Open Access Research Article
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE LAW: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING PATENT AND TRADEMARK ISSUES.
Published Paper
Article Details
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE
LAW: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING PATENT AND TRADEMARK ISSUES.
AUTHORED BY - REETAMBHAR KUMAR DAS
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
Every human being on this Earth has
the right to protect his/her property against another person. The term
‘property’ here would indicate assets like house, jewellery, car, etc. But when
it comes in the context of ‘intellectual property’ it would mean property created
from the ‘mind’ of a human being and is in tangible form.[1]
This property is usually a brain child of a person which has been given a
tangible form by reshaping it.
Every creation needs a lot of efforts
and without new creations a country cannot develop.
Intellectual property is a wide term
including copyright, patents, trademarks, GI, Biodiversity Act etc. The
following laws are being recognized under Indian laws.
The basic IPR laws which are being
used in corporate sectors are limited to Patent and Trade mark laws.
The Patent Act, 1970 was introduced
in order to protect the inventions for a limited period of time by the
government. The patent enjoys an exclusive right to prevent a third party from unauthorized
act of making, sell or reproduce the same product.
Similarly Trade Mark Act 1999 was
introduced in order to do free trade without the fear of the work being stolen
by any third party.[2]
All this laws in today’s world help
in smooth governing of the organization. IPR is crucial in each of these
scenarios because it's vital to protect the items' value. The protection is
provided by means such as intellectual property laws and technological security
measures.
In comparison to any physical
property a corporate entity may own, the majority of firms around the world
believe their intellectual property to be a significantly more valuable asset.
This is because firms are protected by intellectual property laws from both
unfair competition as well as exposure of their trade secrets. The promotion of
the creation of various intellectual properties is the main objective of
intellectual property regulation. To do this, the law normally allows individuals
and organizations ownership rights for a limited period of time to the
information and creative products they develop this in turn creates an economic
incentive for their creation by allowing people to profit from the knowledge
and intellectual products that they create. These financial incentives are
expected to promote innovation and improve technology in nations, depending on
the level of protection offered to innovators.
The establishment of rules and
procedures that control how IP laws are applied has encouraged new creations in
addition to protecting the creator's labour. It is against the law to take
someone else's intellectual property (IP) and use it to make money without
paying the inventor for their time and labour.
Chapter 2
Overview of Intellectual Property in Corporate law
2.1 Importance of patents and trademarks in a corporate sector
Act VI of 1856, the nation's first
statute governing patents, had its inception in India. The objective was to
publicize inventions and persuade inventors to reveal their ideas' trade
secrets. Later, a new law known as Act XV of 1859 was adopted to grant
exclusive privilege. The law was changed to the Patterns and Designs Protection
Act which was passed in 1872. The only revision to the statute during its 30-year
existence was in 1883.
The Indian Patents and Design Act
repealed all previous Indian legislation. This legislation established rules
for the issuance of secret patents, patents for improvements, and a 16-year
patent term extension. The law was examined by many committees after India
gained independence, and as a result, a bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in
1965 but was not passed. The Patents Act, 1970—currently in use in India—was
adopted on the committee's final recommendation in 1970, despite the fact that
the original bill had expired in 1965.[3]
The British Trademark Act of 1938 was
modified to create the Trademark Act of 1940, which was the first law
pertaining to trademarks in India. After independence, the Trade and
Merchandise Act of 1958 were also passed.
Until December 30, 1999, when the
Trade Mark Act, 1999, was established and is in use in India this law serves
two main purposes: a) to protect the owner from confusion and competitor mark
infringement; and b) safeguard the reputation, business, and goodwill that the
trademark owner has established.
There were trademarks which were in
use even in ancient history. Around 3000 years ago, Indian craftsmen used to
engrave their signature on jewellery or other works of art. Trademarks have
been a crucial component of the modern world of worldwide trade since
industrialization. A trade mark is a distinguishing symbol or emblem that indicates that a
certain product is created or offered by a particular person, business, or
industry.[4] Service
marks, like trademarks, set apart businesses that offer services from their
rivals. A firm may use a variety of trademarks to identify its various
products, but it also uses its trade name to set itself apart from other
businesses. Trademarks and trade names assist businesses in building their
brand awareness, reputation, and customer trust.
In order to stand out from the
competition, a certain demographic of customers places a high value on brand
prestige, even for products which are of comparable quality. In order to
differentiate one company or service from another, a trademark or service mark
may include words (such as a company name, surname, geographical name, slogan,
etc.), letters, numbers, drawings, logos, phrases, images, designs, or a
combination of these components.
On the other hand a patent
is a sole right granted to the inventor by the State that forbids anybody from
making, using, or selling the invention for a predetermined period of time.[5] It
pertains to an inventive monopoly right. The exclusivity of patent protection
for inventions is not required, nor is all inventions patentable. The finished
product that arises from an innovation may be protected by other types of
intellectual property rights. By offering innovators exclusive rights to their
ideas, the main goal of patent law is to motivate them to contribute more to
their field. An innovation in India is one that incorporates the inventive
phase, is usable in industry, and qualifies for patent protection.
The sub-set portion of the intellectual
property legislation which deals with new innovations is called the Patents
Act. Product
patents and process patents are the two categories of patents
recognized by the Patents Act of 1970. The process patent describes the steps
taken to produce a patent, whereas the product patent describes the final
product or output of a product. According to the Patent Act, if a procedure or
product is novel, involves an innovative step, and has the potential for
industrial use, it qualifies as an invention.
Legal foundations of patents and trademarks
India's intellectual
property rights are protected through patents and trademarks. The Indian
Patents Act of 1970 incentivizes innovation by granting exclusive rights for up
to 20 years to eligible inventions. The application process involves rigorous
examination by the Indian Patent Office to ensure novelty, non-obviousness, and
industrial applicability. Patent holders enjoy exclusive rights to use, make,
and sell their invention, fostering innovation and competition. The Act also
allows for compulsory licensing and revocation if the patent is not adequately
exploited. Trademarks are regulated by the Trade Marks Act of 1999, which
protects distinctive signs like names, logos, and symbols used in commerce.[6]
To secure trademark protection, individuals or businesses must file an application
with the Trademarks Registry. Once approved, trademark owners have exclusive
rights for ten years, with the option for indefinite renewal. India also
recognizes Geographical Indications (GIs) under separate legislation,
protecting products originating from specific regions with quality and unique
characteristics. This system ensures consumers can trust the authenticity and
origin of products tied to a particular geographical area.
Inter-link between IPR and Corporate laws
Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) and Corporate Laws are interconnected legal domains that
play a crucial role in shaping modern business and innovation. The relationship
between these two domains is symbiotic, fostering innovation, protecting
assets, and ensuring economic growth. M&A activities involve mergers and
acquisitions (M&A), where corporations often acquire or merge with
companies possessing valuable intellectual property assets. Corporate laws
govern the acquisition or merger process, while IPR safeguards these assets.[7]
Due diligence in M&A involves assessing the target company's IPR portfolio
to assess its value, risks, and compliance with relevant laws. Failure to
account for these assets can lead to legal disputes, financial losses, or
missed opportunities. Licensing agreements to use, exploit, or sublicense
intellectual property are regulated by both IPR laws and corporate contract
laws. Companies must navigate these intricacies to ensure compliance with
licensing terms, royalty payments, and protection of their IP rights.[8]
Corporate governance also intersects with IPR and Corporate Laws. Boards of
directors and executives have a fiduciary duty to protect and maximize the
value of a corporation's assets, including intellectual property. They must
ensure compliance with IPR laws and take necessary measures to protect their
IP.
The interplay
between IPR and Corporate Laws also influences competition and antitrust
regulations. Corporations must navigate the delicate balance between protecting
their IP rights and avoiding anti-competitive behaviour when holding dominant
positions due to their intellectual property.[9]
Financial aspects of corporate operations, such as valuation, asset management,
and financing, are deeply intertwined with intellectual property. A company's
IP portfolio can significantly affect its valuation, attracting investors or
lenders who recognize the value of these assets. Corporate laws govern
financial transactions, mergers, and IPOs, which often involve IP
considerations. In conclusion, the inter-link between IPR and Corporate Laws is
essential for businesses operating in today's knowledge-based economy.
As we know that a company is one
which runs its business and in return they generate profit. Whatever creation
they does, needs a protection. For economic growth and development, every
company needs to create something new which would make his product stands out
of the queue. As the technology is advancing, new creations and inventions are
taking place and as a result, the protection of the product needs to be done in
order to protect it from the buyers getting confused between two similar or
identical products.
Now coming to the international
conventions, India is a signatory to World Trade Organization (WTO) and committed
to the agreement on Trade related aspects of Intellectual property rights
(TRIPS).
Furthermore the economics growth and
development depends on the new creation of any products. According to Global
Innovation Index 2023, India ranked 40th in comparison to the whole
world. This statistical data would not have been possible without new
inventions or creations.
In corporate sector Trade mark and
patent are the most required legislations as this two areas are the most
vulnerable aspects of attacks.
Intellectual
property rights (IPR) can directly impact a country's economic growth by
encouraging innovations in various sectors, which in turn improve productivity.
IPR can also affect inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI), technology
transfers, and trade, which may intrude on growth. Studies show a non-linear
relationship between IPR protection and development level, suggesting that
patent protection tends to decline as economies move beyond the poorest stage
into a middle-income stage. Economic indicators like national or sector trade
balance is used to quantify trade-related intellectual property, but these are
often contradicted and considered inaccurate for policy purposes.
The impact of
copyright on an economy is unclear, with debates over whether lowered or
increased provisions lead to more or fewer books, films, movies, websites, or
pro or anti-competitive business practices. However, it can be concluded that
there is at least some economic impact arising from copyright protection if income
distribution can be considered a matter of economic policy rather than a social
policy issue.
Intellectual property rights (IP) are crucial in fostering international
trade and are essential for businesses worldwide. However, they also have limitations
like time and space constraints. Strong domestic and international protection
of IP is essential for a country's success in the competitive global
marketplace. IP will remain part of most international trade agreements, but
varying standards and less discriminatory enforcements will characterize future
global activity. The evolution of trade-related IP is evidence of social,
cultural, and political scenarios, leading to a finely tuned understanding of
the associations between creation, innovation, and efficient IP dissemination.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
Research methodology
is a critical component of any scientific inquiry, guiding the systematic
investigation of a research question or problem. It involves the formulation of
clear objectives and hypotheses to guide the study's focus, selecting an
appropriate research design, and employing various techniques for data
collection and analysis.[10]
Data collection is another critical aspect of research methodology, with
researchers using methods such as surveys, interviews, experiments,
observations, or content analysis. The choice of data collection method should
align with the research design and objectives, ensuring validity and
reliability.
Types of Research those are required
for the enforcement of IPR laws in India:
1. Doctrinal Methods: This type of Research focuses on
basically the letter of Law rather than the law in action. In doctrinal research methods, it is a crucial method in
legal and academic studies, focusing on analysing existing legal principles and
precedents to derive conclusions and interpretations. This approach involves a
systematic examination of legal texts, statutes, case law, and legal literature
to gain a deeper understanding of the legal framework.
2. Analytical Methods: Analytical research is a systematic and rigorous method of
examining data to draw meaningful conclusions and insights. It is crucial in understanding
complex phenomena, such as economics, where it helps assess data on inflation
rates, GDP growth, and consumer behaviour. In science, analytical research is
essential for experiments and data analysis, using spectroscopy to identify
molecules or separate chemical compounds. By applying analytical methods,
researchers can unravel intricate details, make informed decisions, and
contribute to advancements in their respective disciplines.
3. Qualitative Methods: Qualitative research
methods are crucial for understanding human experiences, behaviors, and social
phenomena. They focus on understanding the "why" and "how"
behind a particular issue, providing rich insights into complex human behaviors
and societal dynamics. For example, in sociology, in-depth interviews can
reveal the experiences of marginalized communities, while content analysis of
open-ended survey responses can uncover underlying themes and emotions. This
approach aids in informed decision-making and policy formulation.
In India if a person or an individual
wants to get a patent one needs to do prior search on the product, that is to
say whether that product is already been registered or not, the next step
includes filing of the application before the patent office which is followed
by publication of that patent for any objections. The very important step is to
request for examination followed by response to objection. Finally the patent
is granted by the Government of India for exclusive use of it. Prospective patentees must analyse the Patents Act to
understand statutory requirements like patentable subject matter, novelty,
non-obviousness, and industrial applicability. Study of Indian patent
jurisprudence through relevant case law needs to done in order to understand
the interpretation and application of patent law.
Analytical research
is used by inventors and applicants to conduct a thorough prior art search,
examining existing patents, publications, and technologies to determine if the
proposed invention is novel and non-obvious, thereby identifying potential
obstacles and preparing for the patent examination process.
Analytical research
methods are crucial for trademark registration in India, assessing the
viability, distinctiveness, and protect ability of a proposed trademark. The
first step is a comprehensive search of existing trademarks, identifying
potential conflicting marks. This prior art search ensures the proposed
trademark is unique and doesn't infringe on existing rights, preventing legal
complications and ensuring the proposed trademark doesn't infringe upon
existing rights.
Qualitative research
is a method used by patent applicants to gather detailed insights into their
innovation's market and industry. This helps them assess its practical utility
and market demand, ensuring it aligns with real-world needs and is commercially
viable. It also helps in understanding the competitive landscape by identifying
gaps, opportunities, and challenges in the industry. Additionally, it helps
applicants understand the real-world impact of their invention by engaging with
potential users, stakeholders, and experts.
Qualitative research
is a valuable tool for trademark applicants to understand consumer perception
and associations with their proposed trademark. Through focus groups, surveys,
and interviews, it helps assess the trademark's alignment with brand identity
and market positioning, ensuring it accurately represents the product or
service and resonates with the target audience. Additionally, it helps identify
potential trademark infringement risks by engaging with experts and industry
stakeholders, allowing them to anticipate conflicts and make necessary
adjustments to their trademark application. Overall, qualitative research is
essential for effective trademark application.
Patent and
Pharmatecuals companies in India
India's
biotechnology companies, including Biocon Limited, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories,
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Zydus Cadila, and Intas Pharmaceuticals, are
advancing biosimilar products, contributing to the pharmaceutical and
healthcare sectors. India has regulatory pathways for safety and efficacy in
biosimilar, compulsory licensing for essential medicines and data exclusivity
provisions for clinical trial data. These measures ensure access to essential
medicines and protect innovators' clinical trial data for a specified period.
A biosimilar product
patent is the intellectual property rights for a biologic medicine that is
highly similar to a reference biologic drug. In other words a biosimilar is a
product with a structure that closely resembles but is not identical to a brand
name biologic. These patents cover specific aspects of the biosimilar product,
such as its manufacturing process, formulation, or unique administration
method. The biosimilar patent landscape is complex, involving
composition-of-matter, method-of-use, and process patents. To commercialize a
biosimilar, manufacturers must negotiate licensing agreements with the
reference product's manufacturer or engage in legal battles to invalidate or
circumvent relevant patents.
The biosimilar
market has grown in recent years, offering cost-effective alternatives to
expensive biologics. However, the legal intricacies of biosimilar patents
remain a focus for the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory bodies, impacting
the availability and affordability of these critical medicines.
The COVID-19
pandemic has highlighted the significance of biosimilar in expanding access to
essential treatments like monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. These biosimilar
versions address supply chain issues, reduce costs, and increase global vaccine
availability, ensuring equitable access to life-saving treatments and
contributing to public health resilience and global recovery efforts.
The questions lies
over here is that are this Bio-similar products comes under the ambit of
patented products or not, or does it reduces the effects of the originality of
the product. In India, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO)
and its advisory bodies are responsible for overseeing the approval process for
biosimilar in India.
India's legal
landscape for biosimilar includes the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the
Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, which outline clinical trials, manufacturing,
labelling, and post-marketing surveillance. CDSCO guidelines provide detailed
information on the approval process, including data requirements and
immunogenicity assessments. India's compliance with the World Trade
Organization's TRIPS agreement impacts biosimilar' legal aspects, including
patent protection and data exclusivity.
A New Dimension in the field of Patent
The US Supreme
Court's decision in Diamond v. Chakraborty [11]in
1980 allowed living, genetically altered organisms to qualify for patent
protection as new manufactures or compositions of matter under Section 101 of
the US Patent Code. This broad directive expanded the categories of living
subject matter eligible for patent protection to include plants and animals.
The explosion of commercial interest in the field and the emergence of
commercial biotechnology companies have amplified the importance of
intellectual property in biomedical sciences. Many biotechnology firms find a
market niche between fundamental research and end product development in more
established commercial firms, needing intellectual property rights in
discoveries that arise significantly upstream from commercial product markets.
This creates pressure to patent discoveries closer to the work of research
scientists than to ultimate consumer products.
The passage of the
Bayh-Dole Act and the Stevenson-Wydler Act in 1980[12]
encouraged research institutions to patent discoveries made in the course of
government-sponsored research. This represented a 180° shift in policy for
health-related research institutions. Federal policy now reflects the opposite
assumption, stating that if research results are made widely available, they
will languish in government and university archives, unable to generate
commercial interest in using the results to develop commercial products.
Understanding patent protection in
India
A patent confers a
right to exclude anyone else from using an invention, even an innocent
infringer who independently develops the same invention without any knowledge
of the patent holder's rights. Trade secrets receive more limited protection
and may not be enforced against innocent infringers. Trade secrecy is one way
to keep inventions and discoveries out of the hands of competitors to protect
an investment in R&D. However, secrecy only works for inventions that can
be exploited commercially without disclosure, such as manufacturing processes.[13]
Many inventions and discoveries are self-disclosing once they are put on the
market in the form of a product, and thereafter may only be protected through a
patent. Even when secrecy is feasible, it might not be desirable. For some
inventions, patents provide an alternative strategy for protecting intellectual
property rights that does not require (and indeed does not permit) secrecy. To
get a patent, it is necessary to file an application that includes a full
disclosure of the invention and describes how to make and use it. In many parts
of the world, this disclosure will be made public 18 months after the filing
date of the application. In the US, the disclosure is made public when the
patent is issued.
Once the patent
application is on file, disclosure will not jeopardize the applicant's
prospects for obtaining a patent. A patent gives an inventor the rights to
exclude others from making, using, and selling the invention for a limited
term, 20 years from the application filing date in most of the world. During
the patent term, the inventor may choose to make, use, and sell the patented
invention herself (assuming this does not violate the patent rights of others
or any applicable laws), or to license others to do so on an exclusive or
non-exclusive basis, or even to suppress the use of the invention entirely. One
thing an inventor who wants a patent cannot do is keep the invention secret. In
the industrial realm, patents are generally believed to promote technological
progress by providing an economic incentive to make new inventions and
developing them into commercial products and by promoting disclosure of new
inventions to the public.
The extent to which
the patent system achieves these goals is essentially an empirical question
with different answers in different fields.
Requirement for Patent protection
Patent protection
consists of three basic requirements: novelty, utility, and non-obviousness.
Novelty refers to an invention that did not exist before, while utility is the
extent to which an invention constitutes a significant advance over what was
known previously. This standard is satisfied if the invention would not have
been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the field who was knowledgeable
about the prior art. The utility requirement limits patent protection to
inventions with practical applications, rather than basic knowledge. The
meaning of this requirement has varied over the years, from a minimal standard
to a stricter one that has sometimes approached what the FDA would require for
approval of a new drug. Recent developments in the courts and the PTO suggest
that the utility requirement may be receding from its all-time high level as an
obstacle to patent protection. In theory, the utility requirement can be
justified as a means of distinguishing between basic research discoveries that
are more likely to be effectively utilized if left in the public domain and
more practical technological applications that may require a patent to ensure
adequate incentives for commercial development. The Supreme Court has stated
that discoveries whose only value is as an object of scientific inquiry do not
satisfy the utility standard, suggesting that utility could be an important
limitation on the use of the patent system to protect research tools.
Experimental use exemption- a new loophole
The experimental use
exemption, or research exemption, is a legal provision that allows unlicensed
use of a patented invention for research or experimentation. This doctrine was
first introduced in 1813 by Justice Story in the case of Whittemore v. Cutter[14].
It is difficult to determine the scope of this exception, as it becomes an
issue only in patent infringement actions and patent holders are unlikely to
file a lawsuit against an academic researcher whose use of the invention is
commercially insignificant. Judicial pronouncements on the scope of the
experimental use exemption address situations where a patent holder finds a
defendant's activities sufficiently annoying to be worth pursuing a lawsuit.
Within this universe, the experimental use defense has been frequently raised
but almost never sustained. Nonetheless, courts have consistently recognized
the existence of an experimental use defense in theory, although the defense
has almost never succeeded in practice. Recent case law suggests that the experimental
use defense may be available only for pure research with no commercial
implications, if such a thing exists. In Roche Products v. Bolar Pharmaceutical
Company[15],
a 1984 decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the court
rejected the arguments of a generic drug manufacturer that the experimental use
defense should apply to its use of a patented drug to conduct clinical trials
during the patent term. The court characterized the defense as "truly
narrow," noting that the defendant's use of the drug was "no
dilettante affair such as Justice Story envisioned." The language of the
decision offers little hope of an exemption for research scientists who use
patented inventions with an aim to discover something of potential usefulness.
It certainly suggests that the defense would be unavailable whenever the
defendant's research is motivated by a commercial purpose. As a practical
matter, this parsimonious approach could seriously limit the availability of
the defense in fields of research with commercial significance, in which even
academic researchers are often motivated, at least in part, by commercial
interests.
Congress has
partially abrogated the decision of the Federal Circuit in Roche v. Bolar[16]
in the specific context of clinical trials of patented drugs by an amendment to
the patent statute. However, the amendment did not address the broader question
of when the experimental use defense would be available outside of that very
narrow setting. It is difficult to imagine how a broader experimental use
defense could be formulated that would exempt the use of research tools from
infringement liability without effectively eviscerating the value of patents on
research tools. Researchers are ordinary consumers of patented research tools,
and an excessively broad research exemption could eliminate incentives for
private firms to develop and disseminate new research tools, which could on balance,
do more harm than good to the research enterprise.
Research tools on patent Laws In India
Research tools are
not a term of art in patent law, and they are not categorically excluded from
patent protection. However, there are reasons to be wary of patents on research
tools. The ultimate social value of research tools is likely to be greatest
when they are widely available to all researchers who can use them. Patents
restrict access to inventions to increase profits for patent holders, and an
important research project might call for access to many research tools, which
could mount costs and administrative burdens if researchers need to obtain
separate licenses for each of these tools.[17]
The effects of patenting research tools will vary. For example, patents are
unlikely to interfere substantially with access to research tools like chemical
reagents that are readily available on the market at reasonable prices from
patent holders or licensees. Some research tools are available through
catalogues under conditions that approach an anonymous market, and some are
patented, but the patents are unlikely to interfere with dissemination. Another
risk is that patent holders will choose to license them on an exclusive basis
rather than on a nonexclusive basis, which could choke off the R&D of other
firms before it gets off the ground. This licensing strategy might make sense
for a start-up company that is short on current revenues, but it does not
maximize value in the long run from a broader social perspective. Another risk
is that patent holders will use a device employed by some biotechnology firms
of offering licenses that impose "reach-through" royalties on sales
of products developed in part through use of licensed research tools, even if
the patented inventions are not themselves incorporated into the final products.
Patent holders have had limited success with reach-through royalty licenses,
and it is difficult to figure out mutually agreeable license terms.
A further
complication arises in the case of inventions that have substantial current
value as research tools but might also be incorporated into commercial products
in the future. It might be necessary to offer exclusive rights in the ultimate
commercial products to innovating firms to give them adequate incentives to
develop the products, but it might be impossible to preserve this option
without limiting dissemination of the inventions for their present use as
research tools. In conclusion, exclusive rights risk inhibiting the optimal use
of research tools and interfering with downstream incentives for product
development. To address these challenges, it is essential to examine the
solutions
different institutions have come up with and see how they have operated in practice.
LEGAL RESEARCH ON TRADE MARK IN INDIA
Trademark search is
a crucial process that determines if a proposed trademark belongs to an
existing entity and has been used, registered, or pending for registration with
relevant authorities.[18]
Its purpose is to ensure the proposed trademark is available for use and
registration without causing damage or infringement to existing user's
intellectual property rights.[19]
1. Official trademark data base search: To conduct a
trademark search in India, first, search the official trademark database
maintained by the Indian Trademark Registry, which contains information on all
registered and pending trademark applications in the country. The search can be
conducted online or in person.
2. Common law search: Unregistered trademarks, which have gained
recognition and goodwill among consumers, are protected under common laws rather
than trademark-specific laws. They can be enforced through legal action. A
Common Law search may involve reviewing business directories, trade
publications, and websites to identify similar brands using the proposed mark
in the market.
3. Market surveys: A market survey is a trademark search that
assesses consumer recognition and association between a proposed trademark and
its intended goods or services. It evaluates the likelihood of confusion with
existing trademarks and determines if the proposed trademark is distinctive and
can serve as a source identifier. Market surveys can be conducted through
online surveys, focus groups, and interviews, with a representative sample of
consumers providing feedback on the proposed trademark.
4. Internet Search: Internet searches are a trademark search
method that involves examining the internet for potential trademark conflicts.
They aim to identify potential infringement issues or existing trademark
conflicts that may not be discovered through other search methods. This process
may involve reviewing search engine results, social media platforms, online
marketplaces, and other online sources.
5. Professional Trademark search services: Professional trademark
search services in India offer comprehensive searches for existing trademarks,
providing accurate results on the availability of proposed trademarks. These
services use various methods, including database searches, common law searches,
market surveys, and internet searches, to ensure accurate results.
Important consideration while doing a Trade Mark search
A trademark search
is a crucial step in protecting your intellectual property and brand identity.
It helps distinguish your goods or services from competitors, and ensuring that
your trademark is unique and legally defensible is vital. A comprehensive
trademark search involves various aspects to minimize the risk of potential
conflicts and legal issues. One of the fundamental aspects to consider during a
trademark search is the uniqueness of your proposed trademark. Your trademark
should be distinctive and not merely a generic or descriptive term that anyone
can use. Descriptive terms are typically challenging to register as trademarks
because they do not inherently indicate the source of a product or service. For
example, if you want to trademark the name "The Coffee House," it may
be considered too generic to qualify for trademark protection. Instead,
selecting a more unique and creative name like "BeanBrew Café" could
increase your chances of successful trademark registration. Another critical
consideration is the availability of your chosen trademark. To ensure your
trademark is available for registration, perform a comprehensive search of
existing trademarks, covering both registered trademarks with the United States
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or your country's equivalent authority and
unregistered, but still legally protected, trademarks. Failing to identify
potential conflicts can result in legal disputes and costly rebranding efforts
down the road. The geographic scope of your trademark search is also vital.
Trademarks are generally registered on a territorial basis, meaning that a
trademark registered in one country may not be protected in another. Therefore,
if you plan to expand your business internationally or even across state lines,
it's essential to conduct searches in all relevant jurisdictions to ensure your
trademark is available and not infringing on others. In addition to searching
for exact matches, it is essential to consider similar trademarks.
Trademarks that are
phonetically or visually similar to your proposed mark can potentially cause
confusion among consumers and result in legal challenges. Common-law trademarks
are unregistered marks used in commerce that have acquired rights through use.
Conducting internet searches, checking social media, and reviewing business
directories can help identify common-law trademarks that might conflict with
your proposed mark. Time is of the essence in trademark searches. The earlier
you conduct your search in your branding process, the better. Failure to
perform a thorough search before investing in marketing materials and business
operations can be costly if you later discover your chosen mark is not
available or already in use by others. Consulting with a trademark attorney or
professional is highly recommended to help interpret search results, assess the
risk of potential conflicts, and navigate the trademark registration process.
Important
consideration while doing Trade Mark search are-
1. Trade mark classification: The Indian Trademark
Registry uses the Nice Classification system for Trademark Search, categorizing
goods and services into 45 classes, to identify potential conflicts when
searching for existing trademarks similar to the proposed trademark in the same
or related classes.
2. Knock out search: A knock-out search is a preliminary
method used to identify identical or similar trademarks in a specific class of
goods or services, allowing for early identification of potential conflicts and
enabling the applicant to make necessary trademark changes.
3. Clearance search: A clearance search is a thorough process
that involves a thorough search of similar trademarks, including database,
common law, market surveys, and internet searches, to ensure that a proposed
trademark is not infringing on existing ones and is entirely unique.
4. INN search: An International Non-proprietary Name (INN) search is
necessary for pharmaceutical and healthcare product trademarks. The World
Health Organization (WHO) maintains a database of recognized INNs, unique
non-proprietary names for active pharmaceutical ingredients. No proposed
trademark in the pharmaceutical product class can be similar to any recognized
INN names.
5.
TESS facilities: The Trademark
Application System (TESS) is a tool that aids trademark applications by
allowing web browser searches of data related to active trademark applications
and registrations. It provides access to the exact trademark text and picture
database via the X-Search system, allowing US Patent and Trademark Office
attorneys to examine the database. TESS offers four search forms, including
Structured Form Search for inexperienced users, Free Form Search for more
complex queries, and Advanced Search for more complex queries. Users can also
browse through search indices to see indexed terms related to a search phrase,
and can switch between search forms throughout the search session.
Chapter 5: corporate strategies for
IP protection
Intellectual
property (IP) protection is crucial for a company's success in today's
competitive business environment. Key strategies include patent filings,
trademark registration, copyright protection, trade secrets, licensing
agreements, regular audits, employee training, and legal action against
infringers, cybersecurity measures, and global considerations. Patent filings
protect unique inventions and technologies, while trademark registration
protects a company's brand identity and reputation. Copyright protection
prohibits unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or use of creative works.
Trade secrets are safeguarded through non-disclosure agreements and internal
security measures. Licensing agreements allow a company to generate revenue
while maintaining control over IP usage. Regular audits assess the value and
vulnerabilities of the IP portfolio, while employee training educates them
about IP protection. Legal action against infringers deters future violations
and protects IP's integrity. Cybersecurity measures protect digital IP from
cyber threats. Global considerations account for international regulations,
making a comprehensive IP protection strategy essential for corporate success.
Chapter 6: Conclusion and Suggestions
Access to legal
research tools for patent and trademark law in India is crucial for legal
professionals, researchers, and businesses. These tools enable comprehensive
searches and help understand the nuances of Indian intellectual property law,
which is subject to frequent updates and changes. Staying informed is essential
for effective protection and management of intellectual property rights in
India's dynamic legal environment.
The research
methodology for analysing patent and trademark issues in corporate law involves
a comprehensive review of existing literature, legal frameworks, and the
corporate landscape. This includes examining statutes, case law, and academic
articles to establish a strong foundation of knowledge. The next phase involves
a thorough analysis of the corporate landscape, identifying the specific
industry, competitors, and potential threats and opportunities associated with
intellectual property. Empirical research methods, such as surveys and interviews
with key stakeholders, can provide valuable qualitative data that complements
the legal framework and highlights practical challenges and opportunities. The
research methodology then shifts towards a detailed analysis of the
corporation's existing patents and trademarks, using specialized software tools
and databases to identify assets, status, and potential infringements or
conflicts. A risk assessment is conducted to identify potential threats to the
company's IP, such as infringement risks from competitors or third parties, and
assess the strength and enforceability of existing patents and trademarks. This
risk assessment informs decisions about whether to pursue legal action to
protect IP assets or engage in licensing agreements to monetize them effectively.
The research
methodology also evaluates the corporation's IP management practices, examining
internal processes, policies, and procedures related to IP acquisition,
maintenance, and enforcement. It considers international aspects of IP, especially
if the corporation operates in multiple jurisdictions. Understanding the
intricacies of global IP protection, including the use of international
treaties and conventions, is crucial for companies with a global footprint.
Emerging trends and technologies are also considered, as the landscape of IP
law is continually evolving, with new challenges and opportunities emerging
from advancements in areas like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and
digital media. By employing this methodology, corporations can navigate the
complex terrain of intellectual property with confidence, ensuring their
innovations and brand identities are safeguarded while maximizing their
commercial potential.
The research
methodology for analyzing patent and trademark issues in corporate law is
crucial. It involves a well-structured approach, utilizing legal databases,
intellectual property offices, data analytics tools, and expert consultation.
These tools provide comprehensive legal information, enabling efficient
research. Citation analysis tools, such as Web of Science and Scopus, help
identify influential academic articles and legal cases related to the research
topic. Data analytics and visualization tools, like Microsoft Excel, Tableau,
or Python libraries like Matplotlib and Seaborn, help analyze and present data
effectively. Survey and questionnaire tools, such as SurveyMonkey, Google
Forms, or Qualtrics, streamline data collection and analysis. Case study
frameworks, such as the Harvard Business School Case Method, enable in-depth
examination and discussion of practical scenarios. Intellectual property
management software like Anaqua, IPfolio, or CPA Global can assist in managing
and analyzing patent and trademark portfolios. Expert consultation with legal
experts can guide research, validate findings, and provide valuable insights
into complex legal matters. Comparative analysis frameworks, such as SWOT
analysis or Porter's Five Forces, can assess how different companies or
industries handle patent and trademark issues. Ethical considerations are
essential, and tools for ensuring ethical research, such as informed consent
forms and data anonymization techniques, are recommended. Interdisciplinary
collaboration with professionals from related fields, such as technology experts,
marketing specialists, or financial analysts, can provide interdisciplinary
insights into the impact of patents and trademarks on corporate strategies and
operations. Legal opinion services from law firms specializing in intellectual
property can provide legal insights and interpretations of complex patent and
trademark issues. On Research on this topics, an analysis can be drawn that
more effective a research, the better the development and growth of IPR in
India leading to economic growth.
To confirm this
hypothesis, I have further drilled down on the use of patent and Trade Mark in
daily lives in a corporate world.
In conclusion,
conducting research on patent and trademark issues in corporate law requires a
combination of effective methodologies, appropriate tools, and ethical
considerations. The choice of tools should align with the research objectives
and methodology to ensure a comprehensive and successful study of intellectual
property in corporate law.
References
1. Lalit Jajpura Bhupinder Singha and
Rajkishore Nayak, “An Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights and their
Importance in Indian Context”, vol 22 https://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/41C26FED-7AFE-40EA-8736-4E6C516917AE.pdf
2. Dr. Peter Drahos, “THE UNIVERSALITY
OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT”, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98/wipo_unhchr_ip_pnl_98_1.pdf
3. National Intellectual Property Rights
policy, Govt. of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry,https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/Images/pdf/2016-_National_IPR_Policy-2016__English_and_Hindi.pdf
4. Divya
Samriti, “Role of IPR in Sustainable Development in India”, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4397580
5. Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh “Transforming Dimension of IPR: Challenges for
New Age Libraries”, http://www.nludelhi.ac.in/download/publication/2015/Transforming%20Dimension%20of%20IPR%20-%20Challenges%20for%20New%20Age%20Libraries.pdf
6. Prof. (Dr.) V.K. Ahuja “NLUA Journal of Intellectual Property Rights”
https://www.nluassam.ac.in/docs/Journals/IPR/NLUA_Journal_of_IPR_vol1_issue1.pdf
7. Dr. MOHD.HUSSAIN, “Research
Methodology and IPR”, http://www.ce.griet.ac.in/images/2021-22/Coursefile/RMIPR.pdf
8. Chandra Nath Saha & Sanjib Bhattacharya, “Intellectual
property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217699/
9. Federico Munari, “Review of
Literature on the Use and Impact of IPRs at the Firm Level: Patents, Trademarks
and Designs”, https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/meetings/Statistics_and_Economics_meeting-19-02-2013/Munari_review_final_en.pdf
10. “Patent Searching and Search
Resources -- An Introduction”, USPTO – Office of Patents Stakeholder Experience
Pro Se Assistance Center, https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Basics-of-Prior-Art-Searching.pdf
11. Dipankar Deb , Rajeeb Dey, &
Valentina E. Balas “Engineering Research Methodology”, ISSN 1868- 4394 ISSN
1868-4408 (electronic), Intelligent Systems Reference Library, ISBN 978-981-13-
2946-3 ISBN 978-981-13-2947-0 (eBook), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2947-
12. “Intellectual Property A Primer for Academia”
by Prof. Rupinder Tewari Ms. Mamta Bhardwa
13. David V. Thiel “Research Methods for
Engineers” Cambridge University Press, 978-1-107-03488- 4 – 2.
14. “Intellectual Property Rights” by
N.K.Acharya Asia Law House 6th Edition. ISBN: 978-93-81849-30-9
15. Goode
R, Chao B. Biological patent thickets and delayed access to biosimilar, an
American problem. J Law Biosci. (2022) doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsac022. PMID:
36072417; PMCID: PMC9439849
[1] Lalit Jajpura, Bhupinder Singha and Rajkishore Nayak,
‘An Introduction to Intellectual Property
Rights and their Importance in Indian Context’, Vol 22 2017 https://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/41C26FED-7AFE-40EA-8736-4E6C516917AE.pdf
[2] Making a mark Intellectual
property for business series, No1 https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sme/en/documents/guides/customization/making_a_mark_nig.pdf
[3] Máté, D., Kun, A.I. and Fenyves ‘’ The Impacts of Trademarks and Patents on
Labour Productivity in the Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Sectors’ https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168990/1/aej-v18-i41-p104.pdf
[4]Devki
Nandan, Trademark, “Introduction, Functions, Requirements &
Salient Features”,
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3625716
[5] V. K. Unni,’ Indian
Patent Law and TRIPS: Redrawing the Flexibility Framework in the Context of
Public Policy and Health’, Vol 25 Issue 1 https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/303865429.pdf
[6] Mohammad Amin Naser, “Rethinking the Foundations of Trademarks”,
Vol 5 Issue 1, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236347735.pdf
[7] Danai Christopoulou ·
Nikolaos Papageorgiadis · Chengang Wang & Georgios Magkonis, (2021) “IPR law protection and enforcement”https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11575-021-00443-0
[8] Supreet
Kaur ‘Interface between Intellectual Property and Competition Law:
Essential Facilities Doctrine’ (2011) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1802450
[9] Santanu
Mukherjee, ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Patents: Introduction to
Intellectual Property Rights’, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004542815_003
[10] Mimansha Patel & Nitin Patel “Exploring Research Methodology: Review Article”, Vol 6 issue 3,
(2019) https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.6_Issue.3_March2019/IJRR0011.pdf
[12]
“THE BAYH–DOLE ACT (P.L. 96–517,
AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK ACT OF 1980)— THE NEXT 25 YEARS” (June 2007)https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg36592/pdf/CHRG-110hhrg36592.pdf
[13] Chandra Nath
Saha and Sanjib
Bhattacharya, “Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications
in pharmaceutical industry” Vol 2(2) (2011) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217699/
[14] Whittemore v. Cutter 29FED.CAS.—71
[16] Roche
v. Bolar 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
[17] Zakir Thomas, “Patenting
of Research Tools - Issues and Some Pointers”, Vol 20 Issue 2, (2008) https://repository.nls.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1071&context=nlsir
[18] Richa Kumar, “RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADEMARK LAWS IN INDIA”, Vol 2 Issue 1, https://jlrjs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/1.-Richa-Kumar.pdf
[19] TANDON & CO ADVOCATES AND
SOLICITORS “Overview of trademark laws in
India”
Article Information
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CORPORATE LAW: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSING PATENT AND TRADEMARK ISSUES.
Authors: REETAMBHAR KUMAR DAS
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/05/22
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.