Open Access Research Article
INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 AND BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA 2023 - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Published Paper
Article Details
INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 AND BHARATIYA
NYAYA SANHITA 2023 - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
AUTHORED BY - A ABUTHAHIR
Assistant Professor of Law
Mother Terasa Law College,
Pudukkottai
ABSTRACT
This research article seeks to
provide a complete comparative analysis of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), highlighting the significant changes that
occurred throughout the reform. This research study focuses on historical
evolution, legislative foundations, and significant provisions. This study will
look closely at the structure and functioning of the IPC, as well as the growth
of BNS. This research paper provides a comprehensive comparative examination of
the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), diving into the
many legal nuances weaved throughout both important laws.
Keywords: Indian
Penal Code (IPC), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), legal reform, comparative
analysis, historical evolution, legislative frameworks.
Introduction:
India's criminal justice system has a
significant impact on its residents' lives. This system has recently undergone
significant revision, with the adoption of three new laws: the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the Bharatiya
Sakshya Adhiniyam. These laws are intended to replace the colonial-era statutes
The Indian Penal Code of 1860, the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1973, and the
Indian Evidence Act of 1872. As the landscape of crime and criminality has changed
considerably over the last century, these rules have struggled to keep up with
current demands. Recognizing the need for a legal framework that reflects
current reality, lawmakers have taken significant action to reform the criminal
justice system. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), which would replace
the Indian Penal Code of 1860 (IPC), was reintroduced in the Lok Sabha on
December 12, 2023, following the withdrawal of the initial draft to incorporate
recommendations from the Standing Committee. The updated Bill quickly
progressed through the parliamentary process, with the Lok Sabha adopting it on
December 20, 2023, and the Rajya Sabha following suit on December 21, 2023. The
three Bills obtained Presidential assent on December 25, 2023, ushering in a
new chapter in India's criminal justice system. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
(BNS) 2023 was presented to replace the Indian Penal Code (IPC), with the goal
of modernizing and refining the legal framework for dealing with various
offences. The BNS carefully balances the need to avoid over criminalization and
decriminalization. While it keeps key offenses such as those against the human
body and the state, it modernizes the law by removing potentially obsolete
clauses such as Sections 377, 124-A, and 309 of the IPC. Notably, the BNS makes
substantial headway by identifying and handling hit-and-run instances under
Section 106, which carries heightened penalties of up to ten years, indicating
a gradual shift in the legal landscape.
Historical Evolution (IPC)
The Indian Penal Code served as
India's official penal code, and it was inherited by British India. The code
was developed based on the suggestions of the first Law Commission of India,
which was constituted in 1834 under the Charter Act of 1833 and chaired by
Thomas Babington Macaulay. The document was then carefully scrutinized by
Barnes Peacock, who eventually became the first Chief Justice of the Calcutta
High Court, and the future puisne judges of the Calcutta High Court, who were
members of the Legislative Council, before being signed into law on October 6,
1860. The code was placed into effect on January 1, 1862. The code went into
effect in Jammu and Kashmir on October 31, 2019, as part of the Jammu and
Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019[1],
and superseded the state's Ranbir Penal Code.
For a long time, IPC has evolved in
response to new problems and complicated transformations in society. Exploring
the IPC's dynamic development throughout history is critical for understanding
its strengths and weaknesses, as well as its impact on the contemporary legal
environment. The concept of BNS emerged in response to the IPC's perceived
shortcomings, with the goal of increasing its effectiveness and relevance.
Through its historical context, BNS consistently upholds its vow to uphold
justice, impartiality, and relevance within the Indian judicial system,
exhibiting an unwavering commitment to these principles.
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The
Indian criminal justice system has evolved through a series of obstacles and
key milestones. In the beginning, there was no codified criminal law in
primitive communities, and justice was mainly administered by kings. Muslim
invasions introduced Mohammedan criminal law to the region. However, the most
major adjustments occurred with the entrance of the British, who significantly
improved the system. In 1834, the East India Company founded the Indian Law
Commission with the purpose of developing a comprehensive Penal Code. The
commission was directed by Thomas Babington Macaulay, a British colonialist and
Member of Parliament. After developing the code and soliciting feedback, the
Indian Penal Code (IPC) was passed on October 6, 1860, and went into force on
January 1, 1862. The Preamble of the IPC stated unequivocally that its goal was
to establish a standard criminal code for India, and the title emphasised the
importance of crime punishment[2].
Comparative Analysis: Legislative Frameworks and provision
The Indian Penal Code, 1860, is
divided into 23 chapters and 511 sections, each dealing with a specific type of
offence. The structural organization makes it easier to detect and categorize
criminal conduct, resulting in a more methodical approach to interpreting and
enforcing the law. The purpose of this act is to establish a general penal code
for India.
The code begins with an introduction before moving on to explanations and exceptions, and it covers a wide range of crimes and penalties. An offense's classification is determined by its seriousness and the harm it causes.
Punishments range from fines to
imprisonment and, in certain cases, the death penalty. Its rules and
regulations influence human behaviour, create law enforcement techniques, and
set the standard for justice. This reform adds 20 new offenses and removes 19
provisions, increases sentencing durations for 33 offenses, and raises fines
for 83 offenses. A mandatory minimum punishment has been implemented for 23
offenses. The recently established law embodies the ideas of fairness,
morality, and fundamental liberties while reflecting the ever-changing face of
criminal law. The proposed statute attempts to streamline legal terminology,
the legal process, and address pertinent issues such as cybercrime and
terrorism, all while maintaining public interest and involvement. The BNS rules
are intended to streamline legal terminology, improve procedural effectiveness,
and keep up with our society's ever-changing expectations.
Some of the important aspects and provisions of BNS are
1. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which
replaced the previous Indian Penal Code (IPC), is a codified substantive
criminal law. It specifies the acts or omissions that constitute a criminal
offense, as well as the resulting punishments, fines, or victim rights.
2. Structure and Organization: The
Indian Penal Code (IPC) consisted of 23 chapters and 511 parts. The Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) is a new law that has been divided into 20 chapters
and 358 sections[3].
3. Definition Clauses and Contextual
References: The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has a section for defining terminology
used in the BNS. Section 2 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita specifically lists
all of the terminology and allows for a contextual reading and comprehension of
those phrases (as an exception), as required by the other sections of the BNS.
4. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,
acknowledges 'transgender' as a gender alongside ‘men' and 'women' under
Section 2(10) for pronoun references. The IPC identified only'men' and 'women'
in reference to the meaning of the term 'gender' in the code. This is a
positive shift in thinking, as transgender persons and their rights have become
more widely recognized via various verdicts and societal developments. The
Supreme Court acknowledged transgender people and their right to
self-identification in the historic case of NALSA vs. UOI (2014) (2014 INSC275)[4].
5. Crimes against children and women.
The BNS has designated a specific chapter for offenses against women and children
as one category under Chapter 5 of the Sanhita. This encompasses sexual
offenses, criminal force and assault, marriage-related offenses, miscarriage,
and child abuse. Categorizing offences against children and women together
under one chapter (i.e. chapter 5) draws a parallel between their social
vulnerability and keeps them on an equal footing, owing to the clubbing of
these two as one kind of a category, which has drawn criticism from critics.
However, these two are prone to crime in terms of gender-specific offenses and
age vulnerabilities, and hence require special attention and categorization.
Whether putting women and children in the same group creates any harm in terms
of social or legal views or implications will be investigated in the future.
6. However, over time, people's
perspectives on the purpose of criminal law and punishment have evolved. The
criminal law attempts to reform and rehabilitate convicts, as well as to take a
victim-centric approach[5].
The courts and the
reformative doctrine hold that every saint has a past and every sinner has a
future. Community service has been included as a new form of punishment under
Section 4 of the Sanhita, indicating a reformative and restorative justice
approach in cases involving first-time offenders or minor offenses.
7. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita broadens
the definition of a document and its legal implications. With the advancement
of technology and the digitization of the world, the scope, creation, and storage
of documents has changed dramatically. The term 'document' now encompasses
electronic and digital documents (Section 2(8)).
8. Section 2 (21) defines'movable
property' as anything that does not fall within 'immovable property' and is not
limited by the phrase 'corporeal property'. According to BNS, mobile property
can therefore be either incorporeal or corporeal.
9. Greater Extra-Territorial
Applicability The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita now punishes abetting and abetting an
offense outside of India, that is, outside of India, for an offense committed
within India." A person abets an offense within the meaning of the BNS if
they, without and beyond India, abet the commission of any act in India which
would constitute an offense if committed in India," states Section 48 of
the Sanhita, which addresses assist beyond India for offenses in India.
10. concurrence and Age According to
Explanation 2 of Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, a man's sxual relations
with his woman Were illegal if she
was youngish than 15 times old (Connubial
rape is n't considered an offense else).
In Independent study vs. Union of India
(2017 INSC 1030), the Supreme Court,
still, read down this clause and changed the age to 18 times old (i.e., the age
of maturity and in agreement with the POCSO laws).[6]
The age of concurrence for women has
now been specifically raised by BNS to 18 times oldStill; connubial rape is
still not considered a crime under the Sanhita, with the exception of cases
involving women under the age of 18( i.e., when
concurrence isn't fairly honoured under POCSO).
11. Section 69 False Promise to Marry The
crime of engaging in sexual exertion under false pretenses, including a fraudulent
pledge to marry, has been explicitly conceded by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Indeed though the act is voluntary
and not rape in and of itself, it's considered illegal because the concurrence for it was given under false
pretenses, and according to court rulings, the
pledge in question should have been false from the launch( i.e., made with no intention of
fulfilling it).
12. Gender Neutral References In Sections
76 and 77(which deal with the offenses of assault and voyeurism, independently)
of the BNS, the term" man" has been substituted with" whoever"
to relate to the perpetrator or indicted.
In a analogous tone, Section 366A of
the Indian Penal Code established the crime of earning minor ladies. still,
Section 96 of the BNS addresses the crime of earning any sprat, anyhow of
gender, since the expression" any child" is used.
13. Snatching (Section 304) The BNS
establishes a distinct and particular crime for situations in which swiping involves
robbery. Snatching is an offense that has been on the rise and has come
commonplace over time; thus, it's applicable to fete and give for it
independently. It involves removing, securing, snatching, or seizing portable
property in order to commit theft[7].
According to Section 304(2) of the
Sanhita, snatching carries a maximum judgment of three times in captivity (any
kind) and a fine. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita does not, in proposition, contain
the expression" seceding," as used in the ancient legislation, or the
social crime. nevertheless,"
Acts venturing sovereignty, continuity, and integrity of India" are
included under Section According to the clause, if someone designedly or
designedly uses spoken or written words, signs, visual representations,
technological communication, fiscal
means, or any other system to arouse or
seek to excite,
Those who engage in or carry out
secession, fortified rebellion, subversive conditioning, or incite sentiments
of separatist exertion, or who peril India's sovereignty, continuity, or integrity, will be penalized with a life judgment
or a judgment that can last up to seven times, in addition
to a forfeiture.
As a result, the clause has been
rephrased and given a new name in the Sanhita. Obstacles and Difficulties in
Operations for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 On July 1, 2024, the new Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, went into effect. Due to its fully new legal ramifications
and operation, as well as certain notable additions and variations, this
substantial law will give a number of practical difficulties in its successful
operation.
1. Obstacles in logistics the
development of technology has been specifically conceded by the substantial
felonious law (BNS). For illustration, electronic and digital records are now
included in the BNS’s description of" documents"(Section 2(8)).
Questions that will come
over along the process include how to handle similar documents, colourful legal
and practical ramifications, and other technological aspects or bugs.
2. Junking of Section 377 Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita has fully excluded all citation of offences that are n't natural
(i.e., Section 377 IPC). The Supreme Court's five- judge panel incompletely capsized Section 377 in Navtej
Singh Johar vs. UOI( 2018 INSC 790), which interdicted same- coitus
connections between subscribing
grown-ups in circumstances involving consensual sexual contact. The remaining
offenses, similar as sodomy, animalism, andnon-consensual sexual relations,
were kept, nonetheless. But because BNS does n't view these conduct as crimes,
there's a significant loophole that can be abused and used to avoid discipline
for felonious exertion[8].
3. Sedition Law Section 152 of the BNS
addresses" Acts venturing sovereignty, continuity, and integrity of
India." The language and generalities employed are broad, private, and
nebulous, making them vulnerable to abuse or incorrect use by those in
positions of authority. Section 152 expands the compass of conditioning and
goods by mentioning this offense against" India" rather than just
the" government established by law." No precise description or
explanation is handed to clarify what precisely qualifies as" subversive
conditioning" or" separatist conditioning." Through a series of
court rulings, the provision will ultimately determine its factual meaning and compass.
4. Community Service In agreement with
BNS Section 4(f), community service has been included as a new type of discipline.
The Sanhita, still, makes no citation of what behaviours would be
considered" community service," nor does it outline how it should be
administered or covered continuously.
5. Clashing Duplication Because the BNS
is a broad felonious law that deals with offenses, it has mentioned several
offenses that are also addressed and penalized by other specific laws. This
results in spare tittles. Sections 111 to 113 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
for case, address the offenses of” systematized crime" and"
terrorism."
Conclusion
In summary, this research study
offers a thorough examination of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), examining their legislative frameworks, historical growth,
and important provisions. This analysis has given important insight into how
India's criminal laws have changed over time.
This significant change has the
potential to modernize the Indian judicial system and better satisfy the needs
of contemporary society while also expediting and enhancing the process's
general efficacy and equity. These bills will promote peace and harmony by
aggressively combating and regulating illegal conduct that endangers the peace
and stability of society.
They will address and resolve the
societal injustices and inequities that frequently act as catalysts for
criminal activity by going deeply into the reasons of criminal conduct, finally
focusing on the core of crime itself. BNS needs to cultivate a careful balance
between tradition and modernity in order to succeed. As a result, the legal
system will be better equipped to meet the complex demands of 21st-century
Indian society. This study urges all stakeholders to thoroughly evaluate and
enhance the criminal justice system for a more just and equitable future by
performing a comparative analysis, which adds to the ongoing discussion on
legal reform.
The change from the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) demonstrates how India's legal system has evolved. A comparison analysis reveals the stark contrasts between the two, highlighting the necessity of a thorough overhaul of the criminal justice system. The change from the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) demonstrates how India's legal system has evolved.
A comparison analysis reveals the
stark contrasts between the two, highlighting the necessity of a thorough
overhaul of the criminal justice system. As a product of its epoch, the IPC has
limits when it comes to dealing with contemporary complicated crimes and
reflects the punishing and hierarchical structure of colonial law. The BNS, on
the other hand, provides a transformative strategy that emphasizes restorative
justice, community-based projects, and human rights. There are significant
distinctions in the two codes' underlying ideas, substance, and structure. In
contrast to the intricate and occasionally unclear requirements of the IPC, the
BNS places a higher priority on relevance, accessibility, and clarity.
Furthermore, by including emerging issues like organized crime, economic
offenses, and cybercrime, the BNS recognizes the changing nature of
criminality. For these reforms to be successful, there must be consistent
political will, adequate resources, and effective implementation. To find
possible problems and create solutions, a comprehensive evaluation of the current
criminal justice system is required. The BNS will also need to be continuously
assessed and observed in order to guarantee its efficacy and flexibility in
dealing with new problems. The biggest democracy in the world has advanced
significantly with the switch from the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to the Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
It represents a legal system that is
sensitive to the desires of its people and gives equal weight to the rights of
the accused and the needs of victims, promoting a society that is more just and
equal for all. In the end, the BNS has the power to completely transform Indian
criminal justice, creating a more equitable and effective legal system that
takes advantage of past successes while addressing current adequate.
[1] Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization
Act, 2019
[4] Section 2(10) -The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,
NALSA vs. UOI (2014) (2014 INSC275)[4].
[6] (Section 2(8)), Section 2 (21),
Section 48 -The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
[7] Section 69, Sections 76 and 77
Section 366A Section 304 Section 304(2) BNS 2023
Article Information
INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 AND BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA 2023 - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Authors: A ABUTHAHIR
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2025/03/12
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.