THE BURDEN OF OVERTIME WORKLOAD: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR EMPLOYEE LIVES BY - S. IRFANA RUHAIYA
“THE BURDEN OF OVERTIME WORKLOAD:
A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR EMPLOYEE LIVES”
AUTHORED
BY - S. IRFANA RUHAIYA
ABSTRACT
This article explores the multifaceted burden of overtime and high workloads, examining
their consequences on physical and mental health, work-life balance, and also
highlights the negative outcomes of prolonged working hours, job satisfaction,
financial and legal concerns, interpersonal conflicts. And the uncompensated overtime pays and legal insights of rules for overtime. This paper calls for
interventions to ensure that employee welfare is prioritized, more productive at workplace. And the [1]ILO conventions for overtime work on
employees and national laws, judicial interpretation in such overtime workload.
Furthermore, this paper will examine how organizations can balance the demand
for extended work hours with the need for a sustainable and healthy workforce.
By understanding the true cost of overtime on employee performance and well-being, and can
implement better strategies and policies to ensure the long-term success
and health of their
workforce.
KEYWORDS: Overtime, Workload,
Legal insights, Healthy
workforce
INTRODUCTION
In today’s rapidly evolving and highly competitive work environment, working overtime has become
a widespread practice
across various industries. While some view overtime
as an opportunity to earn extra income or advance in their careers, its
long-term effects on employees can be harmful. The continuous extension of
working hours can lead to considerable physical, mental, and emotional strain, which in turn impacts overall health, job performance, and personal
well-being. A key issue is that many employees, due to extended work hours, are
unable to spend quality time with their family and friends. The constant demand
of overtime work disrupts the work-life balance, leaving individuals struggling
to focus on both their professional and personal lives. As a result, they find
it difficult to fully concentrate on either their job or family commitments, leading
to heightened stress and dissatisfaction. This study aims to explore
the negative consequences that overtime has on
employees, particularly the physical, mental, and social impacts. According to the[2] Factories Act of 1948, adult workers are restricted to a maximum of 48 working hours
per week and 9 hours per day
SIGNS OF OVERLOAD: RECOGNIZING THE STRAIN ON EMPLOYEES
Overtime refers to any hours worked by an employee beyond their
usual working hours. While the term "generalized overtime" typically indicates time worked outside
the regular schedule, it
often occurs when workers are given more tasks than they can manage within their assigned
hours. This situation can create tension
in the workplace. Employee overload occurs when the amount
of work assigned
to an individual surpasses their capacity to finish
it within the given time frame. This issue varies
across different fields, as the nature
of the work can affect
workload demands. Work-related stress occurs when the demands of the job
surpass an individual’s capacity and
skills, leading to physical and mental strain.
Workload refers to the amount of work assigned to a person within
a specific time frame, and it can also describe the balance between the
mental resources required to
complete a task and the individual’s available cognitive capacity. Heavy workloads can have negative consequences on employee
relationships, teamwork, and decision-making. Overloaded workers may experience reduced
motivation, struggle to meet deadlines, and become more prone to conflicts in the workplace.
DETERMINING OVERTIME ENTITLEMENT:
Under[3] Indian labor law, employees are
entitled to overtime compensation if they work beyond the standard working hours. The specifics depend on the industry and whether the employee is governed by the Factories Act or another law. In India, the rules regarding
overtime entitlement are governed primarily by the [4]Factories Act, 1948 and the [5]Shops
and Establishments Act, the[6]
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and[7]
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 may come into play in determining overtime.
Standard Working
Hours in India
Factories
Act, 1948: The standard working
hours for adult workers are set to 48 hours per
week, typically split into 6 working days (8 hours per day). Any work beyond
this is considered overtime.
Shops and Establishments Act: Working hours are typically 9 hours a day and 48
hours a week, though specific details can vary depending on the state.
Overtime Entitlement
Overtime Compensation: According to the Factories Act, any work
beyond 48 hours a week (or 9 hours a day) is considered overtime.
Shops and Establishments Act: In most cases, overtime applies when
employees work beyond the regular working hours defined under state laws.
Overtime Rate in India
Factories Act, 1948:
Overtime compensation is generally paid at a rate of twice the normal
wages.
Shops and Establishments Act: The
rate is also typically twice the ordinary rate of wages,
although the specifics may vary depending on the state.
Maximum Overtime
Hours
The Factories Act, 1948 stipulates that no worker shall work more
than 12 hours a day, including overtime, and 60 overtime hours per quarter.
The Shops and Establishments Act in various states also generally
limits overtime to a certain number of hours per day and week.
EMPLOYEES VIEW
From an employee’s viewpoint, working overtime offers the potential
for increased earnings, as overtime pay is often calculated at a higher
rate than regular wages. This can significantly boost their income, helping
them meet financial
obligations and support
their families, particularly for those in financial need. Additionally,
extra hours can provide employees with opportunities to develop new skills and
gain experience, which can be beneficial for their
career growth. However,
the impact of overtime on employees can vary.
Some may feel overwhelmed or stressed by the added workload and pressure, while others
may appreciate the chance to work more and stay engaged.
EMPLOYERS VIEW
From an employer’s point of view, overtime can serve as an efficient
way to enhance productivity, especially when faced with tight deadlines or sudden increases
in demand for products or services. It can also
help reduce labor costs by eliminating the need to hire additional workers.
Employers have a legal obligation to compensate employees for overtime hours
and ensure that they do not exceed the maximum hours allowed by law.
Furthermore, employers must be mindful of the well-being of their employees,
ensuring they are not overworked to the point of burnout, and must provide
adequate rest and recovery time.
CAN AN EMPLOYER MANDATE THAT AN EMPLOYEE WORK EXTRA HOURS?
Employers can require
employees to work overtime, but this is subject to legal
limitations based on the laws of the country. In India, the regulation
of overtime pay in factories is governed by the Factories Act of 1948.
According to this law, no adult worker in a factory should be required or allowed to
work more than 48 hours in a week.
As per Section 54 of the Factories Act,[8]
daily working hours for adult workers cannot exceed nine hours per day, subject
to certain conditions outlined in Section 51[9].
Additionally, Section 55 of the Act specifies that workers should receive an
interval for rest after working for five continuous hours. This rest period
should last at least half an hour. These provisions ensure that the working
hours and conditions of employees are regulated to avoid exploitation and
overwork.[10]
BURNOUT ON
THE RISE: EFFECT OF OVERLOADING EMPLOYEES
Burnout
and Exhaustion
Excessive work demands can result in burnout, a condition
characterized by long-term physical and emotional fatigue. Burnout typically arises when employees
feel emotionally drained,
develop a sense of detachment or cynicism toward their work, and experience a
diminished sense of personal achievement. Those experiencing burnout
are more likely to disengage, which can negatively impact their performance and decrease their dedication to the organization.
Physical and Mental Health Issues
Excessive workload can significantly impact
both an employee's physical and mental well- being. Prolonged working hours and
constant stress can contribute to anxiety, stress, and depression. In addition, issues like sleep disturbances,
headaches, and other stress-related health problems become more common, leading
to a general decline in health. Continuously burdening employees with workloads
that exceed normal expectations can cause chronic fatigue, tension, and other
negative effects.
Interpersonal Conflicts
The strain of excessive workload can lead to conflicts between team
members. Increased stress and
pressure often result in communication issues, disagreements, and a tense work environment, all of which can
undermine collaboration and teamwork. This, in turn, can reduce the overall
productivity and effectiveness of the team.
Diminished Work-Life
Balance
Employees burdened with an excessive workload often find it
difficult to balance their personal lives and interests, resulting in an
unhealthy work-life dynamic. Over time, this imbalance can foster feelings
of frustration and resentment, which can ultimately diminish their commitment to their work.
Emotional indicators of
overload
It is well-known that emotional signs of employee overload often
include: 1. Increased stress, 2. Extreme
fatigue, and 3. A heightened risk of burnout. Unfortunately, employees dealing with excessive
workloads may also
become more irritable. Additionally, workplace tension frequently arises
as a result of overload. Interestingly, focusing on effective workload management can significantly help alleviate these emotional symptoms
of stress and exhaustion.
Employee morale and job satisfaction
It is clear that excessive workload can result in elevated stress
levels at work, negatively affecting both employee morale and job satisfaction. This kind of exhaustion also disrupts the balance between work
and personal life. By preventing work overload, organizations can foster a
healthier, more relaxed environment for their employees.
Financial and legal concerns
Unpaid overtime: When employers do not adequately compensate for
overtime, it can result in financial difficulties and potential legal
conflicts.
Absenteeism costs: Regular overtime raises the chances of
absenteeism due to health problems or personal reasons.
Social and emotional withdrawal: Overtime can lead employees to
distance themselves from their
social networks and support systems,
contributing to feelings of loneliness
and isolation.
UNCOMPENSATED EFFORTS: THE REALITY
OF NO OVERTIME
PAY
Not all employees in India are entitled to overtime pay, as there are several
exemptions and exclusions under the Factories Act 1948 and the Shops and Establishment Acts of various states.
According to these laws, employees who work more than 48 hours per week are
entitled to overtime at double their regular pay rate. However, certain
categories of employees, including government workers, managers, and supervisors,
are exempt from this rule. Additionally, employees working on a contractual or freelance basis,
particularly in sectors like IT,
may not qualify for overtime pay. While employers are generally aware of overtime
laws, some may attempt to bypass these
regulations by classifying employees as managers or supervisors, even if they work more than 48 hours a week. As a result,
these employees may not receive overtime pay due to their job
classification. This can lead to disagreements, with employees feeling
they are being exploited or not fairly compensated for their extra work.
IS WORKING ON WEEKLY HOLIDAYS ARE PERMITTED
BY LAW?
According to Section 52 of the Factories Act, 1948, adult workers in
factories may be required or allowed
to work on a weekly
holiday only if they have already received
or will receive a full day off within the three days prior to that
holiday[11]. Additionally, workers cannot be made to work for more than ten
consecutive days without a full day off. This provision ensures that all
workers in a factory are given one
full day of rest each week. If workers are required to work on their
designated weekly holiday, they must be compensated with either double pay or
an alternative holiday. The intention behind this rule is to prevent worker
exhaustion and ensure they have sufficient rest.
Exemption:
The factory selected for this case study is classified as an
exempted establishment under the Tamil Nadu Factories Rules of 1950. According
to Section 64(2)(k) of the Factories Act, 1948, the State Government has the authority
to create rules for adult workers engaged in work that is designated as a matter
of national importance in the official
gazette[12]. These rules may provide exemptions from
the provisions of Sections 51, 52, 54, 55, and 56. In line with this, the Tamil Nadu Government has established rules, and Rule 84
of the Tamil Nadu Factories Rules, 1950[13], grants such exemptions for certain factories, setting limits on work hours, including overtime, as outlined
in Section 61(4).
Specifically, Section 61(1) stipulates that: (I) the total
working hours in a day cannot exceed ten hours, (ii) the total time, including rest intervals, must not exceed twelve hours in a day, (iii) the total weekly working hours, including overtime,
must not exceed 60 hours, and (iv) overtime hours cannot exceed fifty in any
quarter.[14]
LEGAL INSIGHTS: OVERTIME
RULES AND EMPLOEES
PROTECTION
Section 59(1) of the
Factories Act, 1948[15], regulates the working hours of
employees in factories. It states that
adult workers should not be required
or allowed to work more than
9 hours a day or 48 hours a week.
If they exceed these limits, they are entitled to overtime compensation at twice their normal hourly rate.
Section 14 of the Minimum
Wages Act, 1948, addresses overtime pay,
stipulating that employers must pay workers for any time worked beyond regular
hours at the overtime rate determined by the
Act or any applicable law set
by the government, whichever rate is higher.[16]
The Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1961, in Sections
7 and 8, also applies to overtime. It specifies that employees cannot work more than 9
hours a day or 48 hours a week. Employees working overtime must be paid at twice
their normal wage rate, and
the total overtime hours should not exceed 50 in any 3-month period[17].
Section 51 of the
Factories Act, 1948, ensures that workers are not
made to work more than 48 hours a week, while Section 54 limits daily working
hours to 9, and Section 59 provides for overtime compensation.
The Occupational Safety, Health and
Working Conditions (OSHW&C) Code, 2020, under Section 33(a)(ii), empowers
employers to set daily working hours in accordance with government regulations[18]. However,
communication after working
hours does not fall
under the legal definition of overtime.
Currently, Indian law does not address the issue of post-work
communication between employers and
employees, leaving a gap in
regulations concerning the right
to leisure and rest time.
THE IMPERATIVE FOR ACTION IN INDIA
In the Francis Coralie Mullin vs The Administrator, Union Territory
of Delhi case, the Supreme Court highlighted that the right to health
is a fundamental component of the right to life under Article 21, defining
"life" as a life of dignity rather than mere survival. The term
"right to life" encompasses a wide range of entitlements, including
the ability to sustain oneself, a better standard
of living, clean work environments, and time for rest[19].
Extended working hours have
been linked to poor sleep quality,
symptoms of depression, and a strong
association with heart disease. When employees are expected to work beyond regular hours, it can lead to
overwork, resulting in various physical and mental health issues.
A study by the UKG Workforce Institute revealed that nearly 78% of
workers in India experience job burnout. This, coupled with the expectation of
being available 24/7, leads to hectic lives where individuals struggle to balance
personal and professional time. Given the high burnout rate and its impact on work-life
balance, it is clear that there is a need
for regulations that ensure
employees can maintain
a healthy work-life balance. Such measures would not only benefit
individuals' well-being but also contribute to long-term economic growth.
INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES: ILO CONVENTIONS ON OVERTIME WORK
ILO Convention No.1 (Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919)[20]
It is a fundamental international labor standard adopted by the International Labor Organization (ILO) to
regulate the working hours of
industrial workers[21]. The main aim of this Convention was to address concerns about excessive
working hours and poor working conditions, ensuring that workers had adequate
rest and leisure
Ratification and
Enforcement: Countries that ratified Convention No.
1 were obligated to adopt national
laws or regulations in alignment with its provisions. It emphasized that such
measures should be enforced to ensure compliance and protect workers’ rights.
ILO Convention No. 29: Forced Labor Convention (1930)[22]
It states
that all forms
of forced or compulsory labor
should be abolished, and no one should
be subjected to involuntary labor except in the context of specific situations
such as: Involuntary labor as a punishment
for a crime. Military or similar duties required by law.
Labor required in emergencies (such as war or national disasters)
that do not fall under regular conditions.
Ratification and
Compliance: ILO Convention No. 29 ratified by a
large number of countries around the world, and its Provisions are considered
the global standard for addressing forced labor. The ILO Committee of Experts
monitors the implementation of the Convention through regular reports submitted by governments. Countries found to be in violation of the
Convention can be subject to scrutiny, and ILO may provide technical assistance to help them fulfill their
obligations
ILO Convention No. 30: Hours of Work (Commerce and Offices) Convention (1930)
The convention specifies a maximum number of working hours that
employees in commercial and office
sectors should work. This is capped at 48 hours per week, or 8 hours
per day, with a maximum of 6 days of work per week. It also stipulates that
employees should be entitled to a weekly rest period, typically one full day
off in every seven-day period. Overtime hours should be paid at a higher rate
than regular working hours[23].
Ratification and
Compliance: Convention No. 30 has been ratified
by several countries, but its relevance is seen as more limited today because
of changes in work environments, such as the rise of flexible work schedules
and remote working.
ILO Convention No. 155: Occupational Safety
and Health Convention, (1981)
Its primary aim is to promote and protect the safety, health, and
welfare of workers at work, providing a framework for governments, employers,
and workers to collaborate in reducing workplace risks and improving conditions[24].
Ratification and Compliance: As of 2024, many countries have ratified ILO Convention
No. 155, although there are still countries that have not done so. The level of
implementation of OSH laws and practices varies
greatly between countries, depending on factors
like economic capacity, industrialization, and the strength of regulatory
bodies[25].
ILO Convention No. 190: Violence and Harassment Convention ,2019
This convention aims to eliminate violence and harassment in the world
of work, including gender-based violence, and to
promote a safe, respectful, and inclusive working environment for all workers[26].
Ratification and Compliance: As of 2024, many countries have ratified ILO Convention
No. 190, with a growing
number of governments committing to tackle
workplace violence and harassment. Compliance involves adopting
national legislation, developing workplace policies, providing training, and establishing
mechanisms for reporting and addressing incidents. However, challenges exist in
enforcement, especially in countries with weak labor laws or limited resources.
NATIONAL LAWS AND ILO COMPLIANCE:
While the ILO sets
these global guidelines, the application of these conventions may vary by country, and
national labor laws often incorporate the ILO's principles into their own
regulations. Some countries have stricter laws on overtime, while others may allow more flexibility, but they must
still comply with core principles such as worker safety, health, and fair
compensation.
ILO recognizes the importance of managing employees' workload, ensuring that overtime
is both reasonable and compensated properly. It also emphasizes the need for adequate rest
periods and the protection of workers' health.
These principles are incorporated into various
ILO conventions and recommendations to guide national labor laws and workplace[27].
CASE STUDIES: JUDICIAL
INSIGHTS ON OVERTIME
ISSUES
Barangay Jute Factory v. Its Workmen
AIR (1960) SC 862
The case dealt with the interpretation of Section 59 of the
Factories Act, 1948, which regulates the maximum working hours and overtime
pay. The Supreme Court held that employees are entitled to overtime pay for
work beyond the regular working hours prescribed by the Factories Act, and the
employer must ensure that overtime work is compensated adequately as per the
legal provisions[28].
Automobile Products
of India Ltd. v.
The Workmen AIR (1960)
SC 745
The case was related to the entitlement of workers to overtime
compensation under the Industrial Disputes Act and
the Factories Act. The
Supreme Court ruled that
work beyond the regular working hours
is considered overtime and must be compensated at the prescribed overtime
rate. The case reinforced the statutory protection for workers regarding their right to fair pay for
extra hours worked[29].
State of Gujarat v. SSRI N.M. Dessi AIR (1964) SC 806
The Supreme Court of India held that an employee is entitled to overtime
pay if they work beyond the regular working hours, even if the employer
does not expressly instruct them to do so. The employer is responsible for
paying overtime wages if the work
exceeds the limits specified under the law[30].
Delhi Transport
Corporation v. D.T.C. Tandoor Congress
AIR (1991) LLR 484
The case concerned the entitlement of transport workers to overtime
compensation for work done beyond
regular hours. The court ruled
that workers employed
in public transport services (like DTC) are entitled to overtime wages
for hours worked
beyond the prescribed limits under the relevant laws[31].
K.R. Tiwari v. The Union of India (2017)
The case addressed the issue of overtime payments for employees
working beyond 48 hours per week, including whether the rate of overtime pay
should be enforced for government employees under the prescribed rules. The
Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employees, stating that overtime pay should
be in accordance with established guidelines and that the failure to compensate
employees for extra work leads to exploitation[32].
OVERTIME AND JUDICIAL
INTERPRETATION
Several judicial pronouncements have reinforced that the right to overtime pay is a fundamental right for workers who are employed in
conditions that require them to work
beyond the prescribed hours[33].
In such cases, the courts have consistently upheld that employers must provide
overtime compensation as per the statute, even if the work is voluntary or at
the request of the employer.
SUGGESTIONS FOR MANAGING THE IMPACT OF WORKLOAD ON EMPLOYEES
Offering employees flexibility in their work hours which enable
workers to balance personal and professional responsibilities, which can improve their
overall well-being and reduce burnout. Make sure that workload
distribution is fair and balanced
across teams and departments. If one team or individual is consistently overloaded, consider
redistributing tasks or hiring additional staff to ease the burden.
Time off, whether it's a vacation or a mental health day, should be
seen as essential for maintaining long-term productivity and employee
satisfaction. Shift the focus from long hours
to tangible results.
If employees can meet or exceed expectations without constantly working overtime, it improves morale and
reduces burnout.
Implement mandatory rest periods and encourage employees to take
regular breaks. Encourage work-life balance by limiting overtime or ensuring
its voluntary and properly compensated. Ensure employees are compensated fairly
for any overtime work. Maintain open
communication channels where employees can voice concerns regarding workload,
overtime expectations, and well-being. Regular check-ins can help identify early signs of burnout or stress.
CONCLUSION
The impact of workload on employees is a significant factor that can
influence not only individual well-being but also organizational performance.
Heavy or poorly managed workloads can lead to burnout, reduced productivity,
lower morale, and higher turnover rates. By proactively addressing workload
concerns through thoughtful workload distribution, offering support programs,
and fostering a positive work culture, employers can reduce the negative impacts on their employees. Taking these steps not only enhances employee health and satisfaction
but also boosts overall organizational performance by maintaining a motivated,
engaged, and productive workforce.
A balanced workload is not just about the number of tasks, but also
about how tasks are assigned, managed, and supported. By prioritizing employee
welfare and adopting strategies to
manage workloads effectively,
organizations can achieve sustainable success while ensuring
a positive and healthy work environment.
REFERENCE
1.
D. Krishnamoorthy &
Aravindan.S, A case study on overtime
and its impacts on employees job statisfaction.26.2020
2.
D. Krishnamoorthy & Aravindan.S, A case study on overtime
and its impacts on
3.
N.S.V.Arivarasan , Scheduling overtime hours-the factors
affecting employers and workers – an industrial
experience.11. 2014
4.
Minette A. Briones, the effect of workload and work stress on employees work motivation and productivity in a
manufacturing company
5.
Lin budilestari & Sundjoto & Sri rahayu, The effect of workload and employee engagement on job satisfaction at the
inspectorate of east java. 2024
6.
Navigating the complexities of overtime in the Indian workplace.13 2023 https://bcpassociates.com/navigating-the-complexities-of-overtime-in-the-indian- workplace/
7.
Work life balance
as legal right:
the case for employee disconnection in India https://cll.nliu.ac.in/work-life-balance-as-a-legal-right-the-case-for-employee- disconnection-in-
8.
Understanding when employee overload occurs and its impact https://www.hellobonsai.com/blog/when-does-the-state-of-overload-occur-in-an- employee
9.
Long working hours
a growing problem
in India https://www.britsafe.in/safety- management-news/2024/long-working-hours-a-growing-problem-for- india#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAs%20compared%20to%20people%20who,of%20al cohol%20misuse%2C%20he%20warned.
10. The implication of work load in
the workplace which may provoke work stress https://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/KLICELS14_258.pdf
11. https://legalequity.in/navigating-indias-overtime-law-a-call-for-fair- compensation-in-the-modern- workplace/#:~:text=Under%20Section%2059%20of%20the,or%2048%20hours% 20a%20week.&text=Section%2014%20of%20the%20Minimum,worked%20beyo nd%20the%20standard%20workday
[1] ILO conventions for overtime work
[2] Factories Act of 1948
[3] Indian labor laws
[4] Factories Act, 1948
[5] Shops and Establishments
Act
[6] Minimum Wages Act, 1948
[7] Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
[8] Section 54 of the Factories Act,1948
[9] Section 51 of the Factories Act,1948
[10] Section 55 of the Factories Act,1948
[11] Section 52 of the Factories Act,1948
[12] Section 64(2)(k) of the Factories Act,
1948
[13] Rule 84 of the Tamil Nadu Factories
Rules, 1950
[14] Section 61(1) and 61(4) of the Factories
Act,1948
[15] Section 59(1) of the Factories Act,1948
[16] Section 14 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948
[17] The Karnataka Shops and Commercial
Establishment Act, 1961
[18] The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions
(OSHW&C) Code, 2020, under Section 33(a)(ii)
[19] Article 21 of the Indian Constitution
[20] ILO Convention No.1 (Hours of Work (Industry) Convention,
1919)
[21] International Labor Organization (ILO)
to regulate the working hours of industrial workers
[22] ILO Convention No. 29: Forced Labor Convention (1930)
[23] ILO Convention No. 30: Hours of Work
(Commerce and Offices) Convention (1930)
[24] ILO Convention No. 155: Occupational Safety and Health
Convention, (1981)
[25] ILO Convention No. 155: Occupational
Safety and Health Convention, (1981)
[26] ILO Convention No. 190: Violence and
Harassment Convention, 2019
[27] ILO conventions and recommendations
to guide national labor laws and workplace
[28] Barangay Jute Factory v. Its Workmen
AIR (1960) SC 862
[29] Automobile Products of Indian Ltd.
V. The Workmen AIR (1960) SC 745
[30] State of Gujarat v SSRI N.M. Dessi AIR (1964) SC 806
[31] Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C.
Tandoor Congress AIR (1991) LLR 484
[32] K.R Tiwari v. The Union of India (2017)
[33] judicial pronouncements have reinforced that the right
to overtime pay is a fundamental right