[1]ArunJaitley, Minister of Finance, Corporate Affairs
and Information & Broadcasting, India,
Statement at the Thirty Third
Meeting of International Monetary and Financial Committee
[1]"India Development
Update", World Bank Report 151554
[1] Under the
Chairmanship of Shri S.S.Tarapore (former Deputy Governor)
[1] (1999) 4 SCC 69
[1] (2000) 100 Compo Cases 257 (Mad) (HC)
[1]AIR 1997 Guj.
75
[1] AIR 2000 SC 1535
[1]Saurav Harsh Son Of Shri Harish vs State Of Rajasthan
on 28 November, 2018
[1]Given in Third Schedule of the B. R. Act.
[1] Agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision in 2010-11
[1] Introduced in Lok Sabha by the Minister of Finance,
Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman, on March 3, 2020
[1]https://www.livemint.com/news/india
[1] 1970 3 SCR 530
[1] (1989) 4 SCC
90
[1] AIR 1986 SC 1370
[1] AIR 1961 Mad 8
[1] 143 ER 441
[1] (2001)3 SCC 726
[1] AIR 2016
[1] Ibid.
[1] W.P. No. 21814 (W) of 2017
Citation
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The
Nature of the Judicial Process 19 (Yale University, 1961).
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law xii
- xiv (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1] Cf. Pound, “Courts and
Legislation” 226, 9 Modern Legal Philosophy Series.
[1]Ibid.
[1]Act 43 of 1954.
[1] Act 2 of 1974.
[1] Prof. (Mrs.) Nomita Agarwal, Jurisprudence -(Legal
Theory) 63 (Central Law Publications, Allahabad, 4th Ed. 2003).
[1] Part III, The Constitution of
India.
[1] Right to free and compulsory
education under Article 21A is a new addition under the right to life in the
year 2002. The society felt the need to educate its children in order to make
them more aware of the social change taking place around him or her. The way it
was carried out was by law so as to make education a compulsory necessity for
all children up to 14 years of age.
[1] A. Lakshmi Nath, Precedent in The Indian Legal
System 16 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 1990).
[1] A V Dicey, Lectures on the
relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth
Century 362(1905).
[1]Investors Compensation Scheme
Ltd v. West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 All ER 98; Rainy Sky SA
v. Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 W.L.R. 2900; Arnold v. Britton
[2015] UKSC 36, [2015] A.C. 1619; Wood v. Capita Insurance Services Ltd
[2017] UKSC 24, [2017] A.C. 1173.
[1]Marks & Spencer Plc v.
BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72,
[2016] A.C. 742.
[1]Marley v. Rawlings [2015]
AC 129.
[1]Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC
42, [2017] A.C. 467.
[1]Donoghue v. Stevenson
[1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.
[1]Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v.
Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] A.C. 465
[1]Hedley Byrne (Supra); Caparo
Industries plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605; Customs and Excise
Commissioners v. Barclays Bank [2007] 1 AC 181.
[1]McLoughlin v. O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410; Alcock
v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310
[1]Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd
v. Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd [1967] 1 A.C. 617.
[1]OBG v. Allan [2008] 1 AC
1.
[1] The Sale of Goods Act 1893 was
an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
which regulated contracts in which goods are sold and bought. The whole of this
Act, except for Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1980, subject to a number
of savings. Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1982. The 1893 Act is still
operative in Ireland, although it has been amended on a number of occasions
since it came into force.
[1]Nichol v. Godts (1854) 10
Ex. 191, Jones v. Just (1867-68) L.R. 3 Q.B. 197, Mody v. Gregson
(1868-69) L.R. 4 Ex. 49 and Drummond & Sons v. Van Ingen & Co
(1887) 12 App. Cas 284.
[1] [1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.
[1]Fons et origo is a Latin term meaning the
‘source and origin’.
[1]Anns v. Merton London Borough
Council [1978] AC 728, 751 per Lord Wilberforce.
[1]Murphy v. Brentwood District
Council [1991] 1 AC 398.
[1]Caparo Industries Plc v.
Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605, Michael v. Chief Constable of South Wales
Police [2015] UKSC 2, [2015] A.C. 1732; Robinson v. Chief Constable of
West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4; [2018] A.C. 736
[1]See, Lewis N Klar, Judicial
Activism in Private law (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Review 251-240.
[1]Cox v. Ministry of Justice
[2016] UKSC 10, [2016] A.C. 660.
[1]Lister v. Hesley Hall Ltd. [2002] 1 AC 215
(sexual abuse); Mohamud v. WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11,
[2016] A.C. 677 (assault); Catholic Child Welfare Society v. Institute of
the Brothers of the Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 56, [2013] 2 A.C. 1 (the
concept of enterprise risk).
[1]Montgomery v. Lanarkshire
Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, [2015] A.C. 1430.
[1]Douglas and others v. Hello!
Ltd and others (No 3) [2008] 1 A.C. 1; Campbell v. Mirror Group
Newspapers [2004] 2 AC 457.
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The
Growth of the Law 2 (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1]Indian
Evidence Act 1872, Act 1 of 1872, Section 53A.
[1]State
of U.P v. Pappu (2005) 3
SCC 594.
[1]Raja
v. State of Karnataka
(2016) 10 SCC 506.
[1]Lillu
v. State of Haryana (2013)
14 SCC 643.
[1]State
of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh
(1996) 2 SCC 384.
[1]State
of U.P v. Munshi ((2008) 9 SCC 390.
Citation
[1] Are
Fair Trials Possible In Today’s World Of Social Media, availale at:
https://www.iarani.com/blogs/are-fair-trials-possible-in-todays-world-of-social-media Are fair trials possible in today’s world of
social media? (last visited on 16th October 2020)
[1]Ibid
[1]
Robert Grant, Joseph Katz, The Great Trials of the Twenties: The
Watershed decade in America’s Courtrooms, Sarpedon, 1998.
[1] 200th Report of the Law Commission on “Trial
by Media: Free Speech v Fair Trial Under Criminal Procedure (Amen
dmentstotheContemptofCourtAct,1971)”
[1] Tata Press Ltd. v. Mahanagar
Telecom Nigam Ltd., AIR 19955SCC 139
[1] State of Kerala and Anr. v. N.M. Thomas and Ors., AIR
1976SC 490.
[1] Justice R.S. Chauhan Trial by
Media: An International Perspective, available at:
http://www.supremecourtcases.com/index2.php.,last visited on 14th
October 2020.
[1] Abolish Rather & Konica Satan, Judicial
Intervention in the Sub-judice-The emerging issues of Trial by Media, Bharati
Law Review, (2015).
[1](1992) 2 SCC
105
[1]
What is the Jessica Lall murder case?, available at: https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpress.com/article/what-is/what-is-the-jessica-lal-murder-case/lite/(last visited on 17th October 2020)
[1]Ibid
[1](2010) 9 SCC 747
[1] Nupur Talwar v Central
Bureau of Investigation and Another (AIR 2012 SC 1921)
[1]Arpan Banerjee, judicial
Safeguards Against “Trial By Media” : Should Blasi’s “Checking Value” Theory
Apply In India? Vol.2,p. 28,Journal of Media Law& Ethics, (2010).
[1]
Article 129- “The Supreme
court shall be a court of record and shall have all powers of such a court
including the power to punish for contempt of
itself”
Article 215-
“Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of
such a court
including power to punish for contempt of itself”
[1]ibid
[1] Commissioner, Agra v Rohtas
Singh, AIR 1998 SC 685
[1] (2007) 98 DRJ 41.
Citation
[1] Section 2(m) of Indian Trademarks Act,
1999
[1] Article 15(1) of TRIPS Agreement
[1] Trade Marks Rules,2017 Rule 26
[1] P. Narayanan, Intellectual Property Law, Third
Edition, page no.147.
[1] P.Narayanan, Intellectual Property Law, Third
Edition,page no.147.
[1] Lakmikant V.Patel v. Chetanbhat Shah, AIR 002 SC
275.
[1] Section 2(1)(m) of Trade Marks Act, 1999
[1] Section 2(1)(zb) of Trade Marks Act, 1999
[1] Mohit Joshi, Smell Mark-New Era, International Journal of Law Management and
Humanities, Volume 3, issue 3, 2020, ISSN 2581-5569
?Mohit Joshi, SMELL MARK: A
NEW ERA, International Journal on Law Management and Humanities, 2020,Vol
3,Issue 3, ISSN 2581-5369.
?Tanushree Roy,
“REGISTRABILITY OF SMELL MARK AS TRADEMARK: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS”, Journal on
Contemporary issue of Law, Vol 4, Issue 3, ISSN 2455-4782.
?WIPO Magazine, Smell, Sound
and taste- Getting a sense of Non-Traditional Marks.
?Aakrishiti Kumar, SMELL MARKS: SHOULD INDIA START SNIFFING, India
Legal, December 12, 2020
Cases:
?Lakmikant V.Patel v.
Chetanbhat Shah, AIR 002 SC 275.
?Ralf Sieckman vs Deutsches
Patent, European Court of Justice Case
Citation
·Bannigan, John (1952, December 3).
The Hindu Code Bill. Far Eastern Survey: American Institute of Pacific
Relations, XX1.
·Kishwar, Madhu (1990, May, 30).
Codified Hindu Law: Myth and Reality.
·Menski, Werner. Comparative Law in a
Global Context : The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. New York: Cambridge
UP, 2006.
·Nagpal, Ramesh C. Modern Hindu Law.
Allahabad: Manav Law House, 1983.
6.^ Jump up to:ab Washbrook, D. A. (1981).
"Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India". Modern
Asian Studies. 15 (3): 649–721. . JSTOR312295.
7.^ Kugle, Scott Alan (May
2001). "Framed, Blamed and Renamed: The Recasting of Islamic Jurisprudence
in Colonial South Asia". [2]
8.J. D. M. Derrett, Religion,
Law, and the State in India (London: Faber, 1968), 96; For a
related distinction between religious and secular law in Dharma??stra, see Lubin, Timothy (2007). "Punishment and
Expiation: Overlapping Domains in Brahmanical Law". Indologica
Taurinensia. 33: 93–122. SSRN1084716.
9.^ K Ewing (1988), Sharia and ambiguity in South Asian Islam,
University of California Press, ISBN978-0520055759
11.^ Jump up to:abc Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber;
Rudolph, Lloyd I. (August 2000). "Living with Difference in
India". The Political Quarterly. Wiley. 71 (s1):
20–38. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.71.s1.4.
[1]Avtar Singh book on
“Competition Law” by EBC edition 2021
[1] Section 3 of the
competition act 2002
[1]Avtar Singh book on “Competition Law” by EBC edition 2021
[1]Versha Vahini Textbook on
“Indian Competition Law” by Lexis Nexis edition 2021
Bare act – The competition act 2002
[1] 255 U.S. 81 (1921)
[1] Case No. 29 of 2010
[1]Versha Vahini Textbook on
“Indian Competition Law” by Lexis Nexis edition 2021
[1]https://www.cci.gov.in
\[1] Case No. 24 of 2011
[1] Case No. 29 of 2018
[1] Case No. 61 of 2014
[1]Avtar Singh book on “Competition Law” by EBC edition
2021
[1] Section 19(3) of the competition
act 2002
[1] Section 32 of the competition
act 2002
[1] Case No. 33 of 2011
[1] Section 26 of the competition
act 2002
[1] Section 19 of the competition
act 2002
[1] Section 27 of the competition
act 2002
[1] Section 33 of the competition
act 2002
Citation
1
S K Dholakia, Analytical Appraisal of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2003, 39 ICA?S ARB. QUAT.
3 (2005).
2
(1992) 2 Arb LR 154: AIR 1993 SC 998: (1992) 3 SCC 511.
3
See para 19 of National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd v. Singer Co
4
1998 AIR 825, 1997( 6 )Suppl.SCR 186, 1998( 1 )SCC 305, 1997( 7 ) SCALE338 , 1997( 9 )JT 666
6 Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Sec. Irrigation Dept., MANU/SC/7460/2008 : (2008) 7 SCC 169 : (AIR
2009 SC (Supp) 396) and Union of India v. Popular Construction Co., MANU/SC/0613/2001 : (2001) 8 SCC 470 : (AIR
2001 SC 4010)
7
State of West Bengal v. Associated Contractors, AIR 2015 SC 260.
8
1994 (4) SCC 541.
9
(Civil Appeal No 1650 of 2018)
10 Commercial Courts Act, s 2(1)(i), “Specified Value”, in relation to a commercial dispute, shall mean the value of the
subject-matter in respect of a suit as determined in accordance with section 12 which shall not be less than one crore rupees
or such higher value, as may be notified by the Central Government
11 1995 Supp (2) SCC 280.
12 Noy Vallesina v Jindal Drugs Limited 2006 (5) BomCR 155
13
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, section- 49
14
2007 (1) RAJ 339 (Bom), AIR 1986 Gujarat 62.
15 2001 (6) SCC 356.
16 M/s. Fuerst Day Lawson Pvt. Ltd v. Jindal Exports Pvt. Ltd. 2001 (6) SCC 356.
17 BALCO v. Kaiser Aluminum, (2012) 9 SCC 552.
18 Ibid
19 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5085 OF 2013
20 Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. v. Progetto Grano Spa, (2014) 2 SCC 433.
21 Law Commission of India, 176TH REPORT ON ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) BILL,
2001, at 68.
22 Frances Van Eupen, Reach of Judicial Review of arbitral award, INT. A.L.R., N-75 (2008).
[1]Yogesh
Patel, Charul Patel, Agenda of Women Empowerment at
the Boards- Amendment to Companies Act, International Journal of Innovations in Engineering
and Management, Vol. 2, 39 (2013), available at http://www.gtia.co.in/papers/IJIEM22062013.pdf
[1] Bala Balasubramanian,Gender Equality, Inclusivity and
Corporate Governance in India, Published in Journal of Human Values 2003,
(19:1) 15-28, DOI: 10.1177/0971685812470327; http://jhv.sagepub.com
[1]Kellye Y.
Testy, Capitalism and Freedom — For Whom?: Feminist Legal Theory and
Progressive Corporate Law, 67 Law
and Contemporary Problems 87-108 (Fall 2004) https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol67/iss4/5
[1]Ronnie Cohen, Feminist Thought and Corporate Law:
It's Time to Find Our Way Up from the Bottom (Line),
2 AM. U. J. GENDER & L. 1 (1994).