestic environmental policy with international human
rights frameworks to successfully address these inequities. Rishika Khare,
meanwhile, criticizes the international climate change regime for being unfair,
particularly when it comes to developing countries like India. Climate
obligations, disadvantage nations like India in striking a balance between
economic development and climate action.[9]
RESEARCH
GAP
Even though the connection between
human rights and climate justice is becoming more widely acknowledged, national
and international climate policies still fall short of meeting the unique needs
of marginalized populations. The majority of climate initiatives prioritize
broad environmental objectives, frequently ignoring the socioeconomic and
cultural vulnerabilities of vulnerable communities. Further research is
necessary regarding the systematic integration of human rights frameworks into
climate policy to guarantee the prioritization of marginalized communities in
climate adaptation and mitigation proposals.
RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES
1) To analyze the disproportionate
impact of climate change on marginalized communities.
2) To evaluate the role of international
climate agreements in addressing the specific needs of marginalized
communities.
3) To propose strategies and
recommendations using a human rights-based approach to ensure equitable
protection of marginalized communities from the adverse effects of climate change.
CONCEPT OF
CLIMATE JUSTICE
Climate justice is an emerging
concept that addresses the ethical dimensions of climate change, with an
emphasis on the disproportionate effects experienced by underprivileged and
vulnerable people. It interprets climate change as a social justice and human
rights concern in addition to an environmental issue. Climate justice advocates
favor a fair distribution of the advantages and costs associated with
addressing climate change, ensuring that those who have historically contributed
the least effects.[10] The concept grew when it was realized that,
although contributing only a small share of the world's greenhouse gas
emissions, the Global South and underprivileged groups were disproportionately
impacted by natural disasters. These marginalized sections were especially
vulnerable to food shortages, health crises, and relocation when
climate-related catastrophes like floods, droughts, and rising sea levels
escalate because they frequently lack the infrastructure and resources needed
to adapt.[11]
Climate justice highlights the
inequality that those least responsible for greenhouse gas emissions face the
most severe consequences. It seeks to ensure a fair distribution of climate
burdens through proactive regulations and legal remedies, grounded in
international human rights principles and domestic environmental justice
frameworks.
Climate change poses a severe threat
to the basic human rights of vulnerable and impoverished communities,
particularly their access to essential resources like water, food, and energy.
This exacerbates their living conditions and undermines sustainable economic
progress.[12]
Climate justice is essentially about
changing policies quickly so that the people most impacted by the climate
disaster can be compensated, adjusted for, and mitigated. It aims to increase
resilience in historically oppressed groups in addition to reducing future
climate threats.
HISTORY AND
DEVELOPMENT OF CLIMATE JUSTICE
(1) The Origin of Environmental
Justice Movements (1970s–1980s)
Climate justice has its roots in the
larger environmental justice movement that developed in the US in the 1970s
and 1980s. Environmental justice activists emphasized how communities of color
and low-income communities were disproportionately impacted by industrial
activity, hazardous waste, and pollution. This movement played a crucial role
in opposing the environmental laws that were in place at the time and did not
take social inequality into account.[13]
The environmental justice movement
witnessed a significant change in 1982 when demonstrations against a hazardous
waste landfill in Warren County, North Carolina, occurred. Black Americans in
particular organized protests against the state's plan to put the dump in
mostly Black neighborhoods. The demonstrations prepared the ground for a
nationwide conversation about the connection between racial injustice and
environmental deterioration.[14]
(2) Global Environmental Conferences
and the Emergence of Climate Justice (1990s)
In the 1990s, the concept of climate
justice developed recognition, especially during international talks on climate
change. The topic of equality in climate action was first explored during the
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as
the Earth Summit, which took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. The Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development, which came out of the meeting,
established the idea of "common but differentiated responsibilities"
(CBDR). According to this principle, wealthy nations should be more accountable
for mitigating environmental damage, as they have historically contributed more
to global emissions than developing nations. [15]
The Kyoto Protocol, which was adopted
in 1997, contributed to the advancement of climate justice by requiring
developed nations to lead the way in lowering greenhouse gas emissions while
developing nations were exempt from legally enforceable targets. Many
detractors, however, contended that the agreement did not adequately address
the needs of the most vulnerable communities in developing nations.[16]
(3) The Turn Towards Human
Rights-Based Climate Justice (2000s)
The emphasis on climate justice
evolved in the 2000s in the direction of a human rights-based strategy.
This strategy highlighted the immediate threat that climate change poses to
basic human rights, such as the rights to food, water, shelter, health, and
life. Small island developing states (SIDS), vulnerable populations, and
indigenous peoples have all made increased demands for the protection of human
rights in climate action. A significant turning point in the relationship
between climate change and human rights was the 2007 Bali Action Plan, which
was adopted during the 13th Conference of the Parties (COP13) to the UNFCCC. It
demanded more adaptation-related action, especially measures to safeguard
vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the 2009 Copenhagen Accord acknowledged
the necessity of limiting global temperature increases to less than 2°C to
prevent disastrous effects on people who are already at risk, despite criticism
that it did not include legally binding obligations.[17]
(4) The Paris Agreement and the
Institutionalization of Climate Justice (2015)
A key moment in the international
institutionalization of climate justice was the 2015 approval of the Paris
Agreement. This agreement expressly addressed the concept of justice and
stressed the need to limit global warming to 1.5°C to safeguard disadvantaged
states and communities. The concept of “loss and damage” was acknowledged in
Article 8 of the Paris Agreement, which also acknowledged that compensatory
procedures are necessary because some climate consequences, like sea level rise
and extreme weather events, cannot be prevented by mitigation or adaptation
alone.[18]
DISPROPORTIONATE
IMPACT ON MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES- DATA ANALYSIS
1. HEALTH IMPACTS
The “World Health Organization
(WHO)” has reported that climate change is exacerbating health risks,
particularly in vulnerable populations, due to factors like extreme heat,
malnutrition, and the spread of vector-borne diseases.
WHO Data (2022): Between 2030 and 2050, climate
change is expected to cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year,
due to malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress. Vulnerable populations
in regions like South Asia and Africa are at the greatest risk.[19]
Heatwaves: By 2023, extreme heat caused a
significant rise in mortality rates in India, particularly among the elderly
and poor.
Air Quality: Air pollution caused by climate
change-related factors is responsible for around 7 million deaths annually, and
low-income communities living near industrial zones are disproportionately
affected.[20]
2. DISPLACEMENT DATA
The “Internal Displacement
Monitoring Centre (IDMC)” reported that in 2023, over 21.5 million
people were displaced annually due to climate-related disasters, such as
floods, storms, and droughts.[21]
A significant proportion of these
displacements occurred in the Asia-Pacific region, which includes countries
like India, Bangladesh, and the Philippines. Marginalized groups, including
low-income rural populations, face significant challenges in resettling, due to
their limited access to social safety nets and economic opportunities.
In India, the “Internal Migration
and Climate Change Report (2022)” found that internal migration increased
by 30% over the past decade, driven largely by climate-related agricultural
losses. Marginalized communities, such as Dalits and Indigenous peoples, are
often forced to migrate to urban slums where they face further economic and
social marginalization.[22]
3. SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUITIES
Socioeconomic disparities
significantly shape how different communities experience climate impacts. Poverty
and Exposure: A 2023 study by the “Notre Dame Global Adaptation
Initiative (ND-GAIN)” ranked India 122nd in the Global Adaptation Index,
indicating significant vulnerability to climate change due to its large
population, poverty, and dependency on agriculture.[23]
·
Vulnerable
populations, including smallholder farmers, suffer from recurrent droughts and
floods, which result in crop losses and food insecurity.
·
Urban Slums:
The UN-Habitat's “World Cities Report (2022)” found that urban slums,
where millions of marginalized people live, are often located in flood-prone
areas. This puts these communities at risk of losing homes and livelihoods
during climate-induced extreme weather events.
IMPACT OF
CLIMATE CHANGE IN INDIA[24]
Impact Area
|
Affected Regions
|
Key Climate Impact
|
Percentage of Indigenous Population
Affected
|
Deforestation & Land Degradation
|
Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh
|
Deforestation, Soil Erosion, Loss of Livelihoods
|
65%
|
Loss of Biodiversity
|
Northeastern India, Tamil Nadu
|
Loss of Forest Resources, Decline in Biodiversity
|
70%
|
Water Scarcity
|
Central and Northeastern India, Karnataka
|
Depleting Water Sources, Reduced Agriculture Output
|
55%
|
Displacement
|
Jharkhand, Odisha, Assam, Andhra Pradesh
|
Forced Migration Due to Loss of Habitats
|
40%
|
Health Impact
|
Tribal Areas Across India, Kerala
|
Increase in Waterborne and Vector-borne Diseases
|
60%
|
Climate change poses a serious threat
to indigenous tribes in India, especially in areas like Jharkhand,
Chhattisgarh, and the northeastern provinces. These communities are especially
vulnerable to environmental deterioration, deforestation, and biodiversity loss
because they rely heavily on natural ecosystems for their livelihoods. These
issues are made much more difficult in southern states like Andhra Pradesh,
Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka by land degradation and water scarcity, which
negatively impact agricultural output and the availability of basic supplies.
According to the country's Climate
Change Vulnerability Index, Indigenous groups in India are disproportionately
affected by climate change-related issues such as deforestation, land
degradation, biodiversity loss, and forced relocation. For instance,
deforestation and soil erosion have caused a major loss of livelihoods in
Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Andhra Pradesh, affecting around 65% of the
Indigenous population.[25]
The reduction in biodiversity and forest resources has been reported to have a
70% impact on Indigenous people in Tamil Nadu and the Northeastern area.[26]
A human rights-based strategy is
essential to addressing the vulnerability of Indigenous communities in light of
these difficulties. Ensuring that Indigenous perspectives are important to
initiatives for climate adaptation and mitigation, prioritizing fair access to
resources, and strengthening land rights are imperative policy objectives. In
the absence of focused actions, the consequences of climate change will keep
exacerbating current disparities and making underprivileged populations more
susceptible to environmental risks.
SUGGESTIONS
TO ENSURE CLIMATE JUSTICE IN INDIA
1. Strengthening Climate-Specific Legal
Frameworks
·
Given
that women, rural populations, and Indigenous groups are among the marginalized
communities that climate change disproportionately affects, India ought to
enact strong national legislation centered on climate justice.
·
Implement
a National Climate Change Act that ensures disadvantaged communities have legal
protections by integrating environmental justice and human rights concepts.
2. Promoting Climate-Resilient
Infrastructure
·
In
vulnerable places, especially for communities in coastal, flood-prone, or
drought-affected areas, invest in climate-resilient infrastructure. Some of
them are improved water management techniques, environmentally friendly
buildings, and renewable energy sources.
·
Assure
fair access to resources in regions severely affected by climate change, such
as energy, clean water, and healthcare.
3. Enhancing Social Protection Programs
? Expand social safety nets like conditional cash transfers, public
employment schemes, and food security programs specifically designed for
climate-vulnerable populations.
? Ensure that climate displacement (i.e., internal and external
migrations due to climate impacts) is integrated into national welfare
programs, providing financial and housing support to affected communities.
4. Mainstreaming a Human Rights-Based
Approach in Climate Policy
·
Embed
human rights principles in national climate policies by aligning climate
actions with the right to life, health, water, and livelihood.
·
Acknowledge
the need for marginalized communities to participate equally in climate
adaptation initiatives and make sure that policies pertaining to climate change
don't worsen already-existing disparities.
5. Strengthening India’s National Action
Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC)
·
Expand
and update the NAPCC to address issues of climate justice by include vulnerable
communities in the decision-making process. Community-based adaption techniques
ought to be given top priority in the plan.
·
To
decrease climate-related vulnerabilities in these sectors, introduce targeted
missions aimed at vulnerable groups such as women, Indigenous communities, and
urban slum dwellers.
6. Increasing Access to Climate Finance
for Marginalized Communities
·
Ensure targeted allocation of
climate finance to vulnerable groups by expanding access to funds such as the
Green Climate Fund (GCF) and promoting public-private partnerships for
climate-resilient projects.
·
Design special financial
products like low-interest loans and subsidies for rural and Indigenous
communities to invest in sustainable agriculture, renewable energy, and
disaster preparedness measures.
7.
Empowering Local Communities
through Decentralized Climate Governance
·
Promote community-based
adaptation programs that provide the local people with an active role in
creating and executing climate solutions.
·
Encourage participatory
governance approaches, especially in rural and Indigenous regions, that involve
local bodies and Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in climate decision-making.
8.
Indigenous Knowledge
Integration and Land Rights Protection:
·
Since
these communities frequently employ sustainable practices that are essential
for the preservation of biodiversity and resilience to climate change, national
initiatives for climate adaptation should acknowledge and include Indigenous
knowledge systems.
·
To
provide equal access to land and resources and to prevent displacement owing to
development projects and the effects of climate change, strengthen the
protections of land rights for Indigenous peoples and rural communities.
9. Improving Data Collection and
Monitoring:
·
Establish
national systems for mapping climate vulnerability using de-identified data to
gain a better understanding of the distinct effects of climate change on
different groups of marginalized people, such as women, children, and
Indigenous peoples.
·
Make
sure the most vulnerable people receive priority treatment when it comes to
policy interventions and resource allocation by using this data to focus
climate adaptation programs.
10. Corporate Accountability and
Environmental Justice
·
Enforce
national frameworks for climate justice and corporate responsibility to hold
companies accountable for their actions affecting the environment and the
climate. Communities impacted by initiatives that impair the environment must
be compensated by corporations.
·
Enforce
stricter corporate reporting guidelines for environmental and social governance
(ESG), making sure companies lessen their influence on disadvantaged groups.
11. Strengthening Early Warning Systems
and Disaster Preparedness:
·
Provide
effective early warning systems and disaster preparedness initiatives for areas
that are most vulnerable to climate-related disasters, such as coastal regions
and drought-prone areas. Make sure that vulnerable groups, particularly the
underprivileged and rural communities, can access these systems.
·
Emphasize
community-based disaster risk management (CBDRM) initiatives that enable nearby
communities to have a proactive role in preparation and recovery for disasters.
India may advance equitable climate
justice by implementing these recommendations, which will give marginalized
communities' needs first priority. This will support sustainable development
while addressing climate vulnerabilities among a variety of demographic groups.
CONCLUSION
In order to address the
disproportionate effects of climate change on marginalized populations, the
relationship of climate justice and human rights is essential. The most
impacted by climate-related disasters are vulnerable groups, such as women,
Indigenous peoples, and the impoverished in rural areas, but they also have the
least means to recover or adapt. To promote equitable and inclusive climate
resilience, a human rights-based approach to climate action that incorporates
justice and equality into policy frameworks is vital. The implementation of
climate-resilient infrastructure, bolstering legislative safeguards, and
enabling local communities are essential measures to guarantee that climate
action is equitable and sustainable, so ensuring that no one is left behind in
the battle against climate change.
References
- Bullard RD and Wright B, The Wrong Complexion for
Protection: How the Government Response to Disaster Endangers African
American Communities (NYU Press 2012).
- Dankelman I, Gender and Climate Change: An
Introduction (Routledge 2010).
- Gupta J, 'Climate Change and Developing Countries: From
Leadership to Responsibility' (2010) 10 International Environmental
Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 7.
- IPCC, Special Report on Climate Change and Land
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2019).
- IPCC, Climate Change and Cities (Sixth Assessment
Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2021).
- Knox J, 'Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue
of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean,
Healthy and Sustainable Environment' (2019) A/74/161.
- Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Climate
Change Action Programme (2018).
- Mukherjee V, 'Re-Looking the Issue of Environmentally
Displaced Persons from an Environmental Justice Perspective' (2022) Journal
of Environmental Law and Policy 44.
- National Institute for Disaster Management (NIDM), Disaster
Risk Reduction Report (2019).
- Nagaveni PL, Bora A, and Anand A, 'From Environmental to
Climate Justice: A Discourse with Special Reference to India' (2023) Indian
Journal of Environmental Law 65.
- OHCHR, Understanding Human Rights and Climate Change
(OHCHR 2018).
- Robinson M, Climate Justice: Hope, Resilience, and
the Fight for a Sustainable Future (Bloomsbury Publishing 2015).
- Tauli-Corpuz V, 'Report of the Special Rapporteur on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples' (2016) A/71/229.
- UNDP, Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change (UNDP
2018).
- UN Women, Gender and Climate Change (2020).
- World Bank, Climate Vulnerability Report for South
Asia (2020).
- World Bank, Urban Development and Climate Impact
Report (World Bank 2021).
- Khare R, 'Fallacies of Justice in International Climate
Change Regime: Looking at India's Interests' (2023) Journal of Global
Environmental Policy 13.
[1] Mary Robinson, Climate
Justice: Hope, Resilience, and the Fight for a Sustainable Future
(Bloomsbury 2015).
[2] Robert D Bullard and Beverly
Wright, The Wrong Complexion for Protection: How the Government Response to
Disaster Endangers African American Communities (NYU Press 2012).
[3] Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (adopted 10 December 1948 UNGA Res 217 A(III)); International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into
force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3.
[4]OHCHR, ‘The Effects of Climate Change
on the Full Enjoyment of Human Rights’ (2018)
https://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/hrandclimatechange/pages/hrclimatechangeindex.aspx
accessed 7 October 2024.
[5] John H Knox, ‘Climate Change and
Human Rights Law’ (2019) 42 Harvard Environmental Law Review 277.
[6] Irene Dankelman, Gender and
Climate Change: An Introduction (Earthscan 2010).
[7] Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, ‘Climate
Change and Indigenous Peoples’ (UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues,
2016) https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples
accessed 7 October 2024.
[8] Preethi Lolaksha Nagaveni,
Amlanika Bora, and Dr Amit Anand, ‘From Environmental to Climate Justice: A
Discourse with Special Reference to India’ (2022) 38 Indian Journal of
Environmental Law 256.
[9] Rishika Khare, ‘Fallacies of
Justice in International Climate Change Regime: Looking at India's Interests’
(2021) 12 International Environmental Law Review 512.
[10] S Caney, 'Climate Change,
Justice and Future Generations' (2010) 19 Critical Review of International
Social and Political Philosophy 163.
[11] Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
(IPCC 2021).
[12] Preethi Lolaksha Nagaven, From
Environmental to Climate Justice: A Discourse with Special Reference to India:3
JCLJ (2022) 1515.
[13] Robert D. Bullard, Dumping in
Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality (3rd edn, Westview Press
2000).
[14] Luke W. Cole and Sheila R.
Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the
Environmental Justice Movement (NYU Press 2001).
[15] Rio Declaration on Environment
and Development (adopted 14 June 1992) UN Doc A/CONF.151/26 (vol I), Principle
7.
[16] The Kyoto Protocol, which was
adopted in 1997, contributed to the advancement of climate justice by requiring
developed nations to lead the way in lowering greenhouse gas emissions while
developing nations were exempt from legally enforceable targets. Many
detractors, however, contended that the agreement did not adequately address
the needs of the most vulnerable communities in developing nations.
[17] UNFCCC, ‘Bali Action Plan’
Decision 1/CP.13 (2007).
[18] Paris Agreement (adopted 12
December 2015, entered into force 4 November 2016)FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1, art 8.
[19] World Health Organization (WHO),
Climate Change and Health (2022) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health
accessed 8 October 2024.
[20] WHO, Air Pollution and Health
(2023) https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution
accessed 8 October 2024.
[21] Internal Displacement Monitoring
Centre (IDMC), Global Report on Internal Displacement (2023)
https://www.internal-displacement.org/global-report/grid2023 accessed 8 October
2024.
[22] Ministry of Home Affairs
(India), Internal Migration and Climate Change Report (2022).
[23] Notre Dame Global Adaptation
Initiative (ND-GAIN), Country Rankings (2023)
https://gain.nd.edu/our-work/country-index/rankings/ accessed 8 October 2024.
[24] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Indigenous
Peoples and Climate Change (2018); Ministry of Environment, Forest and
Climate Change, India.
[25] United Nations Development
Programme (UNDP), Indigenous Peoples and Climate Change (UNDP 2018).
[26] Ministry of Environment, Forest
and Climate Change, India's Third National Communication to the UNFCCC (MoEFCC
2021).