INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER NEUTRAL LAWS IN INDIA: FOCSING ON UPCOMING LECUNAS OF SOCIETY BY - SANIA SIDDIQUE & MOHD AKASH

Authors: SANIA SIDDIQUE & MOHD AKASH

Registration ID: 108831 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8831 & IJLRA8832

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: saniasiddiqui23@gmail.com & mohdakash001@gmail.com

Page No : 18 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-17362928/A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER NEUTRAL LAWS IN INDI

THE IMPACT OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN TOURIST IN INDIA: AN OVERVIEW BY - ADITYA PRATAP SINGH

Authors: ADITYA PRATAP SINGH

Registration ID: 108830 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8830

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: Sadityapratap085@gmail.com

Page No : 22 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-17422734/THE IMPACT OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN TOURIST IN IN

RISE OF CONSUMER DISPUTES AT DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: AN ALTERNATIVE PATH TO JUSTICE BY - ADITYA PRATAP SINGH

Authors: ADITYA PRATAP SINGH

Registration ID: 108829 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8829

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: s2232.aditya@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-78548484/RISE OF CONSUMER DISPUTES AT DIGITAL MARKETPLACE:

"ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT IN INDIAN MARKET" INSTEAD OF "INDIAN ECONOMY." BY - VIBEK MEHER

Authors: VIBEK MEHER

Registration ID: 108828 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8828

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: vibekmeher.student@slsnagpur.edu.in

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-12998874/ANTI COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT IN INDIAN ECONOMY

THE ULTIMATE PRECEDENCE IN LAW SCIENCES: FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE DOCTRINE AS THE NEW LEGAL PARADIGM BY - SANDEEP S. JAISWAL

Authors: SANDEEP S. JAISWAL

Registration ID: 108827 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8827

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: augjaiswal@gmail.com

Page No : 14 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-62277927/THE ULTIMATE PRECEDENCE IN LAW SCIENCES: FLEXIBLE

EVALUATING CHALLENGES IN PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TRADE AND TRANSACTIONS THROUGH CYBERSPACE IN PERSPECTIVE OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BY: SHUBHAM DIWATE

Authors: SHUBHAM DIWATE

Registration ID: 108826 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8826

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: shubhamrajeshdiwate@gmail.com

Page No : 20 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-37896898/EVALUATING CHALLENGES IN PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TRA

CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND PROSPECTS OF IMPLEMENTING INDIA’S NEW CRIMINAL LAW: IN THE CONTEXT OF SWIFT JUSTICE BY: RUP KUMAR

Authors: RUP KUMAR

Registration ID: 108825 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8825

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: rupkumarbgp@rediffmail.com

Page No : 26 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-91582159/CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND PROSPECTS OF IMPLEM

THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2019: A SETBACK FOR INDIAN DEMOCRACY BY - RAM KUMAR BHARDWAJ

Authors: RAM KUMAR BHARDWAJ

Registration ID: 108824 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8824

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: bhardwaj.ramkumar03@gmail.com

Page No : 13 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-23179849/THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2019: A

WTO AND TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO AGRICULTURAL SECTOR BY - GOPIKA KALIDAS

Authors: GOPIKA KALIDAS

Registration ID: 108823 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8823

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: gopika.kalidasn@gmail.com

Page No : 35 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-98448229/WTO AND TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE WITH SPECIFIC

CRITIQUE OF K. CHANDRU COMMITTEE REPORT: SOLUTIONS AND SHORTCOMIGS BY - ANANYA SINGH

Authors: ANANYA SINGH

Registration ID: 108822 | Published Paper ID: IJLRA8822

Year : Dec -2024 | Volume: II | Issue: 7

Approved ISSN : 2582-6433 | Country : Delhi, India

Email Id: ananya23BAL011@gnlu.ac.in

Page No : 31 | No of times Downloads: 0065

DOI Link :: https://www.doi-ds.org/doilink/12.2024-17451814/CRITIQUE OF K. CHANDRU COMMITTEE REPORT: SOLUTIONS

International journal for legal research and analysis

Abbreviation:IJLRA

ISSN:2582-6433

Website:https://www.ijlra.com/

Accessibility:Open Access

License:Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript:Click here

Licensing:

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

[1] Aditya Pratap Singh, Assistant professor, department of legal studies Lcit college of commerce and science

[3] Tourism Destination Competitiveness of India and China, Kumar, Phuong-Dung & Duc-Thang (2016)

[4] U.K. government, on its official website (Foreign Travel Advice, India), https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/india

^{^[1]} Centre VM, “Alternative Dispute Resolving Mechanism in E-Commerce ” (VIA Mediation Centre) accessed October 2, 2024

^{^[2]} Ballesteros T, “International Perspectives on Online Dispute Resolution in the E-Commerce Landscape · International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution· Eleven Journals” 8 International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 85

^{^[3]} “Alternative Dispute Resolution for E-Commerce” (Daniel W. Uhlfelder, P.A., June 6, 2019) accessed October 4, 2024

^{^[4]} Centre VM, “Alternative Dispute Resolving Mechanism in E-Commerce ” (VIA Mediation Centre) accessed October 4, 2024

^{^[5]} Student MKI year BALLB (Hons), “Jurisdiction and Enforcement of E-Commerce Contracts”

^{^[6]} “Conditions of Use” (Amazon Customer Service) accessed October 3, 2024

^{^[7]} mappingadr, “Online Dispute Resolution: The Future of Dispute Resolution in India” (Mapping ADR, April 17, 2024) accessed October 5, 2024

^{^[8]} “THE EVOLUTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR) PLATFORMS: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ADR IN THE DIGITAL AGE”

^{^[9]} “Alternative Dispute Resolution for E-Commerce” (Daniel W. Uhlfelder, P.A., June 6, 2019) accessed October 4, 2024

^{^[10]} Hugh Collins, ‘The Role of ODR in Resolving Consumer Disputes on E-Commerce Platforms: Amazon’s A-to-Z Guarantee’ (2016) 39 Journal of Consumer Policy 503.

^{^[11]} Colin Rule and Shreyas Friedberg, ‘Amazon’s A-to-Z Guarantee and the Impact of ODR on E-Commerce Dispute Resolution’ (2019) 23 Journal of Internet Law 12.

^{^[12]} Yi Cheng and Wei Fang, ‘Resolving Cross-Border Disputes in E-Commerce: Alibaba’s Arbitration Process’ (2017) 34 Journal of International Arbitration 221.

^{^[13]} Pablo Cortes, The Law of Online Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press 2015).

^{^[14]} Pablo Cortes, The Law of Online Dispute Resolution (Cambridge University Press 2015).

^{^[15]} Xiaohua Zhao, ‘eBay’s Mediation Process in E-Commerce Disputes: A Case Study of Consumer Protection’ (2020) 45 International Journal of Law and Commerce 75.

^{^[16]} Ethan Katsh and Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes (Oxford University Press 2017).

^{^[17]} “——” (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) 2002) accessed October 8, 2024

^{^[18]} ——, “International Perspectives on Online Dispute Resolution in the E-Commerce Landscape · International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution · Eleven Journals” 8 International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 85

^{^[19]} ——, “International Perspectives on Online Dispute Resolution in the E-Commerce Landscape · International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution · Eleven Journals” 8 International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 85

^{^[20]} “An Effective Dispute Resolution System for Electronic Consumer Contracts” 23 Computer Law & Security Review 42

[7] Builders Ass’n of India v. Cement Mfrs. Ass’n & Ors., Case No. 29 of 2010, Competition Commission of India (2012)

[8] https://corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com/2016/11/curious-case-cement-cartel/

[9] Auto Parts Cartel, Case No. 27 of 2014, Competition Commission of India (2014)

[10] Beer Market Cartel, Suo Moto Case No. 6 of 2017, Competition Commission of India (2018)

[11] World Bank, India: Competition and Economic Development at 45 (2021), available at https://www.worldbank.org.

[12] Competition Commission of India, Annual Report 2023, at 12-15 (2023), available at https://www.cci.gov.in.

[1] The author is Researcher Student of Master of Laws in Department of Law, IILM University Gurugram.

[2] Gibson, 1984; Benedikt, 1991; Dodge & Kitchin, 2001.

[3] OECD, 2019; WTO, 2018; López González & Ferencz, 2018.

[5] Anwarul Yaquin, Legal Research and Writing Methods, Lexis Nexis

[6] Google LLC v. Equustek Solutions Inc. (2017, Supreme Court of Canada)

[7] Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II) (2020, EU)

[8] Google LLC v. Equustek Solutions Inc. (2017, Supreme Court of Canada)

[2] Chakravarty, R. (2020). The RTI Act and the challenges to accountability in Indian governance. Journal of Public Administration, 45(4), 381-396.

[3] Sinha, D. (2019). Transparency and accountability in India: An analysis of the RTI amendments. Public Policy and Governance Journal, 31(2), 105-120

[4] Zafar, M. (2020). The right to information in India: A threat to transparency or a tool for empowerment? Journal of South Asian Politics, 30(3), 172-189.

[5] Nair, V. (2020). Impact of RTI amendments on the functioning of public authorities. Journal of Indian Public Policy, 27(2), 233-247.

[6] Singh, R. (2020). The role of RTI in strengthening Indian democracy: A critique of the 2019 amendments. Indian Political Science Review, 42(3), 245-262

[7] Mehta, R. (2021). Erosion of transparency? An analysis of the 2019 RTI amendments. Law and Society Review, 39(4), 452-468.

[8] Chakravarty, R. (2020). The RTI Act and the challenges to accountability in Indian governance. Journal of Public Administration, 45(4), 381-396.

[1] Donna Roberts, Timothy E. Josling & David Orden in their paper, A Framework for Analyzing Technical Trade Barriers in Agricultural Markets, Economic Research Service/USDA, 1800 M. Street NW, Washington, DC 20036-5831 (March 1999).

[2] Kym Anderson, Why Open Agricultural Trade Matters, University of Adelaide Press 6-31 (2017), https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5wc5.9.

[3] Anne Celia Disdier, Lionel Fontage & Mondher Mimouni, The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT Agreements, 90 AJAE 336-350 (2008), https://www.jstor.org/stable/30139588.

[4] Erik Wijkstrom & Devin, International Standards and the WTO TBT Agreement: Improving Governance for Regulatory Alignment, ERSD-2013-06 (2013), https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201306_e.pdf.

[5] Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen, Agricultural Trade and Development: A Value Chain Perspective, ERDS-2015- 04 (2015), https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201504_e.pdf.

[6] The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Agro-Food Products and Technical Barriers to Trade: A Survey of Issues and Concerns Raised in the WTO’S TCT Committee, COM/TD/AGR/WP (2002)70/FINAL (2003), https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ- wp/it/papers/0401/0401006.pdf.

[7] US congressional research services, Addressing Nontariff Barriers to Agricultural Trade at the WTO, (2021), https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11903.

[8] OECD, Regional trade agreements and agriculture, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 79 OECD Publishing (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js4kg5xjvvf-en.

[9] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Document No. COM/TD/AGR/WP (2002)21/FINAL[en], OECD iLibrary, https://one.oecd.org/document/COM/TD/AGR/WP(2002)21/FINAL/en/pdf.

[10] McKinsey & Company, Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows (McKinsey Global Institute, Aug. 2016), https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/digital-globalization-the-new-era- of-global-flows.

[12] World Trade Organization, Understanding the WTO: Overview, https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm1_e.htm.

[13] European Commission Directorate-General for Trade, Technical Barriers to Trade (TBTs), https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/barriers.

[14] Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, art. 2, Apr. 15, 1994, 1869 U.N.T. 153

[16] Food Package Labeling, Sciencedirect (2014), https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/food-science/food- package-labeling.

[18] World Trade Organization, Technical Barriers to Trade, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_info_e.htm.

[20] World Trade Org., Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex A, 1867 U.N.T. 154.

[21] Frank Kareth, Navigating the Food Labelling World, Intertek (2019), https://www.intertek.com/blog/2019/03- 05-food/.

[26] World Trade Organization, Agreement on Agriculture, https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/14- ag_01_e.htm.

[27] World Trade Organization, Market Access for Agriculture, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/ag_intro02_access_e.htm.

[28] World Trade Organization, Domestic Support in Agriculture, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/ag_intro03_domestic_e.htm.

[29] World Trade Organization, Export Competition in Agriculture, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/factsheetagric17_e.htm

[30] U.S. Trade Representative, Office of Agricultural Affairs, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Technical Barriers to Trade, https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/agriculture/sanitary-and-phytosanitary-measures-and-technical- barriers-trade.

[31] Geoffrey S. Becker, Agricultural Exports: Technical Barriers to Trade, University of North Texas Libraries (1997), https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs380/.

[32] Anne-Célia Disdier, Lionel Fontagné and Mondher Mimouni, The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT Agreements, 90 AJAE 336–350 (2008), http://www.jstor.org/stable/30139588.

[33] World Trade Organization, Sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS), https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/market-access-trade/wto/sps.

[34] Source 1: A scientific report on the impact of antibiotic use in livestock on antimicrobial resistance. (e.g., World Health Organization report).

Source 2: A government regulation outlining restrictions on specific antibiotics in livestock feed. (e.g., European Union regulation).

[35] Source 3: A food safety handbook detailing permitted food additives and preservatives. (e.g., Codex Alimentarius).

Source 4: A national food safety law outlining regulations on food additives. (e.g., The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Additive Regulations).

[36] Source 5: A legal guide to international food labeling requirements for GMOs. (e.g., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) guidance).

[37] WTO, Country of Origin Labelling Requirements-Comparative Research and Conclusions, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/roi_e/bauer_medelroisept16.pdf.

[38] Codex Alimentarius Commission, General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods, https://www.fao.org/3/Y2770E/y2770e02.htm.

[39] International Trade Centre, A Guide to Sustainable Labeling and Claims, https://intracen.org/file/t4sdpublication20211217webpagespdf.

[40] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Codex Alimentarius, https://www.fao.org/fao- who-codexalimentarius/en/.

[41] World Trade Organization, Technical Barriers to Trade, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_e.htm.

[42] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Codex Alimentarius, https://www.fao.org/fao- who-codexalimentarius/en/.

[43] Eugenio Diaz Bonilla, The Impact of WTO Agreements on Agriculture, IFPRI (2017), https://www.ifpri.org/blog/was-then-now-wto-and-agriculture.

[44] WTO, The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbtagr_e.htm.

[45] Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1A, 1869 U.N.T. 154.

[47] WTO, Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade art. 1 (1986), https://wto.org/tbt.

[48] UNCTAD, Launch of the Least Developed Countries Report 2020, https://unctad.org/meeting/launch-least- developed-countries-report-2020.

[49] Codex Alimentarius Commission, Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs), https://www.fao.org/fao-who- codexalimentarius/codex-texts/maximum-residue-limits/en/.

[50] World Trade Organization, Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/sps_e.htm.

[51] International Trade Centre, E-commerce for Agriculture: Trade Impact for Business and Farmers, https://intracen.org/our-work/topics/food-and-agriculture.

[52] Food and Agriculture Organization, Food Chain Information and Consumer Awareness, https://www.fao.org/3/i5555e/i5555e.pdf.

[53] World Trade Organization, Trade-Related Technical Assistance and Capacity Building, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/teccop_e/tct_e.htm.

[54] Mary E. Meek et al., The Trade Impacts of Stringent Food Safety Standards, 42 J. World Trade L. 1 (2008).

[55] U.S. Dep't of Agric., Animal & Plant Health Inspection Serv., Import Requirements, https://www.aphis.usda.gov/.

[56] Europa.eu, Questions and Answers on the Regulation of GMOs in the European Union, MEMO/07/117 (Apr. 17, 2007).

[58] International Food Policy Research Institute, The EU and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Literature Review (2003), https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/genetically-modified-organisms/reports-and-studies_en.

[61] The European Commission recently proposed a new regulation on corporate sustainability due diligence, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0706.

[64] GATT Working Party on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Report, GATT Doc. MTN/FRT/SE/11 (1989), para. 132.

[65] World Trade Organization, Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Specific Trade Concerns Regarding the Import of Bovine Meat from India, WT/SPS/NGR/10 (2001).

[66] World Trade Organization, Trade Facilitation Agreement, art. 6 (2013), https://wto.org/tradefacilitation.

[67] World Trade Organization, Ministerial Declaration on the Review of the Implementation of Articles VI, XVI and XXIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, 13 (1994), https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/40-dadp2_e.htm.

[68] World Trade Organization, Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, art. 10 (1994), https://wto.org/tbt.

[69] World Trade Organization, Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, art. 3 (1994), https://wto.org/tbt.

[71] UNESCO Science Report, https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-science-report-towards- 2030-part1.pdf.

[73] DS430: India and United States, Measures Concerning the Importation of Certain Agricultural Products, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/430r_e.pdf.

[74] DS621: Slovak Republic and Ukraine, Measures Concerning Agricultural Products from Ukraine, https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/621-1.pdf&Open=True.

[75] WT/DS381: United States and Mexico- Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds381_e.htm.

[76] DS389: European Communities and United States, Certain Measures Affecting Poultry Meat and Poultry Meat Products from the United States, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds389_e.htm.

[77] DS447: United States and Argentina, Measures Affecting the Importation of Animals, Meat and Other Animal Products from Argentina, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds447_e.htm.

[78] DS392: United States, Certain Measures Affecting Imports of Poultry from China, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds392_e.htm.

[1] Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 477.

[2] Erving Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Prentice-Hall 1963).

[3] Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra, (2018) 6 SCC 454.

[4] Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice 190-197 (Richard Nice trans., Cambridge Univ. Press 1977).

[6] Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala, (1986) 3 SCC 615.

[7] State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas, (1976) 2 SCC 310.

[9] Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, (2018) 11 SCC 731.

[10] Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, No. 35, Acts of Parliament, 2009 (India).

[11] Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, No. 32, Acts of Parliament, 2012 (India).

[12] P. Sambamurthy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2008) 2 SCC 522 (India).

[13] Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, (1992) 3 SCC 666 (India).

[15] Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. State of Haryana, (2016) 11 SCC 527.

[16] Max Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Guenther Roth & Claus Wittich eds., Ephraim Fischoff et al. trans., Univ. of Cal. Press 1978).

[17] Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice 190-197 (Richard Nice trans., Cambridge Univ. Press 1977).

[18] Sally Engle Merry, Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice (Univ. of Chicago Press 2006).

[19] Erving Goffman, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Prentice-Hall 1963).

[20] Marc Galanter, Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India (Oxford Univ. Press 1984).

[21] Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Alan Sheridan trans., 2d ed. Vintage Books 1995).

[22] Émile Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society (W.D. Halls trans., Free Press 1984) (1893).

[23] Robert M. Cover, Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1983).

[24] Martha Minow, Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law (Cornell Univ. Press 1990).

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER NEUTRAL LAWS IN INDIA: FOCSING ON UPCOMING LECUNAS OF SOCIETY BY - SANIA SIDDIQUE & MOHD AKASH

THE IMPACT OF OFFENCES AGAINST WOMEN TOURIST IN INDIA: AN OVERVIEW BY - ADITYA PRATAP SINGH

RISE OF CONSUMER DISPUTES AT DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: AN ALTERNATIVE PATH TO JUSTICE BY - ADITYA PRATAP SINGH

"ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENT IN INDIAN MARKET" INSTEAD OF "INDIAN ECONOMY." BY - VIBEK MEHER

THE ULTIMATE PRECEDENCE IN LAW SCIENCES: FLEXIBLE STRUCTURE DOCTRINE AS THE NEW LEGAL PARADIGM BY - SANDEEP S. JAISWAL

EVALUATING CHALLENGES IN PROTECTION OF DIGITAL TRADE AND TRANSACTIONS THROUGH CYBERSPACE IN PERSPECTIVE OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BY: SHUBHAM DIWATE

CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND PROSPECTS OF IMPLEMENTING INDIA’S NEW CRIMINAL LAW: IN THE CONTEXT OF SWIFT JUSTICE BY: RUP KUMAR

THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2019: A SETBACK FOR INDIAN DEMOCRACY BY - RAM KUMAR BHARDWAJ

WTO AND TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO AGRICULTURAL SECTOR BY - GOPIKA KALIDAS

CRITIQUE OF K. CHANDRU COMMITTEE REPORT: SOLUTIONS AND SHORTCOMIGS BY - ANANYA SINGH

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation 2

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation