Open Access Research Article

JURISDICTION OF THE ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNALS IN REGARDS TO PERSONAL ACCIDENT CLAIMS

Author(s):
GAURA AGARWAL
Journal IJLRA
ISSN 2582-6433
Published 2024/05/14
Access Open Access
Issue 7

Published Paper

PDF Preview

Article Details

JURISDICTION OF THE ACCIDENT CLAIM TRIBUNALS IN REGARDS TO PERSONAL ACCIDENT CLAIMS
 
AUTHORED BY - GAURA AGARWAL
SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, HYDERABAD
 
 
ABSTRACT
The motor vehicle Act has been set up for the welfare of the public, and it has been set up for justice to be done to the public under the accidents people go through, which leads to injuries, property damage, deaths. Basically, this Act has been set up to provide people with the compensations of claim which they suffer after the accidents to give declaration to the people whose property has been damaged to provide with that loss, to provide compensation to the person who got injuries for the treatment and also if any person is deceased the balance is to be given to the family of the deceased person The Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Ramesh Babu.[1] The Indian Motor Vehicle Act was an amendment in 1924. The Governor-General of India gave the assent on 18th September 1924. It has been said as "An act further to amend the Indian motor vehicles.
 
The news of the accident is to be given to the police officer either by the driver of the vehicle, or by the claimant, or by a witness of the accident, or by the hospital if the person is deceased. The case is to be handled by the jurisdiction of that area, and the police should immediately contact the insurance company; and if the insurance is available at the point of time, they should claim the compensation because all this compensation has a limited period of the time.
 
CHAPTERIZATION
The study has been chapterized in a manner that will enable the reader to comprehend the information it seeks to convey quickly. Following are the brief descriptions of the chapters:
1-      The first chapter will deal with the detailed study of who will be applicable for asking the compensation of claim after the accident that took place.
2-      The second chapter will clearly deal with the study of how the compensation of the claims can be made by the claimant or by the legal representative of the sufferer.
3-      The third chapter will deal with the study of the new law of awards that are provided by the government to the tribunals.
                                                               
INTRODUCTION
In the motor vehicle Act, it is mentioned that the person can only claim for compensation when there is any bodily harm done to that person or there is the death of a person, so their family can easily claim for the balance or if there is any damage of the property of the third party. The claim for compensation against the motor vehicle, which includes death or bodily harm, is covered under section 140 and section 163-A.
There should be a committee that should settle such disputes arising out of motor vehicle claims. The committee should consist of two to three members, among which one should be the chairman. The committee is to be started, and members of the committee are to be selected by the state government. The only main thing that should be kept in mind while choosing the members the chairman should be either the retired judge of the high court or he should be retired judge at the district court. The chairman can also be appointed member judge of the high court and district court. Section 165 corresponds to section 110 of the motor vehicle act, 1939. When there is the negligence of the motor vehicle, there can be same way negligence of railways so simultaneously we can say motor vehicle and railway is the joint torts, but the claim will lie under motor vehicle claim tribunal act 1988. Some of the case laws included in the declaration of tribunal act are:-
Union of India v Satish Kumar Patel [2]
Gujarat State Road transport corporation vs. Union of India[3]
Maniklal Dubey v Mohd Ismail[4]
Southern Railways v Karnataka state road transport-corporation[5]
The application for the compensation of the claim is covered under section 165(1). The balance can be sent by the person who has suffered the injury, the application can be issued by the person whose property has been damaged, in case of the death of the person, the application can be issued by the guardian of the person or by the legal representation of the dead person, but if all the legal representative of the deceased person has not jointly made the application for the compensation of the claim under the Act, then the application will be made for the benefit of all the legal representative of the deceased person and the person who has not joint as the legal representative will be impleaded as the respondent of the application under the motor vehicle act. In another case as well the legal representation of the person can also issue an application on behalf of the person who is injured. Section 166 is the corresponding section of section 110 A of the motor vehicle act, which deals with the application of the motor vehicle compensation claims. Clause 166 deals with the application for compensation of the motor vehicle act; it tells about by whom application can be filled and within what time period the claim should be made after the accident because the person cannot file for the claim at any time there has been limited time period provided. It also provides that if the claim tribunals want that the report and case are to be handled by the police, then his file can be seen by the police under clause 158 as an application for compensation under this Act.
 
Literature Review
The present article, it is analyzed the meaning and origin of the jurisdiction of the accident claim tribunals in regards to personal accident claims in relation to the Indian perspective. A complete examination of the jurisdiction of accident claim tribunals with regard to personal injury claims from an Indian perspective, including who can seek compensation, how compensation can be awarded, and awards relating to balance to the claimant.
 
In this, the tracks the path of India as the compensation for claiming for the accident of a person, particularly in relation to the tortuous responsibility of the State government to set up committee relating to such accident claims. The emphasis is on establishing the use of case laws to define and describe how people have been compensated with the allegations and all the losses they suffered.
 
This study, it is studies and analyses the development and evolution of the laws and acts regarding the compensation for the claim in India. The main objective revolves around the concept of the jurisdiction of the accident claim tribunals in regards to personal accident claims in relation to its evolution and providing of the losses recovered within the limited time and limited sources with the help of police.
 
In the present study, the opinion that there is a need to clearly define the scope of this concept, because a theory that allows the jurisdiction of the accident claim tribunals in regards to personal accident claims from being circulated in its own courts, leading to significant people aware of the claims they can ask for and recover all the loss they have suffered. In this, the main focus is laid down on how all the things can be done and how the claim can be asked by the claimant.
 
RESEARCH QUESTION
1.      Study of who will be applicable for asking the compensation of claim after the accident that took place.
2.      the study of how the compensation of the claims can be made by the claimant or by the legal representative of the sufferer.
3.      the study of the new law of awards that are provided by the government to the tribunals.
 
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
The objective of my research The study titled jurisdiction of the motor accident claim tribunals in regards to the personal accident claim seeks to reflect what exactly its title requires it to, which is to analyze the case. The objectives of the study are enlisted below:
It is to bring out the laws relating to the accident compensation claim which should be provided to the sufferer and also how our Indian acts have been so advanced that they help people to fight for themselves to the best extend. The objective is to find out who can ask for the claim of compensation from the party the sufferer can ask, or any legal representative of the sufferer can ask for the balance. Secondly, the person can ask the party who has caused them this trouble or either they can ask from the insurance company if they have such policies like in property damage policies provided by the company in case of death or injuries also there are many policies of insurance. Thirdly, the government has also announced the award of the interest to be given to the claimer with the amount of claim and extra interest also to be provided to the sufferer and their family.
 
ANALYSIS
Study of who will be applicable for asking the compensation of claim after the accident that took place.
 A State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for the areas where there are more accidents happening on a daily basis for the purpose of judging a case for compensation of claims to the family who has suffered a loss which may be an injury to the person, property damage or death. An application for settlement of the claim is specified under section 165(1) can be made as follows-
a)      The claimant can be the person who has suffered the injury
b)      The claimant can be the person whose property is damaged
c)      If the person is deceased, then the claimant can be all legal representatives or anyone legal representative of the deceased person
d)      The claimant can be any agent duly authorized by the person who suffered the injury
e)      If all the legal representatives of the dead person do not join for the application, then the application can be made on behalf of the legal representative of a deceased person for their benefit, and if in case any legal representative does not join, then he can be made respondent to the application made.
Every application under sub-section (1) shall be made, and they can be made at the option of the claimant because they have to see if the claimant has jurisdiction at that part or not in which accident took place and within the limit provided to the tribunals  of the jurisdiction where the defendant resides and shall be in such form and contain such particulars as may be prescribed:
 
It is also provided that if there is no claim for compensation that comes under section 140 in such applications, these applications should have statements that are separate immediately go into effect before the applicant sign them.
 
The Claims for compensation Tribunal shall treat any file of accidents forwarded to it under section 158(6) as an application for compensation under this Act.
 
In the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the expression "legal representative" is not defined in Section 166  of the Act and subsection 2 of the Act. A legal representative, which is described in section 2(11) of the CP Code, has to be addressed. According to the Motor vehicle Act, the person who represents the deceased person or any third party means the dead person. They have to be within the meaning of the Motor vehicle act.
 
 Cholan Roadways Corporation Ltd. V. Pavunraj [6]
To continue with the proceedings, the driver has to be present when the case is being judged as claimed in section 166. During the proceeding of the case, the legal representative has to show the evidence that there was negligence in the driving of the driver, which resulted in the accident of the owner, making the owner liable for the compensation under section 166. So, here insurance company has to pay the amount of the settlement and also the awards of interest. The legal representative can also ask the driver to reimburse them with the amount of payment for the accident as the accident has happened due to negligence of the driver; if he were aware, no harm would have been caused. Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Meena Variyal[7]
 
The right to file a claim application has to be considered in the background of the right to entitlement. – The right for the claim of compensation application has been covered under the system because it has some restrictions, which is named as deprivation of dependency. If we say it in simple words, then it means multipliers are a measure. When there happen the questions of entitlement, there are three stages involved. Firstly, the person who is liable for the liability and the person whose liability is indemnified, if any. Secondly is the quantification, and S. 166 is primarily in the nature of recovery proceedings. Terms of S. 140 contain liability. This liability does not come to an end because of the absence of dependency. Controversy is covered under the time and light of S.165. It also includes the explanation of liability under S. 140 and 163-A, but this is under the independent file of application for compensation which is judged in the background. The required amount of the liability cannot be less than the liability referable to S. 140. The claimant, who is the legal representative, is entitled to compensation even if there is no loss of dependency. The amount of which should not be less than the liability avail—Manjuri Bera v. Oriental Insurance company Ltd. [8]
 
Wife. Where claimants were wife, sons, and daughter of the deceased and it was found that sons and daughters were majors and settled in life, held, only the wife would be entitled to Compensation: Sakharibai   Hasanali Makani v. Girish Kumar Rupchand Gadia (1997) 1 Acc. CC 668: 1997 Acc. CJ 95(Bom.) (DB).
 
Remarriage by widow-Effect. –If in case a man dies and a woman is planning to remarry, then she can also claim for compensation till the time she is getting married once she gets remarried; she cannot ask for compensation.
 
 
CASE LAWS REGARDING THIS ARE:
 Kartikram Dhimar v. Chandragopal Verma [9]1998
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Jagdeep Riad [10](1986)
Maqbool Ahmed v. Bhura Lal A.I.R. 1986 Raj[11]. 177.
Husband. – In the same way, a husband is a legal representative of his deceased wife, and if the wife is earning for the family but due to the cause she died in the accident or anything since her husband is her legal representative, he can file for compensation of claim and for all the damages happened to him by the death of his wife but if he remarries than he cannot file for compensation after his marriage.
 
CASE LAWS RELATING TO THIS PART ARE:
Babu v. Kacharu [12]
M.P. Electricity Board v. Ram Mohan[13]
 
The study of how the compensation of the claims can be made by the claimant or by the legal representative of the sufferer.
(1)   For all the inquiries that are to be made by the claimant are covered under section 168, there are rules and regulations laid down on behalf of the claim tribunals, follow such summary procedures as it thinks fit.
(2)   The claimant, also known as Claims Tribunal, should have all the knowledge and power of the civil court for taking oath on pieces of evidence and ensuring the attendance in the court of witnesses, and making out all the documents and materials required in the court and compelling up with discovery for all purposes as defined: he should always first approach civil court under section 195 and code of criminal procedure act, 1973.
(3)   Subject to all rules and regulations that are made on this behalf, the Claims Tribunal or Claimant may, for designation of judging a case for compensation of claim, choose one or more persons possessing special knowledge of any matter relevant to the inquiry to assist it in holding the question.
The police officer who is investing the case has to claim the compensation within the given time period, which is within 48hours after the accident. Sanctum of the facts that the payment of the claim by the claimant can be made by the territory of that area jurisdiction where the accident took place and that all the information is to be recorded in the register of that area.
If the claimant has the insurance valid during that time period, then the investigating police officer should reach out to the insurance company for the claim to be reimbursed within a limited time period by sending an e-mail to an insurance company.
(4)   All the facts of the accident should also be uploaded by that area investigating police on the website.
(5)   The information regarding the accident which is recorded in the records shall contain all the information's which are relevant and are of that accident which includes the date, time and place of accident, registration number of the offending vehicle, police particulars, names and address of the owner and driver of the offending vehicle and the terms and mobile number of the Investigating Officer.
(6)   The police officer who is Investigating the case, shall as far as expeditiously possible, should have the scene of the accident photographed from all such angles as to clearly show the layout, length, and ·width, etc. of the road(s) or place, as the case may be, the position of the vehicle, or person, involved, and such, other facts as may be relevant so as to preserve the evidence in this regard, inter-alia for purposes of proceedings before the Claim Tribunal or Claimant.
 
Procedure on receipt of the detailed accident report:
(1)   The Claimant or Claims Tribunals shall keep the check whether the Details of the Accident is complete in all aspects and shall pass ask for the order in this matter. If the Details of the Accident Report is not complete in any particular aspect, the claimant shall ask the police Officer investing the case to complete the details and shall fix a date for the completion.
(2)   The Claimant shall check the Detailed Accident file by the police officer investigating the case as a claim petition under Section 166(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act. However, if the claim tribunal is not being available and is not produced by the police officer during the time of hearing in the court, the claimant should register a detailed accident file as an extra application which is being registered as main claim petition only if the applicant appears in the hearing under section16
(3)   The claimant shall give 30 days to the Insurance Company to examine the Details written in the Accident Report file and to make a decision as to the legal payment of the money of compensation to the claimants in accordance with the law. The decision of compensation shall be taken by the assigned Officer of the Insurance Company in writing, and he has to give a reason for the decision. The assigned Officer of the Insurance Company shall place the written reasoned decision before the claimant within 30 days of the date of complete Details of Accident Report file.
(4)   The compensation offered by the assigned Officer of the Insurance Company in his written reasoned judgment constitutes a legitimate offer to the claimants, and if the claimants accept the offer, the Claims Tribunal will issue a consent award and give the Insurance Company 30 days to pay the award amount. The Claims Tribunal must, however, ensure that the claimants get just compensation in accordance with the law before making the consent award. The Claims Tribunal must also issue an order determining the claimants' portion and the method of payout.
(5)   If the claimants are unable to react to the Insurance Company's offer right away, the Claims Tribunals must give them at least 30 days to respond.
(6)   If the claimants reject the Insurance Company's offer or the Insurance Company has a legal defense, the Claims Tribunal will conduct an inquiry under Sections 168 and 169 of the Motor Vehicles Act and issue a lawful award within 30 days.
(7)   The Claims Tribunal shall register the claim case under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 if the Claims Tribunal finds that the DAR and, in particular, the report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 197 4 annexed to such DAR has brought a charge of rash and negligent driving, or the causing of hurt or grievous hurt. The Claims Tribunal shall register a claim case under Section 163 A, The Motor Vehicles Act, 19 8 8 in cases where the DAR does not bring a charge of carelessness or when the Claimant(s) before the court chooses to claim on a no-fault basis despite the amount of negligence.
(8)   The DAR shall be treated as an application for compensation claim case in cases when the accident in issue involves more than one vehicle and persons related to all such cars assert a compensation claim, and the DAR shall be presumed to be a claim case favored by each of them.
 
CLAIMS INSTITUTED BY WAY OF AN APPLICATION
(1)   Every application for compensation payment shall be presented by claimant in Form "G". It shall be accompanied by as many copies as may be required, to the Claims Tribunal having authority to pronounce on it, following Section 165 of the Act.
(2)   Every application must include the following: (a) an affidavit by the applicant stating the statement of facts contained in the application is understandable words to the best of their knowledge/belief, as the case may be; (b) details of previous claims preferred by the applicant(s) about the exact cause of action, or any other accident, and if so, what was the outcome; (b) all papers and affidavits for proof thereof, as well as affidavits in the supply of all facts on which the applicant depends 111 contexts of their claim, entered in a list of documents and affidavits provided by the property: The Claims Tribunal may not allow the applicant to rely on any document or affidavit not filed with the application in support of their claim unless it is satisfied that they  prohibited from filing such document or affidavit earlier for good or sufficient reason. c) unless excused by the Claims Tribunal for reasons to be documented in writing, proof of identity of the applicant(s) to the satisfaction of the Claims Tribunal; (d) duly documented passport-size photograph(s) of the applicant(s); (e) reports from the investigating police officer and the registering authority; and, if no such report(s) have been obtained, the reasons; (f) medical certificate of injuries or the effect thereof. (3) To ensure that a bogus or collusive claim has not been made, the Claims Tribunal may also require the applicant to provide the following information: (a) a complete list of all previous accidents in which the applicant or the deceased, as the case may be, was involved; (b) the nature of the injuries sustained and the treatment received; (c) the amount of compensation paid in previous accidents, the victim's name, and details, and the person who paid the damages; and (d) the applicant's relationship, if any, with the parties specified in clause (b), as well as the vehicle's owner and driver.
 
The study of the new law of awards provided by the government to the tribunals.
(1)   After giving notice the application to the insurer and allowing parties (including the insurer) to be heard, the Claims Tribunal shall hold an inquiry into claim, as case may be, each of claims, subject to provisions of section 7(162), may make an award determining an amount of compensation that appears to just and specifying the person whom payment is paid. Providing that an application argues for balance under section 140 in respect of person's death or permanently in state of disable, as well as other claim (whether made in such application or otherwise) for compensation, is governed. (2) The Claim Tribunal shall arrange for copies of the award to be delivered to the parties concerned as soon as possible and in any case within fifteen days after the award's date. (3) When the Claims Tribunal makes an award under this section, the person who is required to pay any amount under the award must deposit the whole amount granted within thirty days of the Claims Tribunal's announcement of the award in the manner directed by the Claims Tribunal. Section 168 corresponds to section 110-B of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
(2)   In some situations, compensation costs awarded. – (1) Any Claims Tribunal may make formal judgement on claim for compensation under this Act if it is satisfied, for reasons to recorded in writing, that - (a) the policy of insurance is void on ground that representation of fact obtained it that was false in any material particular, or (b) any party or insurer has made false or vexatious claim or defence, such Tribunal may make an order for the payment, by the party who is guilty, by the party who is innocent
(3)   Under sub-section (2), no Claims Tribunal is permitted to impose an order for                     extraordinary expenses exceeding one thousand rupees (1).
(4)   No person or insurer against whom an order issued under this section shall be immune from criminal culpability as a result of the misrepresentation, claim, or defense described in subsection (1). (1). (4) Any compensation was given under this section in connection with any misrepresentation, claim, or defense will be considered in any subsequent litigation for damages for compensation in connection with such misrepresentation, claim, or defense. The Motor Vehicles Act of 1939 has a section 172 related to section 110-CCC. Clause 171 aims to give Claims Tribunals the power to pay special compensation costs when it determined that there has been a misrepresentation of the case or that the claims or defense has been vexatious. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), Any individual who aggrieved by a Claims Tribunal award may appeal to the High Court within ninety days of the date of the award: Unless he has deposited with the High Court twenty-five thousand rupees or fifty percent of the sum so awarded, whichever is less, in the manner instructed by the High Court, no appeal by the person who compelled to pay any money in terms of such award shall accept by the High Court: Provided also that the High Court may hear the appeal after the ninety-day term has expired if it is satisfied that the appellant prevented from filing the appeal in time by sufficient cause. 9 (2) If the amount in dispute in the appeal is less than ten thousand rupees, no appeal has been filed against a Claims Tribunal's judgment. Section 173 corresponds to section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Clause 172 allows the aggrieved to appeal the Claim Tribunal's orders to the High Court, and where the aggrieved is the person who must pay the compensation, the aggrieved must deposit 50% of the amount granted as instructed by the High Court.
 
 
CONCLUSION
Finally, the authority of accident claim tribunals assumes an important role in resolving personal accident claims suitably and this is done through the tribunals without any compromise. We have studied the mentioned topics of jurisdiction and this main paper, that is jurisdiction scope, limits, and claims and incentives, in details.
 
The finding highlights that the tribunal of a personal accident claim, whether it arose from road accidents, workplace injury, or medical malpractice, is generally judged as of having the jurisdiction. But, jurisdictional powers may depend on such factors as nature of the accident, value of the compensation claimed, legal context of trail in which tribunal is exercising its authority from.
 
Another finding is that meeting the procedural provisions and knowing whether the claim is within the tribunal’s jurisdiction is vital. The applicants need to be watchful and careful here to be positive that their claims are considered in the legal or judicial forum that is the appropriate one.
 
In addition, the paper provides a detailed analysis of the factors emerging from the administrative issues handling the safety accident tribunals. Even with the world tribunals, there are parts of the system such as the claims adjudication delays, forum shopping by litigants, and the jurisdictional disputes among tribunals and courts that need to be tackled for the enhancement of justice for the accident victims.
 
Finally, it is necessary to point out the main feature of accident claim tribunals which is redressal of personal accident victims. However, there is a need for a fundamental clarity and consistency in their jurisdictional framework. By tackling these problems we can guarantee that negligent drivers would give prompt and ultracomplete compensation for the damage done to the victims, which will in turn lead us to the fair and equitable distribution of justice.


[1] 2021 SCC OnLine SEBI 145
[2]  2001 ACJ 1568, AIR 2001 MP 41
[3]  ACC 80, AIR 1988 Guj 13, (1987) 1 GLR 559
[4] 1999 (1) MPLJ 222
[5] 1998 ACC C.J 973
[6] 2000 -1) 128 Mad. L.W. 796: (1999) 2 Acc.C.C. 518.
[7] (2007) 5 S.C.C. 414.
[8] A.I.R. 2007 S.C. 1474
1-A.I.H.C. 1066
[10] 1 Acc.C.C. 291
[11] A.I.R. 1986 Raj. 177.
[12] 1999) 1 Acc.C.C. 317
[13] (1998) 1 M.P.L.J. 427: 1998 Acc. C.J. 651

About Journal

International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis

  • Abbreviation IJLRA
  • ISSN 2582-6433
  • Access Open Access
  • License CC 4.0

All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.

Creative Commons

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.