[1] The Right to
information Act 2005 section 24(1): Act not to apply to certain organizations:
Nothing contained in this Act shall apply to the intelligence and security
organizations specified in the Second Schedule, being organizations established
by the Central Government or any information furnished by such organizations to
that Government:
[1] The Right to
information Act 2005 section 8(1)(g): information, the disclosure of which
would endanger the life or physical safety of any person or identify the source
of information or assistance given in confidence for law enforcement or
security purposes;
1.MarkElliottandRobertThomas,TribunalJusticeandProportionateDisputeResolution,Vol.71, No. 2,The Cambridge Law Journal, pp. 297-324 (July 2012).
2.Jean McFadden and Dale McFadzean, Book Titled Scottish
Administrative Law Essentials,ChaptertitledTribunals andInquiries,
EdinburghUniversity Press, 2006.
3.NithyaSNair,Tribunalisation
of Justice in India- A Challenge to The Judicial System orNot,Volume
6,Issue 6, (JETIR),June 2019.
4.Law Commission of India, Report No.272 Assessment of
Statutory Frameworks of TribunalsinIndia October, 2017.
5.PratikDutta,MehtabHans,MayankMishra,IlaPatnaik,PrasanthRegy,ShubhoRoy,SanhitaSapatnekar,AjayShah,AshokPalSingh,SomasekharSundaresan,HowtoModernise the Working of Courts and
Tribunals in India, National Institute of Public Financeand Policy New Delhi, No. 258, 25-03-2019.
[25]Jain,M.P., Jain, S.N.,
Principles ofAdministrative
Law 1989, Lexis Nexis, India, 7 th edn., 2011 at p. 1996
Citation
[1]
Afra Afsharipour, The Indian Private Equity Model, NSE
Working Paper WP/8/2013 2 (2013)
[1]
Buyouts are defined as acquisition of more than 50% stake in a company
[1] Growth investments are
defined as minority investments other than investment in start-ups
[1]
A private investment in public equity, often called a PIPE deal, involves the
selling of publicly traded common shares or some form of preferred stock or
convertible security to private investors.
In this context, it would be apt to quote Kofi Annan, ex
Secretary – General of the UN:
“ There is no trust more sacred than the one the world
holds with children. There is no duty more important than ensuring that their
rights are respected, that their welfare is protected, that their lives are
free from fear and want and that they grow up in peace.”
[1]V. R. Krishna Iyer, Jurisprudence of Juvenile Justice : A Preambular Perspective as in Mamta Rao, Law Relating to Women & Children 413 (2nd Ed., Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 2011).
[1] Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India, Study on Child Abuse: India 2007, (2007 ).
[1] 430 US 651 (1977).
[1] Loenard P. Edwards, Corporal Punishment and the Legal System, 36 Santa Clara Law Review 983 (1996).
[1] Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 13, ¶ 41, Art. 13, (1999).
[1] Corporal punishment was condemned in a series of decisions of the European Commission
on Human Rights and judgements of the European Court of Human Rights; see Tyrer v. UK, 1978; Campbell and Cosans v. UK, 1982; Costello-Roberts v. UK, 1993; A v. UK,
1998 available at http://www.echr.coe.int/echr (last visited on March 17, 2022).
[1] Art. 3(1).
[1] S. 92, IPC.
[1] Art. 21 as interpreted in Inderjeet v State of U.P., AIR 1979 SC 1867.
[1] Thukral and Abbasi, Ensuring Child Protection, 574 Seminar India, 34, 32 (June, 2007).
[1] Disha Nawani, Corporal Punishment in Schools, Economic & Political Weekly (June 15, 2013) available at http://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/2013_48/24/Corporal_Punishment_in_Schools.pdf ( last visited on March 29, 2022).
[1] W.P.(C) 5765/2011, Delhi High Court
[1]AIR 2001 Delhi 212
[1] Appeal (civil) 5452-5453 of 2004, SC.
[1] However, the imprisonment of children was abolished in England in 1908.
[1] News of the World, June 23, 1935 as cited in Supra Note 6 at 143.
[1] The Committee commends, as one example, UNESCO’s handbook, Eliminating corporal
punishment: the way forward to constructive child discipline, UNESCO Publishing, Paris, 2005.
This provides a set of principles for constructive discipline, rooted in the Convention. It also
includes Internet references to materials and programmes available worldwide.
Citation
[1] Bratty v. Attorney-General for Northern Ireland
1963 AC 386.
[1]Amrit Bhushan v. Union of India 1977 AIR 608.
[1]Sudhakaran v State of Kerala. 2010 (10) SCC 582.