INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

“COMBATTING EXAMINATION PAPER LEAKS: STRATEGIES FOR THE INDIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM” BY - SEHAR PARVEEN

Authors: SEHAR PARVEEN

Registration ID: 108614 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8614

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: parveensehar90@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-78315689/“COMBATTING EXAMINATION PAPER LEAKS: STRATEGIES

VIRTUAL VULNERABILITIES: THE RISE OF CYBER EXPLOITATION AGAINST CHILDREN POST-PANDEMIC BY - ARUNDHUTI DESHMUKH & SPARSH MANOCHA

Authors: ARUNDHUTI DESHMUKH & SPARSH MANOCHA

Registration ID: 108612 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8612 & IJLRA8613

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: deshmukharundhuti@gmail.com & sparshmanocha2525@gmail.com

Page No : 16 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-91768628/VIRTUAL VULNERABILITIES: THE RISE OF CYBER EXPLOIT

BARKING UP THE RIGHTS FOR ANIMALS ON BEHALF OF VOICELESS: - EXPLORING CRITICAL ISSUES & WELFARE SOLUTIONS. BY - SHRUTI JHA & ROHIT KUMAR

Authors: SHRUTI JHA & ROHIT KUMAR

Registration ID: 108610 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8610 & IJLRA8611

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: sj116420@gmail.com & rkfitness100@gmail.com

Page No : 36 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-91141586/BARKING UP THE RIGHTS FOR ANIMALS ON BEHALF OF VOI

A RESEARCH PAPER ON THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW BY: SHISHIR SINGH

Authors: SHISHIR SINGH

Registration ID: 108609 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8609

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: singhshishir092@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-96419994/A RESEARCH PAPER ON THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE

ROLE OF ITLOS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON URGENT PROCEDURES BY - DR. M. BIRUNTHADEVI

Authors: DR. M. BIRUNTHADEVI

Registration ID: 108608 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8608

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: birunthadevi86.law@gmail.com

Page No : 21 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-95612258/ROLE OF ITLOS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT WITH SPECIAL E

COHABITATION WITHOUT MARRIAGE: ANALYSING LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH THE LENS OF INDIAN PERSONAL LAWS BY - KANGAN CHAWLA & ISHIKA JAISWAL

Authors: KANGAN CHAWLA & ISHIKA JAISWAL

Registration ID: 108607 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8606 & IJLRA8607

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: kangan140@gmail.com & ishika.jaiswal2004@gmail.com

Page No : 17 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-52719542/COHABITATION WITHOUT MARRIAGE: ANALYSING LIVE-IN R

RIGHT TO LIVE IN POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS WITH REFERENCE TO ARTICLE 21 BY - DR. SHIKHA DHIMAN

Authors: DR. SHIKHA DHIMAN

Registration ID: 108605 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8605

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shikha.laws@gndu.ac.in

Page No : 15 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-69743441/RIGHT TO LIVE IN POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT: A CRI

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY BY - MS. BHUVANESHWARI.G & MR. GOWTHAM.M

Authors: MS. BHUVANESHWARI.G & MR. GOWTHAM.M

Registration ID: 108603 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8603 & IJLRA8604

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vmgowtham.murugesan@gmail.com

Page No : 12 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-28448739/INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY

AN ANALYSIS OF “THE IMPORTANCE OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE”: IN COMMEMORATION OF THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LANDMARK JUDGEMENT ‘KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA BY - YOGITA KHATRI

Authors: YOGITA KHATRI

Registration ID: 108602 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8602

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: yogitakhatri22276@rgnul.ac.in

Page No : 11 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-81131351/AN ANALYSIS OF “THE IMPORTANCE OF BASIC STRUCTUR

PROBLEMATIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC EQUITY SHAREHOLDERS: SEBI V. IBC BY - HANAH VARGHESE

Authors: HANAH VARGHESE

Registration ID: 108601 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8601

Year : Oct -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: hanah.varghese@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2024-29119896/PROBLEMATIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC EQUITY SHAREHOLDERS

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

^{^[1]} Is an English language Indian daily newspaper founded in 1932 by Ramnath Goenka

^{^[4]} A person who uses computers to gain unauthorized access to data

^{^[5]} Is a methodology used to hinder or detect unauthorized access to a device or circumvention of a security system

^{^[6]} Includes fingerprints,hand and earlobe geometries,retina patterns voice prints and written signatures ⁷ Closed circuit television

^{^[7]} The recognition from an accrediting agency that an institution maintains a certain level of educational awards

[1] Sakshi Chand, Delhi cops to get ‘one touch’ internet monitoring system, DNA (20 Oct 2024, 5:30 PM), https://www.dnaindia.com/delhi/reports-delhi-cops-to-get-one-touch-internet-monitoring-system-2278908.

[2] Convention on the Rights of the Child, https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention, (last visited oct 26, 2024).

[3] Mohua Das, Child cybercrime surges 32% reveals NCRB data, Underlining vulnerability to online risks, Times of India (Oct. 192024, 7:00 PM), https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/child-cyber-crimes-surges-32-reveals-ncrb-data-underlying-culnerabilty-to-online-risk/articleshow/107168056.cms.

[4] Ministry of Home Affairs https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/CyberSafety_English_Web_03122018.pdf (last visited Oct 26, 2024).

[5] International Centre for missing & Exploited Children, Child Pornography: Model Legislation & Global Review, 7 Edition, (koons Family Institute on int. law and policy 1, 4 (2024), https://www.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/7th-Edition-EN.pdf.

[6] Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking (last visited October 26, 2024).

[7] Miha Šepecfff, Revenge Pornography or Non-Consensual Dissemination of Sexually Explicit Material as a Sexual Offence or as a Privacy Violation Offence, Vol. 13(2) IJCC 418, 420 (2024), https://www.cybercrimejournal.com/pdf/MihaSepecVol13Issue2IJCC2019.pdf.

[8] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, § 75, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).

[9] Monesh Mehndiratta, Information Technology Act, 2000, IPleaders (August 24 2022), https://blog.ipleaders.in/information-technology-act-2000/.

[10] The Information Technology Act, 2000, § 67 and § 67 A, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

[11] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, § 303(1), No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).

[12] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, supra note 11. At § 323.

[13] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, supra note 11. At § 324 (1).

[14] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Preamble, No.32, Acts of Parliament, 2012 (India).

[18] Public Trust of India, over 400% rise in cyber crime cases against children in 2020: NCRB data, Business Standard (Nov. 14 2021, 2:59 PM), https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/over-400-rise-in-cyber-crime-cases-against-children-in-2020-ncrb-data-121111400320_1.html.

[20] Bismee Taskin, Remember ‘Bois Locker Room’? Trial in 2020 case yet to start, forensic report on mobiles awaited, The Print (Oct. 16, 2023, 09:42 am IST), https://theprint.in/india/remember-bois-locker-room-trial-in-2020-case-yet-to-start-forensic-report-on-mobiles-awaited/1804635/.

[1] Author is a student at school of law, MANAV RACHNA UNIVERSITY, FARIDABAD, HARAYANA, INDIA.

[2] Author is a student at school of law, MANAV RACHNA UNIVERSITY, FARIDABAD, HARAYANA, INDIA.

[8] (Animal Welfare Board of India vs. A. Nagaraja & Ors, (2014) 7 SCC 547)

[1] S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr 2010 (5) SCC 600

[2] Payal Sharma v. Superintendent Nari Niketan AIR 2001 All 254.

[3] S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr 2010 (5) SCC 600.

[4] A. Dinohamy v. W.L. Blahamy, AIR 1927 P.C. 185.

[6] D.Velusamy v s D.Patchaiammal AIR 2011 Supreme Court 479.

[9] Wazida Rahman, Live-In-Relationship And Personal Laws: A Contemporary Study, Vol. 3, Issues 3-4, NUJS Journal of Regulatory Studies, 29, 2018, https://www.nujs.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/File-54.pdf .

[10] Rashida Khatoon v S K Islam AIR 2005 Ori 57.

[11] Chanmuniya v Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha and Anr (2011) 1 SCC, 141.

[12] D.Velusamy v s D.Patchaiammal AIR 2011 Supreme Court 479.

[13] Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, 2005, No. 43, Acts of Parliament, 2005 (India).

[14] Narayan Jagluji Thool and Ors v. Mala Chandan Wani AIR 2015 Bombay 36.

[15] Payal Sharma v. Superintendent Nari Niketan AIR 2001 All 254.

[16] Indra Sarma vs. V.K.V. Sarma, (2013) 15 SCC 775.

[18] Vidyadhari v. Sukhrana Bai AIR 2008 SC 1420 (India).

[19] Madan Mohan Singh v. Rajni Kant 2010 (9) SCC 209.

[20] Bharata Matha v. R. Vijaya Renganathan 2010 AIR SCW 3503.

[21] SPS Balasubramanyam v. Sruttayan 1994 AIR 133.

[22]Bharata Matha & Ors. v R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors. 2010 AIR SCW 3503.

[24] Jinia Keotin & Ors. v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi & Ors AIR Online 2002 SC 635.

[25] Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ,§ 16, No. 25, Acts of Parliament, 1955 (India).

[26] Tulsa & Ors v. Durghatiya & Ors 2008 AIR SCW 1148.

[27] Revanasiddappa & Anr. vs Mallikarjun & Ors Civil Appeal No. of 2011.

[28] Dimple Gupta v. Rajiv Gupta 2007 AIR SCW 6651.

[29] Gita Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India 1999 AIR SCW 811.

[1] Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr. (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[2] Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1965 SC 845.

[3] Noorani, A. G., Ninth Schedule and the Supreme Court, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY (Mar. 3-9, 2007) http://www.jstor.org/stable/4419299.

[5] Sri Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 458.

[6] Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1965 SC 845.

[7] Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR (2) 762.

[8] The Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1971.

[9] The Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act, 1971.

[10] The Constitution (Twenty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1971.

[11] The Constitution (Twenty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1972.

[12] Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, (1967) SCR (2) 762.

[13] Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union Of India, AIR 1970 SC 564.

[14] Kesavananda Bharti v. Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461; Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 2299; Minerva

Mills v.Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789; S.P. Sampat Kumar v. India, AIR 1987 SC 386; Sambamurthy v.

A.P, AIR 1987 SC 663.

[15] Sikri, J. Kesavananda Bharati Sripadgalvaru and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr. (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[20] All India Judges Association v. Union of India & Ors., 2023 SCC OnLine SC 673.

[21] Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, (2021) 7 SCC 369.

[23] Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. v. Union of India, AIR 2018 SC 4321.

[24] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors., (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[26] Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 3.

[27] Indian Young Lawyers Association and Ors. v. The State of Kerala and Ors., (2019) 11 SCC 1.

[29] Anuradha Bhasin v. Union Of India, AIR 2020 SC 1308.

[1] Dewan Housing Finance Corporation v. Union of India W.P. 3157 of 2021 (Ind)

[3] DBS Bank Ltd Singapore v. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd and another, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9133 OF 2019 (Ind)

[5] Securities and Exchange Board of India, Recalibration of threshold for Minimum Public Shareholding norms, enhanced disclosures in Companies which undergo Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) ( https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/meetingfiles/dec-2020/1608621922552_1.pdf

[7] Binani Industries Limited Vs. Bank of Baroda & Anr (2018) SCC Online NCLAT 521 (Ind)

[8] K. N Rajakumar v. V. Nagarajan & Ors CIVIL APPEAL NO.2901 OF 2021 (Ind)

[9] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 53 (Ind).

[10] Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee, Report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee, Volume I: Rationale and Design (Nov. 4, 2015), https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf.

[12] Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare Association & Ors. V. NBCC (India) Ltd. & Ors (Ind)

[13] India Resurgence ARC Private Limited v. Amit Metaliks Limited & Another, 2021 SCC Online SC 409 (Ind)

[14] DBS Bank Ltd Singapore v. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd and another, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9133 OF 2019 (Ind)

[15] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 30 (2) (e) (Ind)

[16] Dewan Housing Finance Corporation v. Union of India W.P. 3157 of 2021 (Ind)

[18] Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited (through authorized signatory) v. Satish Kumar Gupta and Others (2020) 8 SCC 531 (Ind)

[19] Rajat Sethi and Aditi Agarwal, Case Note: Judgement of the Supreme Court in the Essar Steel Case, SR Insights, SNRLaw.

[20] Bank of India v. Pradeep Kumar Goenka (RP) Comp.App.(AT)(Ins) 342/2022 (Ind)

[22] Kishorebhai Khamanchonil Goyal vs State of Gujarat (2003) L2 SCC 274 (Ind)

[24] Bhanu Ram v. HDN Diaries and Allied Limited CP No. IB 547 (PB)/2018 (Ind)

[26] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 53 (Ind).

[27] The report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee Volume 1: Rationale and Design (November 2015) https://ibbi.gov.in/BLRCReportVol1_04112015.pdf

[28] Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, No. 31 of 2016, § 29A (Ind).

[29] Arcelor Mittal India Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta (2019) 2 SCC 1 (Ind)

[31] Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [2019] 3 S.C.R. 535 (Ind).

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

“COMBATTING EXAMINATION PAPER LEAKS: STRATEGIES FOR THE INDIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM” BY - SEHAR PARVEEN

VIRTUAL VULNERABILITIES: THE RISE OF CYBER EXPLOITATION AGAINST CHILDREN POST-PANDEMIC BY - ARUNDHUTI DESHMUKH & SPARSH MANOCHA

BARKING UP THE RIGHTS FOR ANIMALS ON BEHALF OF VOICELESS: - EXPLORING CRITICAL ISSUES & WELFARE SOLUTIONS. BY - SHRUTI JHA & ROHIT KUMAR

A RESEARCH PAPER ON THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND MUNICIPAL LAW BY: SHISHIR SINGH

ROLE OF ITLOS IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON URGENT PROCEDURES BY - DR. M. BIRUNTHADEVI

COHABITATION WITHOUT MARRIAGE: ANALYSING LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIPS THROUGH THE LENS OF INDIAN PERSONAL LAWS BY - KANGAN CHAWLA & ISHIKA JAISWAL

RIGHT TO LIVE IN POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS WITH REFERENCE TO ARTICLE 21 BY - DR. SHIKHA DHIMAN

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY BY - MS. BHUVANESHWARI.G & MR. GOWTHAM.M

AN ANALYSIS OF “THE IMPORTANCE OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE”: IN COMMEMORATION OF THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LANDMARK JUDGEMENT ‘KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA BY - YOGITA KHATRI

PROBLEMATIC APPROACH TO PUBLIC EQUITY SHAREHOLDERS: SEBI V. IBC BY - HANAH VARGHESE

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

[21] Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, (2021) 7 SCC 369.

Citation

Citation 2