[30] Terminiello v City of Chicago 337 US 1 (1949)
[31] J T Garner and J P Ragland, ‘Tabling, Discussing, and Giving In: Dissent in Workgroups’ (2019) 23(1) Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 57 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000098 accessed 14 March 2025.
[7]Aritra Ghosh, Workplace Safety in Indian Public Hospitals: Legal Framework and Challenges, 10 Indian J. Clinical & Anatomical Pathology (2024)
[8] In re Alleged Rape & Murder Incident of a Trainee Doctor in R.G. Kar Med. Coll. & Hosp., Kolkata & Related Issues, Suo Motu Writ (Crl.) No. 2 of 2024 (India)
Citation
[1] Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order V Rule 10A (India).
[2] Supreme Court of India (2020). In Re: Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing
[3] Sharma, P. (2020). E-Summons and the Future of Legal Notices. Indian Law Review.
[4] Desai, M. (2022). Cybersecurity Risks in Virtual Courtrooms. Technology & Law Review.
[5] Supreme Court of India (2020). Guidelines on Virtual Court Functioning.
[6] Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India (2020). Report on Virtual Courts and E-Courts.
[7] Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order V Rule 10A (India)
[8] Patel, R. (2021). Virtual Courts: A Step Towards Digital Justice. Indian Legal Journal.
[9] Supreme Court of India (2020). In Re: Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing.
[10] Sharma, P. (2020). E-Summons and the Future of Legal Notices. Indian Law Review.
[11] Supreme Court of India (2020). Guidelines on Virtual Court Functioning
[12] Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India, (2018) 13 SCC 574
[13] Supreme Court of India (2020). In Re: Guidelines for Court Functioning Through Video Conferencing
[14] Iyer, N. (2021). Digital Justice: Bridging the Gap in Indian Courts. Legal Perspectives Journal
[15] Sharma, P. (2020). E-Summons and the Future of Legal Notices. Indian Law Review.
[16] Desai, M. (2022). Cybersecurity Risks in Virtual Courtrooms. Technology & Law Review.
[17] Singh, A. (2015). Technology and Judicial Efficiency in India. Journal of Law & Policy.
[18] Kumar, R. (2021). COVID-19 and the Indian Judiciary: Adaptation to Virtual Hearings. Indian Law Review.
[19] Sharma, P. (2020). Digital Transformation in Judicial Procedures: An Analysis of CPC and IT Act. National Law Journal.
[20] Gupta, S. (2019). Open Justice and Virtual Courts: The Supreme Court’s Evolving Stance. Supreme Court Review
[21] Reddy, V. (2022). Natural Justice in the Age of Digital Courts. Journal of Legal Studies.
[22] Iyer, N. (2021). Bridging the Digital Divide: Access to Justice in Virtual Courts. Legal Perspectives Journal.
[23] Desai, M. (2022). Cybersecurity Risks in Virtual Courtrooms. Technology & Law Review.
[24] Patel, J. (2020). Efficiency vs. Fairness in Virtual Hearings: A Judicial Dilemma. Journal of Procedural Law.
[25] The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, No. 5, Acts of Parliament, 1908 (India).
[26] General Clauses Act, 1897, No. 10, Acts of Parliament, 1897 (India).
[27] Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).
[28] Indian Evidence Act, 1872, No. 1, Acts of Parliament, 1872 (India).
[1] T.K. Dayitha, Charting the Digital Frontier: Decoding India’s Path to Digital Competition Law, 4 J. COMPETITION L. & JUST. 199 (2024).
[2] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, White Paper on Ex-Ante Regulation for Digital Gatekeepers 22–25 (Gov’t of India, 2024), https://www.mca.gov.in/whitepapers/digital-competition (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[4]Neha Kapoor, The Constitutional Validity of India’s Ex-Ante Competition Rules, 25 NAT’L L. SCH. INDIA REV. 45, 48–52 (2024) (arguing that ex-ante measures align with Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution).
[5] Anjali Bhatia, India’s Digital Competition Law: From Ex-Post to Ex-Ante, in The Evolution of Competition Law in Asia 345, 350–55 (Lee Chen & Hiroshi Yamamoto eds., Cambridge Univ. Press 2024).
[6]XYZ v. Alphabet Inc., 999 F.4th 123 (9th Cir. 2022).
[9] S.S. Topiwala & M. Topiwala, Tailoring the Ex-Ante Tides: Analysing the Digital Competition Bill & Digital Markets Act, CBF NLU DELHI BLOG (Apr. 20, 2024), https://www.cbflnludelhi.in/post/tailoring-the-ex-ante-tides-analysing-the-digital-competition-bill-digital-markets-act (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[10] Nishant S. Chopra & Yaman Verma, Does India Require Ex-Ante Competition Regulation in Digital Markets?, SHARDUL AMARCHAND MANGALDAS & CO. (May 19, 2023), https://www.amsshardul.com/insight/does-india-require-ex-ante-competition-regulation-in-digital-markets/ (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[11] Prateek Mishra, The Role of Judicial Review in Ex-Ante Competition Regulation, 5 ASIAN J. COMPETITION POL’Y 78 (2024).
[12] Rajeshwar Singh & Nandini Rao, Data Portability and Interoperability Under India’s Ex-Ante Rules, OXFORD COMPETITION BLOG (Aug. 5, 2024), https://blog.competition.ox.ac.in/data-portability-india-ex-ante (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[13] Global Antitrust Institute, Ex-Ante Regulation in Emerging Economies: A Policy Brief 7–9 (George Mason University, 2024), https://gai.gmu.edu/policy-briefs (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[15] Monalisa Choudhury & Ankur Madhia, The Future of Competition Law and the Need for Technological Advancement for Digital Markets: A Comparative Study of UK and Indian Competition Law, 14 KING’S STUD. L. REV. 1 (2024).
[16] Karan Singh et al., Balancing Different Forms of Competition Regulation in the Digital Economy (2022).
[17] Competition Commission of India, Report on Ex-Ante Regulation for Digital Gatekeepers, 12–18 (2024), https://www.cci.gov.in/reports/digital-markets (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[18] Rahul Mehta & Priya Desai, Ex-Ante Regulation in Digital Markets: Lessons for India from Global Precedents, 12 HARV. J. TECH. & ANTITRUST 45, 50–55 (2024) (comparing India’s approach with the EU’s DMA and Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code).
[19] Sumit Jain & Vikrant Singh, Competition in Digital Markets: An Indian Perspective (SSRN, 2024), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4863926.
[20] Ranjan Kumar & Mahendra Soni, Competition in Digital Markets in India and the Proposed Ex-Ante Regulatory Framework: A Legal Analysis of the Draft Competition Bill, 2024, 6 CAHIERS MAGELLAN-NS 4887 (2024).
[21] Shubham Sharma, Competition Through Evolution, Not Pre-Selection: A Case Against Ex-Ante Regulations in India, NLS BLR (July 2, 2024), https://www.nlsblr.com/post/competition-through-evolution-not-pre-selection-a-case-against-ex-ante-regulations-in-india (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[22]Prachi Agarwal v. UrbanClap Pvt. Ltd., 2021 INSC 123 (India).
[23]Harshita Chawla v. WhatsApp India Pvt. Ltd., (2022) 10 SCC 789 (India).
[24] Dhwani Soni, Ex-Ante Measures to Regulate Competition in the Digital Markets: Analysing the Report of the Committee on Digital Competition Law, 2024, MANUPATRA ART. (July 19, 2024), https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Ex-Ante-Measures-to-Regulate-Competition-in-the-Digital-Markets-Analysing-the-Report-of-the-Committee-on-Digital-Competition-Law-2024 (last visited Nov. 14, 2024).
[26] Aarav Gupta, Algorithmic Collusion and the Need for Ex-Ante Intervention: A Case Study of Indian E-Commerce, 8 INDIAN J. COMPETITION L. 112 (2023).
[5] Elizabeth Rocha, "Sophia: Exploring the Ways Al May Change Intellectual Property, Protections", 28 Dr PAUL J. ARt, TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 1. 126 (2018).
[9] Sujith Ravi, "On-Device Machine Intelligence", Google Research Blog (Feb. 9, 2017) Available At Https://Perma.Cc/WQ8L-WS5D (Visited On Feb 13, 2025).
[10] Brendan Mcmahan & Daniel Ramage, "Federated Learning: Collaborative Machine Learning Without Centralized Training Data", Google Research Blog Available At Https://Perma.Cc/XVA2- J96J(Visited On Feb 13, 2025).
[11] Andres Guadamuz, "Artificial Intelligence And Copyright", 23 WIPO MAG (2017) Http:/Www.Wipo.Inti Stpo Magazinerenl20l7/05/Article_0003.Html [Https:/Iperma.Cc/SD4Q-KE9E (Visited On Feb 13, 2025).
[12] R Chesney, DK Citron, "Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge For Privacy, Democracy, And National Security" 107 California Law Review 17 (2019.)
[13] Ravindra Kumar & Pankaj Kumar, Training AI And Copyright Infringement: Where Does The Law Stand?, 2 INDIAN J. INTEGRATED RSCH. L. 1 (January-February 2022).
[15] Thushar V. Senan, Abey Augustine & Aswathy Krishnan, AI, Creativity, And Copyright Law In India: Navigating The Boundaries Of Originality And Authorship, 6 INT'l J.L. MGMT. & HUMAN. 2941 (2023).
[28] Ravindra Kumar & Pankaj Kumar, Training AI And Copyright Infringement: Where Does The Law Stand?, 2 INDIAN J. INTEGRATED RSCH. L. 1 (January-February 2022).
[29] Section 107 Of US Copyrights Act:-Notwithstanding The Provisions Of Sections 106 And 106A, The Fair Use Of A Copyrighted Work, Including Such Use By Reproduction In Copies Or Phonorecords Or By Any Other Means Specified By That Section, For Purposes Such As Criticism, Comment, News Reporting, Teaching (Including Multiple Copies For Classroom Use), Scholarship, Or Research, Is Not An Infringement Of Copyright. In Determining Whether The Use Made Of A Work In Any Particular Case Is A Fair Use The Factors To Be Considered Shall Include—
(1) The Purpose And Character Of The Use, Including Whether Such Use Is Of A Commercial Nature Or Is For Nonprofit Educational Purposes;
(2) The Nature Of The Copyrighted Work;
(3) The Amount And Substantiality Of The Portion Used In Relation To The Copyrighted Work As A Whole; And
(4) The Effect Of The Use Upon The Potential Market For Or Value Of The Copyrighted Work.
[30] Authors Guild, Inc. V. Hathitrust, 755 F.3d 87, 103 (2d Cir. 2014)
[31] NXIVM Corp. V. Ross Inst., 364 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2004)
[32]Oracle America, Inc. V. Google LLC 886 F.3d 1179 (Fed. Cir. 20a18).
[34] Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. V. Sarony, Ill U.S. 53 (1884).
[35] Sega Enterprises Ltd. V. Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992)
[36] Kelly V. Arriba Soft Corp., 336 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2003); Perfect 10, Inc. V. Amazon.Com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cit. 2007).
[37] Authors Guild V. Google Inc., 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015).
[38] Harper & Row Publ V. Nation Enters 471 U.S. 539, 560 (1985).
[39] Edward Rex, "Jukedeck: Building A Creative Al Business", Available At Https:// Entrepreneurship.Blog.Jbs.Cam.Ac.Uk/Author/Ed-Newton-Rex/(Visited On Feb. 14, 2025)
[48] Sean Flynn Et Al., Implementing User Rights For Research In The Field Of Artificial Intelligence: A Call For International Action, 2020 SSRN Elec. J., , Https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.3578819.
[51] Ted Shapiro & Sunniva Hannson, "The DSM Copyright Directive- EU Copyright Will Indeed Never Be The Same", EIPR 404, 6 (2019). Https://Www.Wiggin.Co.Uk/App/Uploads/2019/08/2019_41_EIPR_Issue_7FINAL_SHAPIRO.Pdf
[57] Christophe Geiger Et Al., Text And Data Mining In The Proposed Copyright Reform: Making The EU Ready For An Age Of Big Data?, 49 IIC - Int'l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Competition L. 814, (2018), Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S40319-018-0722-2
[61] Section 52(1) Of Indiasn Copyrights Act Of 1957 The Following Acts Shall Not Constitute An Infringement Of Copyright, Namely,--
1[(A) A Fair Dealing With Any Work, Not Being A Computer Programme, For The Purpose Of--
(I) Private Or Personal Use, Including Research;
(Ii) Criticism Or Review, Whether Of That Work Or Of Any Other Work;
(Iii) The Reporting Of Current Events And Current Affairs, Including The Reporting Of A Lecture Delivered In Public;
Explanation.-- The Storing Of Any Work In Any Electronic Medium For The Purposes Mentioned In This Clause, Including The Incidental Storage Of Any Computer Programme Which Is Not Itself In Infringing Copy For The Said Purposes, Shall Not Constitute Infringement Of Copyright.]
[62] Section 52(1)(A) A Fair Dealing With A Literary, Dramatic, Musical Or Artistic Work Private Use Including Research
[63]Saregama India Ltd. & Ors. V. Alkesh Gupta & Ors. (2013)
[64] Tips Industries Ltd. V. Wynk Music Ltd AIRONLINE 2019 BOM 1452