Open Access Research Article
AN ANALYSIS OF WHITE-COLLAR CRIMES: THROUGH THE LENS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Published Paper
Article Details
AN ANALYSIS OF WHITE-COLLAR CRIMES:
THROUGH THE LENS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
AUTHORED BY - ASHMIT KHURANA
Abstract
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
is a relatively recent concept that can be interpreted in a number of ways.
Government policies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) are a reassertion
of state power in an area where the involvement of public authorities was once
meant to be limited. Nonetheless, the trajectory and consequences of these
governmental initiatives on CSR hinge on the explicit objectives of the
policies and the dynamics of the relationship between the government and the
corporate sector. This paper shall extensively examine the point of
intersection of white-collar crimes and CSR along with the implications of
misuse of CSR funds concerning white-collar crimes. White-collar crime, a
generic term encompassing all forms of criminal misuse of trust, creates
numerous problems related to economic, political, and moral harm to all sectors
of society and contributes to the perpetuation of common or street crime. A
problem inherent to this study is a concrete definition of white-collar crimes.
Categorising white-collar crime by its descriptions is challenging because new
variations constantly appear. A psychological study identifies the social
settings of white-collar crime, dividing it into four primary categories.
Identifying the reasons why such crimes are committed, ranging from the need
for monetary benefit to obstacles to goal attainment, expertise proficiency,
the belief of helping the victim, and the impact of group behavior, is
essential to prevent and solve such crimes. These efforts can be varied,
including attempts to direct business actions toward accomplishing political
goals and offering governmental support to business strategies. Firms that
emphasize Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are not free from white-collar
crime. The weakness lies in individuals taking advantage of their commanding
positions for personal gain, regardless of the firm's moral principles. Firms
implement CSR initiatives more to improve their reputation and avoid legal
consequences than for genuine commitment towards social welfare. CSR is the
thoughtful and responsible way of doing business. White-collar crime involves
illegal activities performed by those in power. The link between CSR and
white-collar crime is complex, but there is room for real change. Through this
paper, the reader is able to determine the stance of CSR regarding white-collar
crime.
Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, White-Collar Crimes, Intersection,
Implications, Government.
Introduction
The concept of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) was first coined by Howard Bowen in 1953 and was
introduced for the first time in his influential work, “Social Responsibilities
of the Businessman”[1]. It has
been defined as ‘obligations of
businessman to pursue those policies, to make those decisions, or to follow
those lines of action which are desirable to the objectives and values of our
society’.
At the turn of the 21st century,
organisations such as the United Nations and the OECD, among other
international bodies, noted the critical function of Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) in driving social equity and development. With the growth
of companies and becoming key elements of national economies, it was largely
accepted that businesses have a crucial function in society's progress. Profits
made by shareholders are fed back into the economy through spending, taxes, and
investment on social causes. The taxes fund public services. In essence, the
financial success of businesses can fund initiatives that help reduce poverty,
preserve the environment, and undertake other activities to promote equitable
and sustainable growth. India, demonstrating a profound dedication to socialist
principles and the welfare of its populace, mandates specific categories of
enterprises to comply with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) obligations as
stipulated under Section 135 of the Companies Act[2].
Section 135 and the CSR Rules are intended to extend the range of compliance
obligations to cover holding and subsidiary companies and foreign companies
with branches or project offices in India if they meet established criteria.
The criteria set forth are worth at least Rs. 5 billion, turnover of at least
Rs. 10 billion, and net profits of at least Rs. 50 million during any of the
preceding 3 financial years. CSR entails companies actively participating in
benefiting society by weaving together economic, environmental, and social
goals within their operational and growth strategies[3].
The company often misuses these funds because of social and equitable welfare and
development from CSR funds. White Collar Crimes (WCC) have been prevalent since
the dawn of age. Edwin Sutherland defined White Collar Crimes as “A crime committed by a person of
responsibility and high Social Status in the course of occupation”. This definition
encompasses 4 criteria: A crime Committed by a person of Social Status in his
profession, and a violation of trust. Edwin Sutherland introduced white-collar
crime to describe offences committed by individuals of high social status and
respectability within their professional lives. This concept, first presented
in 1939 during a speech to the American Sociological Society, has sparked
ongoing debates about what specific crimes fall under the umbrella of
white-collar crime. Financially motivated non-violent crimes fall under this
category. Essential instances of white-collar crime include insider trading,
fraud, breaking environmental regulations, and breaking antitrust laws.
White-collar crime also encompasses money laundering and public corruption,
which are strategies to stop public officials from abusing their positions of
authority. White-collar crimes are still largely unaccounted for by a single
criminological theory despite advances in our understanding of this type of
crime[4]. This
demonstrates the different perspectives criminology, law, and sociology
professionals hold. Furthermore, many people know the detrimental societal
deeds that influential people have done during their professional or economic
lives. These actions draw attention to more significant social problems that go
beyond classic crimes like robbery, murder, and assault. Various types of crime
occur within the corporate structure, often called White Collar due to their
non-violent and financial nature. Various crimes fall under the umbrella of
WCC, including but not limited to money laundering, insider trading, insurance
fraud, counterfeit currency, and fund manipulation. The paper is highly
concerned with the intersection of White Collar Crimes (WCC) and Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) and, subsequently, the implications that arise out
of it, including multiple factors to determine an effective control and
regulatory mechanism. These questions will be answered sequentially in 3 limbs.
Where does the intersection of
Corporate Social Responsibility and White-Collar Crimes occur?
The opportunity approach to
white-collar crime, as discussed by Simpson and Michael L. Benson, provides a
sophisticated explanation of how these crimes arise not just from personal
deviance but from the identification and exploitation of opportunities in
organizational contexts. This approach posits that white-collar crimes are not
motivated by intrinsic criminality but by situational and organizational
factors that enable or even promote illegal acts. Technically, people commit
white-collar crime because they see opportunities arising from lax regulations,
poor regulation, or systemic failure in the environment in which they work. For
instance, loose regulatory systems, weak laws that are poorly enforced, or
absence of internal checks and balances can facilitate the deviants to take
advantage of these loopholes for self-benefit. The opportunity approach also
identifies the influence of situational factors, such as access to confidential
data, the ability to manipulate finance records, or the force to meet
unrealistic performance targets, which can compel people to engage in unethical
or illegal acts. Organizational structures and culture are also significant in
creating opportunities for such offenses. Hierarchical structures with less
transparency can permit upper-level workers to hide illegal activity, while a
profit-first corporate culture might tacitly condone or ignore unethical
behavior. These environments are fertile grounds for white-collar crime to
flourish, not only due to individual decision-making, but because the setting
actively promotes opportunities for criminal behavior[5].
There is an implicit recognition of the relationship between Corporate Social
Responsibility and White Collar Crimes. A crucial yet meaningful scope of
improvement can be made concerning their intricate relationship. CSR can be
divided into 4 categories: Environmental
Responsibility, Economic Responsibility, Philanthropic Responsibility, and
Ethical Responsibility. Due to the lack of existing theoretical literature on
the relationship between WCC and CSR, it becomes essential to hypothesize the
problem to determine their relationship effectively[6]. White Collar Crimes are of
various kinds[7]:
?
Money laundering: Strongly associated with organized crime,
converts proceeds obtained unlawfully into assets that appear to be legitimate.
This procedure gives thieves a false sense of legitimacy in addition to helping
them manage their illegal riches. Tighter regulation is required since this
practice negatively affects a country's political stability and economy and
encourages the expansion of illicit enterprises.
?
Insider Trading: Directors, executives, and major shareholders
who own more than 10% of the company's stock securities are considered
corporate insiders. Conducting business with the company's shares using
confidential information is considered fraudulent since this violates the
fiduciary obligation of shareholders. Insiders breach their commitment to the
shareholders when they make purchases or sales based on confidential
information about the business. However, the word “insiders” for illicit
insider trading goes beyond significant shareholders and company executives. It
may also apply to anyone who violates a trust duty by trading shares based on
secret information.
?
Bank Fraud: Financial criminals have targeted cooperative and
nationalized banks, stealing substantial amounts of money through shady
relationships with the management teams of the institutions. These big
borrowers account for most of the nationalized banks’ non-performing assets. In
Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Gujarat, several Urban Cooperative Banks
(UCBs) were founded by dishonest individuals in the 1990s. Their ability to
offer unaffordably high interest rates allowed them to amass massive deposits.
Subsequently, these funds were embezzled by loans to themselves or colleagues
within their criminal organization. These malpractices unavoidably caused these
bank failures to devastate many small investors[8].
A significant question
that needs to be answered concerning the relationship between CSR and WCC is ‘Whether there is any impact of CSR on
shareholder value’? The challenge of determining whether the links between
CSR and business success are truly causal or are only the result of model
errors is made more difficult by unobserved variability at the firm level that
is associated with CSR[9]. One
of the key challenges to measuring the actual effect of CSR on shareholder
value is that there is observed firm-level unobserved heterogeneity, which has
a potential to greatly affect results. Company culture, management style,
sector type, and organizational effectiveness tend not to be controlled for in
research, yet may have a close relationship with CSR practices as well as to
financial results. What this implies is that any reported correlation between
shareholder value and CSR could be a result of these unmeasured variables, and
not CSR in and of itself being the cause.In some cases, CSR can lead to
long-term benefits, such as improved reputation, customer loyalty, and
operating efficiencies, that can contribute to shareholder value. But in others,
CSR might be considered a cost or distraction from the primary business
mission, thus potentially hurting profitability and shareholder returns. The
financial performance effect of CSR is generally mediated by the firm-specific
circumstances that are intractable to measure or monitor, which results in
making it challenging to provide conclusive evidence. The primary points of
view in the present theoretical discourse are stakeholder value maximization
and shareholder expense views. According to the shareholder expense view, a
company's social duty is to increase profits above all else. According to
Friedman, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is when managers use the money
shareholders donate to support social issues; he compares this to collecting
taxes and distributing the money they collect[10]. In his opinion, a
company's precious resources—which ought to be used to maximize shareholder
value—are being misused by CSR. The study conducted by Manchiraju & Rajgopal, the first to examine the impact of
legislatively affirming firms to mandatorily spend on CSR, demonstrated that
this mandate often leads to negative consequences for the shareholders[11].
Various criminological theories explain how white-collar crime (WCC) occurs at
the organizational and managerial levels, usually resulting in the
misappropriation of funds; insider trading occurs at macro and micro levels
within organizations involved in WCC activities, thereby increasing the risk to
shareholders’ value. Social Learning Theory (SLT) and the Differential
Association Theory (DAT), hold that social encounters learn criminal behaviors[12].
Through these exchanges, people pick up meanings and attitudes that make them
more likely to commit crimes and the skills necessary to carry them out. This
theory and SLT are similar in that they substantially impact how people
perceive, feel, and justify illegal and compliant behaviour. White-collar crime
has been explained by SLT, which suggests that people develop the motivations
and drives needed to commit this type of crime through favourable definitions.
It is conceivable that white-collar crime occurs when definitions that support
breaking the law outweigh those that do not[13]. A conclusion can be drawn
concerning the convergence of CSR and WCC. White Collar Crimes are exhibited by
firms and companies that aim to maximize shareholder value through illicit
means, and shareholder value impacts Corporate Social Responsibility;
therefore, a connection between them can be drawn. Contextualising it after
considering the factual matrix present, it can be established that when
companies engage in behaviour related to embezzlement and fraud, it
subsequently reduces the shareholders’ value, impacting the funds concerned
explicitly with the appropriation of CSR activities.
What are the implications that arise out of this
intersection?
Several important implications can be inferred from this
overlap. These include financial implications, legal implications, social
confidence impacts, and psychological implications. The four major areas of
corporate social responsibility (CSR) include financial responsibility,
philanthropic responsibility, ethical responsibility, and environmental
responsibility. Whenever funds that are supposed to be utilized for CSR
activities are unlawfully transferred using any embezzlement scheme, it has a
negative impact on the social and equitable welfare schemes that aim to promote
societal harmony[14].
Markets respond well to the needs of society when the social costs and private
costs are aligned. When there exists a gap in this, it leads to a conflict
between corporations and society[15].
Thus, both prevention of WCC and incorporation of CSR as a component of
corporate strategy will result in a decrease in the contradictions that occur
between them. Conversely, while CSR practice aims to instill moral behavior,
public welfare, and ethical business practices, white-collar crimes such as
fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, and corruption are usually carried out by
those individuals or organizations possessing the means and ability to utilize
their position to their own benefit or corporate interest. The first direct
implication of the confluence of CSR and white-collar crime is that it does
reputational damage to a firm. Companies spend millions of dollars in
undertaking CSR efforts with a hope of earning stakeholder trust among
investors, customers, employees, and society as a whole. If such a firm gets
implicated in a case of white-collar crime, the credibility of CSR activities
takes a hit. The public, stakeholders, and even regulatory authorities might
perceive that the company is hypocritical because it has not maintained the
ethical and social norms it professes to adopt publicly. Such erosion of trust
could lead to lower consumer loyalty, market share, and declining stock prices[16].
The link between CSR and white-collar crime is especially relevant when a stake
is considered in terms of shareholder value. Shareholders, for the most part,
are concerned with maintaining or growing the value of their holdings. But if a
company's CSR practices are being used as a front for something shady or
criminal in nature, shareholders are open to a greater financial risk. The
reputational and legal consequences of white-collar crime can lead to crashing
stocks, flight of investors, and the loss of dividends. In a worst-case
scenario, corporations engaged in widespread white-collar crime may be driven
into bankruptcy or takeover by other corporations, resulting in the total
destruction of shareholder value[17].
The genesis of conflict between these parts of society can be traced back to
different perceptions concerning what is just and fair. An example elucidated
through this paper is that the financial sector often indulges in practices
related to discrimination and insider trading, a form of WCC, therefore
increasing the tension between private interests and social interests. A
serious implication of this intersection can be attributed to the value of the
stock in the stock market value. A study conducted in 1995 by Hamilton examined
the effect on stock prices of companies whose toxic release inventory (TRI)
data was made public by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This
analysis helped to clarify the relationship between CSR and capital markets.
Hamilton examined the effects of harmful release announcements on the releasing
companies' stock market values relative to the whole market using the event
study approach. His research centred on the 1989 initial TRI data release,
revealing that the disclosures had a markedly detrimental effect on stock
prices[18].
The fact that these results clearly show social costs exceeding private costs
and that capital markets are penalizing the release of harmful chemicals is an
intriguing feature of the data. Harmful chemical releases are a negative
externality imposed on the rest of society. Reducing the excess of societal
over private expenditures increases the stock market value and benefits
shareholders. These are the various implications that arise out of this
convergence.
A need for effective
control and regulatory mechanism
An improvement that is
long overdue in the corporate operational governance regulatory mechanism is
important to prevent misuse of CSR funds via white-collar crime (WCC) tactics.
As increasing numbers of corporations integrate CSR into a part of their brand
and business model strategy, the menace lies that such funds may get misused or
are spent for individual or organisational gains. For these to be mitigated,
the internal controls have to be tightened up and stronger governance
frameworks need to be instituted. Studies indicate that a number of key
practices, such as formal communication, contingent employee compensation, and
well-defined, established company policies and procedures, are significantly
associated with reduced white-collar crime rates. These factors, when properly
applied, can foster a culture of accountability and transparency that
discourages the temptation or possibility for unethical activities to take root[19].
Formal communication in a business is the transparent and open sharing of
information on expectations, ethical standards, and codes of conduct that gives
rise to an effective organizational culture. If employees are aware of the
company's stand on integrity and have access to information on proper conduct,
they would be less likely to resort to illegal activities. Contingent employee
compensation, or compensation structures that are directly connected to
individual or organizational performance, will similarly have the ability to
make a difference in limiting white-collar crime. Basing bonuses or increases
on long-term, sustainable objectives instead of short-term profit maximization
will encourage moral decision-making and inhibit behavior that will
artificially inflate earnings or find ways to cut corners for personal reasons.
A firm's explicit policies and procedures are at the core of preventing
white-collar crimes. These policies must be comprehensive and should include
proper definitions of what constitutes acceptable behavior, tough reporting
procedures, and the provision for discovering and correcting unethical activity
in a timely manner. The policies should apply not only to the lower echelons of
the firm but to every echelon of management so that nobody is exempt from the
law[20].
Firms with codes of conduct, audit committees, and contingent compensation for
board members have been reported to have lower crime rates. These elements act
as protectors of conduct by establishing standards of behavior, having periodic
audits to evaluate compliance with those norms, and holding those entities at
the helm responsible for upholding ethical governance. The management control
term has also been widely used in studies to explain the rules of the
organizational game. Management control is a firm's internal mechanisms,
including accounting, planning, and budgeting procedures, that offer control
and ensure efficient use of resources and in accordance with corporate
objectives. A sound management control system assists institutions in achieving
their goals while providing protection against white-collar crime in the form
of fraud, embezzlement, or similar acts. Included in this extensive system is
an accounting system comprising procedures for recording, processing, and
retaining accounting data. Compared to a system that is subjected to
self-scrutiny, change, and features widespread employee training as well as
organizational accountability for improved reporting, an accounting system that
is simply constituted to deliver reasonable assurance that errors and
inaccuracies are few can be a weak system. Weak systems do not identify early
warning signals of white-collar crime and may let small discrepancies grow into
large-scale fraud or embezzlement. Conversely, firms that have open policies
and procedures, which stress ongoing monitoring, regular internal auditing, and
regular employee training stand a better chance of preventing white-collar
crimes from happening. It is not only important to create these policies but
also to enforce them at all levels of the firm. This includes creating evident
lines of duty, communications that are directed to company-wide knowledge, and
administrative programs that call attention to the importance of major
policies, processes, and mechanisms[21]. By creating a culture of
continuous learning and ensuring that employees are always reminded of the
necessity of ethical behavior, companies can create robust internal mechanisms
of responsibility. Furthermore, extensive recruitment is one of the most
essential procedures in reducing the risk of white-collar crime. Conducting a
thorough background check to thoroughly screen applicants is crucial in
ensuring that individuals who have a history of unethical behavior or criminal
record are not hired into positions of power or responsibility within the
company. Past work history, education records, fiscal standing, and criminal
background checking can assist enterprises in determining any potential red
flags before the selection of an employee. By interviewing prospective
employees very cautiously and having the assurance that the candidates carry
with them both technical competencies and a moral background, companies are
able topreclude candidates from being placed who might someday exploit their
function for personal motivations. Finally, enhancing the regulatory framework
of corporate governance and internal controls is necessary in the mitigation of
white-collar crime and the misuse of CSR funds. Clear communication, contingent
employee compensation, clearly stated policies, an effective management control
system, and a rigorous recruitment process are all necessary in developing a
strong corporate governance structure.
Conclusion
This offers new
understanding of the intricate relationship between CSR and WCC and the wider
implications for corporate welfare and governance. Firms adopt integrating CSR
initiatives into their business, but it is important to note that such projects
can be exploited or abused by people who want to advance their personal
interests and objectives. White-collar crimes misappropriating CSR money, for
example, undermines the social and moral purpose of policies and severely
challenges corporate integrity and shareholder value. Strong accountability
controls, transparent and clear reporting processes, and inimitable standards
of ethics- all facilitators of good corporate governance- are critical in
empowering effective attempts toward CSR that concur with the firm's interests
and values. There is a dilemma between CSR and WCC. CSR might strive to improve
social good along with ethical corporate acts, but it may, on the other hand,
serve as an entry point for exploitation. Many white-collar crimes- such as
insider trading, fraud, and embezzlement-are fueled by a profit maximization
culture that is sometimes more bereft of any serious consideration to morality
than simply amoral. Hence, in such a cultural setup, some company employees
defend corporate and business crimes because they think it has been viewed as a
way of attaining financial goals or sustaining competitive advantage in the
business world. In this regard, it is significant to recognize CSR and WCC
interaction as a complex relationship between actions, motivations and
structural weaknesses rather than simply based on a comparison of ideas. Again,
the financial implications of white-collar crimes can never be overemphasized.
The theft of CSR funds directly affects allocated resources for social programs.
The attempt to face the urgent societal concerns relating to community
development, environmental sustainability, and poverty alleviation is thus
hindered. Many case studies have demonstrated that the financial outcomes of
WCC could lead to a critical decline in stock prices and further shareholder
value, creating a vicious cycle where the pursuit of unethical behaviour
ultimately threatens the economic safety of the corporation. This, in turn,
underlines the importance of efficacious governance mechanisms and the
importance of being aware of all possible hazards associated with CSR
activities. This makes the question of whether corporate social responsibility
walks hand in hand with white-collar crimes a very complex one, which requires
an active response from regulators, lawmakers, and even executives in a firm.
Corporate cultures where moral action is the root can be fostered and developed
by more vital stakeholders who realise that CSR schemes are for illicit ends.
This can only be achieved through an accountability culture, improved
regulatory settings, and rendering CSR activities truly positive to society
rather than as a tool for the purpose. In the current scenario, only through
ethical practice and social responsibility should business plans of the new
corporate era facilitate growth and progress in society.
[1] Howard R. Bowen, Social
Responsibilities of the Businessman, 3 (Iowa City: University Of Iowa
Press, University of Iowa Faculty Connections), 2013.
[2] Companies Act, No. 18 of 2023, § 135 (India).
[3] Nitin Kumar, A
Study of CSR Rules under Companies Act, 2013, Vol. 2 Issue 5, AJMS, 142,
143-144 (2014).
[4] Gorasiya and Chudasama, White Collar Crime in Indian Context, Vol. 4 Issue 2, NJCSL, 1, 2-3
(2021).
[5]Sally S. Simpson, Making
Sense of White-Collar Crime: Theory and Research, 8 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L.
481 (Spring 2011).
[6] H. Manchiraju and S. Rajgopal, Does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Create Shareholder Value?
Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013, Vol. 55 No. 5, JAR, 1257, 1259
(2017).
[7] Id.
[8] Nihal Gulammahiyuddin Shaikh and Dhaval Chudasama. Research on Cyber Offenses under Information
Technology Act, 2000. Recent Trends in Parallel Computing, Vol 8 Issue 1,
pp. 14–20, 2021, ISSN: 2393-8749 UGC Approved (S. No 47081).
[9] Himmelberg, Hubbard, and Palia, Understanding the Determinants of
Managerial Ownership and Link Between Ownership and Performance, 53 JAF 353, 356-357 (1999).
[10] Dunn, Craig P. and Burton, Brian K., Friedman’s “The Social Responsibility of
Business is to Increase its Profits”: A Critique for the Classroom (2006).
Management. 7.
[11] Supra at 5.
[12] Tim V. Eaton & Sam Korach, A Criminilogical Profile of White-Collar Crime, Vol. 32 No. 1 JABR
129, 131-138 (2016).
[13] Rachel E. Severson, Zachery H. Kodatt, and George W.
Buruss, Explaining White-Collar Crime:
Individual-Level Theories, (Melissa L. Rorie, The Handbook of White-Collar
Crime, 1st Edition).
[14] Geoffrey Heal, Corporate
Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework, 30 The Geneva
Papers 387, 389-390 (2005).
[15] Id.
[16] Khurram Sultan Langraw & Adil Zaman, Corporate Social Responsibility and White
Collar Crimes: Exploring how companies can promote ethical behaviour and
prevent white collar crime within their organisation, Vol 3 Issue 2. IJSSE
349, 353-361 (2023).
[17] Id.
[18] ??Hamilton, Pollution
as News: Media and Stock Markets Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory
Data, 28 JEEM 98-113 (1995).
[19] Michael Levi & Nicholas Lord, White Collar and Corporate Crime, 6th Ed
OUF 1, 5-10 (2017).
[20] Id.
[21] McGurrin, Danielle, Melissa Jarrell, Amber Jahn and
Brandy Cochrane. 2013. White Collar Crime
Representation in the Criminological Literature Revisited, 2001-2010.
Western Criminology Review 14(2):3-19.
Article Information
AN ANALYSIS OF WHITE-COLLAR CRIMES: THROUGH THE LENS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Authors: ASHMIT KHURANA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2025/03/19
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.