INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON THE EXPLOITATION OF FABRICATORS IN SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES: AN INDIAN LEGAL ANALYSIS BY - ASST. PROF. HANUMANT S. DODAKE

Authors: ASST. PROF. HANUMANT S. DODAKE

Registration ID: 108934 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8934

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: dodakesir@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-41298341/HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON THE EXPLOITATION OF FA

THE CONUNDRUM BETWEEN PATENT AND COPYRIGHT LAWS IN AI-DRIVEN DEVICES BY - KANAN JOSHI & GARGI PANT

Authors: KANAN JOSHI & GARGI PANT

Registration ID: 108932 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8932 & IJLRA8933

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: gargipantmithi@gmail.com

Page No : 10 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-33946452/THE CONUNDRUM BETWEEN PATENT AND COPYRIGHT LAWS IN

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT IN SOUTH ASIA: CHALLENGES, GLOBAL DYNAMICS, AND PROSPECTS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY BY - SAPTARSHI MONDAL

Authors: SAPTARSHI MONDAL

Registration ID: 108931 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8931

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: saptarshimandal2021@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-36144958/NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT IN SOUTH ASIA: CHALLENGES, GLO

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TRANSFORMING EDUCATION BY - AASTHA CHOUDHARY

Authors: AASTHA CHOUDHARY

Registration ID: 108930 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8930

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: aastha482@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-85497922/A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIG

ENFORCEABILITY OF NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS UNDER INDIAN LAW BY - ISHA BHARTI

Authors: ISHA BHARTI

Registration ID: 108929 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8929

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: isha785815@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-78815693/ENFORCEABILITY OF NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN EMPLOYMEN

CONSTITUTIONAL GUARDIANS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY - KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

Authors: KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

Registration ID: 108928 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8928

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: moulendra02@gmail.com

Page No : 25 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-42399597/CONSTITUTIONAL GUARDIANS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF J

DEBT RECOVERY MECHANISMS IN INDIA: ANALYZING LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS BY - KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

Authors: KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

Registration ID: 108927 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8927

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: moulendra02@gmail.com

Page No : 23 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-76351836/DEBT RECOVERY MECHANISMS IN INDIA: ANALYZING LEGAL

BRIDGING INNOVATION AND JUSTICE: THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ON LEGAL SYSTEMS BY - KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

Authors: KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

Registration ID: 108926 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8926

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: moulendra02@gmail.com

Page No : 19 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-77868261/BRIDGING INNOVATION AND JUSTICE: THE IMPACT OF TEC

SURROGACY- ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN INDIA BY - SAKSHI SHARMA

Authors: SAKSHI SHARMA

Registration ID: 108925 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8925

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sakshisharma11112001@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-57696318/SURROGACY- ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN INDIA

ADVERSARIAL V/S INQUISITORIAL MODEL OF JUDICIARY BY - IFRAH HAYAT

Authors: IFRAH HAYAT

Registration ID: 108924 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8924

Year : Jan -2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ifrahhayat2006@gmail.com

Page No : 08 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/01.2025-33187366/ADVERSARIAL V/S INQUISITORIAL MODEL OF JUDICIARY

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Assistant Professor in DES Shri navalmal Firodia Law College , Pune

[2] Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, "Annual Report 2022-23" (Government of India, 2023)

[4] Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 161.

[5] People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235

[6] M.C. Mehta v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1996) 6 SCC 756.

[7] Constitution of India, arts. 39(a), 41, 42, 43.

[8] The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020, No. 37, Acts of Parliament, 2020 (India).

[9] The Code on Wages, 2019, No. 29, Acts of Parliament, 2019 (India).

[10] The Industrial Relations Code, 2020, No. 35, Acts of Parliament, 2020 (India)

[11] Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, (1984) 3 SCC 161

[12] People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India, (1982) 3 SCC 235

[13] Gujarat High Court Judgment, (2021) Labor Law Reporter 456.

[14] Bombay High Court Judgment, (2020) Industrial Law Reporter 789.

[15] V.V. Giri National Labour Institute, "State of Working India 2021" (2021).

[16] Ministry of Labour and Employment, "Annual Report 2022-23" (Government of India, 2023).

[17] International Labour Organization, "India Labour Market Update" (2022)

[18] Labour Bureau, Ministry of Labour and Employment, "Indian Labour Statistics 2022" (2022)

[19] Ministry of Labour and Employment, "Shram Suvidha Portal Analysis Report" (2023).

[20] Labour Law Reporter, "Compilation of Labour Enforcement Statistics" (2022).

[21] Reserve Bank of India, "Report on MSME Sector" (2023).

[22] Indian Journal of Labour Economics, "Productivity and Working Conditions in Indian SMEs" 64:2 (2022).

[23] Ministry of MSME, "MSME Support and Outreach Program Report" (2023)

[24] SIDBI, "Annual Report on CGTMSE Scheme" (2022).

[25] Parliamentary Standing Committee on Labour, "Report on Labour Codes Implementation" (2023)

[26] National Commission on Labour, "State Labour Laws Harmonization Report" (2022)

[1] The Patents Act, 1970. (n.d.). Available at: https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/IPOAct/1_31_1_patent-act-1970-11march2015.pdf.

[2] lddashboard.legislative.gov.in. (n.d.). The Patents Act, 1970|Legislative Department | Ministry of Law and Justice | GoI. [online] Available at: https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/actsofparliamentfromtheyear/patents-act-1970.

[3] lddashboard.legislative.gov.in. (n.d.). The Copyright Act, 1957|Legislative Department | Ministry of Law and Justice | GoI. [online] Available at: https://lddashboard.legislative.gov.in/actsofparliamentfromtheyear/copyright-act-1957.

[4] www.merriam-webster.com. (n.d.). Definition of HARDWARE. [online] Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hardware.

[5] Merriam-webster.com. (2019). Definition of SOFTWARE. [online] Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/software.

[6] Yanisky-Ravid, S. and Velez-Hernandez, L.A. (2017). Copyrightability of Artworks Produced by Creative Robots, Driven by Artificial Intelligence Systems and the Concept of Originality: The Formality - Objective Model. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2943778.

[7] Hayes, C.M. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: Both Sides of the Black Box. [online] Social Science Research Network. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4517799.

[8] Reichman, J.H. (1994). Legal Hybrids between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms. Columbia Law Review, [online] 94, p.2432. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/clr94&div=71&id=&page=.

[9] HeinOnline. (2021). About | HeinOnline. [online] Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/injlolw3&div=499&id=&page= [Accessed 2 Jan. 2025].

[10] USPTO (2024). United States Patent and Trademark Office. [online] Uspto.gov. Available at: https://www.uspto.gov/.

[11] Abbott, R. (2022). Intellectual property and artificial intelligence: an introduction. [online] www.elgaronline.com. Available at: https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800881907/book-part-9781800881907-6.xml.

[1] Author is a student at Xavier Law School, St. Xavier University, Kolkata

[2] ‘Home’ (SIPRI) /www.sipri.org/> accessed 15 September 2024

[3] ‘Role of Nuclear Weapons Grows as Geopolitical Relations Deteriorate-New SIPRI Yearbook Out Now’ (SIPRI, 17 June 2024) /www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2024/role-nuclear-weapons-grows-geopolitical-

relations-deteriorate-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now> accessed 15 September 2024

[4] Chaudhry AA, ‘Nuclear Deterrence’ (DAWN.COM, 26 May 2024) /www.dawn.com/news/1835721> accessed 15 September 2024

[5] Biswas S, ‘India and Pakistan Came Close to Nuclear War: Pompeo’ (BBC News, 25 January 2023)

/www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-64396138> accessed 15 September 2024

[6] Malik P, ‘A Speech That Put India on the Global Stage’ (The Hindu, 2 April 2024)

/www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-speech-that-put-india-on-the-global-stage/article68016249.ece> accessed 15 September 2024

[7] Nations U, “Disarmament” (United Nations) /www.un.org/en/global-issues/disarmament> accessed September 15, 2024

[8] (U.S. - india: Civil nuclear cooperation - state.gov) accessed 14 September 2024

[9] Syed BS, “India Leads Pakistan in Nuclear Arms for First Time” DAWN.COM (June 20, 2024) /www.dawn.com/news/1840769> accessed September 15, 2024

[1] Arthur C. Clarke, Profiles of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21 J. Educ. Tech. 145, 149 (2023).

[2] Shannon T. R., Artificial Intelligence and Educational Equity: Opportunities and Ethical Considerations, 5 AI Ethics J. 65, 70 (2022).

[3] John P. Smith, The Impact of AI on Education Systems, 45 Tech. Educ. J. 78, 83 (2022).

[4] Alan M. Goldman, AI Chatbots in Education: Benefits and Challenges, 39 Educ. Tech. Rev. 101, 106 (2023).

[5] Amalia R. Taylor, Personalized Learning with AI: A Case Study of Adaptive Systems, 67 J. Educ. Tech. 55, 58 (2021).

[6] Caroline L. Hughes, The Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems in STEM Education, 12 AI & Learning 45, 49 (2021).

[7] Peter L. Jones, Automated Grading in the Digital Classroom: Opportunities and Limitations, 29 J. Higher Educ. Tech. 234, 238 (2023).

[8] Samantha J. Wells, Predictive Analytics and Student Success: A Review of Current Applications, 58 Data Sci. Educ. 99, 104 (2022).

[9] George T. Wilson, Bias in AI Algorithms: Ethical Concerns for Education, 25 Ethics in Tech. 115, 118 (2023).

[10] David N. Anderson, Protecting Student Data in AI Systems: Privacy Challenges, 38 Cybersecurity Educ. 45, 47 (2022).

[11] Nicholas K. Turner, The Digital Divide in AI Education: Global Inequality in Access to Technology, 31 Global Educ. Review 92, 97 (2021).

[12] Rachel A. Green, The Future of Teaching in AI-Empowered Classrooms, 24 J. Educ. Futures 128, 131 (2022).

[13] Anderson, J. & Rainie, L., Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Education, PEW RESEARCH CENTER (2018), https://www.pewresearch.org.

[14] Warschauer, M., Digital Literacy and Learning in the Age of AI, 34 J. EDUC. COMPUTING RES. 35 (2020).

[16] Joubert, M., AI and Distance Learning in Low-Resource Settings, 14 EDUC. TECH. & SOC'Y 98 (2021).

[17] Perrone, V. & Holmes, M., The Digital Divide in AI Education, 30 INT'L J. EDUC. TECH. 65 (2020).

[18] Zhang, H., Liu, Q., & Chen, Y., AI-Driven Solutions for Educational Accessibility, 7 AI FOR SOC. GOOD J. 92 (2021).

[19] Binns, T., Ethical Challenges of AI in Education, 19 J. AI & EDUC. 85 (2022).

[21] Huang, J., et al., AI-Powered Education: Revolutionizing Learning in the 21st Century, 10 J. EDUC. TECH. DEV. 47 (2020).

[22] Johnson, D., Predictive Analytics in Education: A Game-Changer for Personalized Learning, 11 EDU. TECH. & DEV. 25 (2021).

[23] Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A., The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (W.W. Norton & Company 2017).

[25] Joubert, M., AI and Distance Learning in Low-Resource Settings, 14 EDUC. TECH. & SOC'Y 98 (2021).

[26] Perrone, V. & Holmes, M., The Digital Divide in AI Education, 30 INT'L J. EDUC. TECH. 65 (2020).

[27] Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhang, C., AI and Education: A Review of the Current Applications and Future Prospects, 25 EDUC. & INFO. TECH. 110 (2020).

^{^[1]} Article 142 of the Indian Constitution: . Enforcement of decrees and orders of the Supreme Court and orders as to discovery, etc.—(1) The Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it, and any decree so passed or order so made shall be enforceable throughout the territory of India in such manner as may be prescribed by or under any law made by Parliament and, until provision in that behalf is so made, in such manner as the President may by order1 Prescribe.

^{^[2]}CPC section 151. Saving of inherent powers of Court.—Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the Court.

CrPC section 482. Saving of inherent powers of High Court.—Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code, or to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.

^{^[3]} Prem Chand Garg v. Excise Commissioner, UP (1963 SCR Supl. (1) 885)

^{^[4]} HLA Hart - Positivism and Separation of Law and Morals (1958), 71 Harvard Law Review 593, 601-602).

^{^[5]}Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act (IC Act)- Agreement in restraint of trade, void.—Every agreement by which any one is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that extent void. Exception 1.—Saving of agreement not to carry on business of which good-will is sold.—One who sells the good-will of a business may agree with the buyer to refrain from carrying on a similar business, within specified local limits, so long as the buyer, or any person deriving title to the good-will from him, carries on a like business therein, provided that such limits appear to the Court reasonable, regard being had to the nature of the business.

^{^[6]}Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,-Effect of arbitral and related court proceedings commenced prior to 23rd October, 2015.—Unless the parties otherwise agree, the amendments made to this Act by the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 shall— (a) not apply to— (i) arbitral proceedings commenced before the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (23rd October, 2015); (ii) court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such arbitral proceedings irrespective of whether such court proceedings are commenced prior to or after the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015; (b) apply only to arbitral proceedings commenced on or after the commencement of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 and to court proceedings arising out of or in relation to such arbitral proceedings.

^{^[7]} Ramdas Vithaldas Durbar v. Amerchand & Co (43 IA 164)

^{^[9]} R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka (1991 SCR Supl. (1) 387)

^{^[10]} Madhub Chander v. Rajcoomar Das ((1874) 14 BLR 76)

^{^[11]} Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. Century Spinning and Manufacturing Company Ltd. (1967 AIR 1098),

^{^[12]} E. Underwood & Son Ltd. v. Barker [(1899) 1 Ch 300 CA])

[1] Bhattacharyya, S. (2019). Evolution of the judiciary system in India (pp. 32–45). Oxford University Press

[2] Basu, D. D. (2018). Introduction to the Constitution of India.

[3] Hall, K. L. (1992). The judiciary in American history (pp. 145–189). Oxford University Press.

[4] Finkelman, P. (2014). The U.S. Supreme Court: A historical overview (pp. 78–102). Cambridge University Press.

[5] Basu, D. D. (2018). Introduction to the Constitution of India.

[6] Mahajan, V. D. (2001). Jurisprudence and legal theory (pp. 110–135). Eastern Book Company

[7] Gupta, A. (2015). Structure and functions of the Indian judiciary (pp. 65–89). Sage Publications.

[8] Jain, M. P. (2015). Indian Constitutional Law.

[10] Jain, M. P. (2015). Indian Constitutional Law (8th ed.). LexisNexis. (pp. 785-793).

[12] Rosen, J. (2006). The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries that Defined America. Henry Holt and Co. (pp. 102-110).

[13] Baxi, U. (1980). The Supreme Court under Trial: Judicial Power and Indian Democracy. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 22(3), 369-393.

[14] Sathe, S. P. (2002). Judicial Activism: The Indian Experience. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 1(1), 29-53.

[15] Chandrachud, Y. (2018). The Judiciary and Constitutional Interpretation in India: Challenges and Reforms. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 54(1), 55-72.

[16] Kumar, R. (2010). Appointment and Accountability of Judges: Indian and US Perspective. Comparative Constitutional Law Review, 2(1), 12-28.

[17] Chandrachud, Y. (2018). The Judiciary and Constitutional Interpretation in India: Challenges and Reforms. Journal of Indian Law Institute, 54(1), 55-72.

[18] Kumar, R. (2010). Appointment and Accountability of Judges: Indian and US Perspective. Comparative Constitutional Law Review, 2(1), 12-28.

[19] Bhushan, P. (2004). Judicial Activism and the Role of the Judiciary in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(49), 5159-5161.

[20] Sahu, G. P. (2008). Public Interest Litigation in India. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 69(2), 313-326.

[21] Basu, D. D. (2012). Introduction to the Constitution of India (22nd ed.). Lexis Nexis.

[22] Tushnet, M. (1996). Legal Aid and the U.S. Constitution. Harvard Law Review, 109(8), 125-149.

[23] Singhania, K. (2019). Overview of New Civil and Criminal Laws in India. Journal of Indian Law, 48(3), 112-127.

[24] Zebley, S. (2010). Federal Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure. Journal of Legal Studies, 39(1), 23-31.

[25] Shankar, R. (2007). Judicial Precedents and Their Role in Indian Courts. Journal of Indian Constitutional Law, 17(1), 52-68.

[26] Zebley, S. (2010). Stare Decisis and Federal Court Precedents. Journal of Legal Studies, 39(1), 23-31.

[28] Goodwin, A. (2020). Addressing the backlog: Judicial efficiency and reform in India. Law and Social Policy Journal, 12(1), 30-44.

[29] Meador, D. J. (2019). Judicial activism and restraint: Balancing the scales in the US judicial system. American Journal of Legal Studies, 9(4), 118-135.

[30] Turner, B. (2020). The cost of justice: Examining the high cost of legal services in the US. Harvard Law Review, 13(3), 102-120.

[31] Goodwin, A. (2020). Addressing the backlog: Judicial efficiency and reform in India. Law and Social Policy Journal, 12(1), 30-44.

[32] Turner, B. (2020). The cost of justice: Examining the high cost of legal services in the US. Harvard Law Review, 13(3), 102-120.

[2] Inderdeep Singh Ahluwalia (2024) - Protecting Borrowers and Securing Stability: A Critical View of Debt Recovery Processes in India- International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)

[3] Sujata Visaria (2009) - Legal Reform and Loan Repayment: The Microeconomic Impact of Debt Recovery Tribunals in India - American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, July 2009, Vol. 1, No. 3 (July 2009), pp. 59-81

[5] Inderdeep Singh Ahluwalia (2024) - Protecting Borrowers and Securing Stability: A Critical View of Debt Recovery Processes in India- International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR)

[9] Surojit Dey (2018) - Recovery Mechanisms of Non-Performing Assets in Indian Commercial Banks: An Empirical Study - NSOU-OPEN JOURNAL Vol.1 No.2 (July 2018) A multidisciplinary Online Journal of Netaji Subhas Open University, INDIA

[10] https://www.bajajfinserv.in/benefits-of-using-instant-loan-apps

[11] https://kanoonjunction.com/debt-recovery-tribunal-in-india-challenges-and-way-forwards/#:~:text=Debt%20Recovery%20Tribunals%20(DRT)%20in,in%20the%20recovery%20of%20debts.

[1] Manu Smriti and the Ancient Legal System in India, Journal of Legal History and Culture, vol.15, 2018,

pp.45-68.

[2] The Constitution of India, Government of India, 1950.

[3] The Role of Judiciary in India, Indian Legal Perspectives, Vol. 7,2020, pp. 102-110.

[4] Digitalization of Court Proceedings: A Comparative Study, Journal of Law and Technology, Vol.12, 2022.

[5] Artificial Intelligence in Indian Judiciary: A Comparative Study, Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 9, 2021.

[6]E-filing and its Impact on Indian Judicial Efficiency, Legal Tech Journal, Vol.5, 2020.

[7] Blockchain for Secure Record-Keeping in Courts, International Journal of Legal Technology, Vol.3, 2021.

[8] E-SCR and the Digital Transformation of Legal Systems, Supreme Court of India Reports, 2022.

[9] E-Courts Project Overview, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India,2022

[10] SUVAS: AI-Powered Translation in Indian Judiciary, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Law, Vol.2,2022

[11] SUPACE: AI in Indian Judicial Process, Supreme Court Insights, Vol.1, 2022

[12] Live Streaming in Indian Courts: Enhancing Transparency, Media Law Journal, Vol.8, 2023

[13] Virtual Courts in India: Progress and Challenges, Legal Future Journal, Vol.6, 2021.

[14] NSTEP and the Future of Process Serving in India, Journal of Court Administration, Vol.4, 2021

[15] Digital Signatures in Indian Legal Practice, Journal of Electronic Law and Technology, Vol.5, 2022

[16] The Merits and Demerits of Technological Advancements in Law, Law and Society Review, Vol.10, 2021

[17] Challenges in Implementing Technology in Indian Judiciary, Journal of Law and Policy, Vol.7, 2022.

[1] Surrogacy in India: History, Impact on poor and facts, Aug. 17, 2020 17:19 IST. https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/surrogacy-in-india-1597665040-1.

[2] Surrogacy Laws in India – Past Experiences and Emerging Facets, Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Nov. 23, 2019. https://www.barandbench.com/columns/surrogacy-laws-in-india-past-experiences-and-emerging-facets.

[4] Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill of 2020: Balancing Interests, Sidak Singh Kalra, Oct. 1, 2020. https://www.latestlaws.com/articles/surrogacy-regulation-bill-of-2020-balancing-interests/.

[5] PM Arathi, Report of a study to understand the legal rights and challenges of surrogates at 54.

[6] Aneesh V. Pillai, Surrogacy Contracts: Issues and Challenges (April 2020). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340755352_SURROGACY_CONTRACTS_ISSUES_AND_CHALLENGES

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON THE EXPLOITATION OF FABRICATORS IN SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES: AN INDIAN LEGAL ANALYSIS BY - ASST. PROF. HANUMANT S. DODAKE

THE CONUNDRUM BETWEEN PATENT AND COPYRIGHT LAWS IN AI-DRIVEN DEVICES BY - KANAN JOSHI & GARGI PANT

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT IN SOUTH ASIA: CHALLENGES, GLOBAL DYNAMICS, AND PROSPECTS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY BY - SAPTARSHI MONDAL

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TRANSFORMING EDUCATION BY - AASTHA CHOUDHARY

ENFORCEABILITY OF NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS UNDER INDIAN LAW BY - ISHA BHARTI

CONSTITUTIONAL GUARDIANS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA AND USA BY - KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

DEBT RECOVERY MECHANISMS IN INDIA: ANALYZING LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS BY - KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

BRIDGING INNOVATION AND JUSTICE: THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ON LEGAL SYSTEMS BY - KARRI MOULENDRA SATYA VENKAT

SURROGACY- ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN INDIA BY - SAKSHI SHARMA

ADVERSARIAL V/S INQUISITORIAL MODEL OF JUDICIARY BY - IFRAH HAYAT

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2