Open Access Research Article
THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Published Paper
Article Details
AUTHORED BY
- DHNANJY GUPTA
Student [Persuing
BA.LLB (Hons.)]
United
World School of Law
Karnavati
University, Gandhinagar, India
Abstract:
This essay delves into the definition
and application of jurisprudence, a multidisciplinary area that studies basic
legal concepts and their philosophical, historical, and sociological
underpinnings. The study of law incorporates findings from a variety of
academic fields, including sociology, history, politics, and economics, in
addition to philosophical examination. The study of human behavior in the State
and Society, the analysis of the law as it is and as it should be, and the
morality of the law and the connection between it and morality are all included
in the wide field of jurisprudence. The study also emphasizes the significance
of jurisprudence in comprehending the nature of main departments of law, the
contrast between public and private laws, and the analysis of broad legal
concepts. Overall, jurisprudence is an essential subject of study for academics
and legal professionals alike since it offers a thorough understanding of the
law, its history, and its ramifications for both society and the individual.
This study delves into the development of comparative law as a branch of
jurisprudence, emphasizing its significance in comprehending the similarities
and distinctions among legal systems globally. The study design, data gathering
strategies, and analysis methodologies used in the comparative examination of
particular legal systems are described in the paper.
Keywords- Jurisprudence, legal system,
Comparative law, Legal Paradigms, legal reasoning
1. Introduction:
Understanding the evolution and
application of laws requires an understanding of the complex interactions
between legal systems and jurisprudence. While legal theory concentrates
especially on the law in practice, its operation within societies, and its functioning,
jurisprudence, as the philosophy of law, encompasses the study and analysis of
law, its systems, organisations, and principles.
In addition to offering a greater
comprehension of the topic and its historical and sociological circumstances,
jurisprudence and legal theory aid in people's understanding of the law, legal
systems, and legal reasoning. The study of law demonstrates how society, both
past and present, have benefited from and been shaped by the law, which
benefits a variety of stakeholders, including jurists, judges, law students,
and lawyers.
2. Definition and scope of jurisprudence:
The study of laws, their guiding
principles, and their intellectual, historical, and sociological underpinnings
is known as jurisprudence. This field of study aims to comprehend the nature of
law, where it came from, and how it affects both society and the individual.
Law is defined as the supreme law of the land or civil law, and jurisprudence
is sometimes referred to as the science of law[1].
The study of human behaviour in the
State and in Society is included in the vast and comprehensive field of
jurisprudence. It focuses on the morality of law and the connection between
morality and the law, examining both the law as it is and law ought to be.
The study of general legal concepts,
the division of laws into public and private domains, and the substance of
major legal departments are all aspects of jurisprudence[2].
The study of law include not just
philosophical analysis but also research from other academic fields like
sociology, history, politics, and economics. It is an area of study that has
developed over time, with varying definitions from jurists. All definitions of
jurisprudence, however, have as their common theme the study of basic legal
principles, their historical context, and their application to both society and
the person.
Jurisprudence's emphasis on the
morality of the law and the connection between morality and the law is one of
its main features. The goal of jurisprudence is to determine if moral principles
are reflected in the law or if morality is not a factor in the creation of the
law. In the realm of jurisprudence, this issue has generated a great deal of
discussion and controversy, with many jurists holding varying opinions[3].
Jurisprudence's analysis of the
differences between public and private laws is another crucial component.
Private law deals with relationships between individuals, whereas public law
deals with relationships between the State and the individual.
The goal of jurisprudence is to
comprehend these interactions, the rules that regulate them, and the effects
that these rules have on both society and the individual.
Examining the general principles of
law—the tenets that form the foundation of all legal systems—is another aspect of
jurisprudence. These concepts encompass, among other things, the rule of law,
the legality principle, and the justice principle. The study of jurisprudence
aims to comprehend the foundations of these ideas, how they affect the legal
system, and how they influence both society and the individual.
3. What is legal system?
The frameworks that guide the
creation, interpretation, and application of laws are known as legal systems.
They are a vital component of any society because they offer a framework for settling
conflicts, defending individual liberties, and upholding social order. In the
world, there are three main legal systems: common law, religious law, and civil
law.
Based on Roman law, civil law
systems, often called continental or Romano-Germanic systems, are widely used
in Europe and many other nations. Judges in civil law systems largely interpret
and apply the codes to the case's facts, taking a more passive role in the
legal process[4].
Common law systems, sometimes
referred to as case law or precedent-based systems, are utilised in England,
the US, and other former British colonies. They are based on the English legal
system. Judges participate more actively
in the legal process under common law regimes because they can base their
conclusions on earlier rulings, or precedents. The common law systems' core
tenet of stare decisis, which translates as "to stand by things
decided," requires judges to adhere to the precedents established by
higher courts in cases that are comparable to their own[5].
Another important legal framework is
religious law, which is prevalent in Islamic nations and is founded on divine
law drawn from the Quran and the Sunnah, the teachings and customs of the
Prophet Muhammad.
Every legal system has advantages and
disadvantages, and how it is applied differs based on the social, historical,
and cultural context of the societies in which it is used. Anyone interested in
studying law or working in the legal field must have a basic understanding of
the tenets and features of various legal systems. It offers a framework for
evaluating and analysing various legal systems, finding similarities and
differences, and getting a better grasp of how law functions in society.
4. Interplay between Jurisprudence and legal system:
The
interaction between jurisprudence and legal systems is an intricate and
ever-changing relationship that is crucial for comprehending the evolution,
implementation, and influence of laws. Jurisprudence, as the philosophical
study of law, encompasses the examination and evaluation of law, including its
systems, organisations, and principles. In contrast, legal theory explicitly
concentrates on the practical application of law, its operation, and its role
within society. Jurisprudence and legal theory both contribute to a more
comprehensive understanding of the law, legal systems, and legal reasoning.
They enhance our knowledge of the subject and its historical and societal
circumstances[6].
The examination of jurisprudence, encompassing its inception, chronicles, and
tenets, elucidates the reciprocal influence between the law and societies
throughout time, so conferring advantages upon diverse stakeholders, such as
legal scholars, attorneys, magistrates, and legal experts. The interaction
between jurisprudence and legal systems emphasises the significance of
comprehending the underlying principles and notions of law, as well as the
actual implementation of these principles and concepts within legal systems.
Comparative law, a branch of legal theory, is essential for comprehending the
connections among other legal systems, their evolution throughout time, and the
principles and trends of legal transformation. Comparative law has progressed from
traditional categorizations of national legal systems to clearly defined legal
groups, with the aim of comprehending the timing, agents, and mechanisms of
legal modifications, as well as discerning the principles and trends of legal
transformation. Comparative law has demonstrated its efficacy in comprehending
legal systems, their historical evolution, and the interconnections between
them, surpassing national boundaries and questioning the conventional position
of lawyers as simply translators of domestic legal systems[7].
The primary objectives of comparative law encompass informing the process of
national legislation, aiding judges in addressing complex legal issues,
establishing a foundation for legal standardisation or alignment, and enhancing
knowledge and awareness, particularly in the field of legal education. These
purposes are in line with the goals of legal science as a whole, presenting
comparative law as a distinct branch of general legal science or a thorough
examination of law. The variations in methods used in comparative law can be
accurately characterised as legal culture, which has been unified with
functional equivalence through the notion of legal paradigms. Paradigms refer
to the approaches that legal systems use to solve problems in culturally
specific ways, ultimately achieving functionally comparable answers. The
interaction between jurisprudence and legal systems is an intricate and
ever-changing relationship that is crucial for comprehending the evolution,
implementation, and influence of laws. Comparative law, a branch of legal
theory, has a vital function in emphasising similarities and distinctions among
legal systems, providing insights for legal changes, and promoting a thorough
comprehension of the law. Through the analysis of the interaction between
jurisprudence and legal systems, we can acquire a more profound comprehension
of the function of law in society and its influence on persons and communities.
5. Evolution of comparative law:
The development of Comparative Law
can be linked to several historical people and significant events that have
influenced it throughout history. The study of legal systems, their
distinctions and similarities, and the connections between them is known as
comparative law. It has developed from a basic categorization of legal systems
into discrete families to a more sophisticated comprehension of the guidelines
and trends in legal reform[8].
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz presented
the notion of grouping legal systems into distinct families in 1667, which was
one of the first contributions he made to comparative law[9].
By offering a framework for comprehending the connections between legal
systems, this concept established the foundation for the comparative study of
legal systems.
Another significant figure, Montesquieu,
highlighted the significance of tailoring laws to the character and values of
each government, as well as to the environment, culture, and religion. The
contextual nature of legal systems was emphasised by Montesquieu's work, which
also emphasised the importance of taking into account the social, cultural, and
historical influences on legal systems.
With his work "Ancient
Law," British jurist and legal historian Sir Henry Maine made significant
contributions to the area of comparative law by offering insights into the
evolution of legal institutions in prehistoric cultures and engaging in a
comparative discussion. Maine's work affected the comprehension of the
development of legal systems by placing Comparative Law within historical
frameworks.
Through the introduction of novel
approaches and theories, legal scholars such as Rudolf B. Schlesinger and
Rodolfo Sacco enhanced Comparative Law during the 20th century. Sacco's notion
of "legal formants" and Schlesinger's case technique revolutionised
Comparative Law methodology by highlighting analytical and practical methods of
legal comparison.
Comparative law studies have enjoyed
a rebirth in the twenty-first century, with an emphasis on expanding legal
comparison to many cultures and traditions across the globe, such as those in
China, India, Japan, and Africa.
This development illustrates how
comparative law is dynamic and always evolving to meet the needs and
circumstances of a changing world.
The dynamic and intricate structure
of legal systems is reflected in the development of comparative law,
underscoring the significance of comprehending the interactions between
different legal systems and the external influences that mould them.
6. Purpose and objective of comparative law:
The purposes of comparative law are
to attain a deeper knowledge of the legal systems in effect, to perfect the
legal systems in effect, and possibly, to contribute to the unification or
harmonization of legal systems. Comparative law is essential in the present age
of internationalism, economic globalization, and democratization.
The objectives of comparative law are
to acquire a more profound understanding of the existing legal systems, to
enhance the existing legal systems, and potentially, to facilitate the
unification or harmonisation of legal systems[10].
The inception of contemporary
Comparative Law can be attributed to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in 1667, who
proposed the concept of categorising Legal Systems into multiple lineages. The
primary distinctions among Law Families lay in the origins of Law, the
significance of judicial precedents, and the establishment and evolution of the
Legal System. Montesquieu is widely recognised as one of the early pioneers of
comparative law. The author's use of a comparative method is evident in his
work, De l'esprit des lois (1748), where he suggests that in order to ascertain
which of those systems is most rational, we need consider each system in its
whole and make a comprehensive comparison.
The approach of comparative law
entails comprehending the legal regulations and juxtaposing them with alternate
resolutions for urgent policy matters. Gaining insights from foreign viewpoints
can be highly beneficial in illuminating fundamental policy concerns[11].
Comparative law requires a
comprehensive restructuring in order to establish itself as a significant field
of legal study, alongside emerging disciplines like law and economics, Critical
Legal Studies, and others.
7. Legal paradigms in comparative law:
Legal paradigms in comparative law
pertain to the approach by which legal systems tackle issues in culturally
specific ways in order to achieve functionally identical resolutions. This
concept is a recent advancement in the field of comparative law, which has
traditionally concentrated on the comparison of legal rules and doctrines among
various legal systems. Nevertheless, the examination of legal paradigms extends
beyond simply comparing laws and legal theory to embrace the wider legal
discourse, including how lawyers engage with the law and employ reasoning in
relation to it[12].
The notion of legal paradigms is
founded on the notion that legal systems are not self-contained entities but
rather integral components of wider cultures and socioeconomic contexts. Legal
paradigms refer to the distinct methods by which legal systems tackle issues
within cultural contexts in order to attain functionally identical resolutions.
This approach acknowledges that legal systems may possess distinct hierarchies
of legal sources, diverse methods of statutory interpretation, varied styles of
drafting judicial decisions, and discrepancies in legal techniques and concepts
employed[13].
However, despite these differences, they ultimately share a common methodology
of legal reasoning and argumentation, leading to similar practical outcomes.
An in-depth examination of legal
paradigms is crucial for comparative law as it facilitates a more nuanced
comprehension of the interconnections between legal systems and their cultural
milieus. Through the examination of legal paradigms, comparatists can discern
the distinct methods by which legal systems tackle issues within their cultural
frameworks and evaluate how these approaches measure up against those of other
legal systems. This methodology can offer significant perspectives on the
operation of legal systems and the influence of law in society.
The examination of legal paradigms is
a relatively new advancement in comparative law, and it has been gaining
popularity among scholars in recent times. This perspective acknowledges that
judicial systems are not independent entities but rather integral components of
wider cultures and socioeconomic circumstances.
8. Application of jurisprudence in legal system:
Jurisprudence, often known as the
philosophy of law, has a crucial impact on legal systems as it offers a
theoretical structure for comprehending the essence of law, legal reasoning,
and the underlying ideas that support legal institutions and doctrines. The
application of jurisprudence in legal systems entails employing the knowledge
and analysis obtained from the study of legal philosophy to improve legal
theory and practice in multiple ways.
Jurisprudence aids in identifying and
comprehending the essence of law, including its purpose and societal function.
Jurisprudence delves into inquiries regarding the origins of law, the
correlation between law and morality, and the essence of legal obligations, so
enhancing comprehension of the fundamental principles underlying legal systems[14].
Jurisprudence explores the techniques
and principles used in legal thinking and interpretation. This text explores
the examination of how laws are read, applied, and created by judges and legal
practitioners. It provides insight into the thinking processes that underlie
legal choices and the rules that govern them[15].
Jurisprudence delves into the ethical
and moral aspects of law, investigating the connection between law and
morality, the notion of justice, and the ethical consequences of legal
regulations and judgements. Jurisprudence aids in assessing the equity and
righteousness of legal systems by grappling with these philosophical inquiries.
Jurisprudence examines essential
legal principles, including rights, obligations, accountability, and justice.
It offers a theoretical foundation for comprehending these notions and their
implementation in legal systems, directing legal professionals in their
interpretation and utilisation of the law.
Jurisprudence is the study of legal
organisations and systems, examining their structure and function. It
investigates the processes of law creation, enforcement, and adjudication.
Jurisprudence, via the analysis of legal institutions and the principles that
guide them, provides guidance for the structure and functioning of legal
systems.
Jurisprudence plays a crucial role in
driving legal reforms. It does so by pinpointing deficiencies in current legal
systems, suggesting different ideas about law and justice, and arguing for
modifications to improve the fairness and efficiency of legal systems. It
offers a crucial viewpoint on legal procedures and norms, propelling
advancement and development in legal theory and practice.
The absence of jurisprudence in a
legal system indicates a substantial deficiency in the comprehension and
implementation of law within that system. Jurisprudence, as the philosophical
and theoretical study of law, is essential in influencing legal systems by
offering a conceptual framework for comprehending legal concepts, principles,
and the operations of legal institutions. Devoid of jurisprudence, numerous
fundamental elements of the legal system will be impacted[16].
Absence of Theoretical Foundation:
Jurisprudence serves as the theoretical basis for legal systems, offering guidance
to legal professionals in the interpretation and application of the law.
Jurisprudence is essential for providing a philosophical foundation to legal
ideas and practices.
Limited understanding of Legal
Concepts i.e Jurisprudence aids in comprehending legal concepts such
as rights, obligations, justice, and legal reasoning. Jurisprudence is
essential for a comprehensive comprehension of the underlying principles that
regulate the legal system.
Lack of Critical Analysis
in Jurisprudence encompasses the rigorous examination of legal systems,
legislation, and legal reasoning. Jurisprudence is essential for conducting
thorough investigation and contemplation of the essence of law, legal
institutions, and legal practices.
Jurisprudence has an impact on legal
practice by offering valuable perspectives on legal reasoning, interpretation,
and the implementation of laws. Legal practitioners may face difficulties in
efficiently addressing complicated legal matters if they do not possess a solid
understanding of jurisprudence.
The presence of inconsistencies poses
a risk to legal systems, but jurisprudence mitigates this risk by establishing
a structured approach to interpreting and applying the law, assuring
consistency and coherence. In the absence of jurisprudence, there is a
potential for discrepancies and capricious decision-making within the legal
system.
9. Comparative analysis of legal system:
Comparative analysis of legal systems
entails examining the distinctions and similarities among the legal systems of
various nations[17]. Legal
comparative studies is an academic discipline that seeks to comprehend the wide
range and intricacy of legal systems in different countries, regions, and
cultures. Comparative law utilises many approaches, such as functional
analysis, historical comparison, and linguistic analysis, to examine legal
systems, comprehend their purposes, historical development, and the influence
of language on legal interpretation.
The significance of comparative law
has significantly grown in the current era of internationalism, economic
globalisation, and democratisation. The inception of contemporary Comparative
Law can be attributed to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz in 1667, who proposed the
concept of categorising Legal Systems into distinct families. The primary
distinctions among Law Families lay in the origins of Law, the significance of
judicial precedents, and the establishment and evolution of the Legal System.
Montesquieu is widely recognised as one of the early pioneers of comparative law[18].
Comparative law spans diverse fields
like constitutional law, criminal law, commercial law, administrative law, and
others. The purpose of this examination is to emphasise the parallels,
variations, and the application of legal principles in various settings within
these legal realms. The main objective of this is not to provide consistency,
but rather to offer a more profound comprehension of legal systems, cultural
influences, historical origins, and societal settings that produce laws. It
allows legal practitioners to handle the intricacies of cross-border
transactions, multinational disputes, and international cooperation.
Nevertheless, it aids in providing information
to all of these domains of normativity. Comparative law can assist
international legal institutions, such as those under the United Nations
System, in examining the laws of other countries with respect to their treaty
commitments. Comparative law can enhance legal theory by establishing universal
categories and notions. Comparative law can also offer insights into the
phenomenon of legal transplants, which refers to the transfer of laws and legal
institutions from one system to another.
10.
Conclusion:
Comparative law has progressed from a
basic categorization of legal systems into separate groups to a more refined
comprehension of the regulations and trends of legal transformation.
Comparative law has grown to encompass a wider variety of legal systems and
traditions, integrating interdisciplinary viewpoints and approaches. The
development of comparative law demonstrates the intricate and ever-changing
characteristics of legal systems, emphasising the significance of comprehending
the connections between legal systems and the contextual elements that
influence them.
Comparative analysis of legal systems
is an invaluable tool for comprehending the methods by which case law
harmonisation occurs in various legal systems. Legal studies encompass the
examination of legal systems, including its fundamental components, variations,
and the integration of these components into a cohesive system. Comparative law
is a crucial area of study for legal practitioners and academics, since it
offers a more profound comprehension of the connections between legal systems
and the contextual elements that influence them.
11.
References:
1. “Jurisprudence” (LII / Legal
Information Institute) <https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jurisprudence>.
2. “Jurisprudence - Definition, Nature
and Scope.Pptx | Course Sidekick” (February 16, 2024)
<https://www.coursesidekick.com/law/4035961>.
3. Authors Various, JURISPRUDENCE
<https://www.fimt-ggsipu.org/study/bballb302.pdf>.
4. Mark Carl Rom, Masaki Hidaka and
Rachel Bzostek Walker, “11.3 Types of Legal Systems around the World -
Introduction to Political Science | OpenStax” (May 18, 2022)
<https://openstax.org/books/introduction-political-science/pages/11-3-types-of-legal-systems-around-the-world>.
5. LexisNexis, “Introduction to the
American Legal System | LexisNexis” (LexisNexis)
<https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/lawschool/pre-law/intro-to-american-legal-system.page>.
6. Suman Acharya, “Notion of
Jurisprudence and Legal System” [2019] Social Science Research Network
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3459097>.
7. George Mousourakis, “Explaining Legal
Development: A Jurisprudential and Comparative Law Approach” Ritsumei
<https://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/ir/isaru/assets/file/journal/31-2_03Mousourakis.pdf>.
8. Roberto Scarciglia, “A Brief History
of Legal Comparison: A Lesson from the Ancient to Post-Modern Times” (2015) 06
Beijing Law Review 296
<https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=61900>.
9. “The History of Comparative Law on
JSTOR” www.jstor.org <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1332143>.
10. “The Method and Role of Comparative
Law” Open Scholarship
<https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=law_globalstudies>.
11. HeinOnline, “About - HeinOnline”
(HeinOnline, April 3, 2024) <https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/temple7&div=29&id=&page=>.
12. “Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and
Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law on JSTOR” www.jstor.org
<https://www.jstor.org/stable/761422>.
13. Mark Van Hoecke and Mark Warrington,
“Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for
Comparative Law,” Routledge eBooks (2017)
<https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091907-14>.
14. “Comparative Study (Analysis) of
Mechanisms for Case Law Harmonisation in Selected Member States of the Council
of Europe” Coe <https://rm.coe.int/comparative-analysis-eng/16808b4995>.
15. “Jurisprudence: Legal Concept
Explained”
<https://getlegalbuddies.com/blog/jurisprudence-legal-concept-explained/>.
16. Suman Acharya, “Notion of
Jurisprudence and Legal System” [2019] Social Science Research Network
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3459097>.
17. Zoha Zaidi, “LLB: Exploring
Comparative Law Worldwide | Regenesys” (RegInsights, December 29, 2023)
<https://www.regenesys.net/reginsights/comparative-law-understanding-legal-systems-worldwide/amp>.
18. “Comparative Law” (Scholarship)
<https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3014&context=faculty_scholarship>.
[1] “Jurisprudence” (LII / Legal Information Institute)
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jurisprudence>.
[2] “Jurisprudence - Definition, Nature and Scope.Pptx |
Course Sidekick” (February 16, 2024) <https://www.coursesidekick.com/law/4035961>.
[3] Authors Various, JURISPRUDENCE
<https://www.fimt-ggsipu.org/study/bballb302.pdf>.
[4] Mark Carl Rom, Masaki Hidaka and Rachel Bzostek
Walker, “11.3 Types of Legal Systems around the World - Introduction to Political
Science | OpenStax” (May 18, 2022)
<https://openstax.org/books/introduction-political-science/pages/11-3-types-of-legal-systems-around-the-world>.
[5] LexisNexis, “Introduction to the American Legal
System | LexisNexis” (LexisNexis)
<https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/lawschool/pre-law/intro-to-american-legal-system.page>.
[6] Suman Acharya, “Notion of Jurisprudence and Legal
System” [2019] Social Science Research Network
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3459097>.
[7] George Mousourakis, “Explaining Legal Development: A
Jurisprudential and Comparative Law Approach” Ritsumei
<https://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/ir/isaru/assets/file/journal/31-2_03Mousourakis.pdf>.
[8] Roberto Scarciglia, “A Brief History of Legal
Comparison: A Lesson from the Ancient to Post-Modern Times” (2015) 06 Beijing
Law Review 296
<https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=61900>.
[9] “The History of Comparative Law on JSTOR”
www.jstor.org <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1332143>.
[10] “The Method and Role of Comparative Law” Open
Scholarship
<https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=law_globalstudies>.
[11] HeinOnline, “About - HeinOnline” (HeinOnline, April 3, 2024)
<https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/temple7&div=29&id=&page=>.
[12] “Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine:
Towards a New Model for Comparative Law on JSTOR” www.jstor.org
<https://www.jstor.org/stable/761422>.
[13] Mark Van Hoecke and Mark Warrington, “Legal Cultures,
Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law,” Routledge eBooks (2017)
<https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091907-14>.
[14] “Comparative Study (Analysis) of Mechanisms for Case
Law Harmonisation in Selected Member States of the Council of Europe” Coe
<https://rm.coe.int/comparative-analysis-eng/16808b4995>.
[15] “Jurisprudence: Legal Concept Explained”
<https://getlegalbuddies.com/blog/jurisprudence-legal-concept-explained/>.
[16] Suman Acharya, “Notion of
Jurisprudence and Legal System” [2019] Social Science Research Network
<https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3459097>.
[17] Zoha Zaidi, “LLB: Exploring Comparative Law Worldwide
| Regenesys” (RegInsights,
December 29, 2023)
<https://www.regenesys.net/reginsights/comparative-law-understanding-legal-systems-worldwide/amp>.
[18] “Comparative Law” (Scholarship)
<https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3014&context=faculty_scholarship>.
Article Information
THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Authors: DHNANJY GUPTA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/05/23
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.