Open Access Research Article
BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGYS LEGAL IMPLICATIONS IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT IN INDIA
Published Paper
Article Details
AUTHORED BY - MANSI JHA
This critical essay examines the transformative impact
of blockchain technology on healthcare data management in India. It
investigates various facets of blockchain's role in the healthcare industry,
including secure medical record storage, efficient automation of insurance
claims through smart contracts, end-to-end pharmaceutical traceability,
telemedicine facilitation, streamlined clinical trials and research, enhanced
drug discovery and development collaboration, public health surveillance,
patient-controlled data sharing, healthcare professional credential
verification, and transparency in healthcare pricing.
Introduction
Blockchain technology is poised to
revolutionize healthcare by addressing critical issues related to data
security, interoperability, and trust. This transformative innovation operates
on a decentralized ledger system, ensuring transparency, immutability, and
enhanced security. Its application in healthcare promises to reshape how
medical data is managed and shared.
At its core, blockchain is a
decentralized and distributed ledger where data is securely recorded in blocks,
each linked to the previous one, forming a chain. These blocks are encrypted,
and any attempt to alter them would require altering all subsequent blocks
across the entire network, making it highly secure. Transactions are verified
by a network of participants (nodes) through consensus mechanisms, reducing the
need for intermediaries[2].
Blockchain's potential in healthcare
is vast. It can securely store and share patient records, ensuring accuracy and
accessibility across authorized parties. Smart contracts can automate
healthcare agreements, streamlining processes.
However, these advancements raise
substantial legal concerns, particularly regarding patient data privacy,
consent mechanisms, and compliance with existing healthcare data laws.
Addressing these concerns is paramount as the healthcare industry adopts
blockchain technology, requiring a nuanced understanding of its legal
implications[3].
Blockchain
Technology in Healthcare Industry
Blockchain technology presents
transformative possibilities for the healthcare industry in India,
revolutionizing the way medical data and services are managed and delivered[4].
·
Secure Medical Records Management: Blockchain ensures secure storage and access to patient
records. Each entry is encrypted and immutable, reducing the risk of data
breaches[5].
·
Efficient Claims Processing: Blockchain's smart contracts automate insurance claims,
reducing administrative overhead and minimizing fraudulent claims[6].
This enhances the efficiency of the healthcare insurance ecosystem.
·
Drug Traceability and Supply Chain Management: Blockchain enables end-to-end
tracking of pharmaceuticals, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of drugs
in the supply chain. This is particularly valuable in India to combat
counterfeit medications.
·
Telemedicine and Remote Consultations: Patients can securely share medical records with
remote healthcare providers, facilitating telemedicine. Blockchain ensures data
integrity and privacy during virtual consultations.
·
Clinical Trials and Research: Blockchain streamlines the management of clinical trial
data, ensuring transparency and data integrity. Researchers can securely access
anonymized patient data for medical research[7].
·
Drug Discovery and Development: Pharmaceutical companies can securely collaborate on drug
development through blockchain, sharing research and data while maintaining
data security and IP protection.
·
Public Health Surveillance: Blockchain can be used to track disease outbreaks and manage
public health data efficiently. This is critical in a populous country like
India[8].
·
Patient-Generated Data: Patients can control and monetize their health data by
sharing it with researchers or healthcare providers securely through
blockchain.
·
Healthcare Credential Verification: Blockchain can verify the credentials of healthcare
professionals, reducing the risk of fraudulent practitioners in the healthcare
industry[9].
·
Transparency in Healthcare Pricing: Blockchain can provide transparency in healthcare pricing,
enabling patients to compare costs for medical services and procedures.
Legal Framework for Healthcare Data
India's legal landscape for
healthcare data protection is a complex interplay of domestic laws and an
evolving understanding of data privacy in the global context[10].
At the national level, laws such as
the Information Technology Act, 2000[11],
and the more recent Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019[12]
provide a foundational framework for data privacy. Additionally,
healthcare-specific laws, like the Clinical Establishments (Registration and
Regulation) Act, 2010[13],
govern aspects of healthcare delivery and data management.
However, Indian laws often face
challenges in addressing the intricacies introduced by blockchain technology[14]. Blockchain's
decentralized nature may not align neatly with existing data protection
principles.
Global standards, like the European
Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)[15]
and HIPPA[16] have
influenced discussions around data protection in India[17].
Foreign statutes, particularly those from countries with advanced blockchain
adoption, can provide insights into regulating the technology's legal
implications[18].
Indian laws currently lack precise
provisions for governing blockchain technology in healthcare[19].
Specific issues, such as determining liability in case of data breaches on a
blockchain, require tailored legal solutions[20].
This gap underscores the pressing need for India to formulate clear and
specific legislation addressing the unique challenges posed by blockchain in
the healthcare sector while ensuring compliance with global data protection
standards[21].
Patient Data Security
Blockchain technology significantly
enhances patient data privacy by providing secure and immutable record-keeping[22].
It ensures that once patient data is recorded, it remains unalterable. This
feature guards against unauthorized tampering, promoting data integrity and
privacy[23].
Robust encryption and decentralized storage mechanisms in blockchain reduce the
vulnerability to data breaches[24].
This added layer of security aligns with Indian laws like the Information
Technology Act, 2000[25].
Consent Mechanisms
Indian laws, including the
Information Technology Act and the pending Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019,
emphasize the importance of consent in data sharing. Blockchain facilitates
secure and auditable consent processes through smart contracts. These contracts
automate and record patient consent, ensuring compliance with Indian data
protection laws[26].
Data Ownership
Both Indian and international
regulations stress patient ownership of healthcare data[27].
Blockchain reinforces this by granting patients control over their data through
private keys. This concept mirrors data ownership principles found in
international laws, such as the GDPR in Europe[28].
Data Breach
A data breach in blockchain-stored
healthcare data can happen only if access controls are weak or vulnerabilities
exist at data entry points like hospitals[29].
Hackers may exploit these flaws to gain unauthorized access. While blockchain
offers robust security, safeguarding data necessitates securing the entire
ecosystem, not just the technology itself[30].
This multifaceted challenge arises due to the need for comprehensive protection
across interconnected components[31].
Smart Contracts in Medical Agreements
Evaluating the legal enforceability
of smart contracts in medical agreements is crucial. While the self-executing
nature of smart contracts offers potential efficiency gains, their recognition
under existing legal frameworks requires scrutiny[32].
Implementing smart contracts in
medical agreements holds distinct advantages[33].
Firstly, automation of payment and treatment processes can reduce
administrative overheads. Secondly, tamper-proof records on the blockchain
enhance transparency, minimizing disputes. Thirdly, real-time execution ensures
prompt patient care. These advantages can significantly streamline medical
procedures[34].
However, challenges emerge with the
application of smart contracts in medical contexts. Ambiguities in medical
terms and complex treatment conditions might hinder accurate contract coding.
Legal validity questions also arise, as current laws may not explicitly
accommodate smart contracts. Additionally, data privacy and security concerns
must be addressed to ensure compliance with healthcare regulations[35].
As with any new technology, ensuring that the nuances of medical agreements are
accurately represented in smart contracts is essential. Balancing innovation
with legal and regulatory standards will be a pivotal challenge in realizing
the potential benefits of smart contracts in medical agreements.
Data Privacy Compliance Challenge
Integrating blockchain's inherent
transparency with India's stringent data privacy laws, notably the impending
Personal Data Protection Bill, poses a significant challenge. Blockchain's
design emphasizes data immutability and accessibility, which may conflict with
the need to protect individuals' sensitive health information[36].
Solution: Employ permissioned blockchains to
strike a balance. Limit data access to authorized participants, ensuring
sensitive health data remains accessible only to relevant stakeholders.
Additionally, implement encryption mechanisms to protect confidential patient
information. Smart contracts can be designed to enforce granular data access
controls, ensuring that only parties with legitimate rights can access specific
data points. This addresses data privacy concerns while leveraging blockchain's
transparency for verified stakeholders.
Interoperability and Standardization
Challenge
The healthcare sector employs diverse
systems and standards, hindering seamless data sharing through blockchains[37].
Integrating various legacy systems with blockchain solutions presents a
considerable technical challenge[38].
Solution: Establish a national standard for
healthcare data representation on blockchain. This standardization would
facilitate data exchange among different healthcare providers, ensuring that
data formats are universally understandable. Regulatory bodies can mandate
adherence to these standards for entities adopting blockchain-based healthcare
systems. Such standardization promotes interoperability while maintaining the
integrity of the healthcare data shared across the network. By creating uniform
data structures and communication protocols, blockchain solutions can overcome
existing interoperability barriers.
Smart Contract Legitimacy Challenge
The legal recognition of smart
contracts as enforceable agreements under Indian law is a vital concern[39].
Existing legal frameworks may not explicitly encompass the unique attributes of
blockchain-based automated contracts[40].
Solution: Introduce legislative amendments to
explicitly recognize smart contracts as valid and enforceable agreements.
Simultaneously, create an official registry that curates and verifies legally
compliant smart contract templates. This registry could involve collaboration
between legal experts and blockchain technologists. By legally validating smart
contracts and providing a repository of trusted templates, this solution
ensures that blockchain-based medical agreements hold legal weight and mitigate
potential legal ambiguities.
Data Ownership and Consent Challenge
Defining data ownership and consent
mechanisms within blockchain-based healthcare systems requires precision.
Blockchain's decentralized nature can complicate traditional concepts of data
control.
Solution: Implement blockchain-based consent
mechanisms with user-friendly interfaces. Patients can explicitly grant and
revoke consent through secure blockchain transactions. These transactions are
recorded immutably, ensuring an audit trail of consent history. Additionally,
establish clear protocols for data ownership within smart contracts. Explicitly
state data ownership rights and responsibilities within these contracts,
aligning them with established data protection laws. Introducing a mechanism
for transferring data ownership between parties, subject to patient consent,
ensures data control remains with the individuals while facilitating legitimate
data sharing for medical purposes.
Security and Liability Challenge
Ensuring robust security and
assigning liability within blockchain-based healthcare networks is a
multifaceted challenge. The distributed and immutable nature of blockchain
contrasts with the evolving nature of cybersecurity threats[41].
Solution: Establish a dedicated regulatory
body overseeing blockchain healthcare security. This body would set and enforce
cybersecurity standards specific to healthcare systems, ensuring that
blockchain networks meet stringent security requirements. Additionally, develop
industry-specific insurance policies that address liability concerns arising
from security breaches. These policies would provide financial coverage for
losses incurred due to unauthorized access or data breaches. By creating a
regulatory authority and insurance framework tailored to the unique
cybersecurity landscape of healthcare blockchains, this solution enhances
overall system security while clarifying liability attribution in case of
security incidents.
Conclusion
This essay rigorously
examines blockchain technology's transformative potential in India's healthcare
sector. It has meticulously explored multifaceted applications of blockchain encompassing
secure medical record storage, automated insurance claims, pharmaceutical
traceability, telemedicine, streamlined clinical trials, collaborative drug
discovery, public health surveillance, patient data control, credential
verification, and pricing transparency.
Yet, within this
promising landscape, legal complexities emerge as a focal point. India's
existing legal framework must nimbly adapt to blockchain's decentralized
nature, necessitating precise and customized solutions. In navigating this
transformative terrain, India must adroitly balance innovation with legal
exactitude. Crafting meticulous legislation specific to blockchain's nuances
within healthcare is paramount, harmonized with global data protection
standards. This will ensure the secure, efficient, and transparent management
of healthcare data for its citizens, heralding a new era where technology and
law synergize to revolutionize healthcare, all the while fortifying patient
data security and augmenting healthcare service delivery.
References
Indian Statutes
Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act,
2010, Act No. 23 of 2010........... 7
Information Technology Act, 2000, Act No. 21, 2000.............................................................. 7
Other Authorities
Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019, Bill No. 373 of 2019....................................................... 7
Foreign Statutes
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996,
Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996 7
Regulation (EU) 2016/679, General Data Protection Regulation,
O.J. (L 119) 1 (2016)......... 7
Journal and Articles
Aganaba-Jeanty, T.,
Anissimov, S., & Fitzgerald, O. E. (2017). State of the Technology. In Blockchain
ClimateCup Round Table (pp. 3–4). Centre for International Governance
Innovation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30244.8.......................................................................... 11
Andres Guadamuz, Copyright,
Smart Contracts and the Blockchain, 2018 JOTWELL: J.
Things WE LIKE 1 (2018)................................................................................................................................... 12
Bach Nguyen, Exploring
Applications of Blockchain in Securing Electronic Medical Records, 20 J. HEALTH CARE L. & POL'y 99
(2017)....................................................................... 8
Batuhan Turkec, Legal
Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain, 22 GSI ARTICLETTER 250
(2020). 9
Devon S. Connor-Green, Blockchain
in Healthcare Data,
21 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L. J. 93 (2017) 9
Ducas, E., & Wilner, A. (2017). The security and
financial implications of blockchain technologies: Regulating emerging
technologies in Canada. International Journal, 72(4), 538–562.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017741909.......................................................................... 8
European Investment
Bank. (2021). Ethical and societal implications of AI and blockchain. In Artificial
intelligence, blockchain and the future of Europe: How disruptive technologies
create opportunities for a green and digital economy (pp. 85–90). European
Investment Bank. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep52657.1...................................................................... 4,
10
Guido Governatori , Florian
Idelberger , Zoran Milosevic , Regis Riveret, Giovanni
Sartor & Xiwei Xu, On Legal Contracts, Imperative and
Declarative Smart Contracts, and Blockchain Systems,
26 A.I. & L. 377 (2018)..................................................................................................................................... 9
Hakima Rym Rahal, Sihem Slatnia, Okba Kazar, Ezedin Barka,
Saad Harous, "Blockchain-based multi-diagnosis deep learning application
for various diseases classification," International Journal of Information
Security Journal, DOI 10.1007/s10207-023-00733-8 (Aug. 2023........................................ 5
Johan Loo, Medical
Records Are Shared More Efficiently through Blockchain Technology, 14
Amsterdam L.F. 34 (2022)................................................................................................................................ 5
Kevin DiGrazia, Cyber
Insurance, Data Security, and Blockchain in the Wake of the Equifax Breach,
13 J. Bus. & TECH. L. 255 (2018)................................................................................................ 8
Kollmann, T; Kleine-Stegemann, L; Then-Bergh, C; et al. Eras
of Digital Entrepreneurship Connecting the Past, Present, and Future BUSINESS
& INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING... 9
Kshetri, N. (2023).
Blockchain. In Fourth Revolution and the Bottom Four Billion: Making Technologies
Work for the Poor (pp. 72–102). University of Michigan Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.12205632.1...................................................... 11
Kulhari, S. (2018).
Fitting the Blockchain Solution into the GDPR Puzzle. In Building-Blocks of
a Data Protection Revolution: The Uneasy Case for Blockchain Technology to
Secure Privacy and Identity (1st ed., pp. 38–52). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
mbH. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv941qz6...... 7
Lehr, A. K. (2020).
Data-Sharing Platforms. In New Approaches to Supply Chain Traceability:
Implications for Xinjiang and Beyond (pp. 15–18). Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26936............................................................................. 11
Leonardo Peixoto Barbosa, 'Blockchain Smart Contracts: A
Socio-Legal Approach', (2021), 32, European Business Law Review, Issue 2, pp.
251-294,........................................................................ 5
Lin, C.-F. (2019).
Blockchainizing Food Law: Promises and Perils of Incorporating Distributed
Ledger Technologies to Food Safety, Traceability, and Sustainability
Governance. Food and Drug Law Journal, 74(4), 586–612.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27007714....................................................... 6
MANNING, R. A.
(2020). Emerging Technologies: New Challenges to Global Stability.
Atlantic Council. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep2600................................................................................. 7
Mario Iskander, Blockchain:
The Future of All Data, 22 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L. J.
1 (2017). 7
Maupin, J. (2017). Blockchains
and the G20: Building an Inclusive, Transparent and Accountable Digital Economy.
Centre for International Governance Innovation.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05191 9
Mayer AH, da Costa CA, Righi R da R. Electronic health
records in a Blockchain: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal.
2020;26(2):1273-1288. doi:10.1177/146045821986635...................... 8
Miriam, Doreen Hephzibah; Deepak Dahiya; Nitin; C.R. Rene
Robin, "Secured Cyber Security Algorithm for Healthcare System Using
Blockchain Technology," Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing Journal,
vol. 35, no. 2 (2023): 1889-1906, DOI 10.32604/iasc.2023.028850............................................ 9
Nikhil Kumar Maurya, Blockchain
Technology in the Development of Traditional Contract, 5 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN.
1812 (2022)................................................................... 12
Patrick Van
Eecke & Anne-Gabrielle Haie, Blockchain and the GDPR: The
EU Blockchain Observatory Report,
4 EUR. DATA PROT. L. REV. 531 (2018)............................................................. 7
ROGERS, Z. (2018).
Blockchain and the state: Vehicle or vice? AQ: Australian Quarterly, 89(1),
3–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2645019..................................................................................... 7
Ryan, R., &
Donohue, M. (2017). Securities on Blockchain. The Business Lawyer, 73(1),
85–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26419192................................................................................ 13
Segal G, Martsiano Y, Markinzon A, Mayer A, Halperin A,
Zimlichman E. A blockchain-based computerized network infrastructure for the
transparent, immutable calculation and dissemination of quantitative,
measurable parameters of academic and medical research publications. DIGITAL
HEALTH. 2023;9. doi:10.1177/2055207623119485........................................................................................... 5
Stephen Jones, Data
Breaches, Bitcoin, and Blockchain Technology: A Modern Approach to the
Data-Security Crisis, 50 TEX. TECH L. REV. 783 (2018)......................................................................... 8
Svorny, S. V.,
& Cannon, M. F. (2020). Health Care Workforce Reform: COVID-19
Spotlights Need for Changes to Clinician Licensing. Cato Institute.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep2688..... 6
Werbach, K. (2018).
Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law. Berkeley Technology Law
Journal, 33(2), 487–550. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2653314......................................................... 8
Zhiqiong June Wang, Between
Constancy and Change: Legal Practice and Legal Education in the Age of
Technology, 36 LAW CONTEXT: A Socio-LEGAL J. 64 (2019)....................................... 4
News Articles
Bradly Barth, Hacker Purportedly Selling Over 650,000 Stolen Medical
Records on Dark Web Marketplace, SC MAGAZINE, (Jun. 27, 2016),......................................................................................... 9
[2] European Investment Bank.
(2021). Ethical and societal implications of AI and blockchain. In Artificial
intelligence, blockchain and the future of Europe: How disruptive technologies
create opportunities for a green and digital economy (pp. 85–90). European
Investment Bank. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep52657.10
[3] Zhiqiong
June Wang, Between Constancy and Change: Legal Practice and Legal
Education in the Age of Technology, 36 LAW CONTEXT: A
Socio-LEGAL J. 64 (2019).
[4] Segal G, Martsiano Y, Markinzon A,
Mayer A, Halperin A, Zimlichman E. A blockchain-based computerized network
infrastructure for the transparent, immutable calculation and dissemination of
quantitative, measurable parameters of academic and medical research
publications. DIGITAL HEALTH. 2023;9. doi:10.1177/20552076231194851
[5] Johan
Loo, Medical Records Are Shared More Efficiently through Blockchain
Technology, 14 Amsterdam L.F. 34 (2022).
[6] Leonardo Peixoto Barbosa,
'Blockchain Smart Contracts: A Socio-Legal Approach', (2021), 32, European
Business Law Review, Issue 2, pp. 251-294,
[7] Hakima Rym Rahal, Sihem Slatnia,
Okba Kazar, Ezedin Barka, Saad Harous, "Blockchain-based multi-diagnosis
deep learning application for various diseases classification,"
International Journal of Information Security Journal, DOI 10.1007/s10207-023-00733-8
(Aug. 2023)
[8] Lin, C.-F. (2019).
Blockchainizing Food Law: Promises and Perils of Incorporating Distributed
Ledger Technologies to Food Safety, Traceability, and Sustainability
Governance. Food and Drug Law Journal, 74(4), 586–612.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27007714
[9] Svorny, S. V., &
Cannon, M. F. (2020). Health Care Workforce Reform: COVID-19 Spotlights Need
for Changes to Clinician Licensing. Cato Institute. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26888
[10] Kulhari, S. (2018). Fitting
the Blockchain Solution into the GDPR Puzzle. In Building-Blocks of a Data
Protection Revolution: The Uneasy Case for Blockchain Technology to Secure
Privacy and Identity (1st ed., pp. 38–52). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv941qz6.8
[14] ROGERS, Z. (2018).
Blockchain and the state: Vehicle or vice? AQ: Australian Quarterly, 89(1),
3–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26450190
[16] Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996)
[17] Patrick
Van Eecke & Anne-Gabrielle Haie, Blockchain and the GDPR:
The EU Blockchain Observatory Report,
4 EUR. DATA PROT. L. REV. 531 (2018).
[19] MANNING, R. A. (2020). Emerging
Technologies: New Challenges to Global Stability. Atlantic Council.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26000
[20] Stephen
Jones, Data Breaches, Bitcoin, and Blockchain Technology: A Modern
Approach to the Data-Security Crisis,
50 TEX. TECH L. REV. 783 (2018).
[21] Werbach, K. (2018). Trust,
but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law. Berkeley Technology Law
Journal, 33(2), 487–550. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26533144
[22] Mayer AH, da Costa CA, Righi R da
R. Electronic health records in a Blockchain: A systematic review. Health
Informatics Journal. 2020;26(2):1273-1288. doi:10.1177/1460458219866350
[23] Bach
Nguyen, Exploring Applications of Blockchain in Securing Electronic
Medical Records,
20 J. HEALTH CARE L. & POL'y 99 (2017).
[24] Ducas, E., & Wilner, A.
(2017). The security and financial implications of blockchain technologies:
Regulating emerging technologies in Canada. International Journal, 72(4),
538–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017741909
[26] Kevin
DiGrazia, Cyber Insurance, Data Security, and Blockchain in the Wake of
the Equifax Breach, 13 J. Bus. & TECH. L. 255
(2018).
[27] Maupin, J. (2017). Blockchains
and the G20: Building an Inclusive, Transparent and Accountable Digital Economy.
Centre for International Governance Innovation.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05191
[28] Kollmann, T; Kleine-Stegemann, L;
Then-Bergh, C; et al. Eras of Digital Entrepreneurship Connecting the Past,
Present, and Future BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
[29] Devon
S. Connor-Green, Blockchain in Healthcare Data,
21 INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L. J. 93 (2017).
[30] Bradly Barth, Hacker Purportedly
Selling Over 650,000 Stolen Medical Records on Dark Web Marketplace, SC
MAGAZINE, (Jun. 27, 2016),
[31] Miriam, Doreen Hephzibah; Deepak
Dahiya; Nitin; C.R. Rene Robin, "Secured Cyber Security Algorithm for
Healthcare System Using Blockchain Technology," Intelligent Automation and
Soft Computing Journal, vol. 35, no. 2 (2023): 1889-1906, DOI
10.32604/iasc.2023.028850.
[33] Guido
Governatori , Florian Idelberger , Zoran Milosevic , Regis Riveret, Giovanni
Sartor & Xiwei Xu, On Legal Contracts, Imperative and
Declarative Smart Contracts, and Blockchain Systems,
26 A.I. & L. 377 (2018).
[34] Cadogan, M. S. (2023).
Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology: Definition and Scope. In Enforcing
Smart Legal Contracts: Prospects and Challenges (pp. 2–2). Centre for
International Governance Innovation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep47331.7
[36] Lehr, A. K. (2020).
Data-Sharing Platforms. In New Approaches to Supply Chain Traceability:
Implications for Xinjiang and Beyond (pp. 15–18). Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26936.6
[37] Aganaba-Jeanty, T., Anissimov,
S., & Fitzgerald, O. E. (2017). State of the Technology. In Blockchain
ClimateCup Round Table (pp. 3–4). Centre for International Governance
Innovation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30244.8
[38] Kshetri, N. (2023).
Blockchain. In Fourth Revolution and the Bottom Four Billion: Making
Technologies Work for the Poor (pp. 72–102). University of Michigan Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.12205632.10
[39] Andres
Guadamuz, Copyright, Smart Contracts and the Blockchain,
2018 JOTWELL: J. Things WE LIKE 1 (2018).
[40] Nikhil
Kumar Maurya, Blockchain Technology in the Development of Traditional
Contract, 5 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 1812
(2022).
[41] Ryan, R., & Donohue, M.
(2017). Securities on Blockchain. The Business Lawyer, 73(1),
85–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26419192
Article Information
BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGYS LEGAL IMPLICATIONS IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT IN INDIA
Authors: MANSI JHA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2024/06/17
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.