Open Access Research Article
ADDRESSING THE RISKS OF ONLINE SEXUALISATION AND CYBER-EXPLOITATION OF MINORS IN INFLUENCER CULTURE
Published Paper
Article Details
ADDRESSING THE RISKS OF ONLINE SEXUALISATION AND CYBER-EXPLOITATION OF MINORS IN INFLUENCER CULTURE
AUTHORED BY - NIVEDHA K.V & JAISVICA KAUR BAGGA
Background of the Study
A concerning dichotomy arises in the digital
age, where each scroll takes us into the life of influencers: children, who are
praised for their inventiveness and relatability, are being thrust more and more into the stark
glare of audiences around the world.
Beneath the glamour
of likes and followers, there is a more sinister
reality, minors are being sexualized and exploited online,
a problem that has outrun current legal frameworks. How can we balance
the need to protect children from the predatory aspects of influencer culture
with their right to self-expression?
India is at the core of this dilemma because
of its fast increasing number
of young people
who utilize digital devices. The lines between benign visibility and
dangerous vulnerability are frequently blurred by the algorithms that magnify
their content for engagement. While the financial benefits for young influencers
are apparent, are we unintentionally commercializing childhood and are parents,
platforms, and policymakers complicit in perpetuating this cycle?
This study aims to spark a critical
conversation about these vital issues[1]. It seeks to clarify the role of law, technology, and ethics in addressing these concerns, asking
stakeholders to create a digital
ecosystem in which
children can prosper
without fear, exploitation, or injury. The stakes
are high—our collective response could change the course of digital childhood
forever.
1.
Introduction
In India, a country with over 658 million
internet users, kids' participation as influencers or content makers
has been a growing trend. The decision of this study stems
from the worrisome increase in occurrences of child exploitation in internet areas[2]. According to the National Crime Records Bureau
(NCRB), cybercrimes against
children in India
have increased significantly, particularly those
involving sexual exploitation and the distribution of pornographic content.
This demonstrates a substantial vacuum in legislative safeguards and enforcement mechanisms for children in the fast changing digital world.
The issue is particularly important in India due to its unique socio-cultural dynamics, growing youth population, and fragmented legal environment. This policy aims to investigate the convergence of law, technology, and ethics in protecting minors in the influencer ecosystem. The study intends to suggest rigorous, actionable policy solutions by concentrating on India's legislative framework, worldwide best practices, and region-specific socio-technological problems[3]. The findings will help to create a safer digital world by balancing children's rights with the need to prevent exploitation in a technology-driven society.
1.1 Theoretical Framework - Theory of Reciprocal Determinism.
This policy framework, which addresses the
concerns of online sexualization and cyber-exploitation of kids in influencer culture,
is based on Albert Bandura's
Theory of Reciprocal Determinism. This approach emphasizes the interaction of human elements
(such as minors' cognitive and
emotional characteristics), behavioral aspects (content generation and engagement patterns), and environmental factors
(social media algorithms, societal norms, and parental guidance). By recognizing how
these aspects interact to create behavior, this policy takes a comprehensive approach,
addressing all dimensions to offer strong protections for children while encouraging safe
digital involvement.
The Theory of Reciprocal Determinism explains how environmental factors such as algorithmic
rewards impact personal goals for digital recognition, resulting in behaviors
such as excessive sharing. For example, the glamorization of influencers
(environmental) affects a child's self-perception (personal), which leads to
harmful online conduct. This circular connection
highlights the importance of various measures
such as regulating platform activities, fostering digital literacy, and increasing parental
participation[4]. By addressing these interconnected elements, the policy
applies this theoretical framework to suggest long-term solutions for
protecting minors in India's fast changing digital ecosystem.
2.
Major Issues
The hazards of online sexualization and
cyber-exploitation of minors in influencer culture present complex
legal, social, and technological challenges. Indian laws, such as the Information
Technology Act, 2000, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses
(POCSO) Act, 2012, fail to address the specific risks associated with
influencer culture, including the lack of parental consent for monetized
content and unchecked algorithmic exploitation.
Social media platforms often prioritize
engagement through biased algorithms that amplify exploitative content,
neglecting proactive safety measures such as default
privacy settings or real-time moderation. Algorithmic
incentives further encourage minors to create sensational
content, unintentionally normalizing their sexualization. A lack of awareness among children and guardians amplifies these risks, as
comprehensive digital literacy programs are yet to be widely implemented[5]. The global
nature of social
media adds complexity, with cross-border offenders often evading Indian
jurisdiction.
This policy seeks
to close these
gaps by amending
existing laws to include algorithm regulation and mandatory parental
consent for minors’
content. By fostering
international cooperation, the policy aims to hold global platforms
accountable under Indian law, ensuring a safer, more equitable digital space for children in the
influencer economy.
3. Policy Overview and Key Considerations
Recognizing the critical issues at stake and
guided by the dynamic principles of Bandura’s Theory of Reciprocal Determinism,
this policy endeavors to weave a multifaceted framework integrating legal
reforms, platform accountability, and educational initiatives. Aligned with the
foundational tenets of reciprocal determinism, this policy envisions
a cohesive framework
where individual behaviors, institutional safeguards, and societal norms
dynamically interact to reinforce one another,
constructing a fortified
and equitable digital
landscape that protects
minors from exploitation while safeguarding their autonomy and creative
expression.
Key considerations
3.1 Sample size
Determining an appropriate sample size for a
study on online sexualisation and cyber-exploitation
of minors in India demands consideration of the country’s vast demographic
diversity and infrastructural challenges. With over 472 million internet
users under 25, the study must capture the nuanced experiences
of minors across urban and rural settings, socioeconomic strata, and cultural
contexts. A stratified sampling approach is essential to ensure adequate
representation from metropolitan hubs and underserved rural regions. Engaging
key stakeholders, including minors, parents, educators, and social media
platforms, provides critical insights into behaviors, awareness levels, and regulatory practices. However, challenges such as
safeguarding minors’ privacy, securing parental consent, and reaching
low-connectivity rural areas complicate data collection. Rural regions may necessitate field-based investigations, while
urban respondents might exhibit survey fatigue. Existing datasets, like those
from UNICEF and NCRB, offer valuable baselines but lack the granularity to
analyze algorithmic impacts or specific exploitation trends, necessitating
extensive primary data collection.
This figure presents a framework for
safeguarding children in digital spaces, emphasizing collaboration among
regulators, families, schools,
social workers, law enforcement, healthcare providers, technology
platforms, and companies.
This interconnected approach aligns well with
the theory of reciprocal determinism, where behavioral, environmental, and systemic
factors collectively shape outcomes, ensuring
a holistic response to online
sexualization and exploitation.
3.2 Suitability
Designing
a policy that is both legally robust
and culturally nuanced
necessitates alignment with India’s foundational laws, such as
the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
(POCSO) Act, 2012,
while addressing gaps unique to the digital age. These frameworks, while
foundational, lack provisions to tackle emerging risks in influencer culture,
such as the monetization of minors’ online personas or the subtleties of algorithmic exploitation. To bridge these
gaps, amendments must introduce specific
measures for platform accountability, regulate minors’ digital
behavior, and mandate
parental consent—drawing inspiration from the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in the
United States, which enforces strict parental oversight over data collection
for children under 13.
Equally critical is ensuring feasibility across India’s diverse
digital landscape, marked
by disparities in technology access
and literacy. Resource
allocation must prioritize investments in
AI-driven content moderation, law enforcement training, and expansive digital
education initiatives. Public-private partnerships with platforms like Facebook
and Google can amplify these efforts, enabling
collaborative development of real-time moderation systems and awareness campaigns.
3.3 Sensitivity
Sensitivity
is paramount in crafting interventions to protect minors from exploitation, demanding trauma-informed approaches that preserve their dignity
and privacy. Policies must dismantle the victim-blaming narrative often
associated with online exploitation cases, ensuring minors coerced into
creating inappropriate content are protected under the law while platforms and perpetrators are held accountable. The Supreme Court’s
2024 ruling, emphasizing social media intermediaries'
obligation to report Child Sexual Exploitative and Abusive Material (CSEAM),
underscores the critical
need for platform
accountability. The Court’s
call to amend the POCSO Act to replace “child pornography”
with CSEAM reflects a nuanced understanding of online exploitation complexities
and necessitates comprehensive legal language.
This policy must advocate for accessible mental health resources, robust privacy safeguards, and culturally sensitive family support systems. Drawing from
the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, it should prioritize dignity, privacy, and the assurance of a safe online environment for minors[6]. By integrating sensitivity, suitability, and resource optimization, alongside a systematic sampling approach, the policy
aspires to construct an inclusive, ethical framework.
4. Aim and Objective of the Policy
This policy aims to establish
a comprehensive framework
to safeguard minors from online sexualisation, cyber-exploitation,
and abuse, with a specific focus on influencer culture.
Addressing
the evolving nature of digital
threats, it employs
a multi-pronged strategy
integrating legal reforms, technological advancements, educational
initiatives, and societal transformation. By amending existing laws such as the
POCSO Act and Information Technology Act, and aligning with global standards
like COPPA (USA) and GDPR (EU), the policy ensures robust mechanisms for age
verification, parental consent, and platform accountability[7].
The following policy
suggestions combine legal,
technological, educational, and societal
strategies through a systematic seven step process.
Step 1 - Digital Literacy and Resilience Training
A nationwide digital
literacy program for minors, parents,
and educators should be implemented, focusing on safe online
engagement, risk recognition, and exercising digital
rights. This program can be modeled after Finland’s
successful integration of digital safety education into school curriculums,
where children learn to identify online manipulation, understand privacy
settings, and safeguard personal
data. Psychological resilience training should also be included,
enabling minors to resist pressures related to online sexualisation.
Step 2 - AI-Driven Content Moderation and
Preemptive Screening
Artificial
intelligence (AI) and machine learning
should be employed
to preemptively monitor and filter content before
it is uploaded, ensuring exploitative material is detected
and removed swiftly.
Platforms must implement AI systems to identify harmful content, such as
sexually suggestive material, abuse,
and harassment, similar
to the EU’s Digital Services
Act. These systems should
also integrate age verification measures to prevent minors from engaging in influencer activities without parental
consent, as seen in the Children’s Online
Privacy Protection Act
(COPPA) in the U.S.
Step 3 - Parental Control and Safeguards
Mandatory parental consent
for any online activity involving
minors’ data collection or content creation must be enforced.
Platforms like Instagram
and TikTok should adopt stringent
parental controls, ensuring that parents can monitor content creation,
online interactions, and financial transactions. This aligns with the GDPR’s
provisions on children’s privacy, ensuring parental oversight through
privacy-by-design mechanisms.
Step 4 - Cross-Border Legal Cooperation
Given the global nature of online
exploitation, international cooperation is crucial. India should collaborate with other countries
to standardize laws protecting children’s online rights, as seen in frameworks like Australia's eSafety
Commissioner and UK’s initiatives. A UN-backed Child Online Protection Protocol would help align India with international standards and ensure global
platform accountability.
Step 5 - Platform Accountability with
Financial Penalties
Social media platforms should be financially
accountable for failing to implement adequate safeguards. A tiered penalty
system, similar to GDPR fines,
should be introduced, with penalties
escalating according to the extent of minors’ content being compromised.
Platforms would be required to submit compliance reports to the government,
ensuring transparency and accountability.
Step 6 - Youth-Centered Advisory
Committees
Youth advisory committees comprising minors, parents,
child psychologists, and digital safety experts should guide the development of content regulation policies and platform
standards. This approach,
inspired by UNICEF’s Child Online Protection Program, ensures that minors’
voices are central to shaping protective policies.
Step 7 - Behavioral Economics and Platform Design
Drawing from behavioral economics, platforms
should be incentivized to design systems that
prioritize safety over engagement. This approach mirrors
Norway’s Digital Privacy
Laws, which prioritize user
safety by embedding privacy measures into the core design of digital platforms.
These measures, when implemented together,
form a comprehensive, layered approach to safeguarding minors from online exploitation, creating
a safer digital environment for children to thrive.
5. Scope of the Policy
The scope of this policy extends to all
minors under the age of 18 in India, with a specific
emphasis on female children, who are disproportionately targeted by online sexualisation and exploitation. The policy covers
the entire digital
landscape, including social
media platforms, influencer
culture, online gaming, and e-learning platforms, where minors are increasingly
active[8]. The policy will mandate
robust age verification systems, enforce parental
consent for data processing, and ensure that platforms implement
gender-sensitive content moderation to prevent the abuse of female minors.
The jurisdiction of this policy
is nationwide, applying
to all digital platforms that operate in India, regardless of whether the
platform is registered in India or abroad. This includes foreign-based platforms
like Instagram, TikTok,
and Facebook, which are widely used by minors
in India[9]. The policy mandates that these platforms comply with
Indian child protection laws, such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, and
the POCSO Act, 2012, as well as international frameworks like the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR), to ensure that children's privacy and safety
are upheld globally. Furthermore, the policy
will advocate for cross-border cooperation with international bodies to ensure that the protections provided
under Indian law are enforced in other jurisdictions, holding foreign
platforms accountable for the exploitation of minors in India.
6. Data and Methodology
The policy's development necessitates a
rigorous, multidimensional methodology tailored to India's socio-cultural and digital nuances. This approach
integrates quantitative and qualitative research, comparative policy analysis, and stakeholder engagement, ensuring an evidence-based and adaptable framework[10]. Key data sources include National Crime Records Bureau
(NCRB) statistics, highlighting cybercrimes against minors like sextortion and
harassment, and social media platform analytics
from TikTok and Instagram, which reveal patterns
of exploitation.
Surveys and interviews with
stakeholders—minors, parents, educators, and child
psychologists—provide qualitative insights into vulnerabilities and
behaviors, while global frameworks such as COPPA (USA) and GDPR (EU) benchmark international best practices.
The methodology employs quantitative analyses
to model trends in victim demographics and identify gaps in current
safeguards, complemented by qualitative tools such as thematic coding of interviews and case studies.
Incidents like the Blue Whale Challenge and data misuse cases are examined for
lessons on systemic reform. Comparative analyses of global laws, including Australia’s eSafety
Commissioner program and the EU’s Digital Services
Act, ensure scalability and localization.
Workshops with policymakers, NGOs, and tech
companies refine the framework, while pilot programs assess interventions like AI-driven content
moderation and parental
control systems. This blended
approach balances empirical precision with exploratory flexibility, creating a
robust, inclusive, and scalable policy. By integrating empirical data,
stakeholder insights, and international standards, the methodology provides a
comprehensive foundation to address the evolving complexities of online
exploitation in India’s digital landscape.
7. Tailor-Made Policies for Digital
Child Safety
Each policy measure
is carefully crafted
to address the complexities of online sexualisation and cyber-exploitation of minors, establishing a robust legal
and technological framework. Legal reforms, such as amending the POCSO Act to
replace "child pornography" with Child Sexual Exploitative and
Abusive Material (CSEAM), broaden the scope to include nuanced forms of
exploitation in influencer culture. Mandatory age verification and parental
consent provisions ensure supervised digital
participation, protecting against
unauthorized data collection and commercialization of minors’ online identities.
The introduction of AI-driven content
moderation allows platforms to proactively detect and remove harmful material,
holding them accountable through stringent penalties. This aligns with international standards like the
GDPR, which protects minors’ digital footprints by prohibiting behavioral
profiling and targeted advertising. With a focus on gender-sensitive education,
the policy tackles risks like cyberstalking and sextortion, empowering
stakeholders to identify and mitigate threats[11].
Acknowledging the global nature of digital
platforms, the policy emphasizes cross-border cooperation, drawing from
frameworks like Australia’s eSafety Commissioner to ensure protection beyond
national boundaries. Additionally, integrating privacy-by-design principles in platform architecture mandates default safety settings,
restricted visibility, and regulated interactions, reducing exposure to
unsolicited contact. These integrated measures form a comprehensive, proactive
defense, safeguarding India’s minors in the dynamic and evolving digital
environment.
8. Funding the Vision
Implementing a policy to safeguard minors
from online sexual exploitation in influencer culture necessitates a
well-structured financial framework, with an initial outlay of ?2,000 crore and
an annual budget of ?1,500 crore thereafter. This funding supports critical
technological, legal, and educational measures, including
?500 crore for AI-driven content
moderation, ?150 crore for age verification systems, and ?200 crore
for enhancing the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal to ensure real-time
action against CSEAM[12]. Legal reforms, including amendments to the POCSO Act
and IT Act, will require ?50 crore, supplemented by ?100 crore for judicial and
law enforcement training. Establishing a Data Protection Authority, at ?200 crore annually, will ensure compliance audits,
bolstered by penalties
for non-compliance in alignment with GDPR
standards.
The policy dedicates ?300 crore to digital
literacy campaigns for children, parents, and educators, with ?100 crore
for psychological support
systems. Additionally, ?150 crore annually will facilitate cross-border
enforcement collaborations under frameworks like GDPR and COPPA[13]. To future-proof initiatives, ?100 crore is reserved
for research and development, with a ?200 crore contingency fund for
unforeseen needs.
Funding sources include
government allocations through
the MWCD and MeitY, CSR contributions from tech companies
under the Companies
Act, 2013, and international grants from
UNICEF and the World Bank. Fines from non-compliant platforms will provide
self-sustaining revenue. Cost-efficiency measures include leveraging existing
systems like the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal
and Aadhaar-based verification, phasing rollouts, and integrating
child protection training into current law enforcement programs. Partnerships
with tech companies to develop AI systems at reduced costs further optimize
resources[14]. This integrated, advanced funding strategy ensures
sustainability and maximizes the policy’s impact
in protecting minors across
India’s digital ecosystem.
9. Unveiling the Ripple Effects:
Implications of the Policy
The policy to protect minors
from online sexual
exploitation sets into motion a wide array
of ripple effects, fundamentally reshaping India’s digital landscape. In
the immediate term, it establishes a fortified
legal framework that bridges critical
gaps, empowering authorities to address exploitation effectively.
9.1 Short-Term Implications
In the short term, this policy will provide
immediate legal clarity and enforceability by addressing critical gaps, such as updating the POCSO Act
to include Child Sexual Exploitative and Abusive Material (CSEAM), and
implementing AI-driven content moderation and age verification systems.
These measures will quickly enhance
detection and removal
of exploitative material,
creating a deterrent effect against malicious actors. Platforms will face heightened
accountability, with penalties for non-compliance, promoting better regulatory
practices.
Additionally, digital literacy campaigns will
empower minors and their guardians to identify and report online exploitation. However,
resistance may arise from platforms
due to compliance costs and
technical challenges, necessitating adaptive regulatory measures.
9.2 Long-Term Implications
Long-term, the policy will establish a
robust, sustainable framework for child protection by integrating legal,
technological, and educational strategies[15]. The creation
of a Data Protection
Authority and expanded National Cybercrime Reporting Portal will
institutionalize child protection mechanisms. Over time, these efforts will
position India as a global leader in safeguarding children’s digital rights,
aligning with international frameworks like GDPR and COPPA for cross-border
cooperation. Digital literacy programs will cultivate a generation capable of
navigating online spaces safely, reducing exploitation at its core. By prioritizing
gender-sensitive measures for female minors, the policy will address specific
vulnerabilities, furthering broader societal
goals of gender
equity and child
welfare. Ultimately, this policy will not only mitigate immediate risks
but transform India’s digital landscape, fostering trust, accountability, and
safe participation in the digital economy.
10. Global Benchmarks: Learning from International Models
Several countries have adopted robust
measures and legal frameworks to address the online sexual exploitation of minors, offering
valuable case studies
and precedents for India to draw
from.
Australia has been a global leader in this domain through its eSafety Commissioner, a statutory body established to protect Australians from online harm. The Commissioner’s office provides tools
for reporting child abuse material and mandates immediate takedown of
exploitative content by online
platforms. In the landmark Australian Communications and Media
Authority v. Twitter (2021),
the court upheld stringent penalties against non-compliant platforms,
reinforcing platform accountability. This regulatory framework demonstrates how a centralized authority can enforce proactive moderation and rapid response systems
effectively.
In the United Kingdom, the Online Safety Bill
aims to make the internet a safer space for children. Platforms are required to
prevent harmful content under penalty of heavy fines. In the case of Ofcom v.
Facebook (2022), the UK’s communication regulator penalized Facebook for
failing to remove child exploitative material promptly, showcasing the efficacy
of fines in enforcing compliance. The UK also emphasizes parental
controls, with tools
built into platforms for monitoring children's online
activity, demonstrating the importance of involving guardians in child protection.
Canada has focused
on cross-border cooperation and legal enforcement through initiatives like Project Arachnid, an AI-powered tool
operated by the Canadian Centre for Child Protection.
This tool has scanned billions of images to
identify and remove exploitative content globally. In R v. Sharpe (2001), the
Supreme Court upheld stringent laws against child pornography while balancing freedom
of expression, reinforcing that child safety takes precedence in online spaces.
These examples show that integrating
centralized oversight bodies, platform accountability, technological solutions, and international cooperation creates an effective framework. India can adapt these strategies, ensuring a
comprehensive policy tailored to its digital and cultural landscape.
11. Navigating Implementation Challenges and Addressing Research
Gaps
Approaching the execution of this policy
requires a careful balance between enforcing child safety and respecting
digital freedoms. Legal measures must avoid overreach, ensuring they do not
stifle minors’ legitimate rights to expression and participation in the digital
economy. For instance, stringent age verification systems, while crucial, must
not disproportionately invade privacy or create barriers to access[16]. Sensitivity in implementation is vital; victims of
online exploitation should be protected from further trauma through confidential reporting mechanisms and trauma-informed support services. Inspired
by Canada’s Project
Arachnid, the policy
must include tools for rapid identification and removal of exploitative
content while ensuring accountability for platforms.
However, no research
is without shortcomings. This policy relies heavily on secondary data, which may not fully capture
ground-level realities, especially in rural and underrepresented regions of
India. Addressing these gaps requires continuous feedback loops, stakeholder collaboration, and adaptive mechanisms to ensure the policy evolves
with emerging challenges in India’s diverse digital landscape[17].
12. Conclusion
The urgency of implementing this policy lies in the faces and futures of the millions
of children who fall prey to online
exploitation every year. Consider a 14-year-old girl from a small town who,
inspired by social media influencers, starts sharing videos online, only to
become a target of predators through manipulated images and threats. Her
parents, unaware of the digital risks, are left helpless as the harm spirals.
Stories like hers are far too common, reflecting a growing crisis where minors
are victimized in spaces designed for expression and connection.
As Plato wisely observed, "All learning
has an emotional base," highlighting that the most sensitive and challenging topics often drive the greatest
growth and awareness. Discussions surrounding online sexual exploitation of minors,
particularly in influencer culture, are inherently uncomfortable but vital[18]. Such topics confront societal norms and expose vulnerabilities,
yet addressing them is crucial to initiating meaningful change. When we shy
away from these conversations, we allow exploitation to persist in the shadows,
leaving victims without recourse and perpetuating cycles of harm. Open dialogue
around these measures,
despite their discomfort, fosters a culture where difficult but
necessary conversations pave the way for actionable solutions.
This isn’t just a policy; it is a promise
through this multi-pronged approach, we ensure that no child’s laughter is
muted by fear and no childhood is stolen by exploitation. In doing so, we
uphold not only their rights
but the collective humanity that demands
we protect the vulnerable.
[1] Louis Fourie, Protecting Children in the Digital Society,
in Childhood Vulnerabilities in South Africa: Some Ethical Perspectives 229,
229-72 (Jan Grobbelaar & Chris Jones eds., 1st ed. 2020).
[2] Sabine K. Witting, Regulating Bodies:
The Moral Panic of Child Sexuality in the Digital Era, 102 KritV 5, 5–38 (2019).
[3] Wendy Walsh, Melissa Wells & Janis Wolak, Challenges
in Investigations and Prosecutions of Child Pornography Crimes, in Refining
Child Pornography Law: Crime, Language, and Social Consequences 215, 215–34
(Carissa Byrne Hessick ed., Univ. of Mich. Press 2016).
[4] Shaheen Shariff & Ashley DeMartini, Defining the Legal
Lines: eGirls and Intimate Images, in eGirls, eCitizens: Putting Technology, Theory
and Policy into Dialogue with Girls’ and Young Women’s Voices 281, 281–306 (Jane
Bailey & Valerie Steeves eds., Univ. of Ottawa Press 2015).
[5] Gillian Angrove, “She’s Such a Slut!”:
The Sexualized Cyberbullying of Teen Girls and the Education Law Response, in eGirls,
eCitizens: Putting Technology, Theory and Policy into Dialogue with Girls’ and Young
Women’s Voices 307, 307–36 (Jane Bailey & Valerie Steeves eds., Univ. of
Ottawa Press 2015).
[6] Roelof Petrus Reyneke, A
Restorative Approach to Address Cyber Bullying, in Rethinking Teacher Education
for the 21st Century: Trends, Challenges and New Directions 340, 340–54 (Marta Kowalczuk-Walêdziak
et al. eds., 1st ed. Verlag Barbara Budrich 2019).
[7] J. Ashley & K. Burke, Implementing Restorative Justice:
A Guide for Schools (Ill. Criminal Justice Info. Authority 2009).
[8] K. Barnes, S. Brynard & C. De
Wet, The Influence of School Culture and School Climate on Violence in Schools of
the Eastern Cape Province, 32 S. Afr. J. Educ. 69, 69–82 (2012).
[9] Lauren M. & K.T. Ratliffe, Cyber Worlds: New Playgrounds
for Bullying, 28 Comput. Sch. 92, 92–116 (2011).
[10] M.M. Ttofi, D.P. Farrington & F. Lösel, The Predictive
Efficiency of School Bullying Versus Later Offending: A
Systematic/Meta-Analytic Review of Longitudinal Studies, 21 Crim. Behav. &
Mental Health 80, 80–89 (2011).
[11] B. Morrison, P. Blood & M. Thorsborne,
Practicing Restorative Justice in School Communities: The Challenge of Culture
Change, 5 Pub. Org. Rev.: A Global J. 335, 335–57 (2005).
[12] Tim McCaskell, Race to Equity: Disrupting Educational
Inequality 182 (Between the Lines 2005).
[13] Catharine MacKinnon, “Reflections
on Sex Equality Under Law,” Yale Law Journal 100:5 (1991).
[14] Jordan Fairbairn, Rape Threats
and Revenge Porn: Defining Sexual Violence in the Digital Age, in eGirls,
eCitizens: Putting Technology, Theory and Policy into Dialogue with Girls’ and Young
Women’s Voices 229, 229–52 (Jane Bailey & Valerie Steeves eds., Univ. of
Ottawa Press 2015).
[15] Holly Johnson & Myrna Dawson, Violence Against Women
in Canada: Research and Policy Perspectives 2 (Oxford Univ. Press Canada 2011).
[16] Shaheen Shariff & Andrew H. Churchill (eds.), Truths
and Myths of Cyber-Bullying: International Perspectives on Stakeholder
Responsibility and Children’s Safety (2015).
[17] Jamie L. Williams, Teens, Sexts, & Cyberspace: The
Constitutional Implications of Cur- rent Sexting & Cyberbullying Laws,
William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 20 (2012), p. 1032.
[18] Dana Northcraft, A Nation Scared: Children, Sex and the
Denial of Humanity, 12 Am. U. J. Gender, Soc. Pol'y & L. 511 (2004)
Article Information
ADDRESSING THE RISKS OF ONLINE SEXUALISATION AND CYBER-EXPLOITATION OF MINORS IN INFLUENCER CULTURE
Authors: NIVEDHA K.V, JAISVICA KAUR BAGGA
- Journal IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Published 2025/03/08
- Issue 7
About Journal
International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis
- Abbreviation IJLRA
- ISSN 2582-6433
- Access Open Access
- License CC 4.0
All research articles published in International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis are open access and available to read, download and share, subject to proper citation of the original work.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of International Journal for Legal Research and Analysis.