Open Access Research Article
THE INFLUENCE OF ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES ON CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR.
Published Paper
Article Details
THE
INFLUENCE OF ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES ON CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR.
AUTHORED BY - HIYA VADGAMA
The burden of troubles childhood is
one that many take into adulthood and negatively affects the fabric of crime.
People involved in negative experiences in their childhood, go on to commit
crimes in the future. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) like physical,
emotional, and sexual abuse, neglect, living in a dysfunctional home,
witnessing domestic violence, and overall trauma are not unfortunate
experiences anymore. They are powerful and proper predictors of whether or not
a person would end up in prison or any other centre involved with crime. These
experiences can derail the trajectory of children’s development and work
corrosively on children’s brains, psyche and relationships, framing for all
subsequent negative development that can later manifest as criminal behaviour
in adolescence and adulthood.. Such penetrative trauma does not just impact the
life of an individual; it touches the dynamics of the entire community and is
responsible for staggering demands on societal resources. Understanding the
nuanced and often complicated relationship between childhood adversities and
criminal behaviour is not simply an academic exercise; it is a needed,
foundational step towards finding efficacious prevention and intervention
strategies; to foster a more compassionate and equitable response to crime
prevention; and ultimately, to promote healthier, more resilient communities.
The original ACE study (1995-1997) by
Kaiser Permanente showed a strong link between ACEs and numerous health
outcomes, including psychological and physical health problems and risky
behaviors. The study primarily aimed to examine the long-lasting connection
between childhood traumas and health and well-being later in life. About 17,000
adult members of Kaiser Permanente’s health maintenance organization took part,
completing confidential questionnaires about their childhood experiences and
their current health status and behaviours. Various ACEs studied in detail are
physical, emotional and sexual abuse, as well as emotional and physical
neglect. Also included is exposure to
household dysfunction i.e someone in the home being beaten up, someone in the
home being mentally ill and someone in the home being jailed. The results of
the study showed that the more ACEs a person has, the more likely they are to
have various negative outcomes. These
experiences have a powerful effect on the young, developing brain that can
change brain structure and wiring. The brain’s structure can undergo
alterations in many different regions, but the areas that most frequently
change are those involved in stress and emotional-regulating responses i.e.
amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.
An example of this is the dysfunction in the amygdala, the brain's fear
center, and the prefrontal cortex, which controls executive functions like
planning and impulse control, due to chronic stress caused by ACEs. This
unhealthy brain development has effects on cognition and emotional regulation
which then lead to a host of psychological and behavioural problems. Cognitive
consequences might include things like memory, executive function and attention
(impact on cognitive functions like memory etc.); behavioural consequences
might include aggression, defiance, and hyperactivity (which often occur in the
form of conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder) ACEs can also hinder
emotional regulation leading to mood swings, irritability, anxiety,
impulsivity, etc. People with high ACEs are more likely to suffer from chronic
diseases, including heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and autoimmune conditions
as they get older. On top of that, those who have extremely high ACEs often
engage in smoking, drinking too much alcohol or drug use which are often all linked
with chronic disease, compounding the harm of the ACEs since unhealthy coping
leads back to their issues. The experiences of children who have gone through
so much adversity will affect their relationship long into adulthood. When
combined with the other interactions and other experiences mentioned, the
experiences of marginalization can lead to criminal behaviours. Not receiving
the proper social support, these individuals tend to resort to deviant peers.
Many studies show a direct cause and
effect relationship between ACEs and crime behaviour. When we compare the
general population with the adults in the criminal justice system, we notice
that the adults in the justice system have a significantly higher presence of
ACEs. A lot of criminals have been through some traumatic experience when they
were children. It's important to note that certain ACEs often correspond with
specific crime types. Physical abuse is often associated with crime and
violence, sexual abuse with sexual assault and other delinquent behaviour, and
domestic violence household dysfunction with street gang participation and
early offending. This implies that the type of ACE affects the kind of crime
committed.
Here we will talk about the childhood
of the serial killers like John Wayne Gacy and Pedro Lopez and how it can help
us understand the complicated relationship better. John Wayne Gacy was a famous
serial killer called The Killer Clown. He was a Chicago-based sex offender who
tortured, raped, and murdered 33 young men and boys from 1972 to 1978. Gacy had
a hard childhood. His father was an alcoholic who severely criticized and
emotionally abused him. Gacy had a severely critical father who emotionally
abused him in addition to being a severe alcoholic. This abuse greatly affected
the developing psyche, creating a sense of inferiority and resentment. At the
age of 11, he suffered a head injury that resulted in a brain clot from which
he was rendered unconscious for years. Later, he suffered from this clot and
throughout his life, he started making heart-related problems. He always wanted
to impress others and look like a good person. Later, he committed crimes using
the same techniques. He was given the death sentence and was hanged on 10th May
1994. Pedro Lopez, known as "The Monster of the Andes," is charged
with 110 murders in Ecuador and is also believed to be responsible for around
200 more deaths in the neighbouring countries of Peru and Colombia; most of his
victims were young girls. Lopez was the seventh child among fourteen siblings,
and his mother was a prostitute. He grew up in a chaotic and violent home
environment characterized by instability and neglect. Lopez was kicked out by
his mother at an early age after attempting to molest his sister. Living on the
streets, he became a frequent victim of sexual abuse by men who exploited his
vulnerability, claiming they were offering him help. These repeated traumas
left him deeply scarred and distrustful. He eventually joined a street gang for
protection. His life took a brief, potentially rehabilitative turn when he was
adopted by an American immigrant couple. However, this opportunity was
tragically cut short when he was sexually abused by his school teacher, leading
him to flee back to his home country. Pedro Lopez was captured in 1980. After
serving 14 years in prison, he was released in 1994 and declared insane by the
authorities. He was placed in a psychiatric facility but was later declared
"sane" and released in 1998. Since then, his whereabouts remain
unknown.
The childhood experiences of serial
killers John Wayne Gacy and Pedro Lopez show how childhood trauma connects to
later violence. John Wayne Gacy and Pedro Lopez both experienced severe trauma
early in life, which deeply affected their brains and contributed to their later
outrageous behaviour. Most importantly, we should make clear that not everyone
who experiences childhood trauma will become a criminal. Having aces does not
guarantee an individual will become a criminal but prevents normal development
and impairs emotional regulation, leading to a hopeless disconnection.
Different crime theories suggest that
numerous psychological biological and socio-factors influence criminal
behaviour. Some of the main reasons are:
1.
Heredity and Brain Activity: The brain releases neurochemicals that trigger various
bodily activities and hormones. The mood-altering substances in our brain
regulate a variety of bodily activities and hormone. We observe that
neurochemical serotonin (many may have heard about it) is linked to less aggression
and impulsivity. Serotonin is a substance that has a huge impact on how a
person feels. Higher levels of the neurochemical dopamine, which is another key
one, have been linked to greater levels of aggression and risk-taking
behaviour. This is the case with dopamine; it affects blood pressure; and heart
rate, perhaps leading to arousal and reactivity. Research has indicated that
those who commit crimes (especially violent crimes) tend to possess lower
levels of serotonin but higher levels of dopamine than the general public.
Still, heredity and crime can be a complex relationship. Criminal behaviour
does not result from a single gene or biological factor. Rather, it typically a
complex interplay of biological psychological environmental and social factor.
One or more genes may give someone a higher chance to commit crime, but whether
an individual actually commits crime often depends on the childhood
experiences, social influences, and economic situation.
2.
Parental relations: Hervey M. Cleckley believed that the cycle of violence refers to an
individual who was born violent and raised in a violent home. A cycle of
violence is when a person who is violent or abusive himself has a child, this
child often follows the same pattern. Children who are abused or neglected are
significantly more likely to commit crimes than children who were not. Being
sexually abused as a child can sometimes make a victim sexually aggressive at
the time of adulthood. Not all victims will become abusers. Still, sexual abuse
adds trauma and psychological damage that would make it likely the victim
eventually becomes abuse. On the contrary, those people who enjoy healthy and
strong parental relations have a much lower risk of criminal behaviour.
Parental affection, effective discipline, and a supportive home climate enhance
pro-social behaviour, emotional coping, and a strong conscience.
3.
Peer pressure:
Peer pressure can impact the choices you make during your lifetime. People you
hang out with influence your thoughts, attitudes, and behaviour. Many of the
criminal choices people make are as a result of negative influence from their
peers. When youth experience exclusion or inability to conform to societal
expectations in school and/or leisure activities or lack access to basic
necessities due to overwhelming poverty, they often seek approval from
antisocial peer groups. These peer groups can encourage anti-social behaviour
and risk-taking while providing opportunities for crime. The wish to fit in and
fear of being left out can make vulnerable people take part in acts they would
not do otherwise.
4.
Drugs and alcohol: Drugs and alcohol contribute greatly to criminal choices associated with
violent crime and other crimes evidence. Addicts commit offences to support
their habit, such as theft, robbery, or drug dealing. Also, these substances
impair judgment, reduce inhibitions, and increase aggression, create a greater
likelihood of doing something impulsive and violent. When someone dies after
being attacked by a stranger, it is called stranger violence. Data show that a
major share of violent offences – murder, sexual assault, and aggravated
assault – has the offender under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Abuse of
drugs and alcohol making things worse, can lead to violent criminals.
Childhood trauma shapes mental
health. But how does it influence the personality traits of a person. We know
that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are linked to psychiatric problems,
but their impact on non-clinical personality traits is less clear. How do these experiences influence
personality-related traits? This may be due to a heavy focus on mental health
in research on ACEs and the scattergun distribution of relevant studies across
diverse fields, producing muddled data and inconsistent findings. We need to
know more about how ACEs form personality and how those personalities may, in
turn, be involved in crime. Knowing the details of this process can help create
stronger intervention options for children as well as adult offenders. This
means we can't just think about mental health but also about a person's
personality, their friends and family, and where they live.
To sum up, adverse childhood
experiences are a serious public health issue with significant consequences.
Experiences in childhood that are adverse (ACEs) have a strong connection to
criminal behaviour. To support this claim, it is important to understand the
biological, psychological and social factors behind it. By tackling the root
causes of ACEs and assisting people who experienced trauma as kids, we can help
prevent criminal behaviour and create fairer communities. This includes using
programs that help prevent crime before it happens like social services, CPR
for your mind, recreational drugs addiction help, and setting up local clubs that
would help children be happy and socials. To help troubled children and their
families break the cycle of violence, a collaborative and thorough response is
required.
- Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social
structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern
University Press.
- Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J. D., Walker, J.
D., Whitfield, C., Perry, B. A., Chapman, D. P., & Giles, W. H.
(2006). The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in
childhood. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical
Neuroscience, 256(3), 174-186.
- Anda, R. F., Whitfield, C. L., Felitti, V. J., Chapman,
D., Edwards, V. J., Dube, S. R., & Williamson, D. F. (1999). Adverse
childhood experiences, alcohol abuse, alcoholism, and liver disease
mortality: Thirty-year follow-up study. BMJ, 319(7218),
1249-1256.
- Anda, R. F., Brown, D. W., Felitti, V. J., Bremner, J.
D., Dube, S. R., & Giles, W. H. (2008). Adverse childhood experiences
and prescription drug use in adults. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 34(4), 321-327.
- Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008).
The relationship between drug use and crime: A systematic review. Aggression
and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 107-116.
- Brown, D. W., Anda, R. F., Tiemeier, H., Felitti, V. J.,
Edwards, V. J., Croft, J. B., & Giles, W. H. (2009). Adverse childhood
experiences and health-related well-being in adulthood. American
Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(6), 458-464.
- Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Larson, C. L.
(2000). Dysfunction in neural circuitry associated with emotional
regulation: Implications for childhood psychopathology. Development
and Psychopathology, 12(3), 433-455.
- Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson,
D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V.,... & Marks, J. S. (1998).
Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the
leading causes of death in adults. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
- Kerner, A. M., Chard, K. M., & Davis, P. A. (2016).
Associations Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Delinquency: A
Meta-Analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(15),
2744–2770.
- Teicher, M. H., Andersen, S. L., Polcari, A., Anderson,
C. M., Navalta, C. P., & Dumont, N. L. (2003). The effects of
childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function and
connectivity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(12), 972-982.
- van der Kolk, B. A. (2003). The neurobiology of trauma. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 26(1), 1-22.
- Widom, C. S. (1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244(4901), 160-166
Article Information
THE INFLUENCE OF ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES ON CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR.
Authors: HIYA VADGAMA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2025/03/22
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.