[19] Vodafone International Holdings B.V. v. Republic of India, PCA Case No. 2016-35, Award (September 25, 2020).
[20] Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021, No. 34 of 2021.
[21] Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan, (2004) 10 SCC 1.
[22] Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. v. Dy. DIT, (2011) 342 ITR 308 (AAR).
[23] Protocol amending the Convention between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of Mauritius to avoid double taxation and prevent fiscal evasion concerning taxes on income and capital gains, signed on May 10, 2016.
[42] Mastercard Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. v. ADIT, (2018) 406 ITR 43 (AAR).
[43] Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT, ITA No. 1190/Bang/2014 (ITAT Bangalore).
Citation
1Foschi,JessicaK."AConstantBattle:TheEvolvingChallengesintheInternationalFightAgainstDoping in Sport." Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 16, no. 2 (2006): 457-86.
2Amos,Anne."GovernanceModelsforSportsandAnti-DopingOrganizations."InternationalJournalof Sport Policy and Politics 12, no. 3 (2020): 359-74
3 Hanstad, Dag Vidar, Andy Smith, and Ivan Waddington. "The Establishment of the World Anti-Doping Agency:AStudyoftheManagementofOrganizationalChangeandUnplannedOutcomes."International Review for the Sociology of Sport43, no. 3 (2008): 227-49.
4InternationalOlympicCommittee.OlympicCharter.Lausanne:IOC,2020. 5Dvorak,Jiri,etal."TimeforChange:ARoadmaptoGuidetheImplementationoftheWorldAnti-Doping Code 2015." British Journal of Sports Medicine 48, no. 10 (2014): 801-06.
6Kamber,Matthias."DevelopmentoftheRoleofNationalAnti-DopingOrganizationsintheFightAgainst Doping: From Past to Future." Forensic Science International 213, no. 1-3 (2011): 3-9.
7Robinson,Neil,etal."TheAthleteBiologicalPassport:HowtoPersonalizeAnti-DopingTestingAcross an Athlete's Career?" British Journal of Sports Medicine 46, no. 4 (2012): 111-17.
13Zorzoli,Mario,etal."ADecadeoftheAthleteBiologicalPassport:APowerfulToolfortheFightAgainst Doping." British Journal of Sports Medicine 54, no. 19 (2020): 1153-54.
14Solberg,HarryArne,DagVidarHanstad,andThorAtleThøring."DopinginEliteSport-DotheFans Care? Public Opinion on the Consequences of Doping Scandals." International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship 11, no. 3 (2010): 185-99.
[iii] Sana Ali, ‘Explained: Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill to Regulate India’s Fertility Industry’ (Business Today, 1 December 2021) accessed 21 November 2024
[iv] Baby Manji Yamada vs Union Of India & Anr on 29 September, 2008
Equivalent citations: AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 84,
[v] Peeyush Das, Janbalaz v. anand municipality, (The legal lama blog), 11th august, 2021), https://thelegallamablog.wixsite.com/website/post/jan-balaz-v-anand-municipality, accessed on 15th November, 2024
[vi] Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2018
[viii]Enobong Mbang Akpambang, Determining Legal Parentage and Nationality of a Child Born Through Assisted Reproductive Technology, Research gate
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368497675_Determining_Legal_Parentage_and_Nationality_of_a_Child_Born_Through_Assisted_Reproductive_Technology_A_Comparative_Perspective last accessed on 18th November, 2024
[x] Koen Lemmens, Cross-border surrogacy and the European Convention on Human Rights, Sage Journals, ( April 18, 2024 ), https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09240519241246131, Last accessed on 18th, November, 2024
[1]Ahmad, I. (2011). Waqf Law in India: Theory and Practice. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
[2]Khan, A. (2015). "Challenges in Waqf Management in India." Journal of Islamic Law, 12(2), 45-58.
[3] Hasan, F. (2021). Political Influence in Waqf Board Operations. Indian Journal of Minority Studies, 9(4), 34–48.
Citation
[1] Biehl, Janet and Albie Sachs, Transformative Constitutionalism, 87 Tul. L. Rev. 969 (2012).
[2] Madhav Khosla, “The Indian Constitution”, Oxford University Press (2012)
[3] S.P.Sathe, “ Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits”, Oxford University Press (2002)
[4]Videh Upadhyay, “Public Interest Litigation in India: Concepts, Cases and Concerns” (Lexis Nexis, 2007).
[5] Upendra Baxi, “The Indian Supreme Court and Politics” (Eastern Book Company, 2000)
[6]Vishaka and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., AIR 1997 SC 3011
[7]Olga Tellis and ors v. Bombay Municipal Corporation and ors., 1985 SCC (3) 545
[8] Hans Dembowski, “Taking the State to Court Public Interest Litigation and the Public Sphere in Metropolitan India” (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001)
[9] Granville Austin, “The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation”, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
[10]Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC1461
[11]Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011
[12]Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 477
[13]Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India 2008 3 SCC 1
[14]Navtej Johar, “The LGBTQ+ Activists Behind India's Historic Ruling”, BBC News, September 7, 2018.
[12] S. 4(b), The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
[13] S. 4(a), The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
[14] 228th Law Commission of India Report, Need For Legislation To Regulate Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics As Well As Rights And Obligations Of Parties To A Surrogacy, 22 (2009), Available athttps://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2022/08/2022
[8]See Hindu Marriage Act, 1955,§9; Special Marriage Act, 1954, § 22; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936,§ 36; Christian Divorce Act, 1869, § 32 & 33
[11] Raj Kumari Agarwala, Restitution of Conjugal Rights Under Hindu Law: A Plea for the Abolition of the Remedy, 12 J. INDIAN L. INST. 257, 259 (1970).
[14]See generally, Smt. Venkatamma v. Venkataswamy (1962) AIR 1963 MYSORE 118, Trade Links Ltd. and Ors. vs. Mount Shivalik Breweries Ltd. and Ors (1998) MANU/CL/0003/1999, Tarab Nath Dhar v. Sneharani Dharr', AIR 1949 Cal 87, Gurcharansingh v. Smt. Waryam Kuar AIR 1960 P&H 422, Kamala Bai v. Rathnavelu AIR 1965 MADRAS 88, Jinarthanammal v. P.Srinivasa, A.I.R. 1964 Mad. 48, Varalakshmi v. Viramulu, AIR 1956 Hyd. 75, Teja Singh Subedar Santa Singh Vs. Sarjit Kaur (1961) MANU/PH/0129/1962: AIR 1962 Punj 195
[15] Parliamentary Debates on Special Marriage Bill, 10th December, 1954,
[16] Shakila Banu v. Gulam Mustafa (1971) AIR 1971 Bom 166