COVID 19 PANDEMIC BEING A BREAKTHROUGH TO THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDIA BY - ANUSREE J & AKHIL SAJEEV
COVID 19 PANDEMIC BEING
A BREAKTHROUGH TO THE JUSTICE
SYSTEM IN INDIA
AUTHORED
BY - ANUSREE J & AKHIL SAJEEV
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic situation has
paved way for the Indian society to look into the different aspects of flaws in the practicalities of the existing legislations in the Indian Administration. Though this research,
the researcher is focusing on two
main areas of failure on the part of the government in the process
of handling pandemic
situation. The former refers to the existing
limited legislations on healthcare to deal with crisis situations including pandemic
outbreak or any other unexpected disease outbreak, the latter refers to the various privacy infringement during
this COVID-19 pandemic situation. The
Researcher also aims at suggesting some practical measures that shall be adopted
by the government to solve these drawbacks
thus being a model administrative body for other countries to look up to.
Keywords: - Epidemic
Disease Act 1897; Disaster Management Act 2005; Right to Privacy.
INTRODUCTION
The unprecedented situation of COVID – 19 pandemics is one of the biggest
challenges before the Government of
India. The Government in this crisis is duty bound to prevent spread of the pandemic and ensure that the public health
is not compromised. Considering the absence of a rational structured legislation, the center decided to invoke
the Epidemic Disease Act 1897 and The
Disaster Management Act 2005 to handle the pandemic. The central government and
state government are duty bound to
deal with dangerous epidemic disease under Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 for better prevention of the
widespread of dangerous epidemic diseases. The Disaster Management Act, 2005, which plays an eminent role in the
COVID-19 pandemic situation, also suffers from some major
flaws. Even during
the initial stages
of pandemic, the central
government could have used its powers
to increase the preparedness of COVID-19 at the hospitals and could have also enabled the
states to use the State Disaster Response Fund for taking necessary precautionary measures for its prevention. The government is in charge of taking measures for providing better facilities and amenities
for protecting the citizens from these
viruses, providing enough healthcare workers, hospitals, intensive care units
etc. it also has the responsibility
of providing vaccines to the citizens
for preventing the disease from affecting us.
Through this research, the researcher also focuses on bringing up practical
suggestions that shall be adopted
by the government to solve the drawbacks of the existing legislation.
Another area on which
government involvement is mandatory
is on protecting the right to privacy of citizen provided under Art 21
of the Constitution of India. The pandemic situation has brought to light the cases of privacy infringement of citizens
rights through newspapers and other media
resources. The right to privacy being a fundamental right shall not be violated
even during times of health
emergencies; therefore the government has the utmost responsibility to prevent any kind of infringement of privacy right
of the individual and the state must take every effort to retain the rights of the citizens with the
governing rules of the central government. With this research, the researchers also analysis the reasonability of the
various measures taken by the government
during this pandemic situation through theoretical analysis to draw a
conclusion on the efficiency of the government.
THE EPIDEMIC
DISEASE ACT 1897
In September 1896, one case of Bubonic Plague was detected in Mamdvi
(then in Bombay Presidency) now in
Gujarat. Bombay Presidency was one of the densely populated area and rapidly the Plague epidemic had spread
throughout the population in Bombay. India under the rule of queen and British Parliament had enacted the Epidemic
Disease Act 1897 to prevent the Plague from spreading to the rest of India. This century old blunt Act “The Epidemic Disease Act 1897
“enacted by the British Parliament was
the only enactment for the Indian government to rely upon to tackle the COVID 19
Pandemic outbreak which had spread throughout the India. The Act provided the power to invoke and search
for suspected plague cases in homes
and among passenger and thereafter
forcible segregation of affected person, disinfection, evacuation and demolition of infected place.
The Act also confers power to prevent
assembly of crowd, public meetings,
festivals and suspended pilgrimages. Corresponding to it
military powers were used to ensure the proper
implementation of the preventive measures. The Act was criticized as one
of the most draconian pieces of
sanitary legislation ever adopted in colonial India[1].
The Act is purely regulatory in nature
and emphasis the power of the government , “when the state government is
satisfied that the state or any part
thereof is visited by or threatened with an outbreak of any dangerous epidemic disease and if it thinks that the ordinary provisions
of the law are insufficient for the purpose
, then the state may take , or require or empower any person to take some
measures and by public notice
prescribe such temporary regulations to be observed by the public , the state government may prescribe regulations for inspection of persons travelling by railway or otherwise
and the segregation in hospital , temporary accommodation or otherwise of
persons suspected by the inspecting
officer of being infected with any such disease “[2].
It also imposes punishment of 6month imprisonment and 1000 rupees fine for disobeying the Act[3].
The punishment for such disobedience shall be same as that in section
-188 of Indian Penal
Code.
The Act legally protects the implementing officer who acts under the Act[4].
This shortest Act comprising 4
section was one of the frameworks to assist the central government in the COVID 19 pandemic situation.
Drawbacks of the Epidemic
Disease Act 1897
The Act is not in the line with the contemporary scientific understanding
of outbreak prevention and response
but only reflects the scientific and legal standards that prevailed at the time
when it was framed the Act doesn’t
reflect the spread of disease in the modern world. Some of the drawbacks
of the Act are as follows:
1. It is a
century old blunt Act for about 118 years old which is the major drawback of
the changing era.
2. Main motive
is to prevent the spread
of the disease and not to curb or eradicate
the disease which has already started to spread.
3. Inadequate definition if the word epidemic.
4. It doesn’t provide the scientific measures
or directions which have to be followed by the government at the time of epidemic.
5. It does not provide
the guideline for formation of a special
committee or a disaster management team to act in emergency.
6. Act is silent in taking measures for isolation of the suspected patients
of isolation centers.
7. Guidelines
for the distribution of vaccines
and drugs are not provided in the Act.
8. The Act so
concentrated towards the travel by ship or vessels and it is silent
in regard to air travel which is
common in the present scenario.
The Act is not sufficient to deal with the prevention and control of
communicable disease in the current situation.
So, the inadequacy of the legal frame has to
be considered by the Government.
Suggestion
Different states in India had invoked the provisions of Epidemic Disease
Act 1897, including Maharashtra,
Punjab, Gujarat. Then also the state and central government is struggling to
cop up with the Pandemic situation. Even the WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION & UNITED NATIONS were not established at the time
of such an enactment. With this COVID 19 pandemic the Government is understood with the difficulties faced by
the country to face such a pandemic so
accordingly the legislature has to enact a new enactment and the right to
health has to be incorporated in
Fundamental Rights. Some of the suggestions for a better legislation are as follows:
1. Right to health has to be added in Fundamental Rights.
Strong health laws have to be implemented with due diligence and transparency.
2. Healthcare system
has to be imposed
3. The state and local authorities have to be empowered to take appropriate action to tackle
the health emergency
4. The Epidemic
Act 1897 has to be repealed.
5. The tern epidemic isolation
quarantine and social
distancing has to be defined
6. Act has to emphasis
on right of citizen and imposes duties to the government to prevent and control epidemic
7. Delegated power should be limited
DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT 2005
From the early stages of breakdown of the pandemic, government invoked
the powers under the Disaster
Management Act, 2005 to increase the preparedness of COVID 19 at
the hospitals. It has enabled the
states to use funds from the State Disaster Response Fund and also provided a list of penal provisions against the person not abiding the government. Sec
51to 60 of the Disaster Management Act,2005 provided for the offences relating
to false claims, obstructions, warnings etc which amounts to an maximum imprisonment for 2 years and fine.
The Disaster Management Act, 2005 has enabled the establishment of
institutional framework necessary for
preventing and mitigating the adverse effects of disasters and chalks out
robust mechanism for the Disaster
Management[5].
As per the Act, The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) is established which is headed by
the Prime Minister, similarly, State Disaster
Management Authorities (SDMAs) is heading by the respective Chief Minister and
at the District Level the District
Disaster Management Authorities (DDMAs) is heading by the District Collector. These bodies are
statutorily bound to provide “a more proactive, holistic and integrated approach of strengthening disaster preparedness, mitigation and emergency response[6].”
The executive committee of the NDMA is called the National Executive Committee. It coordinates the response on behalf of the NDMA. It consists
of 14 Secretaries of the government of India as well as the chief of the integrated
defence staff. To assist the NDMA two other bodies have been created called
the National Institute
of Disaster Management (NIDM) and the
National Disaster Response Force (NDRF). The act also envisages the
establishment of National Executive
Council, Preparation of National Plan, and Guidelines for minimum Standards of relief[7].
The National Disaster Management Authority under the DM Act is the nodal
central body for coordinating
disaster management. The 2019 national disaster management plan issues deals exclusively with biological disaster and
health emergency, which is the broad legal framework within which the activities under COVID 19 are being carried out by
the union and state governments[8].
The chairperson of the authority, declared COVID 19 as a national disaster
under Sec 6 and 10 of the Act, to
undertake uniform lockdown regulation to implement throughout the country. National Disaster Management Act
under the Disaster Management Act lays down policies,
plans and guidelines for management of disaster and has formulated 30
guidelines on various disasters
including the ‘guidelines of management of biological disaster 2008’. These guidelines include; -
·
Closing of certain establishments and institutions,
place of worship etc in order to avoid crowding and social distancing.
·
Seeks to ensure unhindered access to essential
services like ration shops, pharmacies, health
services, banking services, telecommunications, petrol pumps, manufacturing of essential
commodities and unhindered supply of food, medical equipment
etc.
·
The Disaster Management Authority was conceived to
operate as part of co- operative federalism, with the national
authority issuing advisories and guidelines and the respective state governments formulating
state and district level responses and measures to ensure that region
and location specific
needs and challenges are addressed.
·
From and operational perspective, the deputy
commissioners and SDMs at the district level
are undertaking the task of ensuring inter departmental coordination,
evacuation of those endangered or likely
to spread effects of disease, identification of building to act as relief centres, establishment of
stockpiles of relief and rescue materials, provision of shelter, food, drinking water,
and essential provisions, health services amongst
others.
·
The authority also undertook protocol
to deal with biological or epidemiological disasters
such as COVID 19, for which special isolated health facilities have been created.
·
The National and State Disaster relief forces have
been trained to deal with biological disasters, especially with regards to immediate
evacuation of the people.
·
The authority also notified guidelines to provide
monetary relief and compensation to poor people
across the country who suffered loss during this pandemic.
·
The Act provides for detention of any person for
defying government orders including government
officials and directors of the private companies. Sec 51 to 60 deals
with these provisions with a
prescribed penalty of one year for first offence and two years for the second. The officials notified as
nodal officers; district magistrates in this case can summon anyone to
perform duties for disaster mitigation and relief. A department head could be held responsible for any
dereliction of duty by
the personnel reporting to him. A complaint
against any official can be made only to chairpersons of national, state or district
disaster management authorities.
Drawbacks of the Disaster
Management Act, 2005
The Pandemic has exposed the country to various dimensions of which we
have not travelled so far. The three
main aspects namely accountability, transparency and access to the government have become central to the discourse
around the state, law and the citizenship which is based on representation and emergencies. The response of the government had load
bare the opaque mechanisms of
governance in today’s world. it has outlined a peculiar effect of governance in
the form of partisan communication
between the media and the government. This is made possible by alteration in law, its operations and processes to suit the
purpose of the state in the name of contingency.
Even though the Disaster Management Act, 2005 gave the Central government
power to take quick policy decisions
and impose restrictions on people to manage a disaster, the Act had its failures,
which includes; -
·
It failed to classify properly what constitutes a
disaster, which is the reason why the current pandemic
was not under the purview
of the disaster management authority.
·
Failed to locate disaster prone zones and make special
provisions for those areas in need for
special attention. The states can play a more active role when such provisions
are made as this classification can help in mitigating
the damages that will be caused.
·
Even though the act provided a detailed action plan
right from the central government to the
district and the local levels to draw implement and execute a disaster
management plan, it did not take the responsibilities of each level. It failed to involve
local communities in management practices.
·
They failed to take into account the different gender
roles and responsibilities that are socially
attributed to men and women when making policies and designing disaster recovery programmes. The researchers in
this field have shown that the disaster impacts men and women differently.
·
There are complaints of discrimination, police
excesses, starvation, lack of medical aid etc
from various corners of the country. There is bar on jurisdiction of courts and
no grievance redressal mechanisms under Disaster Management Act.
·
The pandemic exposed the lack of resourcefulness of
the government and its various institutions
whether it was the unavailability of sufficient healthcare spaces, lack of
basic equipment for healthcare professionals and
supporting staff, or the lack of property equipped
laboratories capable of testing the samples. The government could not regulate the market, which was flooded
with overpriced and counterfeit masks and sanitizers.
·
Another important aspect of lockdown was the rumour
mill sustained by ill-informed WhatsApp forwards
and the irresponsible sections of media.
·
The worst sufferers have been the daily wage workers.
The pandemic has exposed the apathy
of the government towards its migrant labourers.
COVID 19 had rendered most of them
without food, proper living space and more unemployment. Unable to pay the rents, exposed them to protest on the streets.
Suggestions for improvement
in the Disaster Management
Act, 2005
·
By keeping in mind, the drawbacks of the said act, it
shall be an eye opener for the authorities concerned to take immediate and necessary actions
for the people in need.
·
The establishment of ‘disaster prone zones’ helps in promoting
more active and detailed study
analysis of the state and hence provide assistance to every person.
·
The establishment of proper grievance
cells, courts and laws will help people to address
their issues and get easy remedies for their issues.
·
Establishment of laws for protection of children, women and other vulnerable categories of people from exploitation and mental trauma during these situations of pandemic.
·
Need for establishment of provisions in laws regarding
the information and data passed
on the media as well as
social networking sites.
·
Addressing the needs of the poor, accessibility to resources irrespective of class, caste etc should
be the one of the key
areas where the law should be stringent.
·
Expanding the definition of disaster to include provisions for Pandemic situations and hence including
more stringent laws for dealing with situations of these kinds.
The
Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 and the
National Disaster Management Act of 2005 which was the most prevailing act
during this pandemic situation, clearly states that there is no provision in these acts to permits or
legitimizes the publication of personal data of the persons in a public
database.
During this COVID 19 pandemic situation, the use of electronic data and
transmission has replaced physical
documentation to a larger extent; hence increase in privacy infringement also. Government took the responsibility of
stringening the measures to protect the infringement of right to privacy as the existing laws were not successful in
meeting its objective and lead to the introduction of Personal
Data Protection Bill, 2019 in Lok Sabha.
The bill recognizes the protection of personal data as a vital element of
information privacy, use and flow of
personal data, a structure for processing of data and also prescribes remedies
for harmful and unauthorized
processing of data. The bill also recommends establishment of Data Protection Authority of India to safeguard
the interests of the data principal by preventing abuse and misuse of their
data and it shall be held responsible for monitoring and enforcing the provision
of this bill.
Failure on the part of
the government to protect the interest of the citizens
India is undergoing many challenges which include the inability to
control the disease; immense economic
losses, huge unemployment rate; increasing death rate etc which is an outcome
of the violation of those rights
provided to them by the Indian government. The most heartbreaking effect of COVID 19 pandemic is not the
death caused or spread of disease but the means and measures taken by the government in this matter. The reluctant
or casual responses from the side of the government are the reasons
of this uncontrollable spread
of disease in the Indian
society.
Some of the policies of the government that evidently shows the failure
on the part of the government are as
follows[9]:-
·
The abrupt decision
of LOCKDOWN as a containment strategy
Lockdown
was the most prevailing and most adopted strategy adopted by most of the
countries across the world to prevent
the spread of the disease by maintaining a physical distance between them. India being a nation with around 95% of the population is involved in unskilled employment of which most of them are paid
on the basic of daily wages. They are completely depended on the day to day work and run their family according
to it. The strategy of adopting Lock
down in India with short notice to the public has created a panicking situation
among the population of India as they
were not given enough time to prepare for the following days of unemployment which eventually lead them to die out of poverty.
Moreover,
around one-third of the urban population and quarter of the rural population
live in congested and crowded areas
in small dwellings with five or more people confined in one room facilities as they have left their home
land and settled in the cities in search of better job opportunities and work and their inability to afford better environment. The “stay at home” policy has confined them to these single
room environments for a prolonged period with lack of basic necessities and clean environment, has later become the
breeding ground for wide spread of disease effecting a huge number of citizens in a very short period of
time. Due to the unavailability of the expected physical
distancing, clean water to wash hands regularly, lack of money to even pay for the essentials has lead to this disasteristic effect
in the society.
If
these factors were taken into consideration beforehand, essentials commodities
were given free of cost to these poor
people, essential measures to provide social distancing environment by replacing them from their confined
environment to schools, flats etc. before adopting lockdown provisions in it would have
reduced the death rate as well as wide spread of disease in most of the states
in India. This flaw from the government has lead to death of huge masses of
population in India.
·
The concentration of power
with the central government alone.
The
decision of adopting lockdown was imposed by the central government with the
consultation with the National
Disaster Management Authority alone. The state government was not given an opportunity to address their concerns and
their requests were abruptly ignored or brushed aside. The lack of consultation and coordination among the state has
created confusion among the state in
matters of interstate movement of trains and buses which has lead to chaos and
delayed services to the citizen which
has hindered the lives of common individuals who used to travel from one area to another due to employment
etc. similarly abrupt cancellation of air services without giving proper beforehand instructions of rules of
lockdown has created a chaos to the people.
Above
all, the state government was made responsible for providing essential public
health and economic assistance during
lockdown to the citizens but no funding was provided by the central government for meeting the additional
requirements of the state which put the state in
an unhelpful situation
to meet the health and economic requirements of the state.
·
Unplanned, untimely declaration of lockdown
Lockdown
is a strategy that should be adopted as the past weapon for the prevention of the spread of the disease when all other
strategies have failed to do so, whereas in India, lockdown was adopted as the first measure to
prevent the spread of the disease. It was initiated in India when the virus has started to be
found in the individuals. It has inadequately
affected the economic development as
well as the livelihood of the citizen and forced the government to lift lockdown due to the unemployment
environment created in the society. Hence the state of lifting of lockdown was during the crucial times
of spread of disease which is the factor responsible for immense spread of the disease
in the country. The government’s lack of vision,
plan and observation of the
spread of virus has lead to thus untimely declarations in the society which is the sole reason for the death and wide spread of the disease in the
society.
·
Immense pressure on the health
sector
The
government during this pandemic situation has failed to provide enough
amenities such as personal protective
equipments which created an unsafe environment
for both the patients as well as the health services and is the
root cause of increase in death rate of many patients and health workers which is a violation of
their basic fundamental right to live with dignity which includes the right to die with dignity.
The
health care workers were under the duty to take care for the patients and to prevent the spread of the virus. the measures taken by them includes
expanding, training and deploying the public
health force, ramping up testing capacity and availability, developing a clear
plan to trace and quarantine contacts
and ensuring key facilities including hospital beds, intensive care units, ventilators and other machines, personal
protective equipment for health care workers etc. to treat and isolate the patients. The central
government’s actions and involvements were extremely limited and inadequate in respect with the rate of spread of the
disease; therefore, the whole pressure
was left on to the hospital workers with no help from the government. The lack
of amenities like personal protection
kits, intensive care units, beds for the patients and doctors and nurses taking double shifts were not even solving the issue. This careless attitude
can be experienced in the matters of vaccine availability also. The
failure of the government to take necessary
steps including providing the required necessities and amenities have lead to
death of patients in the hospital.
Other
impact can be seen in the delay of meditation and treatment given to those
patients with other adverse
health implications like TB, kidney failure, cancers etc. these people require regular study and checkup. The single minded focus on the COVID
19 because of the extreme pressure from the
government has put the other patients’
lives also in risk.
·
Failure on the part of the government to protect the privacy rights of the citizens.
A
pandemic situation is not common to an Indian society, our past history have
records of earlier pandemic situations and how our health workers
came and fought
for the prevention of the disease spread.
The same strategy
is followed by the health workers now but with the advancement and use of technology. The
health workers across the country are fighting together to provide prevention of excessive spread of this disease, which
is to an extent successful. Artificial intelligence and app based on technologies are used
by them to track hotspots, monitor and
understand the nature of COVID-19. The government of India has introduced the Aarogya Setu
application[10] to have a track on the spread of the
virus by digitally tracking COVID-19 patients
and those in close contact with the patients. The government also urged the
citizens to download the application
to identify potential risks and provide immediate help. Even though the application aims at providing users
information as to whether they are prone to a COVID-19 infection by analyzing
their proximity to COVID Positive
persons, the application had a drawback of collecting information from
persons without their knowledge and hence interfering in the privacy of the individual. It also had negative impacts
in the society for instance the health workers
will be shown prone to COVID-19 disease through the application, because of
which the lot of landlords
or neighbors harassed
or even refused to accommodate them.
Aarogya
Setu application also have the technological advancement of monitoring the GPS location
of an individual who is sick and also considers medical data to be personal
sensitive data and provides for
inbuilt privacy features to protect these data, because of the lack of stringent laws in India for the protection of privacy, these
data’s are prone to be misused. The lack
of proper study on an application for calculating the effected individual of a
society and the impact it shall
have on the society are to be studied before hand of the pandemic and not after the attack of the virus, which is why the
government could not provide enough measures for preventing the adverse impact on the society.
For
establishing an analytical framework for the creation of categorical variable
To assist the health workers
in collecting data of COVID-19
cases, a multidimensional descriptive typology[11] was developed which would establish an
analytical framework focusing on these categories such as proximity
and contact tracing;
symptom monitoring; quarantine control and flow
modeling. The information is obtained through telephone towers, mobile
applications, Bluetooth connections,
surveillance video, social media feeds, smart thermometers, credit card records, wearable, and several other
devices. In addition to these, Apple and Google which is world’s largest information technology companies have
unprecedentedly banded together to create
application programming interfaces that shall enable an inter- operation
between android and iOS devices to
provide a Bluetooth based exposure notification platform by building this functionality into the platform, thus
providing information related to health status, behavior or location of individuals to the public
health authorities or any other authorities to monitor on individuals personal information without
their explicit consent, which is an infringement of an individual’s right to privacy guaranteed by the Indian
Constitution.
The
lack of stringent laws on privacy is the root cause for the companies having
access to the personal data’s of the
individual, which are sources by which the personal data are collected without the consent of the individual as
an explicit consent is provided by us while using the devices, which is the main gateway through
with the personal
information are used and prevented
from questioning the consent.
Government Websites[12] like corona virus disease 19; trace
together and COVID safe are also eminent
platforms for infringement of a person’s right to privacy as a central server
is used to collect and record PII information
of citizens and upon which evaluation is conducted. Another authority such as marketing company or
advertising company shall be able to collect these information which includes their personal data such as name,
phone number, contact lists, postcode.
Home addresses, location trails and deduce a social communication through
messages sent to their phone numbers and market for their product. These kinds of getting text messages
to our personal phone without us providing information to them has increased
to a larger extend in this COVID 19
pandemic out of which majority of them turned to be fraudulent company with the intention to obtain money from
the patients or patients family making full utilization of this
pandemic situation.
The
lack of proper guidelines on what data shall be displayed and what shall not be
displayed is a reason for the
personal data being published without any restriction. The government should have made necessary rules and regulations
on the working of the government website as it is a platform which is accessible to all citizens
and therefore those
data have an high chance
of being misused
for other purposes
which shall also include crimes.
·
Negligence on the impact of lockdown on youngsters
This
COVID 19 pandemic situation has forced the government to initiate lockdown
measures across the country where the
individual’s right to free movement is curtailed to reduce the spread of disease. But prolonged lock down
scenarios affects the mental health of the individual. The online classes, work from home situations
engage students and employees whereas the majority unemployed youngsters are forced to live in isolation. To escape
from boredom they engage in online gaming platforms[13] such as video games. This may later
become an addiction. To an extend it is a stress management mechanism, but may
also open up a platform for hacking experts
to utilize the information and even control the minds of the player i.e. the
youngster. The player shall not check
for what all have they given consent to as they blindfoldly accept the “accept
cookie” icon and fall for these traps, which indirectly is an impact of COVID 19 pandemic situation.
Studies
have also proved that lockdown have created a platform for increasing rates of
crimes in the society and the
shocking news is that most of the crimes are committed by youngsters. The untimely and prolonged lockdown by the
government without giving any pre hand notice to the citizen gave them less time to prepare for the lockdown
situation. It has adversely impacted the youngsters
who are neither like school going
children who had online classes, nor employees
who have work. They eventually fall victims to heinous crimes of online fraud, child pornography
also. The lack of government’s vision
on how the lockdown shall impact the youngsters
are the reasons for increase in crimes committed by them like online frauds,
child pornography etc and those to which they are victims also.
Conclusion and Suggestions
The researchers also suggest the following measures that shall be taken
for better governance in this matter,
which includes;
Ø The term
‘data’ shall be also included in the definition clause of Indian Penal Code,
1857 and the inclusion of “data
theft” as a crime and necessary punishment shall be prescribed for the same.
Ø Strengthening of Cyber Security laws and other laws
for stringening the requirement of data
protection of the citizens.
Ø Amending
the age-old Epidemic Disease Act to include provisions for new bio weapons and mode it according to the needs of the existing society.
Ø Establishment
of a separate legislation for protection of the rights of the citizens during pandemic situations like COVID-19 as a
preparation for future pandemics and hence preventing this chaos situation in the future.
Thus, by following the suggestions, it can be ensured that the privacy of
the citizens is not violated during COVID-19 pandemic.
Along this research,
the researcher focused
her study on the main two areas on which government
need to incorporate more adequate measures for the welfare of the citizen and
also put forth suggestions that shall
be taken by the government for solving the issues of the existing scenarios.
[1] Criticism of the Act by Historian David
Arnold
[2] Section -2 of The Epidemic Disease Act 1897
[3] Section -3 of The Epidemic Disease
Act 1897
[4] Section -4 of The Epidemic Disease Act 1897
[5] Vishwanath Maraiah, “Disaster Mangemnt
Law: The Indian Experience”Paper presented at International Conferece on Treads
IN Economics, Humaities and Management (ICTEHM’14), Pattaya, Thailand (Aug,
13-14,2014)
[6] National Disaster Management Plan, 2016, A
Publication of the National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India XIII
(May 2016)
[7] Disaster Management Act, 2005, ss 8,11,12.
[8] ‘COVID 19 AND THE AMBIT OF THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT’
M.P Ram Mohan, Jacob P Alex;
The
Week April 26,2020.
[9] Jayati Ghosh, A critique of the Indian government’s
response to the COVID 19 pandemic, Journal of Industrial and Business
Economics, 2020,47:519-530.
[10] Sukhpreet kaur, Seerat Gill,
Namita Bhardaj, Rajinder kaur, Mitigating the Impact of COVID 19 Through Technological
Interventions in India Legally Equipped:Aarogya App Case Study, Vol. 21,Medico-Legal
Update, April-June 2021, No:2.
[11] Urs Gasser,Marcello Ienca,James Scheibner,Joanna
Sleigh, Effy Vagena, Digital tools against COVID 19:taxonomy, ethical challenges,
and navigation aid, Vol.2,Lancet Digital Health 2020, e425-34.
[12] Hyunghoon Cho, Daphne Ippolite, Yun William Yu, Contract
Tracing Mobile Apps for COVID 19: Privacy Considerations and Related Trade –offs,
arXiv.2003, cs.CR, 30 Mar 2020.
[13] Kritika Premnath Amin, Mark D.Griffiths, Deena Dimple
Dsouza, Online Gaming During the COVID 19 Pandemic in India: Strategies for
Work-Life Balance, International Journal of Mental Health and Addition, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00358-1.